ABSTRACT
The use of hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) has recently been used to show an improvement in both standard and extended criteria donor liver grafts but creating a more dynamic preservation environment that can be supplemented with a variety of additives to aid in cold temperature metabolism and vasodilatation. Increasing the benefits of HMP, we explore the use of α-tocopherol in reducing inflammatory markers and apoptotic pathways to reduce the incidence of preservation injury. We explored the use of a donation after cardiac death (DCD) rodent model to test the additive benefits of α-tocopherol in HMP. The addition of α-tocopherol reduced the level of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) over the course of reperfusion as well, reduced the levels of inflammatory cytokines within a 90 minute reperfusion biopsy. Further benefit was seen with α-tocopherol through the reduction of the level of caspase 3/7 in the circulation, shown to be a result of the reduction of the levels of Cytochrome C mRNA. Liver perfusion with Vasosol® and HMP could benefit further from the addition of α-tocopherol to existing formulations of Vasosol®.
Subject(s)
Death , Hypothermia, Induced , Liver , Organ Preservation Solutions , alpha-Tocopherol/administration & dosage , Alanine Transaminase/metabolism , Animals , Apoptosis , Base Sequence , Cytochromes c/genetics , Cytokines/metabolism , DNA Primers , Female , Inflammation Mediators/metabolism , Liver Transplantation , Male , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , Rats , Rats, Wistar , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionABSTRACT
Although living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been shown to decrease waiting-list mortality, little is known of its financial impact relative to deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). We performed a retrospective cohort study of the comprehensive resource utilization, using financial charges as a surrogate measure-from the pretransplant through the posttransplant periods-of 489 adult liver transplants (LDLT n = 86; DDLT n = 403) between January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2006, at a single center with substantial experience in LDLT. Baseline characteristics differed between LDLT versus DDLT with regards to age at transplantation (p = 0.02), male gender (p < 0.01), percentage Caucasians (p < 0.01) and transplant model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score (p < 0.01). In univariate analysis, there was a trend toward decreased total transplant charges with LDLT (p = 0.06), despite increased surgical charges associated with LDLT (p < 0.01). After adjustment for the covariates that were associated with financial charges, there was no significant difference in total transplant charges (p = 0.82). MELD score at transplant was the strongest driver of resource utilization. We conclude that at an experienced transplant center, LDLT imposes a similar overall financial burden than DDLT, despite the increased complexity of living donor surgery and the addition of the costs of the living donor. We speculate that LDLT optimizes transplantation by transplanting healthier and younger recipients.