Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 43(1): 3-11, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34253266

ABSTRACT

This consensus statement by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine (AMDA), the Association for Professionals in Epidemiology and Infection Control (APIC), the HIV Medicine Association (HIVMA), the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (PIDS), and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists (SIDP) recommends that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination should be a condition of employment for all healthcare personnel in facilities in the United States. Exemptions from this policy apply to those with medical contraindications to all COVID-19 vaccines available in the United States and other exemptions as specified by federal or state law. The consensus statement also supports COVID-19 vaccination of nonemployees functioning at a healthcare facility (eg, students, contract workers, volunteers, etc).


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , COVID-19 Vaccines , Child , Delivery of Health Care , Employment , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , United States/epidemiology , Vaccination
4.
N C Med J ; 82(1): 43-45, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33397754

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has illuminated many painful truths in our state. This commentary addresses some of them, including racism, lack of universal health care access, and defunded public health infrastructure, from the perspective of a local county health department medical director. We have an opportunity to fundamentally improve North Carolinians' collective health, but only if we are willing to reckon with past and current failings.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Racism , Humans , Pandemics , Public Health , SARS-CoV-2
6.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 69(39): 1416-1418, 2020 Oct 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33001871

ABSTRACT

Preventing transmission of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), in institutes of higher education presents a unique set of challenges because of the presence of congregate living settings and difficulty limiting socialization and group gatherings. Before August 2020, minimal data were available regarding COVID-19 outbreaks in these settings. On August 3, 2020, university A in North Carolina broadly opened campus for the first time since transitioning to primarily remote learning in March. Consistent with CDC guidance at that time (1,2), steps were taken to prevent the spread of SARS-CoV-2 on campus. During August 3-25, 670 laboratory-confirmed cases of COVID-19 were identified; 96% were among patients aged <22 years. Eighteen clusters of five or more epidemiologically linked cases within 14 days of one another were reported; 30% of cases were linked to a cluster. Student gatherings and congregate living settings, both on and off campus, likely contributed to the rapid spread of COVID-19 within the university community. On August 19, all university A classes transitioned to online, and additional mitigation efforts were implemented. At this point, 334 university A-associated COVID-19 cases had been reported to the local health department. The rapid increase in cases within 2 weeks of opening campus suggests that robust measures are needed to reduce transmission at institutes of higher education, including efforts to increase consistent use of masks, reduce the density of on-campus housing, increase testing for SARS-CoV-2, and discourage student gatherings.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Universities , Adolescent , Adult , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , North Carolina/epidemiology , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Residence Characteristics , Social Behavior , Students/psychology , Students/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
7.
Hum Vaccin ; 7(9): 952-7, 2011 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22024912

ABSTRACT

We characterized parental attitudes regarding school HPV vaccination requirements for adolescent girls. Study participants were 866 parents of 10­18 y-old girls in areas of North Carolina with elevated cervical cancer incidence. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by logistic regression. Approximately half (47%) of parents agreed that laws requiring HPV immunization for school attendance "are a good idea" when opt-out provisions were not mentioned. Far more agreed that "these laws are okay only if parents can opt out if they want to" (84%). Predictors of supporting requirements included believing HPV vaccine is highly effective against cervical cancer (OR = 2.5, 95% CI:1.7­.0) or is more beneficial if provided at an earlier age (OR = 16.1, 95% CI:8.4­1.0). Parents were less likely to agree with vaccine requirements being a good idea if they expressed concerns related to HPV vaccine safety (OR = 0.3, 95% CI:0.1­.5), its recent introduction (OR = 0.3, 95% CI:0.2­.6). Parental acceptance of school requirements appears to depend on perceived HPV vaccine safety and efficacy, understanding of the optimal age for vaccine administration, and inclusion of opt-out provisions.


Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Papillomavirus Vaccines/therapeutic use , Parents/psychology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...