Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 30
Filter
1.
NPJ Parkinsons Dis ; 10(1): 114, 2024 Jun 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38851717

ABSTRACT

The effects of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) on anxiety in Parkinson's disease (PD) are understudied. We identified clinical predictors of STN-DBS effects on anxiety in this study. In this prospective, open-label, multicentre study, we assessed patients with anxiety undergoing STN-DBS for PD preoperatively and at 6-month follow-up postoperatively. We assessed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-anxiety and depression subscales), Unified PD Rating Scale-motor examination, Scales for Outcomes in PD-motor (SCOPA-M)-activities of daily living (ADL) and -motor complications, Non-Motor Symptom Scale (NMSS), PDQuestionnaire-8 (PDQ-8), and levodopa-equivalent daily dose. We tested changes at follow-up with Wilcoxon signed-rank test and corrected for multiple comparisons (Bonferroni method). We identified patients with a clinically relevant anxiety improvement of anxiety based on a designated threshold of ½ standard deviation of baseline HADS-anxiety. Moreover, we investigated predictors of HADS-anxiety changes with correlations and linear regressions. We included 50 patients with clinically relevant baseline anxiety (i.e., HADS-anxiety ≥ 8) aged 63.1 years ± 8.3 with 10.4 years ± 4.5 PD duration. HADS-anxiety improved significantly at 6-month follow-up as 80% of our cohort experienced clinically relevant anxiety improvement. In predictor analyses, worse baseline SCOPA-ADL and NMSS-urinary domain were associated with greater HADS-anxiety improvements. HADS-anxiety and PDQ-8 changes correlated moderately. Worse preoperative ADL and urinary symptoms predicted favourable postoperative anxiety outcome, which in turn was directly proportionate to greater QoL improvement. This study highlights the importance of detailed anxiety assessments alongside other non-motor and motor symptoms when advising and monitoring patients undergoing STN-DBS for PD.

2.
NPJ Parkinsons Dis ; 10(1): 91, 2024 Apr 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38671017

ABSTRACT

Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS) is an established therapy in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). Motor and non-motor outcomes, however, show considerable inter-individual variability. Preoperative morphometry-based metrics have recently received increasing attention to explain treatment effects. As evidence for the prediction of non-motor outcomes is limited, we sought to investigate the association between metrics of voxel-based morphometry and short-term non-motor outcomes following STN-DBS in this prospective open-label study. Forty-nine PD patients underwent structural MRI and a comprehensive clinical assessment at preoperative baseline and 6-month follow-up. Voxel-based morphometry was used to assess associations between cerebral volume and non-motor outcomes corrected for multiple comparisons using a permutation-based approach. We replicated existing results associating volume loss of the superior frontal cortex with subpar motor outcomes. Overall non-motor burden, however, was not significantly associated with morphometric features, limiting its use as a marker to inform patient selection and holistic preoperative counselling.

3.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(1): e2352177, 2024 Jan 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38236600

