Utility of ßhCG monitoring in the follow-up of medical management of miscarriage.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the percentage change in total ßeta-unit human chorionic gonadotropin (ßhCG) levels (%ΔßhCG) in the prediction of treatment outcomes following intravaginal misoprostol for missed miscarriage before 13 weeks. METHODS: A secondary analysis of a randomised controlled study of medical management of miscarriage was performed. Total ßhCG levels were collected before misoprostol (baseline) and after a planned seven day interval (follow-up), when a transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) reported a gestational sac as present or not. If no sac at TVUS, surgery was indicated on clinical criteria. %ΔßhCG ((baseline ßhCG - follow-up ßhCG)/baseline ßhCG × 100) was evaluated in the prediction of a sac at TVUS and surgery on clinical criteria. RESULTS: %ΔßhCG was calculated for cases with ßhCG levels within two days of misoprostol and TVUS; calculation interval determined case number. The median %ΔßhCG for 24 cases with a persistent sac (6-9 day interval) was significantly lower than for 145 with no sac (58.75% (interquartile range (IQR): 37.59-76.69; maximum 86.54) vs 97.65% (IQR: 95.44-98.43); P < 0.0001). The median %ΔßhCG for eight cases needing surgery on clinical criteria (5-9 day interval) was significantly lower than for 140 cases with no sac not needing surgery (79.68% (IQR: 64.63-91.15; maximum 94.06) vs 97.68% (IQR: 95.61-98.50); P < 0.0001). The area under the receiver-operator curve was 0.975 for prediction of a persistent sac and 0.944 for prediction of surgery on clinical criteria, respectively. %ΔßhCG > 87% predicted no sac at TVUS. %ΔßhCG > 94.5% predicted no surgery on clinical criteria. CONCLUSION: %ΔßhCG calculation over one week reliably predicted treatment outcomes after medical management of missed miscarriage.

The medical management of missed miscarriage: outcomes from a prospective, single-centre, Australian cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To report the prospective outcomes of medical management of missed miscarriage before 13 weeks' gestation from an Australian cohort. DESIGN: Descriptive study of a cohort selected out of a randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Outpatient management at a maternity hospital between 1 May 2007 and 28 July 2010. PARTICIPANTS: 264 women requesting medical management of missed miscarriage. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of doses of misoprostol required, unscheduled visits for care, findings at ultrasound follow-up, requirement for surgical management, number of cases of gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD), and self-reported patient experience. RESULTS: 107 women (40.5%) received a repeat dose of misoprostol, and 79 women (29.9%) made unscheduled visits for care. Among the 241 women with Day 7 ultrasound follow-up, a gestational sac was found in 32 women (13.3%), indicating failure of medical management. Complete miscarriage was induced without the need for surgery in 206 women (78.0%). Surgery was performed as an emergency in 13 women (4.9%). Twelve women (4.5%) had surgery for ongoing bleeding after medical management, and four of these did not have chorionic villi on histopathological examination. Five women (1.9%) had GTD, which was managed incidentally under the protocol. Among those who returned patient questionnaires, 73.0% participants (116/159) indicated that they would recommend medical management of miscarriage to other women, while 18.2% (29/159) indicated that they would undergo surgery next time. CONCLUSION: The medical management of missed miscarriage on an outpatient basis is safe and effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12612000150842.

Can we use a lower intravaginal dose of misoprostol in the medical management of miscarriage? A randomised controlled study.

BACKGROUND: The optimal dose of misoprostol to be used in the medical management of miscarriage before 13 weeks has not been resolved. AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness and side effect profile of two different dosages of misoprostol. METHODS: A randomised controlled, equivalence study comparing 400 vs 800 µg misoprostol per vaginum (PV) on an outpatient basis. The allocated dose was repeated the next day if clinically the products of conception had not been passed. Complete miscarriage was evaluated using two methods: ultrasound criteria on Day 7 and the need for surgical management (clinical criteria). Equivalence was demonstrated if the 95% confidence interval [CI] of the observed risk difference between the two doses for complete miscarriage lay between -15.0 and 15.0%. Differences in side effects and patient satisfaction were evaluated using patient-completed questionnaires. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-eight women were allocated to receive 400 µg and 152 women to 800 µg misoprostol for the management of missed (91.3%) or incomplete (8.7%) miscarriage. The rate of induced complete miscarriage was equivalent using both ultrasound criteria (observed risk difference (ORD) -4.6%, 95% CI -12.8 to 3.7%; P = 0.313) and clinical criteria (ORD -5.6%, 95% CI -14.8 to 3.6%; P = 0.273). Following the 400 µg dose, the reported rate of fever/rigors was lower (ORD -15.6%, 95% CI -28.1 to -3.0%; P = 0.015), and more women reported their decision to undergo medical management as a good decision (ORD 15.2%, 95% CI 2.8 to 27.7%; P = 0.018). CONCLUSION: Four hundred-microgram misoprostol PV can be recommended for the medical management of miscarriage on an outpatient basis.