Word frequency does not moderate the degree to which people can selectively attend to parts of visually presented words.

Whether attention is allocated to an entire word or can be confined to part of a word was examined in an experiment using a visual composite task. Participants saw a study word, a cue to attend to either the right or left half, and a test word, and indicated if the cued half of the words (e.g., left) was the same (e.g., TOLD-TONE) or different (e.g., TOLD-WINE). Prior research using this task reports a larger congruency effect for low-frequency words relative to high-frequency words but extraneous variables were not equated. In this study (N = 33), lexical (orthographic neighbourhood density) and sublexical (bigram frequency) variables were controlled, and word frequency was manipulated. Results indicate that word frequency does not moderate the degree to which parts of a word can be selectively attended/ignored. Response times to high-frequency words were faster than response times to low-frequency words but the congruency effect was equivalent. The data support a capacity model where attention is equally distributed across low-frequency and high-frequency words but low-frequency words require additional processing resources.

Accuracy of Critical Care Transport Team Estimation of Patient Height and Weight in Scene Responses.

Estimates of clinically relevant information, such as height, weight, blood loss, and burn area, have consistently been fraught with error in the health care setting. Seemingly little has been done in health care education to improve estimate outcomes. Standardized tools, most often in pediatric populations, have become commonplace to guide acute care management when misestimation of data points like height or weight would likely have its biggest impact on patient care and outcome. This article is a retrospective study of a critical care transport team's abilities to estimate patient height and weight in scene responses using the Glasgow Coma Scale score as an indicator for the likelihood of patient input. Ultimately, height was removed as a variable because of the paucity and unreliability of the collected data. The expected outcome with respect to weight estimates was observed; with decreased patient Glasgow Coma Scale scores, the discrepancy in provider estimate increased from 8% to 12%. Although statistically significant, it does not represent the level of aberrancy noted in other studies, which has been reported to be as high as 40%.