ABSTRACT

Importance: Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS) improves quality of life (QOL) in patients with advanced Parkinson disease (PD). However, controlled studies with more than 3 years of follow-up are lacking. Objective: To investigate the long-term effects of STN-DBS on QOL compared with standard-of-care medication (MED). Design, Setting, and Participants: In this prospective, observational, quasi-experimental, longitudinal nonrandomized controlled trial, 183 patients were screened for eligibility and 167 were enrolled from March 1, 2011, to May 31, 2017, at 3 European university centers. Propensity score matching for demographic and clinical characteristics was applied to 108 patients with PD (62 in the STN-DBS group and 46 in the MED group), resulting in a well-balanced, matched subcohort of 25 patients per group. Data analysis was performed from September 2022 to January 2023. Exposure: Treatment for PD of STN-DBS or MED. Main Outcomes and Measures: Assessments included Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire 8 (PDQ-8), Unified PD Rating Scale-motor examination, Scales for Outcomes in PD-activities of daily living (ADL) and motor complications, and levodopa-equivalent daily dose. Within-group longitudinal outcome changes, between-group differences, and correlations of change scores were analyzed. Results: The study population in the analysis included 108 patients (mean [SD] age, 63.7 [8.3] years; 66 [61.1%] male). At 5-year follow-up, PDQ-8 and ADL worsened only in the MED group (PDQ-8 change, -10.9; 95% CI, -19.0 to -2.7; P = .01; ADL change: -2.0; 95% CI, -3.1 to -0.8; P = .002), whereas both outcomes remained stable in the STN-DBS group (PDQ-8 change, -4.3; 95% CI, -13.2 to 4.7; P = .34; ADL change, -0.8; 95% CI, -2.5 to 1.0; P = .38). Changes in PDQ-8 and ADL correlated moderately (rs = .40, P = .008). Furthermore, STN-DBS outcomes were favorable for motor complications (median difference in change scores between STN-DBS and MED, -2.0; 95% CI, -4.0 to -1.0; P = .003), mobility (-1.0; 95% CI, -2.0 to 0; P = .03), and levodopa-equivalent daily dose reduction (-821.4; 95% CI, -1111.9 to -530.8; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: This study provides evidence of differences in QOL outcomes at 5-year follow-up between STN-DBS (stable) and MED (worsened), mainly driven by the favorable effect of STN-DBS on mobility (class IIb evidence). The association between changes in QOL and ADL, but not motor impairment or complications, highlights the relative importance of ADL outcomes for long-term DBS assessments. Trial Registration: German ClinicalTrials Registry: DRKS00006735.


Subject(s)
Parkinson Disease , Quality of Life , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Activities of Daily Living , Levodopa , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Prospective Studies , Aged
4.
Sensors (Basel) ; 23(20)2023 Oct 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37896714

ABSTRACT

Clinical rating scales for tremors have significant limitations due to low resolution, high rater dependency, and lack of applicability in outpatient settings. Reliable, quantitative approaches for assessing tremor severity are warranted, especially evaluating treatment effects, e.g., of deep brain stimulation (DBS). We aimed to investigate how different accelerometry metrics can objectively classify tremor amplitude of Essential Tremor (ET) and tremor in Parkinson's Disease (PD). We assessed 860 resting and postural tremor trials in 16 patients with ET and 25 patients with PD under different DBS settings. Clinical ratings were compared to different metrics, based on either spectral components in the tremorband or pure acceleration, derived from simultaneous triaxial accelerometry captured at the index finger and wrist. Nonlinear regression was applied to a training dataset to determine the relationship between accelerometry and clinical ratings, which was then evaluated in a holdout dataset. All of the investigated accelerometry metrics could predict clinical tremor ratings with a high concordance (>70%) and substantial interrater reliability (Cohen's weighted Kappa > 0.7) in out-of-sample data. Finger-worn accelerometry performed slightly better than wrist-worn accelerometry. We conclude that triaxial accelerometry reliably quantifies resting and postural tremor amplitude in ET and PD patients. A full release of our dataset and software allows for implementation, development, training, and validation of novel methods.


Subject(s)
Essential Tremor , Parkinson Disease , Humans , Tremor/diagnosis , Reproducibility of Results , Parkinson Disease/diagnosis , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Essential Tremor/diagnosis , Accelerometry/methods
6.
J Parkinsons Dis ; 13(5): 829-839, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37334621

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Stigma is significant in Parkinson's disease (PD). However, no specific tool is available to assess stigma in PD comprehensively. OBJECTIVE: This pilot study aimed to develop and test a stigma questionnaire specific to PD patients (PDStigmaQuest). METHODS: Based on a literature review, clinical experience, expert consensus, and patients' feedback, we developed the preliminary, patient-completed PDStigmaQuest in German language. It included 28 items covering five stigma domains: uncomfortableness, anticipated stigma, hiding, experienced stigma, and internalized stigma. In this pilot study, 81 participants (PD patients, healthy controls, caregivers, and health professionals) were included to investigate the acceptability, feasibility, comprehensibility, and psychometric properties of the PDStigmaQuest. RESULTS: The PDStigmaQuest showed 0.3% missing data points for PD patients and 0.4% for controls, suggesting high data quality. Moderate floor effects, but no ceiling effects were found. In the item analysis, most items met the standard criteria of item difficulty, item variance, and item-total correlation. Cronbach's alpha was > 0.7 for four of five domains. PD patients' domain scores were significantly higher than healthy controls' for uncomfortableness, anticipated stigma, and internalized stigma. Feedback to the questionnaire was predominantly positive. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that the PDStigmaQuest is a feasible, comprehensive, and relevant tool to assess stigma in PD and helps to understand the construct of stigma in PD further. Based on our results, the preliminary version of the PDStigmaQuest was modified and is currently validated in a larger population of PD patients for use in clinical and research settings.


