Creation of an institutional preoperative checklist to support clinical risk assessment in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) considering ileoanal pouch surgery.

Background: Total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the most established restorative operative approach for patients with ulcerative colitis. It has associated morbidity and the potential for major repercussions on quality of life. As such, patient selection is crucial to its success. The main aim of this paper is to present an institutional preoperative checklist to support clinical risk assessment and patient selection in those considering IPAA. Methods: A literature review was performed to identify the risk factors associated with surgical complications, decreased functional outcomes/quality of life, and pouch failure after IPAA. Based on this, a preliminary checklist was devised and modified through an iterative process. This was then evaluated by a consensus group comprising the pouch multidisciplinary team (MDT) core members. Results: The final preoperative checklist includes assessment for risk factors such as gender, advanced age, obesity, comorbidities, sphincteric impairment, Crohn's disease and pelvic radiation therapy. In addition, essential steps in the decision-making process, such as pouch nurse counselling and discussion regarding surgical alternatives, are also included. The last step of the checklist is discussion at a dedicated pouch-MDT. Discussion: A preoperative checklist may support clinicians with the selection of patients that are suitable for pouch surgery. It also serves as a useful tool to inform the discussion of cases at the MDT meeting.

Empowering stoma patients and nurses during the pandemic and beyond.

Zarah Perry-Woodford, Consultant Nurse, Stoma and Internal Pouch Care Department, St Mark's Hospital, London (zarah.perry-woodford@nhs.net), winner of the Gold Award in the Nurse of the Year category in the BJN Awards 2023.

The voice of stoma care nurses: an exploration of stoma care in England.

BACKGROUND: This article is part two of a series presenting the findings of stakeholder surveys with ostomates and stoma care nurses (SCNs) for stoma services in England. Part one explored the experiences of ostomates. This article focuses on the views and experiences of 108 SCNs in England. AIM: To understand the experience of SCNs in England in relation to current services provided. This includes the scope of the SCN role, the service they provide, and SCN experience and views on areas for improvement. METHOD: SCNs were invited to share their experiences and views in a national online survey. Questions considered the experience of the nurse, where the care they provide is delivered, how their post is funded and their views on current issues such as responsibility for managing waste of stoma product. Two free-text questions asked what areas of stoma care services worked well and what areas could be improved, results of which were coded and thematically analysed. FINDINGS: Themes included patient care, industry involvement and prescribing process. CONCLUSION: Overall, survey respondents felt that they provided a good standard of care. Nurses reported complex industry relationships. Awareness of the Nursing and Midwifery Council Code, Bribery Act 2010 and NHS England guidance on managing conflicts of interest is advocated, as is promoting transparency in funding arrangements. It was noted that there appears to be variation in the care provided to ostomates.

The voice of ostomates: an exploration of stoma care in England.

BACKGROUND: This article is part one of a series presenting the findings of stakeholder surveys with ostomates and stoma care nurses for stoma services in England. Due to the volume of data and publication limits this article focuses on the views and experiences of 2504 people living with a stoma (ostomates). AIM: To understand the experience of ostomates in relation to the current services provided in hospital and at home, the delivery of care and views on areas that work well and areas that require improvement. METHODS: Ostomates were asked to share their experiences in a national online survey, promoted via multiple organisations. The survey included sections for respondent demographics, interactions with the stoma care nurse (SCN), products and dispensing services, as well as patients' experiences relating to both hospital-based care and home-based care. Free-text responses relating to service delivery in hospital and at home were coded and thematically analysed. FINDINGS: Results are presented, and verbatim quotes used to demonstrate themes. These include care provision and access to visits from the SCN, physical and psychological care, information sharing, specialist knowledge and products. CONCLUSION: Overall, the survey respondents praised the care given, however, the experiences and views shared via the survey show significant variation in the care and services received. This article presents the findings of a survey of ostomates living in England. A second article, presenting the findings about the experiences of stoma care nurses will be published in a forthcoming issue.

Nurse-led surveillance of ileoanal pouch patients post-stoma reversal: outcomes at 12-month review.

