Investigation of optimal hernia repair techniques in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

INTRODUCTION: Multiple laparotomies, immunosuppressive therapy, wound infection, and malnutrition are risk factors for incisional hernia development, which places inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients at high risk. With advances in minimally invasive techniques, this study assesses incisional hernia repair techniques and complications in the IBD population. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective review of adults with IBD who underwent incisional hernia repair from 2008 to 2022. Complications relative to operative approach and mesh placement location were assessed using descriptive and univariate statistics. RESULTS: Eighty-eight IBD patients underwent incisional hernia repair. Fifty-two (59.1%) were on immunomodulators and 30 (34.1%) were repaired primarily. Thirty-five (39.7%) hernias recurred, of whom 19 (33%) had mesh placed. Three (30%) occurred in onlay repairs and 16 (33%) occurred in underlay repairs. Subdivision of underlay repairs into intraperitoneal, preperitoneal and retrorectus mesh placement revealed recurrence rates of 35.1%, 50%, and 14.3%, respectively. Patients with open repair were more likely to have intraoperative bowel injury (28.6% vs 9.7%, p = 0.041) and develop postoperative seromas/abscesses (12.5% vs 0%, p = 0.001) and wound complications (17.9% vs 0%, p = 0.012) compared to laparoscopic. Seromas/abscesses developed more frequently in onlay repairs compared to underlay (40% vs 2.13%, p = 0.001). Twelve (13.6%) patients presented with postoperative small bowel obstruction (SBO), 7 (58.3%) of whom had mesh placed, and 6 (85.7%) were underlay. All SBO after underlay repair had intraperitoneally placed mesh. When comparing surgeons, hernias were more likely to recur performed by colorectal surgeons compared to hernia surgeons (63.3% vs 21.3%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In IBD patients, minimally invasive approaches lead to fewer perioperative complications compared to open. Underlay mesh placement demonstrated decreased incidence of seroma/abscess formation compared to onlay. When sub-grouped, underlay placements were similar in terms of complications. Retrorectus placement, however, had fewer recurrences and no readmissions for SBO. This suggests a minimally invasive approach or placement of retrorectus mesh may provide the optimal repair in this patient population.

Association Between Nil Per Os Status and Intubated Patients Undergoing Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Patient outcomes heavily rely on nutritional support. However, holding enteric feeds prior to surgical operations in critically ill patients is still a common practice in intensive critical units. Our objective is to describe the relationship between duration of nil per os (NPO) and respiratory outcomes in intubated, critically ill patients requiring operative intervention. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis on intubated, critically ill patients who underwent operative intervention between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018, to investigate how the duration of NPO status may affect respiratory outcomes. We compared adverse respiratory events among patients who maintain NPO ≥6 h (NPO group) versus those who were NPO <6 h (non-NPO group) prior to surgery. RESULTS: Two hundred patients met inclusion criteria: 104 for NPO and 96 for non-NPO. Aspiration event was found in 5.8% of NPO patients and 7.3% in non-NPO patients, P = 0.66. Desaturation event was found in 16.3% for NPO and 14.6% in non-NPO, P = 0.73. Pneumonia was found in 18.3% of NPO patients and 19.8% in non-NPO patients, P = 0.78. Reintubated rates were 13.5% for NPO and 16.7% for non-NPO, P = 0.57. Median (range) hours of NPO for non-NPO was 1.0 h (0-3.0) and 13.0 h (6.0-20.0) for NPO, P < 0.05. CONCLUSIONS: For intubated, critically ill patients requiring operative intervention, there was no difference observed in adverse respiratory events between those kept NPO for 6 h or greater compared to those kept NPO for less than 6 h. Patients were commonly without enteric nutrition for periods of time much greater than the American Society of Anesthesia's recommended 6-h period.

Increased risk of upstage when combinations of breast lesions of uncertain malignant potential are found on core needle biopsy: The need for surgical excision.

