One-Year Results of a Phase I/II Randomized, Double-Masked, Placebo-Controlled Study of Processed Amniotic Fluid Drops After PRK.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the 1-year outcomes of using processed amniotic fluid (pAF) postoperatively after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). METHODS: Sixty-one participants were randomized to receive either placebo or pAF drops. The drops were instilled 4 times daily for 1 week after PRK along with routine postoperative medications. The primary outcome measures included uncorrected visual acuity, topographic corneal irregularity measurement, and surface staining over 1 year. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference in uncorrected distance visual acuity between the placebo and treatment groups was seen at 1 month post-PRK, with a visual advantage evident in the pAF group. A suggestive difference in corneal irregularity measurement was also seen between the placebo and treatment groups at 1 month postsurgery, with less irregularity noted in the pAF group. No differences in uncorrected distance visual acuity or corneal irregularity measurement were found at 3, 6, and 12 months. There was also no significant difference in corneal staining scores between the 2 groups at any of the measured time points. CONCLUSIONS: This 1-year study evaluating the safety and efficacy of pAF as an additional postoperative topical medication after PRK demonstrated that pAF offered a mild visual advantage at 1 month post-PRK. There were no late adverse events, and the intervention proved safe at 1 year.

A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial of sterile filtered human amniotic fluid for treatment of COVID-19.

IMPORTANCE: Acellular human amniotic fluid (hAF) is an antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory fluid that has been used to treat various pro-inflammatory conditions. In a feasibility study, we have previously demonstrated that hAF could be safely administered to severely ill patients with coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19). The impact of acellular hAF on markers of systemic inflammation and clinical outcomes during COVID-19 infection remain unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and efficacy of acellular, sterile processed intravenously administered hAF on markers of systemic inflammation during COVID-19. DESIGN, SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: This single-center Phase I/II randomized, placebo controlled clinical trial enrolled adult (age ≥ 18 years) patients hospitalized for respiratory symptoms of COVID-19, including hypoxemia, tachypnea or dyspnea. The study was powered for outcomes with an anticipated enrollment of 60 patients. From 09/28/2020 to 02/04/2022 we enrolled and randomized 47 (of an anticipated 60) patients hospitalized due to COVID-19. One patient withdrew consent after randomization but prior to treatment. Safety outcomes to 30 days were collected through hospital discharge and were complete by the end of screening on 6/30/2022. INTERVENTIONS: Intravenous administration of 10 cc sterile processed acellular hAF once daily for up to 5 days vs placebo. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: Blood biomarkers of inflammation, including C-Reactive protein (CRP), lactate dehydrogenase, D-dimer, and interleukin-6 (IL-6), as well as safety outcomes. RESULTS: Patients who were randomized to hAF (n = 23) were no more likely to have improvements in CRP from baseline to Day 6 than patients who were randomized to placebo (n = 24) hAF: -5.9 [IQR -8.2, -0.6] vs placebo: -5.9 [-9.4, -2.05]; p = 0.6077). There were no significant differences in safety outcomes or adverse events. Secondary measures of inflammation including lactate dehydrogenase, D-dimer and IL-6 were not statistically different from baseline to day 6. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this randomized clinical trial involving hospitalized patients with COVID-19, the intravenous administration of 10 cc of hAF daily for 5 days did not result in statistically significant differences in either safety or markers of systemic inflammation compared to placebo, though we did not achieve our enrollment target of 60 patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT04497389 on 04/08/2020.

Phase I/II randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled study of processed amniotic fluid drops after PRK.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of processed amniotic fluid (pAF) used postoperatively after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). SETTING: University of Utah, Moran Eye Center, Salt Lake City, Utah. DESIGN: Randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled prospective study. METHODS: 61 participants were randomized to receive either placebo or pAF drops, which were instilled 4 times per day for 1 week after PRK along with routine postoperative medications. The primary outcome measure was time to full re-epithelialization in days. Secondary measures included visual acuity at 30 days and postoperative pain scores during the first week. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in time to re-epithelialization, with a median of 5 days for both groups. There were no difference in pain indicator scores during the first week and no difference in corneal staining scores at day 30 between the 2 groups. There were no adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study evaluating the safety and efficacy of pAF as an additional postoperative topical medication for PRK demonstrated that pAF did not improve the rate of epithelial healing after PRK. pAF may be safely studied in other ocular conditions to determine its effect on epithelial healing.

Acellular human amniotic fluid protects the ischemic-reperfused rat myocardium.