Subject(s)
Parkinson Disease , Humans , Pilot Projects , Quality of Life , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and Questionnaires , Psychometrics
7.
Neurol Res Pract ; 5(1): 26, 2023 Jun 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37287054

ABSTRACT

Here we report on a patient with Parkinson's Disease and camptocormia due to Myofibrillar Myopathy Type 3. By leading the reader through the clinical reasoning process and highlighting the respective red flags we aim to increase the readers' awareness for the differential diagnosis of camptocormia.

8.
Mov Disord ; 38(7): 1236-1252, 2023 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37147135

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To compare drug regimens across clinical trials in Parkinson's disease (PD) conversion formulae between antiparkinsonian drugs have been developed. These are reported in relation to levodopa as the benchmark drug in PD pharmacotherapy as 'levodopa equivalent dose' (LED). Currently, the LED conversion formulae proposed in 2010 by Tomlinson et al. based on a systematic review are predominantly used. However, new drugs with established and novel mechanisms of action and novel formulations of longstanding drugs have been developed since 2010. Therefore, consensus proposals for updated LED conversion formulae are needed. OBJECTIVES: To update LED conversion formulae based on a systematic review. METHODS: The MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and Embase databases were searched from January 2010 to July 2021. Additionally, in a standardized process according to the GRADE grid method, consensus proposals were issued for drugs with scarce data on levodopa dose equivalency. RESULTS: The systematic database search yielded 3076 articles of which 682 were eligible for inclusion in the systematic review. Based on these data and the standardized consensus process, we present proposals for LED conversion formulae for a wide range of drugs that are currently available for the pharmacotherapy of PD or are expected to be introduced soon. CONCLUSIONS: The LED conversion formulae issued in this Position Paper will serve as a research tool to compare the equivalence of antiparkinsonian medication across PD study cohorts and facilitate research on the clinical efficacy of pharmacological and surgical treatments as well as other non-pharmacological interventions in PD. © 2023 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.


Subject(s)
Levodopa , Parkinson Disease , Humans , Levodopa/therapeutic use , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , Antiparkinson Agents/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
9.
Neuromodulation ; 26(2): 340-347, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35219570

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Whether treatment response in patients with Parkinson disease depends on brain atrophy is insufficiently understood. The goal of this study is to identify specific atrophy patterns associated with response to dopaminergic therapy and deep brain stimulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, we analyzed the association of gray matter brain atrophy patterns, as identified by voxel-based morphometry, with acute response to levodopa (N = 118) and subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (N = 39). Motor status was measured as a change in points on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale III score. Baseline values were obtained before surgery, after cessation of dopaminergic medication for at least 12 hours; response to medication was assessed after administration of a standardized dose of levodopa. Response to deep brain stimulation was measured three months after surgery in the clinical condition after withdrawal of dopaminergic medication. RESULTS: Although frontoparietal brain gray matter loss was associated with subpar response to deep brain stimulation, there was no significant link between brain atrophy and response to levodopa. CONCLUSION: We conclude that response to deep brain stimulation relies on gray matter integrity; hence, gray matter loss may present a risk factor for poor response to deep brain stimulation and may be considered when making decision regarding clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Deep Brain Stimulation , Parkinson Disease , Subthalamic Nucleus , Humans , Levodopa/therapeutic use , Parkinson Disease/diagnostic imaging , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Subthalamic Nucleus/diagnostic imaging , Subthalamic Nucleus/physiology , Treatment Outcome
12.
J Parkinsons Dis ; 12(5): 1497-1505, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35491797

