ABSTRACT
Significant occlusions of the peripheral arterial circulation, responsible for chronic limb ischemia (CLI), are a serious cause of morbidity, mortality, and poor quality of life. The currently available treatment options for patients with severely symptomatic CLI include bypass surgery and arterial revascularization. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for CLI is shown to be as effective as bypass surgery at high-volume centers, and it also offers a less invasive alternative, leading to quicker patient recovery times and lower short-term costs. This case report reviews the current techniques available and discusses an "antegrade-retrograde" angioplasty approach to successfully recanalize such challenging obstructions.
Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon , Arterial Occlusive Diseases/therapy , Ischemia/therapy , Limb Salvage , Lower Extremity/blood supply , Aged , Arterial Occlusive Diseases/complications , Arterial Occlusive Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Arterial Occlusive Diseases/physiopathology , Chronic Disease , Female , Humans , Ischemia/diagnostic imaging , Ischemia/etiology , Ischemia/physiopathology , Radiography, Interventional , Regional Blood Flow , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome , Vascular PatencyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) who are at high risk for cardiovascular collapse during the procedure may benefit from prophylactic circulatory support. The objective was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of prophylactic use of the Impella 2.5 during high-risk PCI. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We used the Impella 2.5 for partial circulatory support during 60 consecutive elective high-risk PCI cases over 20 months. All patients either were deemed inoperable by the cardiac surgeons or were offered bypass surgery but declined. RESULTS: The patients had multiple risk factors including hypertension (95%), diabetes (52%), chronic pulmonary disease (23%), prior myocardial infarction (62%) and prior bypass surgery (18%). Forty-five percent presented with acute coronary syndrome. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 23%±15%. Nearly all patients had multivessel disease (93%), and 60% had left main disease. The average SYNTAX score was 30±9. Despite lesion complexity and high-risk factors, we achieved an angiographic success rate of 96%. Left main lesions were treated in 55% of the patients, and 83% of patients had multiple lesions treated. There was one procedural death. At 30 days postintervention, mortality was 5%, and rates of myocardial infarction, stroke, target vessel revascularization and urgent bypass surgery were 0%. CONCLUSIONS: The single-center experience reported here demonstrates that use of the Impella 2.5 during high-risk PCI in the "real world" - outside the controlled environment of a clinical trial - is safe and feasible.
Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/adverse effects , Coronary Stenosis/therapy , Heart-Assist Devices , Shock/prevention & control , Aged , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/mortality , Coronary Angiography , Coronary Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Stenosis/mortality , Feasibility Studies , Female , Heart-Assist Devices/adverse effects , Hemodynamics , Humans , Male , Michigan , Middle Aged , Prosthesis Design , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Shock/etiology , Shock/mortality , Shock/physiopathology , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Many recently published studies established the admission electrocardiogram as an excellent source of prognostic information in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction. Using our search criteria, we identified a large number of articles but selected only the most relevant in each category. The best predictors of increased short-term mortality are ventricular tachycardia (odds ratio [OR] 6.1, 95% CI 4.6-8.3), ST-segment deviations (OR 5.1, 95% CI 4.6-8.3), high-degree atrioventricular block (OR 5.1, 95% CI 2.1-11.9), and long QRS duration (OR 4.2, 95% CI 1.8-10.4). For increased long-term mortality, the best predictors were ST-segment depression (OR 5.7, 95% CI 2.8-11.6), ST-segment elevation (OR 3.3, 95% CI 2.1-5.1), and left bundle-branch block (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.8-4.3). In addition, our review discusses electrocardiographic markers of poor outcome that were not independent risk factors on multivariate analysis, conflicting findings, and knowledge gaps that can help plan future research efforts.
Subject(s)
Electrocardiography , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Atrial Fibrillation/epidemiology , Bundle-Branch Block/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Heart Conduction System/physiopathology , Heart Rate , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Multivariate Analysis , Myocardial Infarction/drug therapy , Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Myocardial Infarction/physiopathology , Myocardial Revascularization , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Tachycardia, Ventricular/epidemiology , Thrombolytic TherapyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Elderly patients are less likely to receive statin therapy because of concerns about their side-effects. However, 80% of deaths related to coronary heart disease occur in patients above the age of 65 years. This study evaluated the potential benefit of early administration of statins in elderly patients presenting with an acute coronary syndrome. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of 774 elderly patients (>65 years) with acute coronary syndrome. The patients were divided into two groups. The first group, consisting of 611 patients, received statins within the first 24 hours of admission, while the second group, consisting of 163 patients, received statins after the first 24 hours. The end points studied included death, heart failure/pulmonary edema, stroke and recurrent myocardial infarction during hospitalization. RESULTS: Multivariable logistic regression analysis, adjusting for baseline demographics, co-morbidities and chronic statin therapy, showed that the occurrence of heart failure/pulmonary edema during hospitalization was relatively lower among those who received statins within 24 hours of admission (odds ratio: 0.5, 95% CI: 0.27-0.94, p=0.03). The C statistic for the model was 0.79. CONCLUSION: Elderly patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome seem to benefit from early statin therapy, and have significantly lower rates of heart failure and pulmonary edema than those who are administered statins at a later stage.
Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome/drug therapy , Heart Failure/prevention & control , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Acute Coronary Syndrome/complications , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Heart Failure/etiology , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This study attempts to determine the incidence of established acute pulmonary embolism (PE) in a community/teaching general hospital. BACKGROUND: The reported incidence of objectively diagnosed acute PE among hospitalized adults in a large urban hospital or major university hospital ranges from 0.27 to 0.40%. Whether the incidence of PE in other categories of hospitals fits within this narrow range is unknown. METHODS: Patients with acute PE diagnosed by ventilation/perfusion lung scan, pulmonary angiography, compression ultrasound in a patient with suspected PE, autopsy, or (by coincidence) lung biopsy were identified among patients hospitalized during a 2-year period from 1998 to 2000. The incidence of PE was also determined according to age, sex, and race. RESULTS: Among adult patients (> or = 20 years old), the incidence of established acute PE was 95 of 34,567 patients (0.27%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.22 to 0.34%). No PE was diagnosed in patients < 20 years old. The incidence of PE in men was 36 of 13,722 patients (0.26%; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.36%); in women, it was 59 of 20,845 patients (0.2%; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.36%; not significant [NS]). The incidence in African-Americans adults was 10 of 4,344 patients (0.23%; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.42%); in white adults, it was 84 of 28,615 patients (0.29%; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.36%; NS). CONCLUSION: The incidence of PE in a community/teaching general hospital was comparable to the incidence in a large urban-care center and in a major university hospital.