Depression Symptoms and Physical Activity in Veterans With COPD: Insights From a Web-Based, Pedometer-Mediated Physical Activity Intervention.

BACKGROUND: Depression is known to limit physical activity (PA) among individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, whether and how depression influences the effectiveness of PA interventions is unknown. PURPOSE: The study examined the association between baseline depression symptoms and change in daily step count and whether group assignment to a web-based, pedometer-mediated PA intervention moderated the association between baseline depression symptoms and change in daily step count. METHODS: Secondary analysis included two cohorts of U.S. Veterans with COPD (n = 212; 97% male; mean age 69 ± 8 years) assessed at baseline and 3 months. Cohorts 1 and 2 were randomly assigned to the same PA intervention (n = 111) or a control group (n = 101). Multivariate regressions tested the main effects of baseline depression symptoms (BDI-II total and cognitive-affective and somatic subscales) on change in daily steps, as well as the interaction between baseline BDI-II and subscales and group assignment on change in daily steps. RESULTS: Greater BDI-II total score (B = -31.8, SE = 14.48, p = .030) and somatic subscale scores (B = -99.82, SE = 35.76, p = .006) were associated with less improvement in daily step count. There was a significant interaction between baseline cognitive-affective subscale and the intervention predicting change in daily step count (B = -88.56, SE = 42.31, p = .038). When cognitive-affective subscale scores were ≥1 SD above the mean, the intervention was no longer associated with an increase in daily step count (p = .585). CONCLUSIONS: Depression should be routinely assessed and targeted as part of PA promotion efforts.

United States (U.S.) Veterans have high rates of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), a progressive lung disease that causes shortness of breath. Promoting physical activity (PA) is an important component to the management of COPD resulting in improved outcomes. Technology-based interventions (i.e., pedometers, websites) are effective at increasing PA in persons with COPD. However, depression symptoms, such as low mood and motivation, may influence their effectiveness. This secondary data analysis examined whether depression symptoms were related to improvement in daily step count. Two cohorts of U.S. Veterans were randomized to either a web-based, pedometer-mediated PA intervention (i.e., pedometer, goal setting and feedback, education and online community) or a control group (i.e., pedometer only or usual care). Daily step count was assessed at baseline and at 3 months. Across both groups, greater overall depression symptoms and greater bodily symptoms of depression (i.e., fatigue) were associated with less improvement in daily step count. Veterans with greater cognitive-affective symptoms of depression (i.e., low mood, loss of interest, or pleasure) who were assigned to the intervention group showed no improvement in daily step count compared with controls. Results highlight the importance of detecting and treating depression as part of PA interventions.

Momentary Partner Involvement in Diabetes Self-Care and Continuously Measured Glucose: A Dynamic Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the dynamic, real-time associations between partner involvement in diabetes self-care and continuous glucose monitor (CGM) metrics in adults with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: For 1 week, 63 participants wore Dexcom G4 CGMs and provided momentary reports of partner involvement in diabetes self-care five times per day. Dynamic structural equation models were used to estimate the reciprocal lagged effects of partner involvement on next-hour CGM metrics (and vice versa). RESULTS: Partner involvement predicted improved next-hour glucose control for five of six CGM metrics in analyses adjusted for time-varying covariates. The hour after partner involvement, the model predicted a 26.34 mg/dl decrease in glucose level (standardized ß = -0.19), 30% greater odds of meeting target time in target range ( ß = 0.07), 48% higher odds of target time below target range (TBR; ß = 0.04; the only nonsignificant effect), 47% greater odds of target time above target range (ß = 0.11), a 4.20 unit decrease in glucose standard deviation ( ß = -0.19), and a 0.01 unit decrease in glucose coefficient of variation ( ß = -0.08; all p values < .05). There was less consistent support for the reverse pathway, with only two metrics significantly related to next-hour partner involvement: glucose level ( ß = 0.15) and TBR ( ß = 0.21), such that having higher levels and meeting target TBR were significantly predictive of next-hour partner involvement. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study showing that partner involvement in daily diabetes management predicts short-term glucose control. More research is needed to understand how partners influence glycemic control and evaluate interventions that promote their involvement in diabetes care.

Daily partner responsiveness and everyday sleep outcomes in breast cancer survivors and their partners.