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) is a well-established treatment for patients with Parkinson's disease. Previous acute challenge studies suggested that short pulse widths might increase the therapeutic window while maintaining motor symptom control with a decrease in energy consumption. However, only little is known about the effect of short pulse width stimulation beyond the setting of an acute challenge. OBJECTIVE: To compare 4 weeks of STN-DBS with conventional pulse width stimulation (60 µs) to 4 weeks of STN-DBS with short pulse width stimulation (30 µs) regarding motor symptom control. METHODS: This study was a monocentric, double-blinded, randomized crossover non-inferiority trial investigating whether short pulse width stimulation with 30 µs maintains equal motor control as conventional 60 µs stimulation over a period of 4 weeks (German Clinical Trials Register No. DRKS00017528). Primary outcome was the difference in motor symptom control as assessed by a motor diary. Secondary outcomes included energy consumption measures, non-motor effects, side-effects, and quality of life. RESULTS: Due to a high dropout rate, the calculated sample size of 27 patients was not met and 24 patients with Parkinson's disease and STN-DBS were included in the final analysis. However, there were no differences in any investigated outcome parameter between the two treatment conditions. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that short pulse width settings (30 µs) provide non-inferior motor symptom control as conventional (60 µs) stimulation without significant differences in energy consumption. Future studies are warranted to evaluate a potential benefit of short pulse width settings in patients with pronounced dyskinesia.


Subject(s)
Deep Brain Stimulation , Parkinson Disease , Subthalamic Nucleus , Cross-Over Studies , Humans , Parkinson Disease/complications , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Quality of Life , Subthalamic Nucleus/physiology , Treatment Outcome
13.
Neuromodulation ; 25(6): 877-887, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33476474

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Open questions remain regarding the optimal target, or sweetspot, for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in, for example, Parkinson's disease. Previous studies introduced different methods of mapping DBS effects to determine sweetspots. While having a direct impact on surgical targeting and postoperative programming in DBS, these methods so far have not been compared. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study investigated five previously published DBS mapping approaches regarding their potential to correctly identify a predefined target. Methods were investigated in silico in eight different use-case scenarios, which incorporated different types of clinical data, noise, and differences in underlying neuroanatomy. Dice coefficients were calculated to determine the overlap between identified sweetspots and the predefined target. Additionally, out-of-sample predictive capabilities were assessed using the amount of explained variance R2. RESULTS: The five investigated methods resulted in highly variable sweetspots. Methods based on voxel-wise statistics against average outcomes showed the best performance overall. While predictive capabilities were high, even in the best of cases Dice coefficients remained limited to values around 0.5, highlighting the overall limitations of sweetspot identification. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the strengths and limitations of current approaches to DBS sweetspot mapping. Those limitations need to be taken into account when considering the clinical implications. All future approaches should be investigated in silico before being applied to clinical data.


Subject(s)
Deep Brain Stimulation , Parkinson Disease , Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Humans , Parkinson Disease/therapy
15.
NPJ Parkinsons Dis ; 7(1): 48, 2021 Jun 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34103534

ABSTRACT

To identify predictors of 36-month follow-up quality of life (QoL) outcome after bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) in Parkinson's disease (PD). In this ongoing, prospective, multicenter international study (Cologne, Manchester, London) including 73 patients undergoing STN-DBS, we assessed the following scales preoperatively and at 6-month and 36-month follow-up: PD Questionnaire-8 (PDQ-8), NMSScale (NMSS), Scales for Outcomes in PD (SCOPA)-motor examination, -activities of daily living, and -complications, and levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD). We analyzed factors associated with QoL improvement at 36-month follow-up based on (1) correlations between baseline test scores and QoL improvement, (2) step-wise linear regressions with baseline test scores as independent and QoL improvement as dependent variables, (3) logistic regressions and receiver operating characteristic curves using a dichotomized variable "QoL responders"/"non-responders". At both follow-ups, NMSS total score, SCOPA-motor examination, and -complications improved and LEDD was reduced significantly. PDQ-8 improved at 6-month follow-up with subsequent decrements in gains at 36-month follow-up when 61.6% of patients were categorized as "QoL non-responders". Correlations, linear, and logistic regression analyses found greater PDQ-8 improvements in patients with younger age, worse PDQ-8, and worse specific NMS at baseline, such as 'difficulties experiencing pleasure' and 'problems sustaining concentration'. Baseline SCOPA scores were not associated with PDQ-8 changes. Our results provide evidence that 36-month QoL changes depend on baseline neuropsychological and neuropsychiatric non-motor symptoms burden. These findings highlight the need for an assessment of a wide range of non-motor and motor symptoms when advising and selecting individuals for DBS therapy.

