Peritoneal dialysis discontinuation: to the root of the problem.

As the global burden of chronic kidney disease continues to increase, the use of peritoneal dialysis is often advocated as the preferred initial dialysis modality. Observational studies suggest a survival advantage for peritoneal dialysis over hemodialysis for the initial 2-3 years of dialysis. Peritoneal dialysis has been associated with better graft survival after kidney transplantation and has a reduced cost burden compared to hemodialysis. However, several medical and non-medical reasons may limit access to peritoneal dialysis, and less than 20% of patients with end-stage kidney disease are treated with peritoneal dialysis worldwide. In this narrative review, we sought to summarize the recent medical literature on risk factors for peritoneal dialysis discontinuation, distinguishing the early and the late phase after peritoneal dialysis initiation. Although the definition of clinically relevant outcomes varies among studies, we observed that center size, older age, and the presence of many comorbidities are risk factors associated with peritoneal dialysis discontinuation, regardless of the phase after peritoneal dialysis initiation. On the contrary, poor technique training and late referral to nephrology care, as opposed to the need for a caregiver, patient burnout and frequent hospitalizations, are related to early and late peritoneal dialysis drop-out, respectively. The aim of the review is to provide an overview of the most relevant parameters to be considered when advising patients in the selection of the most appropriate dialysis modality and in the clinical management of peritoneal dialysis patients. In addition, we wish to provide the readers with a critical appraisal of current literature and a call for a consensus on the definition of clinically relevant outcomes in peritoneal dialysis to better address patients' needs.

A report from the Brescia Renal COVID Task Force on the clinical characteristics and short-term outcome of hemodialysis patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

The SARS-CoV-2 epidemic is pressuring healthcare systems worldwide. Disease outcomes in certain subgroups of patients are still scarce, and data are needed. Therefore, we describe here the experience of four dialysis centers of the Brescia Renal COVID Task Force. During March 2020, within an overall population of 643 hemodialysis patients, SARS-CoV-2 RNA positivity was detected in 94 (15%). At disease diagnosis, 37 of the 94 (39%) patients (group 1) were managed on an outpatient basis, whereas the remaining 57 (61%) (group 2) required hospitalization. Choices regarding management strategy were made based on disease severity. In group 1, 41% received antivirals and 76% hydroxychloroquine. Eight percent died and 5% developed acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). In group 2, 79% received antivirals and 77% hydroxychloroquine. Forty two percent died and 79% developed ARDS. Overall mortality rate for the entire cohort was 29%. History of ischemic cardiac disease, fever, older age (over age 70), and dyspnea at presentation were associated with the risk of developing ARDS, whereas fever, cough and a C-reactive protein higher than 50 mg/l at disease presentation were associated with the risk of death. Thus, in our population of hemodialysis patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection, we documented a wide range of disease severity. The risk of ARDS and death is significant for patients requiring hospital admission at disease diagnosis.