PURPOSE: Breast cancer (BC) survivors and their intimate partners face several adverse consequences from the cancer experience, including sleep disturbance, which is a common side effect of BC and its treatment. Sleep has been conceptualized and examined as an individual phenomenon despite most adults sharing a bed/room with a partner. Limited research has examined the associations between daily relationship processes and sleep in couples coping with cancer. Using an intensive longitudinal design, the present study examined the daily, within-person links between attempted and perceived partner responsiveness and subjective sleep. METHODS: Immediately following adjuvant treatment, 72 early-stage BC survivors and their intimate partners (144 paired individuals) reported on daily attempted and perceived partner responsiveness each evening and subjective sleep each morning for 21 consecutive days. RESULTS: Survivor and partner reports of partner responsiveness were associated with their own subjective sleep, such that greater attempted and perceived partner responsiveness were associated with improvements in one's own subjective sleep. Effects of one participant's partner responsiveness on their partner's sleep were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that among couples coping with early-stage BC, increased partner responsiveness is associated with subsequent improvements in subjective sleep. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Sleep disturbance is a serious concern for BC survivors and their intimate partners. Future research should assess intimacy processes as a potential method to improve BC survivor and partner sleep.

Fear of Cancer Recurrence and Sleep in Couples Coping With Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) and sleep disturbance are common in cancer survivors. Yet, little research has examined their relationship, and even less is known about what links may exist between these variables among the intimate partners of cancer survivors. PURPOSE: This study examines the relationship between FCR and sleep disturbance in breast cancer survivors and their partners. Using daily sleep data collected at two distinct periods early in survivorship-the completion of adjuvant treatment and the first post-treatment mammogram-higher survivor and partner FCR was hypothesized to predict greater sleep disturbance. METHODS: Breast cancer survivors and intimate partners (N = 76 couples; 152 individuals) each reported sleep duration, sleep quality, sleep onset latency, and wake after sleep onset each morning of two 21-day sleep diary bursts during the first year post-diagnosis. Three validated measures formed latent FCR factors for survivors and partners, which were used to predict average daily sleep. RESULTS: Across both sleep diary bursts, survivor FCR was associated with their own reduced sleep duration, reduced sleep quality, and greater sleep onset latency. Survivor FCR was also associated with their partners' reduced sleep quality and greater sleep onset latency. Partner FCR was associated with their own reduced sleep duration, reduced sleep quality, and greater sleep onset latency. Partner FCR was also associated with survivors' reduced sleep quality. CONCLUSIONS: Findings revealed intrapersonal and interpersonal associations between FCR and sleep disturbance, addressing gaps in knowledge on FCR and an outcome with known short- and long-term implications for health and mortality.

The longitudinal course of emotional and cognitive factors of fear of cancer recurrence in breast cancer patients and their partners.

OBJECTIVE: Although fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) has been conceptualized as a multidimensional construct with emotional and cognitive components, little work has distinguished or assessed both components. Further, most existing research has not included intimate partners of cancer patients, although they also experience FCR. This study aimed to (1) determine whether FCR is better conceptualized as a singular or multidimensional construct at the within-person level over time and (2) model the corresponding trajectories in patients and their partners. METHODS: Female early stage breast cancer patients and their partners (N = 78 couples) completed up to five assessments over the first year post-diagnosis tapping both emotional and cognitive elements of FCR. Multilevel confirmatory factor analysis was used to evaluate FCR's factor structure, and multivariate latent growth curve modeling was used to estimate trajectories of emotional and cognitive FCR. RESULTS: FCR was best conceptualized as two distinct but related emotional and cognitive factors. In patients and partners, emotional FCR decreased over the first year post-diagnosis on average, while cognitive FCR did not change over time. CONCLUSIONS: Findings support the conceptualization of FCR as a multidimensional construct and underscore the potential importance of distinguishing emotional and cognitive components of FCR in future research.

Predicting Progression Patterns of Type 2 Diabetes using Multi-sensor Measurements.