BACKGROUND: Management of breast lesions of uncertain malignant potential diagnosed at core needle biopsy (CNB) is controversial due to variable upstage rate (UR) with surgical excision (SE). METHODS: We performed an IRB-approved retrospective analysis of adult women who underwent CNB demonstrating atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), flat epithelial atypia, radial scar, or intraductal papilloma then SE between 2010 and 2022. We evaluated CNB pathology for combination diagnoses (CD), defined as multiple primary lesions or primary with lobular neoplasia (LN), and surgical pathology for upstage. RESULTS: 719 patients were included. UR was 12.2% (88/719). CD experienced higher UR than pure (17.7% (45/254) vs. 9.2% (43/465), p â€‹= â€‹0.001). ADH/LN had the highest UR of all CD (34.6% (9/26), p â€‹= â€‹0.001). Increased size (15.6 vs. 10.5 â€‹mm, p â€‹< â€‹0.001), distance from nipple (79 vs. 66 â€‹mm, p â€‹< â€‹0.001), and personal history of breast cancer (p â€‹= â€‹0.04) were associated with UR. CONCLUSIONS: CD was associated with increased UR. ADH/LN had the highest UR.

Prehospital Transport Time and Outcomes for Pediatric Trauma: A National Study.

INTRODUCTION: Historically, emergency medical services have aimed to deliver trauma patients to definitive care within the 60 min (min) "Golden Hour" to optimize survival. There is little evidence to support or refute this for pediatric trauma. The objective of this investigation was to describe national trends in prehospital transport time, in relation to the "Golden Hour," and pediatric trauma outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of patients (<15 y old) receiving emergency medical services trauma transport between 2017 and 2019. Transport time (less than or greater than 60 min) was the exposure variable, and analyses were adjusted for injury severity score (ISS). Continuous variables with a normal distribution were compared by t-test was and skewed variables were compared by Mann-Whitney U-test. Categorical variables were compared by Chi-Square test. RESULTS: 54,489 patients met our criteria: 49,628 blunt and 4861 penetrating. Most patients (62.2%) had transport times less than 60 min: 30,389 (61.2%) blunt and 3479 (71.6%) penetrating. The overall mortality rate was 1.6%, 1.2% for blunt and 5.5% for penetrating. For blunt trauma, mortality was higher for transport times less than 60 min (1.5%). For penetrating trauma, mortality was lower for transport times less than 60 min (0.7%). Mean ISS was greater for blunt (7.9) compared to penetrating trauma (7.1), and greater for both trauma types with transport times less than 60 min. For both trauma types, mean length of stay was significantly longer for transport times greater than 60 min, when adjusting for ISS (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We did not find evidence that prehospital transport within the "Golden Hour" had a substantial association with survival, though it may be associated with length of stay. There are many factors contributing to trauma outcomes, so efforts should continue to expand access and pediatric readiness.

The Influence of Screening Mammography Cessation and Resumption on Breast Cancer Presentation and Treatment: A Multi-Hospital Health System Experience During the Early COVID-19 Pandemic.

Objective: To assess the impact of the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic screening restrictions on the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer in a single health system. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective, cohort investigation of breast cancer patients at a multi-institution health system from March 1, 2019 to December 31, 2020 with two time periods related to the pandemic: "Early phase" (March 18 - June 7) reflecting the time of the screening mammography moratorium and "Late phase" (June 8 - December 31) to reflect the time once screening mammography resumed. 2020 was compared to 2019 to exclude potential differences from temporal or seasonal changes. Variables included demographics, COVID related-deferral, cancer specific data, method of detection, type of treatment recommended and received. Results: Fewer patients presented with a breast cancer diagnosis during Early phase 2020 when compared to any other time period. Numbers increased significantly in Late phase 2020; total numbers of patients seen in 2020 approached but did not completely reach that of 2019. When compared to other time periods, patients who presented during the moratorium on screening were younger, more likely to be black, had a higher Body Mass Index, and were more likely to have a human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive tumor. There was a slight increase in size of presenting tumor and node positivity, although no differences in breast or axillary surgical management were identified. Conclusion: Despite an increase in tumor size and positive nodal status seen during the screening moratorium, surgical treatment was not negatively impacted.