Restorative proctocolectomy with pouch anal anastomosis is the accepted treatment for suitable patients with ulcerative colitis, yet surveillance following stoma reversal remains contentious and involves several issues. While most patients are discharged from routine follow-up between 6 weeks and 3 months, some remain on surveillance pathways indefinitely. A high volume of patients require advice for many months or years after the stoma has been reversed, with the burden of surveillance on consultant-led clinics. Nurse-led follow-up after restorative proctocolectomy has been recognised for decades but has not been validated. This study reports the first protocol-based pathway for nurse-led follow-up. Using validated questionnaires, suitable pouch patients were followed up in nurse-led clinics over a 12-month period then sent an online survey to report on the service they received. Overall, most patients were satisfied with the nurse-led follow-up; however, further engagement and investment in the workforce and infrastructure is required to offer sustainable services.

Implementing digital technology during the pandemic: impact on stoma nursing services at a tertiary referral centre.

The COVID-19 pandemic has been one of the greatest challenges to the NHS, creating turmoil in the public health workforce and for all of those who use its services. Its immediate impact was a rapid change in how care in the NHS is planned, delivered and accessed, with no concession for stoma care services. Investment in global resources detailing COVID-19 recovery plans and the steady increase in national data related to the transmission and treatment of the virus has allowed stoma care nurses to better understand the long-term effects of the pandemic and mitigate future risk to specialist nursing services. This article describes how this crisis has provided an opportunity to radically change systems and processes in stoma care through the use of digital technology to continue interaction with patients, communicate with the multidisciplinary team and collaborate with relatives or carers, and as a platform to enhance personal development, training and education.

Transanal Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis for Ulcerative Colitis has Comparable Long-Term Functional Outcomes to Transabdominal Approach: A Multicentre Comparative Study.

BACKGROUND: The transanal approach to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis [Ta-IPAA] provides better access to the lower pelvis with lower short-term morbidity in ulcerative colitis [UC]. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term functional outcomes after Ta-IPAA vs transabdominal IPAA [Abd-IPAA] in UC. METHODS: A multicentre cohort analysis was performed between March 2002 and September 2017. Patient characteristics, surgical details and postoperative outcomes were compared. CGQL [Cleveland global quality of life] score at 12 months with a functioning pouch was considered the primary end point. RESULTS: A total of 374 patients [100 Ta-IPAA vs 274 Abd-IPAA] were included. Ta-IPAA demonstrated a comparable overall quality of life [CGQL score] to Abd-IPAA [0.75 ± 0.11 vs 0.71 ± 0.14; respectively, p = 0.1]. Quality of life [7.71 ± 1.17 vs 7.30 ± 1.46; p = 0.04] and energy-level items [7.16 ± 1.52 vs 6.66 ± 1.68; p = 0.03] were significantly better after Ta-IPAA, while the quality of health item was comparable [7.68 ± 1.26 vs 7.64 ± 1.44; p = 0.96]. Analysis excluding anastomotic leaks did not change the overall CGQL scores. Stool frequencies [>10/24 h: 22% vs 21%; p = 1.0] and the rate of a single episode of major incontinence during the following 12-month period [27% vs 26%; p = 0.89] were similar. The differences in 30-day morbidity rates [33% vs 41%; p = 0.2] and anastomotic leak rates were not significant [6% vs 13%; p = 0.09]. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence of comparable long-term functional outcome and quality of life after Ta-IPAA and Abd-IPAA for UC.

Quality of life following ileoanal pouch failure.

This article describes a novel qualitative study exploring the lived experience of participants having undergone ileoanal pouch failure, on a background of ulcerative colitis (UC). It focuses on the impact of living with indefinite diversion of the pouch and a permanent end ileostomy. Six participants were interviewed with an aim to establish their experience of pouch failure and the support they required. Five pertinent themes emerged that suggested participants did not expect pouch failure and were unprepared for the regression towards UC. Some participants recommenced drug therapy, wore pads to manage leakage from the diverted pouch, avoided certain social settings or manipulated diet and lifestyle in order to gain an acceptable quality of life with a permanent ileostomy. Pouch failure potentially presents adverse effects on patients' quality of life, but currently there is a deficit in support and resources available in order to provide acceptable outcomes for patients experiencing pouch failure.

Quality of life following ileoanal pouch failure.