Type 2 diabetes - a prevalent chronic disease worldwide - increases risk for serious health consequences including heart and kidney disease. Forecasting diabetes progression can inform disease management strategies, thereby potentially reducing the likelihood or severity of its consequences. We use continuous glucose monitoring and actigraphy data from 54 individuals with Type 2 diabetes to predict their future hemoglobin A1c, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglyceride levels one year later. We use a combination of convolutional and recurrent neural networks to develop a deep neural network architecture that can learn the dynamic patterns in different sensors' data and combine those patterns with additional demographic and lab data. To further demonstrate the generalizability of our models, we also evaluate their performance using an independent public dataset of individuals with Type 1 diabetes. In addition to diabetes, our approach could be useful for other serious and chronic physical illness, where dynamic (e.g., from multiple sensors) and static (e.g., demographic) data are used for creating predictive models.

Psychosocial Impact of Cancer Care Disruptions in Women With Breast Cancer During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic caused significant disruptions in cancer care, and preliminary research suggests that these disruptions are associated with increased levels of psychosocial distress among cancer survivors. The purpose of this study was to offer a descriptive report of the psychosocial functioning, perceived risk and fear of cancer progression, and COVID-19 pandemic impact and experiences in a unique, high-risk patient cohort: breast cancer survivors whose cancer treatment was delayed and/or changed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 50 women with dual carcinoma in situ, lobular carcinoma in situ, or invasive breast cancer whose cancer surgery was postponed due to the pandemic. As they awaited delayed surgery or shortly after they received delayed surgery, participants completed questionnaires on psychosocial functioning (depression, anxiety, sleep, and quality of life), their perceived risk and fear of cancer progression, patient-provider communication about disruptions in their care, personal impact of the pandemic, worry/threat about COVID-19, and COVID-19 symptoms/diagnoses. Descriptive statistics and bivariate correlations were computed among continuous study variables. Independent samples t-tests explored group differences in psychosocial functioning between survivors who were still awaiting delayed surgery and those who had recently received it. Results: Overall, the sample denied that the pandemic seriously negatively impacted their finances or resource access and reported low-to-moderate levels of psychosocial distress and fear about COVID-19. Twenty-six percent had clinically significant levels of fear of cancer progression, with levels comparable to other recent work. About a third were still awaiting delayed cancer surgery and this group reported lower satisfaction with communication from oncology providers but overall did not seem to report more psychosocial difficulties than those who already had surgery. Conclusion: Shortly before or after primary breast cancer surgery that was delayed due to the COVID-19 pandemic, this sample of survivors appears to be generally managing well psychosocially. However, many psychosocial difficulties (e.g., fear of cancer recurrence/progression) typically have an onset after the completion of treatment, therefore, research should continue to follow this cohort of cancer survivors as the pandemic's direct impact on their care likely increases their risk for these difficulties later in survivorship.

Spousal Influence on Diabetes Self-care: Moderating Effects of Distress and Relationship Quality on Glycemic Control.

BACKGROUND: Spouses often attempt to influence patients' diabetes self-care. Spousal influence has been linked to beneficial health outcomes in some studies, but to negative outcomes in others. PURPOSE: We aimed to clarify the conditions under which spousal influence impedes glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Spousal influence was hypothesized to associate with poorer glycemic control among patients with high diabetes distress and low relationship quality. METHODS: Patients with type 2 diabetes and their spouses (N = 63 couples) completed self-report measures before patients initiated a 7-day period of continuous glucose monitoring. Mean glucose level and coefficient of variation (CV) were regressed on spousal influence, diabetes distress, relationship quality, and their two- and three-way interactions. RESULTS: The three-way interaction significantly predicted glucose variability, but not mean level. Results revealed a cross-over interaction between spousal influence and diabetes distress at high (but not low) levels of relationship quality, such that spousal influence was associated with less variability among patients with low distress, but more among those with high distress. Among patients with high distress and low relationship quality, a 1 SD increase in spousal influence predicted a difference roughly equivalent to the difference between the sample mean CV and a CV in the unstable glycemia range. CONCLUSIONS: This was the first study to examine moderators of the link between spousal influence and glycemic control in diabetes. A large effect was found for glucose variability, but not mean levels. These novel results highlight the importance of intimate relationships in diabetes management.