Amniotic products are potent immunomodulators used clinically to repair tissue injury. Little information exists regarding the potential of cell-free human amniotic fluid (hAF) to treat cardiovascular disease. Herein, we sought to determine the influence and efficacy of acellular hAF on myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury. Processed hAF was obtained from volunteer donors at the time of elective caesarean section and manufactured using proprietary methods. Left anterior descending coronary artery ligation was performed on rats for 60 min. Thirty minutes after release and reperfusion, either saline or hAF was injected intramyocardially. Serial echocardiography revealed that compared with saline-injected rats, hAF animals maintained their ejection fraction and did not adversely remodel through the 4-wk period. This preserved ventricular function correlated with decreased infarct size, less fibrosis, and reduced expression of cytokines and infiltrating inflammatory cells. Comparative arrays of different donor hAF lots confirmed the presence of a wide array of immunomodulatory and host-defense proteins. The observed functional cardioprotection was furthermore evident when given intravenously and across multiple hAF donors. In conclusion, our data demonstrate, for the first time, the cardioprotective effect of acellular hAF on myocardial injury. These observations spanned across diverse donors and likely result from the mixture of a plethora of naturally produced cytokines, chemokines, and immune-modulating proteins rather than a single, defined mechanistic culprit. The ubiquitous availability of hAF as a cell-free solution further suggests its potential for widespread adoption as a therapy for myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Rather than targeting a single pathway implicated in myocardial reperfusion injury, cell-free human amniotic fluid-a naturally derived cocktail composed of thousands of proteins involved with innate immunity and anti-inflammation-markedly reduces injury and preserves cardiac function in a model of rodent myocardial ischemia-reperfusion. With its ubiquitous availability as well as its anti-inflammatory and nonimmunogenic properties, human cell-free amniotic fluid offers potential for use as a cardioprotective adjunct.

Safety and feasibility of using acellular sterile filtered amniotic fluid as a treatment for patients with COVID-19: protocol for a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Human amniotic fluid (hAF) has been shown to reduce inflammation in multiple experimental models. hAF has previously been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a human cellular and tissue product for tissue injury for human administration, and used safely in thousands of patients as a therapeutic treatment for diverse conditions. Given the profound inflammatory response observed in patients with COVID-19, and the successful completion of 10-patient pilot study of intravenous hAF, we present a trial design for a larger clinical trial of intravenous hAF for the treatment of COVID-19. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This paper describes the methodology of a phase I/II randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial to determine the safety and feasibility of using acellular sterile filtered amniotic fluid as a treatment for patients with COVID-19. Primary outcome will be the change in C-reactive protein. Secondary outcomes include safety, biomarker inflammatory levels and clinically relevant outcomes at 30 days, including mortality, ventilator-free days and hospital and intensive care unit length of stay. Exploratory outcomes of health-related quality-of-life patient-reported outcomes will be collected. Hospitalised patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 will be recruited. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the University of Utah Institutional Review Board (IRB_0013292), approved by the US FDA under Investigational New Drug (No 23369) and is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04497389; Pre-results.

A pilot trial of human amniotic fluid for the treatment of COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: Vertical transmission from SARS CoV-2-infected women is uncommon and coronavirus has not been detected in amniotic fluid. Human amniotic products have a broad immune-mediating profile. Observing that many COVID-19 patients have a profound inflammatory response to the virus, we sought to determine the influence of human amniotic fluid (hAF) on hospitalized patients with COVID-19. RESULTS: A 10-patient case series was IRB-approved to study the impact of hAF on hospitalized patients with documented COVID-19. Nine of the 10 patients survived to discharge, with one patient succumbing to the disease when enrolled on maximal ventilatory support and severe hypoxia. The study design was altered by the IRB such that the last 6 patients received higher dose of intravenous hAF. In this latter group, patients that had observed reductions in C-reactive protein were associated with improved clinical outcomes. No hAF-related adverse events were noted. Acknowledging some of the inherent limitations of this case series, these results inform and catalyze a larger scaled randomized prospective trial to further investigate hAF as a therapy for COVID-19. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04319731; March 23, 2020.

Processed human amniotic fluid retains its antibacterial activity.

BACKGROUND: Human amniotic fluid (AF) contains numerous nutrients, trophic factors and defense proteins that provide a nurturing and protective environment for fetal development. Based on reports that AF has antibacterial, anti-inflammatory and regenerative properties, we designed a novel method to process AF for use in clinical care. METHODS: Six randomly selected lots of processed AF (pAF) were examined to determine whether they retained their antibacterial activity against a panel of wound-associated pathogens E. faecium, S. aureus, K. pneumoniae, A. baumannii, P. aeruginosa, and E. aerogenes (ESKAPE). To identify proteins in pAF that might be responsible for its antibacterial activity, three different lots of pAF were analyzed with quantitative cytokine arrays that consisted of 400 unique human proteins. One protein identified by microarrays, lactoferrin, and a second prominent antibacterial protein that was not identified by microarrays, lysozyme, were examined by depletion experiments to determine their contribution to the antibacterial activity of pAF. RESULTS: All six lots of pAF exhibited antibacterial activity against ESKAPE microorganisms, especially against the pathogens predominately found in chronic wounds (i.e. S. aureus and P. aeruginosa). Thirty-one of the peptides on the microarray were annotated as having antibacterial activity and 26 of these were detected in pAF. Cystatin C and lactoferrin were among the most highly expressed antibacterial proteins in pAF. Cystatin C and lactoferrin were confirmed by ELISA to be present in pAF along with lysozyme. Immunoprecipitation of lactoferrin and lysozyme reduced, but did not abolish the antibacterial activities of pAF. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that pAF maintains antibacterial activity via the preservation of antibacterial proteins against a broad spectrum of wound-associated pathogens.