This article describes a novel qualitative study exploring the lived experience of participants having undergone ileoanal pouch failure, on a background of ulcerative colitis (UC). It focuses on the impact of living with indefinite diversion of the pouch and a permanent end ileostomy. Six participants were interviewed with an aim to establish their experience of pouch failure and the support they required. Five pertinent themes emerged that suggested participants did not expect pouch failure and were unprepared for the regression towards UC. Some participants recommenced drug therapy, wore pads to manage leakage from the diverted pouch, avoided certain social settings or manipulated diet and lifestyle in order to gain an acceptable quality of life with a permanent ileostomy. Pouch failure potentially presents adverse effects on patients' quality of life, but currently there is a deficit in support and resources available in order to provide acceptable outcomes for patients experiencing pouch failure.

Osteoporosis in patients over 50 years of age following restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: is DXA screening warranted?

BACKGROUND: Ulcerative colitis (UC) and increasing age are associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis. Screening of postmenopausal women and men older than 50 years with ulcerative colitis for osteoporosis is recommended. The prevalence of osteoporosis in restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) patients more than 50 years old is not known. METHODS: Fifty-three consecutive patients older than age 50 who had undergone RPC for UC underwent a bone density scan (DXA). Sex, smoking status, age at diagnosis of UC, duration of UC, age at RPC, years since RPC, age at DXA, and pouch histological inflammatory score were recorded. The Kruskal-Wallis test and Spearman's correlation coefficient were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients were studied; their median age was 58 years, and the median age at RPC was 45. The prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis was 43.4% and 13.2%, respectively. Age at RPC was negatively correlated with bone density (P = 0.041, r = 0.281), and there was a negative correlation approaching significance with age at the time of DXA (P = 0.071, r = -0.250). No other factor studied correlated with bone density. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia found in this study is similar to that reported for UC patients who have not undergone RPC. Patients having RPC should be screened in line with current UC guidelines, targeting those older than 50 years.

Ileoanal pouch dysfunction and the use of a Medena catheter following hospital discharge.

With the advent of new surgical techniques to manage colorectal disease, the number of ileoanal pouch operations has amplified and therefore increased numbers of pouch patients are being discharged into the community setting. Community nurses will now encounter the ileoanal pouch patient and may be required to manage related complications. Restorative proctocolectomy with ileoanal pouch anastomosis (RPC) has become established as the gold standard operation for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and selected patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Using a reservoir constructed from small bowel as a substitute rectum is a medical triumph which in the majority of cases improves the quality of life for patients, not only by eradicating disease and preserving anal sphincter function but also by avoiding a permanent ileostomy. Recent investigation into the use of Medena catheterization for pouch dysfunction has found that it is tolerated in the long-term and is associated with satisfactory quality of life in pouch patients with outflow obstruction.

Recommended follow-up for ileo-anal pouch patient.

One of the greatest advances in colorectal surgery over the past 30-years has been the development of restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for patients suffering with ulcerative colitis and selected patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. This has coincided with a proliferation of new and exciting advanced clinical roles for nurses in the United Kingdom and subsequently has led to an increase in the responsibilities and professional status of nurses. Staff development is necessary to maintain the unique contribution that nurses make to health care in the terms of practice, education and research. Nurse specialists in gastroenterology are taking their place alongside medical specialists, and more importantly establishing themselves as the principle carer in many diverse roles. However, as these nursing roles expand, a recognized framework needs to be designed, which takes into account the educational, ethical and legal issues related to accountability of running nurse-led clinics, offering support, advice and follow-up for patients. This article provides nursing staff with research-based recommendations and practical guidance on running a successful nurse-led pouch clinic and follow-up service in collaboration with the consultant surgeon, gastroenterology teams and nursing staff involved specifically with the ileo-anal pouch patient.

Education in practice: a colorectal link-nurse programme.

This article illustrates the planning, implementation, evaluation and personal implications of a link-nurse programme for colorectal cancer nursing. The programme was designed to maintain a patient-centred support service and continue the provision of bowel cancer education and support to nurses in the clinical environment. Literature on previous link-nurse schemes, and the recent legislation on education and cancer nursing provides the background on which this programme is based. The use of educational theory supplies the theoretical underpinnings for this approach to learning, and evaluation findings are reported from both the group's and the individual's viewpoints. The programme increased the link nurses' awareness of the patient's pathway, support and information needs and the role of the multidisciplinary team in managing care. Sufficient time, support and encouragement from ward teams and clinical managers were seen as vital to the success of the programme, and specific benefits and challenges when establishing this type of practice based education for nurses are explored.