Fear of Cancer Recurrence and Inhibited Disclosure: Testing the Social-Cognitive Processing Model in Couples Coping With Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Withholding cancer-related concerns from one's partner (protective buffering) and feeling that one's partner is inaccessible or unresponsive to such disclosure (social constraints) are two interpersonal interaction patterns that separately have been linked to poorer adjustment to cancer. PURPOSE: Guided by the Social-Cognitive Processing Model, we examined the joint effects of social constraints and protective buffering on fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) in survivors and spouses. Social constraints and protective buffering were hypothesized to emerge as independent predictors of higher FCR. METHODS: Early-stage breast cancer survivors and spouses (N = 79 couples; 158 paired individuals) completed up to five repeated measures of FCR, social constraints, protective buffering, and relationship quality during the year postdiagnosis. A second-order growth curve model was estimated and extended to test the time-varying, within-person effects of social constraints and protective buffering on a latent FCR variable, controlling for relationship quality. RESULTS: As hypothesized, greater social constraints and protective buffering significantly (p < .05) predicted higher concurrent FCR at the within-person level, controlling for global relationship quality and change in FCR over time. The fixed effects were found to be similar for both survivors and spouses. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that interaction patterns resulting in inhibited disclosure are associated with greater FCR for both survivors and spouses, consistent with the Social-Cognitive Processing Model. This work adds to the growing body of research highlighting the social context of FCR.

Everyday protective buffering predicts intimacy and fear of cancer recurrence in couples coping with early-stage breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Patient and spouse/partner mutual self-disclosure is central for maintaining intimacy and cognitive processing when transitioning to life after cancer. Protective buffering inhibits self-disclosure and is defined as efforts to protect one's partner from upset and burden by hiding or denying cancer-related concerns. Intimacy and fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) are important determinants of individual and couple adaptation following cancer. Links between protective buffering and intimacy have not been examined in the context of daily life, and links with FCR have not been studied. We hypothesized that protective buffering is associated with decreased intimacy and increased FCR at a daily, within-person level. METHODS: Sixty-nine early-stage breast cancer (BC) survivors and their spouses completed electronic diaries for 21 consecutive days at the end of adjuvant treatment. Patients and spouses reported on daily protective buffering, intimacy, and FCR. Dyadic multilevel path modeling was used to estimate within-person effects. Patient and spouse protective buffering on one's own as well as one's partner's same-day intimacy and FCR were examined, controlling for previous levels of intimacy and FCR. RESULTS: Protective buffering was associated with decreased intimacy and increased FCR for the individual reporting buffering that same day. Patient and spouse protective buffering was also linked to decreased intimacy for her/his partner that same day. Moreover, patient protective buffering predicted increased spouse FCR that same day. CONCLUSIONS: Findings supported a daily, within-person link between buffering, intimacy, and FCR, suggesting open disclosure of cancer-related concerns may be a relevant target for interventions for adaptation to BC.

Threat sensitivity and fear of cancer recurrence: a daily diary study of reactivity and recovery as patients and spouses face the first mammogram post-diagnosis.

OBJECTIVES: Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is a top concern of breast cancer (BC) survivors and their spouses, yet little is known about responses to FCR triggers in daily life. We examined whether a biologically based individual difference-threat sensitivity-predicted FCR in couples facing the first post-diagnosis mammogram (MMG). We hypothesized that threat sensitivity would predict greater FCR reactivity before the MMG and higher peak FCR on the MMG day, controlling for global anxiety. We also explored the link between threat sensitivity and FCR recovery after MMG. DESIGN AND SAMPLE: Fifty-seven early-stage BC patients and their spouses completed cross-sectional measures of threat sensitivity and global anxiety. Couples then reported daily FCR during a 3-week diary period that began 2 weeks before the patient's MMG appointment. METHODS: Multilevel actor-partner interdependence modeling was used to estimate within-person random slopes of FCR before (reactivity) and after (recovery) the MMG. Random intercepts captured individual differences in peak FCR on the MMG day. Patient and spouse threat sensitivity and anxiety were entered as predictors of reactivity, peak, and recovery. FINDINGS: FCR increased leading to MMG; however, inconsistent with hypotheses, this reactivity was not significantly predicted by threat sensitivity. Actor, but not partner, effects for peak FCR emerged, such that patients and spouses with greater threat sensitivity had greater FCR on the MMG day. FCR decreased after the MMG, and spouse, but not patient, threat sensitivity predicted slower recovery for both partners. CONCLUSIONS: Findings lend preliminary support for the role of threat sensitivity in the experience of FCR as couples confront threatening events in BC survivorship. Implications for psychosocial providers: MMGs can be a triggering event for couples. Threat sensitivity may help identify those who are likely to experience elevations in FCR during this stressful period.