The effect of delay of excisional biopsy on upstage rate for atypical ductal hyperplasia, flat epithelial atypia, intraductal papilloma, and radial scar.

PURPOSE: When Core Needle Biopsy (CNB) demonstrates Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia (ADH), Flat Epithelial Atypia (FEA), Intraductal Papilloma (IDP), or Radial Scar/Complex Sclerosing Lesion (RS), excisional biopsy (EB) is often performed to rule out underlying malignancy with upstage rates (UR) ranging between 1 and 20%. The COVID-19 pandemic led to delayed EB for many patients. We sought to evaluate whether this delay was associated with higher UR. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of women who underwent CNB and then EB for ADH, FEA, IDP, or RS between 2017 and 2021 using an IRB-approved repository. UR was evaluated by days between CNB and EB. RESULTS: 473 patients met inclusion. 55 were upstaged to cancer (11.6%). 178 patients had pure ADH on CNB and 37 were upstaged (20.8%). 50 patients had pure FEA and 3 were upstaged (6%). 132 had pure IDP and 7 were upstaged (5.3%). 98 had pure RS and 1 was upstaged (1%). 7/15 (46.7%) had a combination of diagnoses or diagnosis with palpable mass and were upstaged. Days between CNB and EB were < 60 for 275 patients (58.1%), 60-90 for 108 (22.8%), 91-120 for 43 (9.1%), and > 120 for 47 (9.9%). There was no significant difference in UR (10.9% for < 60, 14.8% for 60-90, 7% for 90-120, and 12.8% for > 120, p = 0.54). UR for ADH was clinically increased after 60 days (27.8 vs. 17.5%), but this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.1). CONCLUSION: Surgical delay was not associated with an increased UR.

Optimal Timing of Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background Laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed less than 72 hours from hospital admission for acute cholecystitis has shown to decrease hospital cost without an increase in length of stay (LOS). Very few studies have examined clinical and cost outcomes of performing cholecystectomy less than 24 hours from hospital admission. The aim of this study was to examine the cost and LOS of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed on an early (less than 24 hours from admission) and late (more than 24 hours from hospital admission) basis. Methods We performed a retrospective observational study of 569 patients at Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, USA, who underwent urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis between January 1, 2018 and February 28, 2020. We evaluated preoperative/postoperative LOS, operative duration, hospital cost, and patient complications. Results 468 patients underwent urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis during our study period. Early cholecystectomy (less than 24 hours from admission) had an overall decreased LOS (43.6 hours versus 102.9 hours, p-value < 0.01) and decreased hospital cost ($23,736.70 versus $30,176.40, p-value < 0.01) compared to late cholecystectomy (more than 24 hours from admission). There was also a significantly higher rate of bile leak in patients who underwent surgery more than 24 hours from hospital admission compared to those who had surgery less than 24 hours from admission (5.9% versus 0.4%, p-value < 0.01). Additionally, those procedures performed greater than 24 hours from hospital admission were significantly more likely to be converted to an open procedure (6.9% versus 2.2%, p-value = 0.02).  Conclusion Urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed within 24 hours of hospital admission for acute cholecystitis decreased hospital cost, LOS, and operative complications in our institution's patient population. Our data suggests that performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy within 24 hours of hospital admission would be beneficial from a patient and hospital standpoint.

