Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Genes Immun ; 10 Suppl 1: S5-S15, 2009 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19956101

ABSTRACT

The Type I Diabetes Genetics Consortium (T1DGC) Rapid Response Workshop was established to evaluate published candidate gene associations in a large collection of affected sib-pair (ASP) families. We report on our quality control (QC) and preliminary family-based association analyses. A random sample of blind duplicates was analyzed for QC. Quality checks, including examination of plate-panel yield, marker yield, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, mismatch error rate, Mendelian error rate, and allele distribution across plates, were performed. Genotypes from 2324 families within nine cohorts were obtained from a panel of 21 candidate genes, including 384 single-nucleotide polymorphisms on two genotyping platforms performed at the Broad Institute Center for Genotyping and Analysis (Cambridge, MA, USA). The T1DGC Rapid Response project, following rigorous QC procedures, resulted in a 2297 family, 9688 genotyped individual database on a single-candidate gene panel. The available data include 9005 individuals with genotype data from both platforms and 683 individuals genotyped (276 in Illumina; 407 in Sequenom) on only one platform.


Subject(s)
Databases, Nucleic Acid , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/genetics , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Genotype , Humans , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Quality Control
2.
Diabetes Obes Metab ; 11 Suppl 1: 2-7, 2009 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19143809

ABSTRACT

AIM: The aim of this study was to perform quality control (QC) and initial family-based association analyses on the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and microsatellite marker data for the MHC Fine Mapping Workshop through the Type 1 Diabetes Genetics Consortium (T1DGC). METHODS: A random sample of blind duplicates was sent for analysis of QC. DNA samples collected from participants were shipped to the genotyping laboratory from several T1DGC DNA Repository sites. Quality checks including examination of plate-panel yield, marker yield, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, mismatch error rate, Mendelian error rate and allele distribution across plates were performed. RESULTS: Genotypes from 2325 families within nine cohorts were obtained and subjected to QC procedures. The MHC project consisted of three marker panels - two 1536 SNP sets (Illumina Golden Gate platform performed at the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Cambridge, UK) and one 66 microsatellite marker panel (performed at deCODE). In the raw SNP data, the overall concordance rate was 99.1% (+/-0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The T1DGC MHC Fine Mapping project resulted in a 2300 family, 9992 genotyped individuals database comprising of two 1536 SNP panels and a 66 microsatellite panel to densely cover the 4 Mb MHC core region for use in statistical genetic analyses.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/genetics , Major Histocompatibility Complex/genetics , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide/genetics , Base Pair Mismatch/genetics , Chromosome Mapping , Cohort Studies , DNA/analysis , Genotype , HLA Antigens/genetics , Humans , Microsatellite Repeats/genetics , Pedigree , Quality Control , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL