Increased prevalence of sleep disturbance in psoriatic arthritis is associated with inflammatory and non-inflammatory measures.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the prevalence of sleep disturbances, quantified by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), psoriasis (PsO) and healthy controls (HCs), explore associations between PSQI and clinical and patient-reported outcomes, and evaluate the effect of treatment on PSQI. METHOD: Patients were included from the Parker Institute's PsA patient cohort to evaluate the prevalence of sleep disturbances. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to explore associations between sleep disturbance and outcome measures. Treatment effect in PsA patients was assessed with a mixed-effect model for repeated measures. RESULTS: In total, 109 PsA patients, 20 PsO patients, and 20 HCs were included. Sleep disturbances were reported by 66.1% of PsA patients, 45.0% of PsO patients, and 15.0% of HCs. Univariate regression analyses revealed statistically significant associations (p < 0.001) between PSQI and Disease Activity Score (DAS28CRP), tender points, visual analogue scale (VAS) patient global and pain, Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease fatigue, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), and painDETECT score. Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated VAS patient global, VAS pain, and tender points as being independently associated with PSQI. The mixed-effect model revealed no effect of treatment. CONCLUSION: More PsA patients than PsO patients and HCs reported sleep disturbances. Sleep disturbances were associated with inflammatory and non-inflammatory measures possibly explaining the limited effect of treatment. This demonstrates the need for interdisciplinary approaches to improve the management of sleep disturbance in PsA.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02572700).

Definitions of remission in psoriasis: a systematic literature review from the National Psoriasis Foundation.

Psoriasis studies increasingly employ outcomes that indicate complete disease resolution, yet remission and cure are poorly defined for psoriasis. We conducted a systematic literature review to identify definitions of psoriasis remission and cure reported in the literature. Medline, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched on July 22, 2020, for full-text studies providing definitions for psoriasis remission/cure. Definitions were analysed descriptively for endpoint, time-frame, on/off treatment, patient-reported outcomes, and disease domains. We identified 106 studies that provided 41 unique remission definitions. Most definitions included endpoints based on Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), such as PASI75 (n = 16 studies), PASI90 (n = 10), PASI100 (n = 10), and PASI of 0 (n = 3), and descriptive endpoints related to 'skin clearance' (n = 18). Few definitions specified time-frame, on/off treatment or other psoriasis-related disease domains. One small consensus-initiative defined drug-free remission for plaque psoriasis by BSA of 0 without any therapy for at least 12 months. While there is no cure for psoriasis, seven studies defined psoriasis cure using similar endpoints to those used to define remission. We identified a variety of definitions of psoriasis remission. These results will inform the development of consensus-based definitions for psoriasis remission to support efforts to improve research and clinical outcomes.

The National Psoriasis Foundation psoriasis treatment targets in real-world patients: prevalence and association with patient-reported outcomes in the Corrona Psoriasis Registry.

INTRODUCTION: The National Psoriasis Foundation (NPF) published treat-to-target guidelines for psoriasis, yet their applicability in clinical practice remains unknown. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the proportion of psoriasis patients meeting the NPF's body surface area (BSA) 'target' (≤1%) and 'acceptable' (≤3%) response criteria and the cross-sectional associations of these criteria with patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in the Corrona Psoriasis Registry. METHODS: Separately for three independent cross-sectional cohorts of patients at the (i) enrolment, (ii) 6-month and (iii) 12-month visits, we calculated the proportion of patients with BSA ≤1% and ≤3%. Furthermore, we calculated odds ratios estimating the risk of PROs associated with not meeting criteria in the 6-month cohort. RESULTS: The enrolment, 6- and 12-month cohorts included 2794, 1310 and 629 patients, respectively. At enrolment, 24% of patients had a BSA ≤ 1% and 41% a BSA ≤ 3%. In the 6-month cohort, 43%/64% had a BSA ≤ 1%/BSA ≤ 3%. In the 12-month cohort, 46%/69% of patients had a BSA ≤ 1%/BSA ≤ 3%. Patients not at target/acceptable criteria had higher odds for worse quality of life compared with those who were. CONCLUSION: While most patients at 6- and 12-month visits were at the 'acceptable' response, less than half were at the 'target' response despite systemic therapy. There remain unmet needs to optimize psoriasis therapy and further validate current treat-to-target guidelines.