Comparative analyses of industrial-scale human platelet lysate preparations.

BACKGROUND: Efforts are underway to eliminate fetal bovine serum from mammalian cell cultures for clinical use. An emerging, viable replacement option for fetal bovine serum is human platelet lysate (PL) as either a plasma-based or serum-based product. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Nine industrial-scale, serum-based PL manufacturing runs (i.e., lots) were performed, consisting of an average ± standard deviation volume of 24.6 ± 2.2 liters of pooled, platelet-rich plasma units that were obtained from apheresis donors. Manufactured lots were compared by evaluating various biochemical and functional test results. Comprehensive cytokine profiles of PL lots and product stability tests were performed. Global gene expression profiles of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) cultured with plasma-based or serum-based PL were compared to MSCs cultured with fetal bovine serum. RESULTS: Electrolyte and protein levels were relatively consistent among all serum-based PL lots, with only slight variations in glucose and calcium levels. All nine lots were as good as or better than fetal bovine serum in expanding MSCs. Serum-based PL stored at -80°C remained stable over 2 years. Quantitative cytokine arrays showed similarities as well as dissimilarities in the proteins present in serum-based PL. Greater differences in MSC gene expression profiles were attributable to the starting cell source rather than with the use of either PL or fetal bovine serum as a culture supplement. CONCLUSION: Using a large-scale, standardized method, lot-to-lot variations were noted for industrial-scale preparations of serum-based PL products. However, all lots performed as well as or better than fetal bovine serum in supporting MSC growth. Together, these data indicate that off-the-shelf PL is a feasible substitute for fetal bovine serum in MSC cultures.

Collection and characterization of amniotic fluid from scheduled C-section deliveries.

Amniotic fluid (AF) possesses anti-inflammatory, anti-microbial and regenerative properties that make it attractive for use in clinical applications. The goals of this study were to assess the feasibility of collecting AF from full-term pregnancies and to evaluate non-cellular and cellular properties of AF for clinical applications. Donor informed consent and medical histories were obtained from pregnant women scheduled for C-sections and infectious disease testing was performed the day of collection. AFs were evaluated for total volume, fluid chemistries, total protein, and hyaluronic acid (HA) levels. AF was also assessed with quantitative antibody arrays, cellular content and for an ability to support angiogenesis. Thirty-six pregnant women consented and passed donor screening to give birth tissue. AF was successfully collected from 17 individuals. Median AF volumes were 70 mL (range 10-815 mL; n = 17). Fluid chemistries were similar, but some differences were noted in HA levels and cytokine profiles. Cytokine arrays revealed that an average of 304 ± 20 of 400 proteins tested were present in AF with a majority of cytokines associated with host defense. AF supported angiogenesis. Epithelioid cells were the major cell type in AF with only a minor population of lymphoid cells. Cultures revealed a highly proliferative population of adherent cells capable of producing therapeutic doses of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs). These findings showed that significant volumes of AF were routinely collected from full-term births. AF contained a number of bioactive proteins and only a rare population of MSCs. Variations noted in components present in different AFs, warrant further investigations to determine their relevance for specific clinical applications.

Serum-converted platelet lysate can substitute for fetal bovine serum in human mesenchymal stromal cell cultures.

BACKGROUND AIMS: Fetal bovine serum (FBS) is commonly used as a serum supplement for culturing human mesenchymal stromal cells (hMSCs). However, human cells grown in FBS, especially for extended periods, risk potential exposure to bovine immunogenic proteins and infectious agents. To address this issue, we investigated the ability of a novel human platelet serum supplement to substitute for FBS in hMSC cultures. METHODS: Platelet lysate-serum (PL-serum) was converted from platelet lysate-plasma (PL-plasma) that was manufactured from pooled platelet-rich plasma (PRP) apheresis units. Growth factor levels and the number of residual intact platelets in PL-serum and PL-plasma were compared with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and flow cytometry, respectively. Proliferation responses of hMSCs cultured in PL-serum, PL-plasma, or FBS were assessed with 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay, the immunophenotype of harvested hMSCs was evaluated by flow cytometry and tri-lineage differentiation potential was evaluated by assessing adipogenic, osteogenic and chondrogenic development. RESULTS: Selected growth factor levels in PL-serum were not significantly different from PL-plasma (P > 0.05). hMSC cultures supplemented with PL-serum had comparable growth kinetics to PL-plasma, and hMSC yields were consistently greater than with FBS. hMSCs harvested from cultures supplemented with PL-serum, PL-plasma or FBS had similar cell surface phenotypes and maintained tri-lineage differentiation potential. CONCLUSIONS: PL-serum, similar to PL-plasma, can substitute for FBS in hMSC cultures. Use of PL-serum, in contrast to PL-plasma, has an added advantage of not requiring addition of a xenogeneic source of heparin, providing a completely xeno-free culture medium.