Racialized and beneficiary inequities in medication to treat opioid use disorder receipt within the US Military Health System.

BACKGROUND: Medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) can be critical to managing opioid use disorder (OUD). It is unknown the extent to which US Military Health System (MHS) patients diagnosed with OUD receive MOUD. METHODS: Healthcare records of MHS-enrolled active duty and retired service members (N = 13,334) with a new (index) OUD diagnosis were included between 2018 and 2021, without 90-day pre-index MOUD receipt were included. Elastic net logistic and Cox regressions evaluated care- and system-level factors associated with 1-year MOUD receipt (primary outcome) and time-to-receipt. RESULTS: Only 9% of patients received MOUD 1-year post-index; only 4% received MOUD within 14 days. Black patients (OR for receipt 0.38, 95% CI 0.30-0.49), Latinx patients (OR for receipt 0.44, 95% CI 0.33-0.59), and patients whose race and ethnicity was Other (OR for receipt 0.52, 95%CI 0.35, 0.77) experienced lower MOUD access (all p < 0.001). Retirees were more likely to receive MOUD relative to active duty service members (OR for receipt 1.81, 95%CI 1.52, 2.16, p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Institutional racism in MOUD prescribing, combined with the overall low rates of MOUD receipt after OUD diagnosis, highlight the need for evidence-based, multifaceted, and multilevel approaches to OUD care in the Military Health System. Without clear Defense Health Agency policy, including the designation of responsible entities, transparent and ongoing evaluation and responsiveness using standardized methodology, and resourced programming and public health campaigns, MOUD rates will likely remain poor and inequitable.

The Impact of Operation Bushmaster on Medical Student Decision-making in a High-Stress, Operational Environment.

INTRODUCTION: Operation Bushmaster is a high-fidelity military medical field practicum for fourth-year medical students at the Uniformed Services University. During Operation Bushmaster, students treat live-actor and mannequin-based simulated patients in wartime scenarios throughout the five-day practicum. This study explored the impact of participating in Operation Bushmaster on students' decision-making in a high-stress, operational environment, a crucial aspect of their future role as military medical officers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A panel of emergency medicine physician experts used a modified Delphi technique to develop a rubric to evaluate the participants' decision-making abilities under stress. The participants' decision-making was assessed before and after participating in either Operation Bushmaster (control group) or completing asynchronous coursework (experimental group). A paired-samples t-test was conducted to detect any differences between the means of the participants' pre- and posttest scores. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Uniformed Services University #21-13079. RESULTS: A significant difference was detected in the pre- and posttest scores of students who attended Operation Bushmaster (P < .001), while there was no significant difference in the pre- and posttest scores of students who completed online, asynchronous coursework (P = .554). CONCLUSION: Participating in Operation Bushmaster significantly improved the control group participants' medical decision-making under stress. The results of this study confirm the effectiveness of high-fidelity simulation-based education for teaching decision-making skills to military medical students.

Medical Students' Integration of Formative Feedback During Simulation: A Grounded Theory Study.

INTRODUCTION: Formative feedback is critical for trainees' growth and development. However, there is a gap in the professional literature regarding the ways in which formative feedback affects student performance during simulation. This grounded theory study addresses this gap by exploring the ways in which medical students received and integrated ongoing formative feedback throughout a multiday, high-fidelity military medical simulation, Operation Bushmaster. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our research team interviewed 18 fourth-year medical students in order to investigate how they processed formative feedback during the simulation. Guided by the grounded theory tradition of qualitative research, our research team used open coding and axial coding to categorize the data. We then used selective coding to determine the casual relationships between each of the categories that emerged from the data. These relationships determined our grounded theory framework. RESULTS: Four phases emerged from the data and provided a framework to delineate the process in which students received and integrated formative feedback throughout the simulation: (1) ability to self-assess, (2) self-efficacy, (3) leadership and teamwork, and (4) appreciation of feedback for personal and professional growth. The participants first focused on feedback related to their individual performance but then shifted to a teamwork and leadership mindset. Once they adapted this new mindset, they began to intentionally provide feedback to their peers, increasing their team's performance. At the end of the simulation, the participants recognized the benefits of formative feedback and peer feedback for ongoing professional development throughout their careers, signifying a growth mindset. CONCLUSIONS: This grounded theory study provided a framework for determining how medical students integrated formative feedback during a high-fidelity, multiday medical simulation. Medical educators can use this framework to intentionally guide their formative feedback in order to maximize student learning during simulation.

Military Medical Provider Perspectives During the New York COVID-19 Response.

