[CUFFING PRISONERS AND DETAINEES IN ISRAELI HOSPITALS - A MULTI-CENTER STUDY].

AIMS: To describe the extent of prisoner/detainee cuffing and characterize cuffing methods. BACKGROUND: Thousands of prisoners and detainees receive medical treatment in Israeli hospitals every year. According to the Israeli law, cuffing during hospital stay should be an exceptional measure, to be considered only in cases of real threat of violence or escape, based on individual assessment. There is no documentation of cuffing rates in hospitals. METHODS: A multi-center study in 12 hospitals was performed during 2020-2021. Data were collected prospectively or retrieved retrospectively from security records, when available. RESULTS: A total of 1857 prisoners/detainees were documented, of whom 1794 (96.6%) were cuffed. Of the 241 hospitalized patients, 230 (95.4%) were cuffed. Details regarding cuffing methods were available for 185 hospitalized patients, revealing that at least 63 patients (68% of patients for whom details regarding cuffing to bed were available) were cuffed to the bed with opposite arm and leg in a cross position. Cuffing rates of prisoners under custody of the Prisons Authority, police and the Israeli Defense Forces, were 98.5%, 96.6%, and 83%, respectively. Impaired mobility for medical reasons was documented in 64 cases, of whom 85.9% were cuffed regardless. CONCLUSIONS: Cuffing of prisoners/detainees in Israeli hospitals is performed non-selectively, in violation of the law. During hospitalization, cuffing is usually performed in a cross position, severely impairing mobility. Our findings highlight the need for routine documentation of cuffing due to its medical consequences and the responsibility of medical staff towards patients according to rules of ethics and regulations.

Providing Health Care in the Shadow of Violence: Does Emotion Regulation Vary Among Hospital Workers From Different Professions?

Research into violence against health care staff by patients and their families within the health care services shows a rising frequency of incidents. The potentially damaging effects on health care staff are extensive, including diverse negative psychological and physical symptoms. The aim of this qualitative study was to examine how hospital workers from different professions reacted to patients' and visitors' violence against them or their colleagues, and how they regulated their emotional reactions during those incidents. The research question was as follows: How do different types of hospital workers regulate the range of their emotional reactions during and after violent events? Participants were 34 hospital workers, representing several professional sectors. Data were collected through in-depth semistructured interviews, which were later transcribed and thematically content analyzed. Five themes were revealed, demonstrating several tactics that hospital workers used to regulate their emotions during incidents of violent outbursts by patients or visitors: (1) Inability to Manage Emotion Regulation, (2) Emotion Regulation by Distancing and Disengagement Tactics, (3) Emotion Regulation Using Rationalization and Splitting Tactics, (4) Emotion Regulation via the Use of Organizational Resources, and (5) Controlling Emotions by Suppression. Hospital workers who experienced dissonance between their professional expectations and their emotional reactions to patients' violence reported using various emotion regulation tactics, consequently managing to fulfill their duty competently. Workers who did not experience such dissonance felt in full control of their emotions and did not manifest responses of emotion regulation. Others, however, experienced intense emotional flooding and failed to regulate their emotions. We recommend developing health care staff's awareness of possible emotional implications of violent incidents, for themselves as people and for their intact functioning at work. In addition, we recommend further development of health care staff training programs for coping with violent patients and enhancement of formal and informal organizational support.

Incivility and Patient Safety: A Longitudinal Study of Rudeness, Protocol Compliance, and Adverse Events.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the impact of social interactions on iatrogenesis and lapses in patient safety. METHODS: This field-based experience-sampling study of primarily nurses in a general hospital explored the impact of rudeness on patient safety performance, state depletion (that is, exhaustion of mental energy for reflective behavior), and team processes (for example, information sharing). Objective measures of performance were compliance with hand hygiene and medication preparation protocols, as well as archival reports of adverse events. Data were analyzed by department shift (480 shifts [15 days] in 16 departments). RESULTS: A total of 231 rudeness incidents were reported in 98 shifts, most stemming from a patient or family. Compliance with hand hygiene was significantly lower up to 24 hours after rudeness exposure (p = 0.03). Rudeness significantly increased team members' state depletion (p = 0.002) and was associated with decreased information sharing (p = 0.046) but was not directly associated with adverse events or level of compliance with medication and hand hygiene protocols. However, the adverse indirect effect of shifts' temporal proximity to rudeness on poor compliance with medication preparation and team members' information sharing via state depletion was significant. Rudeness exposure was also associated with increased rate of adverse events in the subsequent 24 hours, although this association was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Rudeness exposure was associated with reduced team member compliance with infection control and medication protocols via greater team member state depletion and diminished information sharing.