17.
J Parkinsons Dis ; 11(1): 323-335, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33074192

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Sleep disturbances and neuropsychiatric symptoms are some of the most common nonmotor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD). The effect of subthalamic stimulation (STN-DBS) on these symptoms beyond a short-term follow-up is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To examine 36-month effects of bilateral STN-DBS on quality of sleep, depression, anxiety, and quality of life (QoL) compared to standard-of-care medical therapy (MED) in PD. METHODS: In this prospective, controlled, observational, propensity score matched, international multicenter study, we assessed sleep disturbances using the PDSleep Scale-1 (PDSS), QoL employing the PDQuestionnaire-8 (PDQ-8), motor disorder with the Scales for Outcomes in PD (SCOPA), anxiety and depression with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and dopaminergic medication requirements (LEDD). Within-group longitudinal outcome changes were tested using Wilcoxon signed-rank and between-group longitudinal differences of change scores with Mann-Whitney U tests. Spearman correlations analyzed the relationships of outcome parameter changes at follow-up. RESULTS: Propensity score matching applied on 159 patients (STN-DBS n = 75, MED n = 84) resulted in 40 patients in each treatment group. At 36-month follow-up, STN-DBS led to significantly better PDSS and PDQ-8 change scores, which were significantly correlated. We observed no significant effects for HADS and no significant correlations between change scores in PDSS, HADS, and LEDD. CONCLUSIONS: We report Class IIb evidence of beneficial effects of STN-DBS on quality of sleep at 36-month follow-up, which were associated with QoL improvement independent of depression and dopaminergic medication. Our study highlights the importance of sleep for assessments of DBS outcomes.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/therapy , Deep Brain Stimulation , Depression/therapy , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Sleep Wake Disorders/therapy , Subthalamic Nucleus , Aged , Anxiety/etiology , Depression/etiology , Dopamine Agents/pharmacology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Parkinson Disease/complications , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , Quality of Life , Sleep Wake Disorders/etiology
18.
Ann Neurol ; 89(2): 315-326, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33201528

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to gain insights into structural networks associated with stimulation-induced dysarthria (SID) and to predict stimulation-induced worsening of intelligibility in essential tremor patients with bilateral thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS). METHODS: Monopolar reviews were conducted in 14 essential tremor patients. Testing included determination of SID thresholds, intelligibility ratings, and a fast syllable repetition task. Volumes of tissue activated (VTAs) were calculated to identify discriminative fibers for stimulation-induced worsening of intelligibility in a structural connectome. The resulting fiber-based atlas structure was then validated in a leave-one-out design. RESULTS: Fibers determined as discriminative for stimulation-induced worsening of intelligibility were mainly connected to the ipsilateral precentral gyrus as well as to both cerebellar hemispheres and the ipsilateral brain stem. In the thalamic area, they ran laterally to the thalamus and posteromedially to the subthalamic nucleus, in close proximity, mainly anterolaterally, to fibers beneficial for tremor control as published by Al-Fatly et al in 2019. The overlap of the respective clinical stimulation setting's VTAs with these fibers explained 62.4% (p < 0.001) of the variance of stimulation-induced change in intelligibility in a leave-one-out analysis. INTERPRETATION: This study demonstrates that SID in essential tremor patients is associated with both motor cortex and cerebellar connectivity. Furthermore, the identified fiber-based atlas structure might contribute to future postoperative programming strategies to achieve optimal tremor control without speech impairment in essential tremor patients with thalamic DBS. ANN NEUROL 2021;89:315-326.