INTRODUCTION: The response to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in New York City (NYC) included unprecedented support from the DoD-a response limited primarily to medical and public health response on domestic soil with intact infrastructure. This study seeks to identify the common perspectives, experiences, and challenges of DoD personnel participating in this historic response. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a phenomenological qualitative study of 16 military health care providers who deployed to NYC in March 2020. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the USU (No. DBS.2020.123). All participants served on either the United States Naval Ship Comfort or at the Javits Center. We conducted semi-structured interviews exploring the participants' experiences while deployed to NYC. These interview scripts were then independently coded by five research team members. RESULTS: We identified four common themes and 12 subthemes from the participants' responses. The themes (subthemes) were lack of preparation (unfamiliar mission and inadequate resources); confusion about integration with civilian health care (widespread, dynamic situation, and NYC overwhelmed), communication challenges (overall, misunderstanding and miscommunication resulting in tension, and patient handoffs); and adaptation and success (general, military-civilian liaison service, positive experience, and military support necessity). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides unique insight into the DoD's initial response to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in NYC. Using this experiential feedback from the DoD's pandemic responders could aid planners in improving the rapidity, effectiveness, and safety of military and civilian health care system integrations that may arise in the future.

Medical Students' Professional Identity Formation During Operation Bushmaster.

INTRODUCTION: The role of the military medical officer is complex, as it encapsulates officer, physician, and leader. Professional identity formation is therefore essential for military medical students and junior military physicians to successfully execute the responsibilities of the military medical officer in their future careers. Because little is known regarding best practices for professional identity formation training for military physicians, this study explored the ways in which medical students conceptualized the complex roles of the military medical officer during a medical field practicum. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Guided by the phenomenological tradition of qualitative research, we interviewed 15 fourth-year medical students twice regarding their understanding of the role of the military medical officer, as they progressed through a 5-day high-fidelity military medical field practicum, Operation Bushmaster. Our research team then analyzed the interview transcripts for emerging themes and patterns, which served as the results of this study. RESULTS: The following themes emerged from the data regarding the participants' conceptualization of the military medical officer: (1) the scope of the role of the military medical officer; (2) the intersecting identities of the military medical officer; and (3) the adaptable role of the military medical officer in an operational environment. As they progressed through the medical field practicum, the participants articulated a clear understanding of the vast and complex nature of the military medical officer's intersecting roles as officer, physician, and leader in austere and often unpredictable environments. At the end of the medical field practicum, the participants expressed confidence in carrying out their roles as military medical officers during their future deployments. CONCLUSIONS: This study provided an in-depth understanding of the participants' conceptualization of the military medical officer. The participants described how the medical field practicum provided them with opportunities to experience first-hand and therefore better understand the roles of the military medical officer while leading a health care team in an operational environment. As a result, high-fidelity medical field practicums like Operation Bushmaster appear to be an effective tool for facilitating professional identity formation.

Naloxone Prescribing Associated With Reduced Emergency Department Visits in the Military Health System.

PURPOSE: The aim was to determine the association between the receipt of naloxone and emergency department (ED) visits within 60 days after the receipt of an opioid. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of individuals 18 years of age or above, enrolled in TRICARE, and were dispensed an opioid at any time from January 1, 2019, through September 30, 2020 was identified within the United States Military Health System. Individuals receiving naloxone within 5 days of the opioid dispensing date were propensity score matched with individuals receiving opioids only. A logistic regression was used to estimate the odds of an ED visit in the 60-day follow-up period after the index opioid dispense event among those co-dispensed naloxone and those receiving opioids only. RESULTS: Of the 2,136,717 individuals who received an opioid prescription during the study period, 800,071 (10.1%) met study inclusion criteria. Overall, 5096 (0.24%) of individuals who received an opioid prescription were co-dispensed naloxone. Following propensity score matching, those who received naloxone had a significantly lower odds of ED utilization in the 60 days after receiving an opioid prescription (odds ratio: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.68-0.80, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: This study highlights the importance of expanding access to naloxone in order to reduce ED utilization. Future research is needed to examine additional outcomes related to naloxone receipt and develop programs that make naloxone prescribing a routine practice.

Naloxone prescribing practices in the Military Health System before and after policy implementation.

Introduction: Despite public health campaigns, policies, and educational programs, naloxone prescription rates among people receiving opioids remains low. In June 2018, the U.S. Military Health System (MHS) released 2 policies to improve naloxone prescribing. Objectives: The objective of this study was to examine whether the policies resulted in increased naloxone coprescription rates for patients who met the criteria for 1 or more risk indicators (eg, long-term opioid therapy, benzodiazepine coprescription, morphine equivalent daily dose ≥50 mg, and elevated overdose risk score) at the time of opioid dispense. Methods: Prescription and risk indicator data from January 2017 to February 2021 were extracted from the MHS Data Repository. Naloxone coprescription rates from January 2017 to September 2018 were used to forecast prescribing rates from October 2018 to February 2021 overall and across risk indicators. Forecasted rates were compared with actual rates using Bayesian time series analyses. Results: The probability of receiving a naloxone coprescription was higher for patients whose opioid prescriber and pharmacy were both within military treatment facilities vs both within the purchased-care network. Bayesian time series results indicated that the number of patients who met the criteria for any risk indicator decreased throughout the study period. Naloxone prescribing rates increased across the study period from <1% to 20% and did not significantly differ from the forecasted rates across any and each risk indicator (adjusted P values all >0.05). Conclusion: Future analyses are needed to better understand naloxone prescribing practices and the impact of improvements to electronic health records, decision support tools, and policies.