Characteristics and behaviours of formal versus informal nurse champions and their relationship to innovation success.

AIMS: To identify the sociodemographic attributes, project characteristics and champion strategies that differentiate formal from informal nursing champions, and to test their success in terms of project spread and novelty. BACKGROUND: Champions spread innovation in healthcare organizations. Empirical research has not explored the differences between formal and informal champions in terms of their antecedents and success. DESIGN: A quantitative cross-sectional design. METHOD: Data were collected on 93 nursing champions in three hospitals from 2015 - 2016. Champions were identified according to a validated approach; data on their sociodemographic attributes, project characteristics and strategies were assembled through interviews and validated questionnaires. Their success in terms of novelty and spread was assessed via expert ratings and validated questionnaire. FINDINGS: Informal champions had longer tenure and were involved mainly in bottom-up projects aimed mostly at improving human resources and services; formal champions were mostly involved in top-down projects aimed at quality control. Informal champions expressed more enthusiasm and confidence about the innovation; formal champions tended to use more online resources and peer-monitoring strategies. Projects of informal champions were more novel than those of formal champions. Project spread did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Formal and informal champions differ in their characteristics and implementation strategies. To encourage project's innovation, the organizational climate should encourage the emergence of informal champions; formal and informal champions should be chosen wisely, assuring that they possess enough organizational resources; and coaching programmes for junior champions should be planned to equip them with championing behaviours.

Nurses as boundary actors: Promoting integrative medicine in hospital wards.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the research was to explore attitudes of hospital nurses toward integrative medicine (IM). DESIGN: A special training program was developed in the Bnai-Zion medical center, a public hospital in Israel, where an innovative IM program was launched. METHODS: 65 nurses from 22 wards were asked at the beginning and the end of the program to complete an open-ended questionnaire concerning three major aspects: 1) their attitudes toward complementary medicine and its integration, 2) the importance and impact of the training program and 3) how they perceive their potential role in promoting IM in the wards. RESULTS: Nurses perceive themselves as boundary actors, who can play an important role in promoting IM within the wards. IM training programs for hospital nurses are recommended. This empowers nurses while restoring to clinical practice the essence of nursing as an integrative healing discipline.

[Influence of knowledge and attitude on the uptake of influenza vaccine by healthcare workers].

BACKGROUND: The compliance of healthcare workers (HCW) with the yearly influenza vaccination campaigns is suboptimal. The reasons behind this low compliance are poorly defined. Actually, nosocomiaL transmission of the virus may cause high morbidity and mortality, especially among the immunocompromised, and vaccines are offered free of charge, but nonetheless, vaccination rates are low. AIM OF STUDY: To study the reasons underlying this low vaccine uptake. METHODS: Anonymous questionnaires were randomly distributed to hospital staff at the Bnai-Zion Medical Center in Haifa. The questionnaires included demographics, knowledge and attitude regarding the influenza vaccine. RESULTS: Overall, 255 of the 275 distributed questionnaires were returned (117 nurses, 108 physicians and 30 others). Only 21% of those returning the questionnaires had been vaccinated in the fall of 2007. Vaccination rates among different professional sectors were not significantly different. The rate of vaccination was significantly higher in the division of pediatrics (45%) vs. the division of medicine (10%, p < 0.01). The vaccination rates correlated directly with knowledge: 11% among low-level, 16% in intermediate and 42% in those demonstrating the highest knowledge (p < 0.001). Of those who believed that the vaccine is efficacious, 33% were vaccinated, compared to only 14% among those who did not believe so (p < 0.001). Twenty-six percent of those who knew that their work constitutes a high risk condition were vaccinated vs. 9% of those who did not (p < 0.01). Higher vaccination rates (albeit low) were noted in those who believed that non-vaccination places their patients at a higher level of risk (27% vs. 14%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge and behavioral patterns may predict which HCW will be vaccinated. Higher levels of knowledge were associated with higher vaccination rates. Towards the goal of higher vaccination rates, we must assimilate knowledge and foster our obligation to our patients.