Effectiveness of Gravity and Manual Stress Radiographs and the Use of Lateral Talar Displacement in Determining Ankle Stability of Supination-External Rotation Type Ankle Fractures.

OBJECTIVES: (1) To evaluate adequacy and reproducibility of the gravity and manual stress imaging in the diagnosis of unstable ankle fractures and (2) to evaluate the diagnostic utility of lateral talar displacement ratio (LTDR) derived in relation to the talar body width on ankle stress imaging. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Level 1 Trauma Center. PATIENTS: One hundred seventy consecutive patients who presented with supination-external rotation 2 ankle fractures (OTA/AO 44-B2.1) requiring dynamic stress testing. INTERVENTION: Dynamic stress imaging to determine ankle stability. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Ankle instability and subsequent need for surgical fixation as determined by dynamic stress imaging. RESULTS: No statistical significant difference was found between the adequacy of gravity stress radiographs and manual stress images in regards to surgical decision-making (P = 0.595). Using manual and gravity stress images, receiver operating characteristic curves were generated for medial clear space (MCS) (area under the curve = 0.793, 0.901) and LTDR (0.849, 0.850), corresponding to thresholds of 10.5% and 10.2% for manual and gravity, respectively. Seventy-three of 105 patients (69.5%) with MCS > 5 mm and 62 of 75 patients (82.7%) with LTDR > 10% were offered surgical intervention. Sixty-two of the 77 patients (80.5%) offered surgery had both MCS > 5 mm and LTDR > 10%. CONCLUSION: This study shows that manual stress radiographs are just as effective as gravity stress radiographs in making an assessment of ankle fracture stability as there was no difference in diagnostic value between gravity and manual stress imaging in regards to surgical decision-making. Use of additional radiographic measurements such as the LTDR can provide additional information in determining stability when MCS is within a clinical gray area. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Effect of initial emergency room imaging choice on time to hip reduction and repeat imaging.

OBJECTIVES: Hip dislocations are highly morbid injuries necessitating prompt reduction and post-reduction assessment for fracture and incarcerated fragments. Recent literature has questioned the need for initial pelvic radiographs for acute trauma patients, resulting in computed tomography (CT) scans as the initial evaluation. This study investigates the relationship between choice of pre-reduction imaging and treatment of acute hip dislocations. DESIGN: Retrospective Case-Control. SETTING: Single Academic Level I Trauma Center. METHODS: All acute hip dislocations from 2011 to 2016 were reviewed. Exclusion criteria were diagnosis of dislocation at another facility, death prior to reduction, emergent surgical or ICU intervention, and periprosthetic dislocation. Patients were grouped by those with only a radiograph prior to reduction, Group I, versus those with a pre-reduction CT scan, Group II. The primary outcomes were time to reduction and the acquisition of a second CT scan. RESULTS: Of the 123 hip dislocations identified, 35 patients were excluded, mostly for transfer with a known dislocation. Group I included 29 patients and Group II included 59 patients. The mean time to reduction was 74 min in Group I and 129 min in Group II for a difference of 55 min (p < 0.001). The rate of repeat CT scan was 0 in Group I versus 48 (81%) in Group II (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Initial trauma pelvic radiography prior to CT is still important in the setting of suspected hip pathology to decrease time to hip reduction and unnecessary radiation exposure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III.

Opening a New Level II Trauma Center Near an Established Level I Trauma Center: Is This Good for Trauma Care?

OBJECTIVES: To describe how the initiation and later removal of a provisional level II trauma center (PL2TC) status at a community hospital affected the volume and severity of injured patients seen at an established academic level 1 trauma center (AL1TC). METHODS: Census data including counts of injury ICD-9 codes and patients seen in the emergency department (ED) and trauma center at an AL1TC were collected monthly from January 2010 to October 2014. An interrupted time series analysis was used to model the monthly census data with 2 time interruptions to describe the change in patient volume at the interruptions. The interruptions were (1) the initiation of the PL2TC status at a nearby community hospital and (2) the subsequent removal of the PL2TC status. RESULTS: The number of diagnoses, encounters, and patients seen at the AL1TC ED decreased while the PL2TC was operating. After the removal of the PL2TC status, there was a 19.4% increase in the ED patient volume per month at the AL1TC. The number of orthopaedic trauma patients seen through the ED at the AL1TC dropped 11.1% per month when the PL2TC began functioning as a trauma center. However, the volume of orthopaedic patients at the AL1TC did not recuperate after the PL2TC lost level 2 status. CONCLUSIONS: A significant decrease in patient volume was seen at the AL1TC with the initiation of the PL2TC in close proximity. Orthopaedic patient volume did not recuperate after the removal of the PL2TC status.