Social constraints and fear of recurrence in couples coping with early stage breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is a top concern of breast cancer (BC) survivors and their spouses. FCR often occurs within an interpersonal context, yet there has been little research on relationship processes that may influence FCR in patients and spouses. It was hypothesized that the inhibition of disclosure of cancer-related concerns, thoughts, and feelings because of perceived partner disinterest or avoidance (termed social constraints) would predict greater FCR in BC patients and their spouses both globally and in the context of everyday life. METHOD: Two studies, 1 cross-sectional (N = 46 couples) and 1 daily diary (21 days; N = 72 couples), were conducted to examine the between-person and within-person associations between social constraints and FCR in early stage BC patients and their spouses. Assessments were conducted about 6 months after BC surgery. RESULTS: Global social constraints predicted greater global FCR in patients and spouses at the cross-sectional level, controlling for anxiety symptoms, relationship quality, and patient age, physical impairment, and BC stage. At the within-person level, results indicated that on days when more social constraints were reported, both partners were more likely to report greater FCR, controlling for momentary negative affect and relationship quality. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to examine the within-person association between social constraints and FCR. These findings suggest relationship processes, particularly inhibition of disclosure, can uniquely influence the experience of FCR for both BC patients and their spouses, pointing to an important consideration for future research and possible intervention development. (PsycINFO Database Record

Does sharing good news buffer fear of bad news? A daily diary study of fear of cancer recurrence in couples approaching the first mammogram post-diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE: The core of fear of cancer recurrence (FCR)-a top concern of couples after successful breast cancer (BC) treatment-is fear of death. Daily relationship processes may be instrumental in regulating FCR as triggers of existential distress are encountered. We tested the hypothesis that daily capitalization, the process of sharing good news (capitalization attempts) to a partner perceived as responsive (responsiveness), buffers patient and spouse FCR as they confront the first mammogram post-diagnosis. METHODS: Fifty-seven early-stage BC survivors and their spouses reported daily FCR, capitalization, and positivity of the disclosed event during a 3-week diary period beginning 2 weeks before the first annual mammogram post-diagnosis. Dyadic multilevel path models estimated within-person effects of patient and spouse capitalization on same-day FCR, controlling for event positivity. RESULTS: Before the mammogram, capitalization attempts were unrelated to FCR, but for patients, responsiveness was predictive of greater same-day FCR. After the mammogram, for both partners, attempts were predictive of greater same-day FCR, yet responsiveness was predictive of lower FCR. CONCLUSIONS: Findings were largely inconsistent with the hypothesis that capitalization buffers existential distress. However, results revealed novel insights about daily dyadic processes that may characterize within-person adaptation to existential threat. Potential explanations for the differential links between capitalization and FCR based on timing (before versus after threat) and capitalization component (attempts versus responsiveness) are discussed.

Negative emotional responses to motherhood-related support receipt during pregnancy predict postpartum depressive symptoms.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Prenatal stress increases risk for postpartum depression. While social support availability may attenuate this risk, little research has examined support receipt during pregnancy, which has been linked to increased distress in other domains. This study assesses the implications of motherhood-related and motherhood-unrelated support receipt for daily distress during pregnancy and tests whether negative responsiveness to motherhood-related support predicts postpartum depression risk. DESIGN AND METHOD: Thirty-one pregnant women were recruited from the community for a 3-wave study (beginning at approximately 26 weeks gestation, 34 weeks gestation, and 4 weeks postpartum). Each wave included a survey of general characteristics (e.g. depressive symptoms) and a two-week diary period measuring mood, stress, and support. RESULTS: A multilevel model analysis suggested that motherhood-related support predicted greater increases in daily distress than motherhood-unrelated support. Follow-up regression analysis showed that those who responded more negatively to motherhood-related support reported higher postpartum depressive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Although preliminary due to the sample size, the results suggest that how women interpret and respond to support may contribute to postpartum depression risk. Future research should focus on how mothers can more positively construe the support they receive in addition to how to increase the support available to them.