Functional Assessment of Myocardial Bridging With Conventional and Diastolic Fractional Flow Reserve: Vasodilator Versus Inotropic Provocation.

Background Functional assessment of myocardial bridging (MB) remains clinically challenging because of the dynamic nature of the extravascular coronary compression with a certain degree of intraluminal coronary reduction. The aim of our study was to assess performance and diagnostic value of diastolic-fractional flow reserve (d-FFR) during dobutamine provocation versus conventional-FFR during adenosine provocation with exercise-induced myocardial ischemia as reference. Methods and Results This prospective study includes 60 symptomatic patients (45 men, mean age 57±9 years) with MB on the left anterior descending artery and systolic compression ≥50% diameter stenosis. Patients were evaluated by exercise stress-echocardiography test, and both conventional-FFR and d-FFR in the distal segment of left anterior descending artery during intravenous infusion of adenosine (140 µg/kg per minute) and dobutamine (10-50 µg/kg per minute), separately. Exercise-stress-echocardiography test was positive for myocardial ischemia in 19/60 patients (32%). Conventional-FFR during adenosine and peak dobutamine had similar values (0.84±0.04 versus 0.84±0.06, P=0.852), but d-FFR during peak dobutamine was significantly lower than d-FFR during adenosine (0.76±0.08 versus 0.79±0.08, P=0.018). Diastolic-FFR during peak dobutamine was significantly lower in the exercise-stress-echocardiography test -positive group compared with the exercise- stress-echocardiography test -negative group (0.70±0.07 versus 0.79±0.06, P<0.001), but not during adenosine (0.79±0.07 versus 0.78±0.09, P=0.613). Among physiological indices, d-FFR during peak dobutamine was the only independent predictor of functionally significant MB (odds ratio, 0.870; 95% CI, 0.767-0.986, P=0.03). Receiver-operating characteristics curve analysis identifies the optimal d-FFR during peak dobutamine cut-off ≤0.76 (area under curve, 0.927; 95% CI, 0.833-1.000; P<0.001) with a sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value of 95%, 95%, 90%, and 98%, respectively, for identifying MB associated with stress-induced ischemia. Conclusions Diastolic-FFR, but not conventional-FFR, during inotropic stimulation with high-dose dobutamine, in comparison to vasodilatation with adenosine, provides more reliable functional significance of MB in relation to stress-induced myocardial ischemia.

The Coronary ARteriogenesis with combined Heparin and EXercise therapy in chronic refractory Angina (CARHEXA) trial: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled stress echocardiographic study.

BACKGROUND: Coronary collateral circulation exerts protective effects on myocardial ischaemia due to coronary artery disease and can be promoted by exercise with heparin co-administration. Whether this arteriogenetic effect is accompanied by functional improvement of left ventricle during stress and lessening of angina symptoms remains unknown. AIMS: To evaluate the anti-ischaemic efficacy of heparin plus exercise in coronary artery disease. METHODS: In a prospective, single-centre, randomized, double-blind study we recruited 32 'no-option' patients (27 males; mean age 61 ± 8 years) with stable angina, exercise-induced ischaemia and coronary artery disease not suitable for revascularization. All underwent a two-week cycle of exercise (two exercise sessions per day, five days per week) and were randomized (n = 16 per group) to intravenous placebo (0.9% saline) versus unfractionated heparin (5.000 IU intravenously), 10 min prior to exercise. We assessed Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class, stress electrocardiogram and echo parameters (wall motion score index) and computed tomography angiography for collaterals. RESULTS: After two-week cycle, Canadian Cardiovascular Society class statistically decreased in both groups (heparin plus exercise group: 2.6 ± 0.7 to 1.9 ± 0.7, p < 0.001, exercise group: 2.4 ± 0.7 to 2.1 ± 0.9, p = 0.046). Only the heparin plus exercise group improved time-to-ST segment depression (before 270, 228-327 s vs. after 339, 280-360 s, p = 0.012) and wall motion score index (before 1.38 ± 0.25 vs. after 1.28 ± 0.18, p = 0.005). By multi-slice computed tomography angiography, collaterals improved in 12/15 (80%) in the heparin plus exercise group versus 2/16 (12.5%) in the exercise group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A two-week, 10-test cycle of heparin plus exercise is better than exercise in improving angina class, myocardial ischaemia and collaterals by computed tomography angiography.

Prediction of a good response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with severe dilated cardyomyopathy: could conventional echocardiography be the answer after all?

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the performance of echocardiographic parameters to predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). BACKGROUND: CRT reduces morbidity and mortality due to the proper selection of candidates for CRT. METHODS: The 12-month trial was performed on 70 optimally medicated patients with standard inclusion criteria: NYHA class III or IV heart failure, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35%, and QRS ≥ 120 ms. All parameters were evaluated by conventional and tissue Doppler-based methods. Indicator of positive CRT response was more than 20% in improvement of LVEF. RESULTS: LVEF increased >20% in 42 patients. Out of 43 tested baseline echocardiographic parameters, 12 showed statistical difference between responders and nonresponders. Out of these 12 parameters, six (LVSV, LVSI, LVFS, RVd, VPMR, and PISA) had modest to moderately good ability to predict LVEF response with sensitivity ranging from 62.2% to 82.4%, and specificity ranging from 56.5% to 81.2%. For those parameters, the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for positive response to CRT was ≤0.76. Multivariate regression analysis resulted in selection of LVSI and LVFS as possible predictive independent parameters for a good response. The cutoff value for LVSI was 38.7 mL/m(2) (P = 0.045) and for LVFS was 13% (P = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: Contribution of LVSI and LVFS is to be confirmed in larger trials. Simplicity of their assessment by conventional echocardiography could be an argument for adding them to the inclusion criteria for CRT in severe heart failure patients.