18F-BMS-986229 PET to Assess Programmed-Death Ligand 1 Status in Gastroesophageal Cancer.

Anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors are the standard of care for advanced gastroesophageal cancer. Although recommendations and approval by regulatory agencies are often based on programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, pathologic assessments of PD-L1 status have several limitations. Single-site biopsies do not adequately capture disease heterogeneity within individual tumor lesions or among several lesions within the same patient, the PD-L1 combined positive score is a dynamic biomarker subject to evolution throughout a patient's disease course, and repeated biopsies are invasive and not always feasible. Methods: This was a prospective pilot study of the PD-L1-targeting radiotracer, 18F-BMS-986229, with PET imaging (PD-L1 PET) in patients with gastroesophageal cancer. Patients were administered the 18F-BMS-986229 radiotracer intravenously at a dose of 370 MBq over 1-2 min and underwent whole-body PET/CT imaging 60 min later. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of 18F-BMS-986229. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04161781). Results: Between February 3, 2020, and February 2, 2022, 10 patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma underwent PD-L1 PET. There were no adverse events associated with the 18F-BMS-986229 tracer, and imaging did not result in treatment delays; the primary endpoint was achieved. Radiographic evaluation of PD-L1 expression was concordant with pathologic assessment in 88% of biopsied lesions, and 18F-BMS-986229 uptake on PET imaging correlated with pathologic evaluation by the combined positive score (Spearman rank correlation coefficient, 0.64). Seventy-one percent of patients with 18F-BMS-986229 accumulation on PET imaging also had lesions without 18F-BMS-986229 uptake, highlighting the intrapatient heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression. Patients treated with frontline programmed death 1 inhibitors who had 18F-BMS-986229 accumulation in any lesions on PET imaging had longer progression-free survival than patients without tracer accumulation in any lesions (median progression-free survival, 28.4 vs. 9.9 mo), though the small sample size prevents any definitive conclusions. Conclusion: PD-L1 PET imaging was safe, feasible, and concordant with pathologic evaluation and offers a potential noninvasive tool to assess PD-L1 expression.

Noninvasive Assessment of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) in Esophagogastric Cancer Using 89Zr-Trastuzumab PET: A Pilot Study.

Variations in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression between the primary tumor and metastases may contribute to drug resistance in HER2-positive (HER2+) metastatic esophagogastric cancer (mEGC). 89Zr-trastuzumab PET (HER2 PET) holds promise for noninvasive assessment of variations in HER2 expression and target engagement. The aim of this study was to describe HER2 PET findings in patients with mEGC. Methods: Patients with HER2+ mEGC were imaged with HER2 PET, 18F-FDG PET, and CT. Lesions were annotated using measurements (on CT) and maximum SUVs (on HER2 PET). Correlation of visualized disease burden among imaging modalities with clinical and pathologic characteristics was performed. Results: Thirty-three patients with HER2+ mEGC were imaged with HER2 PET and CT (12% esophageal, 64% gastroesophageal junction, and 24% gastric adenocarcinoma), 26 of whom were also imaged with 18F-FDG PET. More lesions were identified on 18F-FDG PET (median, 7 [range, 1-14]) than HER2 PET (median, 4 [range, 0-11]). Of the 8 lesions identified on HER2 but not on 18F-FDG PET, 3 (38%) were in bone and 1 was in the brain. Of the 68 lesions identified on 18F-FDG but not on HER2 PET, 4 (6%) were in bone and the remainder were in the lymph nodes (35, 51%) and liver (16, 24%). Of the 33 total patients, 23 (70%) were HER2 imaging-positive (≥50% of tumor load positive). Only 10 patients had 100% of the tumor load positive; 2 had 0% positive. When only patients receiving HER2-directed therapy as first-line treatment were considered (n = 13), median progression-free survival (PFS) therapy was not significantly different between HER2 imaging-positive and -negative patients. Median PFS for patients with at least 1 intense or very intense lesion (SUV ≥ 10) was 16 (95% CI: 11-not reached) mo (n = 7), compared with 12 (95% CI: 6.3-not reached) mo for patients without an intense or very intense lesion (n = 6) (P = 0.35). Conclusion: HER2 PET may identify heterogeneity of HER2 expression and allow assessment of lesions throughout the entire body. A potential application of HER2 PET is noninvasive evaluation of HER2 status including assessment of intrapatient disease heterogeneity not captured by standard imaging or single-site biopsies.

Neurosurgical Skills Assessment: Measuring Technical Proficiency in Neurosurgery Residents Through Intraoperative Video Evaluations.

OBJECTIVES: Although technical skills are fundamental in neurosurgery, there is little agreement on how to describe, measure, or compare skills among surgeons. The primary goal of this study was to develop a quantitative grading scale for technical surgical performance that distinguishes operator skill when graded by domain experts (residents, attendings, and nonsurgeons). Scores provided by raters should be highly reliable with respect to scores from other observers. METHODS: Neurosurgery residents were fitted with a head-mounted video camera while performing craniotomies under attending supervision. Seven videos, 1 from each postgraduate year (PGY) level (1-7), were anonymized and scored by 16 attendings, 8 residents, and 7 nonsurgeons using a grading scale. Seven skills were graded: incision, efficiency of instrument use, cauterization, tissue handling, drilling/craniotomy, confidence, and training level. RESULTS: A strong correlation was found between skills score and PGY year (P < 0.001, analysis of variance). Junior residents (PGY 1-3) had significantly lower scores than did senior residents (PGY 4-7, P < 0.001, t test). Significant variation among junior residents was observed, and senior residents' scores were not significantly different from one another. Interrater reliability, measured against other observers, was high (r = 0.581 ± 0.245, Spearman), as was assessment of resident training level (r = 0.583 ± 0.278, Spearman). Both variables were strongly correlated (r = 0.90, Pearson). Attendings, residents, and nonsurgeons did not score differently (P = 0.46, analysis of variance). CONCLUSIONS: Technical skills of neurosurgery residents recorded during craniotomy can be measured with high interrater reliability. Surgeons and nonsurgeons alike readily distinguish different skill levels. This type of assessment could be used to coach residents, to track performance over time, and potentially to compare skill levels. Developing an objective tool to evaluate surgical performance would be useful in several areas of neurosurgery education.