Association Between the SARS-Cov2 Pandemic and Pediatric Surgical Consultations.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate changes to acute pediatric surgical needs during the early phase of the SARS-Cov2 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all in-hospital pediatric surgery consultations placed through the consult paging system at a single institution. We compared both median and absolute differences for emergency department (ED), operative, and hospital outcomes between March, April, and May of 2019 versus 2020. RESULTS: There were 225 in-hospital pediatric surgery consults in 2019 and 123 in 2020. Overall, mean age was 8.4-y (standard deviation = 6.4) and 60% were male. Initial vitals were similar between years and a similar proportion of patients underwent laboratory and imaging tests. In 2020, children spent a median of 1.1-h fewer in the ED (95% confidence interval = -2.2, -0.1) and 0.9-h fewer in the ED before surgical consultation (95% confidence interval = -1.5, -0.3) compared to 2019. Patients required significantly more procedures in the ED in 2020 (n = 16, 14.3%) than 2019 (n = 13, 6.2%) (P = 0.02), most commonly laceration repairs. In 2019, 46 children (20.4% of all consults in 2019) presented with appendicitis and 27 children (22.0% of all consults in 2020) in 2020. Complicated appendicitis was more common in 2020 (n = 12, 44.4%) than 2019 (n = 9, 19.6%) (P = 0.02). Two children (7.4%) were managed nonoperatively with a drain in 2020 compared to none in 2019 (P = 0.13). Median time from surgical consultation to surgery, median operative time, and median time to discharge was similar for children with appendicitis in both years. CONCLUSIONS: The early phase of the pandemic was associated with more efficient triaging in the ED, but more ED procedures and more complex surgical pathology.

Analysis of Presentation and Outcomes in Acute Limb Ischemia Patients During COVID-19 State of Emergency.

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, cardiovascular patients were found to be presenting to hospitals with myocardial infarctions and cerebrovascular accidents at progressed disease states. We noticed a parallel in acute limb ischemia (ALI) patients presenting during Massachusetts' COVID-19 State of Emergency declaration. We question whether patients developed a hesitancy to seek medical attention at hospitals due to fear of COVID-19. Our objective was to compare acuity of ALI, interventions, and limb survival in patients presenting before, during, and after a state of emergency. METHODS: Four timeframes were set to compare patients presenting peri-2020 COVID-19 State of Emergency and patients presenting during a pre-pandemic era at a tertiary, academic institution. A reference period from 2019, Pre-State of Emergency period, State of Emergency period, and Post-State of Emergency period were designated. Patient characteristics, interventions, and outcomes data were collected. Unpaired t-test, ANOVA, and Chi-square statistical analyses were used. RESULTS: A total of 95 patients presenting with ALI were identified. Compared to Reference group, state of emergency group had more patients presenting with Rutherford Class III, 12.9% vs 35%, and less patient presenting with Class I, 45.1% vs 0%, P = .02. State of emergency group had more delayed presentations with ≥6 hours after symptom onset, 45% vs 85%, P = .01. Above-knee amputations were performed in 20% of patients during state of emergency and 31.6% for Post-State of Emergency, vs 6.5% in the Reference group; P = .03. There was no difference in intensive care unit admission, length of stay, or mortality between patients from different groups. CONCLUSION: During a state of emergency, ALI patients were noted to present later from symptom onset, have greater disease severity, and more likely to undergo amputations. We suspect delay in presentation and limb lost to be attributed to reluctance to seek immediate medical attention.

Long-term results on the severity of acute appendicitis during COVID-19 pandemic.

Background: Acute appendicitis cases increased in severity following COVID-19-related restrictions in March, 2020. We investigated if similar changes occurred during Wave 2. Methods: Acute appendicitis patients during Wave 1 were grouped 8 weeks before (Group A) and after (Group B) stay-at-home restrictions were initiated on March 15, 2020. Cases in Wave 2 were grouped 8 weeks before (Group C) and after (Group D) November 6, 2020. Groups were compared to equivalent time frames in 2018/2019. Results: Group A versus B revealed 42.6% decrease (confidence interval: - 59.4 to - 25.7) in uncomplicated appendicitis and 21.1% increase (confidence interval: 4.8-37.3) in perforated appendicitis. Similar patterns were noted comparing Group C versus D without statistical significance. The changes seen in Wave 1 were significantly different than in 2018/2019. This trend continued in Wave 2. Conclusion: Similar to Wave 1, acute appendicitis cases increased in severity during wave 2 of COVID-19, but with less prominence.