Phase I study of intravenous oxaliplatin and intraperitoneal docetaxel in recurrent ovarian cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy improves survival in ovarian cancer but its use has been limited by toxicity with cisplatin-based regimens. The primary objective of this study was to define the maximum tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicity of intravenous (IV) oxaliplatin and IP docetaxel in women with recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube or peritoneal cancer. Secondary objectives were response rate, time to progression, symptom interference with quality of life, and pharmacokinetics. METHODS: Patients received a constant dose of oxaliplatin 75 mg/m2 IV on day 1 and docetaxel escalating from 50 mg/m2 IP on day 2 every 3 weeks using a 3 + 3 design. Treatment continued until disease progression, remission, or intolerable toxicity occurred. Plasma and IP samples were taken to determine drug concentrations. Patients completed the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory weekly. RESULTS: Twelve patients were included. The median number of cycles was 4 (range 2-6) with a median time to progression of 4.5 months. Among eight patients with measurable disease, the best responses were partial response in two patients, stable disease in five, and progressive disease in one. A total of 14 grade 3-4 toxicities were noted, most commonly hematologic. Four patients, all dose level 3, had six dose-limiting toxicities: two with prolonged neutropenia, one with infection, one with hyponatremia, and two with abdominal pain. Dose level 3 was therefore considered intolerable. The mean±SD ratio of docetaxel area under the curve (AUC) in IP fluid to AUC in plasma was 229±111. Symptom interference with life activities steadily decreased from cycle 1 to 5. CONCLUSIONS: Oxaliplatin 75 mg/m2 IV on day 1 and docetaxel 75 mg/m2 IP on day 2 was the maximum tolerated dose. Most patients had partial response or stable disease, even in a heavily pre-treated population. At this dose level, patient-reported outcomes demonstrate temporary but tolerable decrements in quality of life.

Phase I study of intravenous (IV) docetaxel and intraperitoneal (IP) oxaliplatin in recurrent ovarian and fallopian tube cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of IV docetaxel and IP oxaliplatin in women with recurrent ovarian (OV), fallopian tube (FT) or peritoneal (PP) cancer. Secondary objectives included response rate, time to progression, pharmacokinetics (PK) and quality of life (QoL). METHODS: Patients received docetaxel 75mg/m(2) IV day (d) 1 and oxaliplatin escalating from 50mg/m(2) IP d2 every 3weeks using a 3+3 design. Treatment continued until disease progression, remission, or intolerable toxicity. Plasma and IP samples were taken to determine drug concentrations. MD Anderson Symptom Inventory and symptom interference scale were completed weekly. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were included. Median number of cycles was 6 (range 1-10). Ten patients had measureable disease. Best response was partial response (PR-2), stable disease (SD-7), and progressive disease (PD-1). Twenty-one Grades 3-4 toxicities were noted, commonly hematologic. Two patients had DLTs: prolonged neutropenia (1) and abdominal pain (1). MTD was d1 docetaxel 75mg/m(2) IV and d2 oxaliplatin 50mg/m(2) IP. Symptom burden peaked week one and returned to baseline by week two of each cycle on dose level 1. Dose level 2 had persistently high symptom burden and interference. At IP oxaliplatin doses of 50mg/m(2), total unbound drug exposure (AUC) averaged 8 times larger and Cmax reached concentrations 50-fold greater in IP fluid compared to plasma. CONCLUSIONS: Docetaxel 75mg/m(2) IV d1 and oxaliplatin 50mg/m(2) IP d2 is the MTD. Most patients had PR or SD. Patient-reported outcomes demonstrate temporary but tolerable decrements in QoL. IP oxaliplatin provides PK advantages over IV administration.

The effects of nanoparticle drug loading on the pharmacokinetics of anticancer agents.

Major advances in carrier-mediated agents, which include nanoparticles, nanosomes and conjugates, have revolutionized drug delivery capabilities over the past decade. While providing numerous advantages, such as greater solubility, duration of exposure and delivery to the site of action over their small-molecule counterparts, there is substantial variability in systemic clearance and distribution, tumor delivery and pharmacologic effects (efficacy and toxicity) of these agents. This review provides an overview of factors that affect the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of carrier-mediated agents in preclinical models and patients.

Nanoparticles and the mononuclear phagocyte system: pharmacokinetics and applications for inflammatory diseases.

Nanoparticles (NPs) provide several advantages over the small molecule drugs including prolonged circulation time and enhanced delivery to targeted sites. Once a NP enters the body, it interacts with host's immune system and is engulfed by cells of the mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS). The interaction between NPs and the immune cells can result in immunosuppression or immunostimulation, which may enhance or reduce the treatment effects of NPs. Therefore, it is critical to understand the interactions between NPs and the immune system in order to optimize the treatment benefit and minimize the undesirable toxicities of NPs. This review elaborates on the interaction between NP and the MPS and its impacts on the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of NPs and applications for inflammatory diseases. This review also encompasses an overview of NPs being developed for treatment of inflammatory diseases.