Subject(s)
Cerebellum/physiopathology , Deep Brain Stimulation/adverse effects , Dysarthria/etiology , Essential Tremor/therapy , Motor Cortex/physiopathology , Speech Intelligibility , Aged , Ataxia/physiopathology , Connectome , Dysarthria/diagnostic imaging , Dysarthria/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Muscle Contraction/physiology , Neural Pathways/physiopathology , Ventral Thalamic Nuclei
19.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry ; 91(7): 687-694, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32371534

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine 36-month effects of bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) on non-motor symptoms (NMS) compared with standard-of-care medical treatment (MED) in Parkinson's disease (PD). METHODS: Here we report the 36-month follow-up of a prospective, observational, controlled, international multicentre study of the NILS cohort. Assessments included NMSScale (NMSS), PDQuestionnaire-8 (PDQ-8), Scales for Outcomes in PD (SCOPA)-motor examination, -activities of daily living, and -complications, and levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD). Propensity score matching resulted in a pseudo-randomised sub-cohort balancing baseline demographic and clinical characteristics between the STN-DBS and MED groups. Within-group longitudinal outcome changes were analysed using Wilcoxon signed-rank and between-group differences of change scores with Mann-Whitney U test. Strength of clinical responses was quantified with Cohen's effect size. In addition, bivariate correlations of change scores were explored. RESULTS: Propensity score matching applied on the cohort of 151 patients (STN-DBS n=67, MED n=84) resulted in a well-balanced sub-cohort including 38 patients per group. After 36 months, STN-DBS significantly improved NMSS, PDQ-8, SCOPA-motor examination and -complications and reduced LEDD. Significant between-group differences, all favouring STN-DBS, were found for NMSS, SCOPA-motor complications, LEDD (large effects), motor examination and PDQ-8 (moderate effects). Furthermore, significant differences were found for the sleep/fatigue, urinary (large effects) and miscellaneous NMSS domains (moderate effects). NMSS total and PDQ-8 change scores correlated significantly. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides Class IIb evidence for beneficial effects of STN-DBS on NMS at 36-month follow-up which also correlated with quality of life improvements. This highlights the importance of NMS for DBS outcomes assessments.


Subject(s)
Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Fatigue/physiopathology , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Sleep/physiology , Subthalamic Nucleus/physiopathology , Activities of Daily Living , Aged , Antiparkinson Agents/therapeutic use , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Levodopa/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , Parkinson Disease/physiopathology , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
20.
Ann Neurol ; 87(6): 962-975, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32239535

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) in Parkinson's disease (PD) not only stimulates focal target structures but also affects distributed brain networks. The impact this network modulation has on non-motor DBS effects is not well-characterized. By focusing on the affective domain, we systematically investigate the impact of electrode placement and associated structural connectivity on changes in depressive symptoms following STN-DBS, which have been reported to improve, worsen, or remain unchanged. METHODS: Depressive symptoms before and after STN-DBS surgery were documented in 116 patients with PD from 3 DBS centers (Berlin, Queensland, and Cologne). Based on individual electrode reconstructions, the volumes of tissue activated (VTAs) were estimated and combined with normative connectome data to identify structural connections passing through VTAs. Berlin and Queensland cohorts formed a training and cross-validation dataset used to identify structural connectivity explaining change in depressive symptoms. The Cologne data served as the test-set for which depressive symptom change was predicted. RESULTS: Structural connectivity was linked to depressive symptom change under STN-DBS. An optimal connectivity map trained on the Berlin cohort could predict changes in depressive symptoms in Queensland patients and vice versa. Furthermore, the joint training-set map predicted changes in depressive symptoms in the independent test-set. Worsening of depressive symptoms was associated with left prefrontal connectivity. INTERPRETATION: Fibers connecting the electrode with left prefrontal areas were associated with worsening of depressive symptoms. Our results suggest that for the left STN-DBS lead, placement impacting fibers to left prefrontal areas should be avoided to maximize improvement of depressive symptoms. ANN NEUROL 2020;87:962-975.


Subject(s)
Deep Brain Stimulation/adverse effects , Depression/etiology , Depression/psychology , Neural Pathways/diagnostic imaging , Prefrontal Cortex/diagnostic imaging , Subthalamic Nucleus , Affect , Aged , Brain Mapping , Connectome , Depression/diagnostic imaging , Electrodes, Implanted , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Neuroimaging , Parkinson Disease/complications , Parkinson Disease/psychology , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Subthalamic Nucleus/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...