Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 20
Filter
Add more filters











Publication year range
1.
J Psychopharmacol ; 17(3): 269-72, 2003 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14513917

ABSTRACT

The effect of straight release carbamazepine monotherapy was studied in 12 well-controlled epileptic patients using adaptive tracking, smooth pursuit and saccadic eye movements, body sway, Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) and Visual Analogue Scales. Patients were matched to healthy controls for age and gender. After patients had received their usual morning dose of carbamazepine, patient-control pairs were studied for 7 h. Compared to controls, the average DSST scores of patients were significant lower. No relationships were shown between DSST performance and plasma concentrations of carbamazepine and carbamazepine-epoxide. No significant differences were found for any of the other effect parameters. Variations in plasma concentrations were limited, contributing to the absence of systematic fluctuations in test results. Of the used tests, DSST is most clearly related to cognitive function. It is concluded that the difference in DSST performance appears to reflect a long-term small neurocognitive difference between subjects with and without epilepsy.


Subject(s)
Anticonvulsants/pharmacology , Carbamazepine/analogs & derivatives , Carbamazepine/pharmacology , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Psychomotor Performance/drug effects , Adolescent , Adult , Anticonvulsants/blood , Anticonvulsants/pharmacokinetics , Area Under Curve , Carbamazepine/blood , Carbamazepine/pharmacokinetics , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid , Epilepsy/physiopathology , Epilepsy/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pursuit, Smooth/drug effects , Saccades/drug effects , Time Factors
2.
Cephalalgia ; 22(4): 271-81, 2002 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12100089

ABSTRACT

This study investigates the CNS effects of sumatriptan and rizatriptan, with temazepam as an active comparator, in healthy female volunteers. Sixteen volunteers completed a randomized, double-blind, crossover study and on four separate occasions received either 100 mg sumatriptan, 20 mg rizatriptan or 20 mg temazepam. The main parameters were eye movements, EEG, body sway, visual analogue scales and a cognitive test battery. Rizatriptan and sumatriptan decreased saccadic peak velocity by 18.3 (95% CI: 5.7, 30.8) and 15.0 (2.2, 27.9) degrees/sec, respectively, about half the decrease induced by temazepam (35.0 (22.1, 47.8) degrees/sec). Body sway increased (30% for rizatriptan (16%, 45%) and 14% for sumatriptan (1%, 27%), respectively). Temazepam caused larger, similar effects. In contrast to temazepam, sumatriptan and rizatriptan decreased reaction times of recognition tasks and increased EEG alpha power (significant for sumatriptan, 0.477 (0.02, 0.935). Therapeutic doses of sumatriptan and rizatriptan caused CNS effects indicative of mild sedation. For EEG and recognition reaction times the effects were opposite to temazepam, indicating central stimulation.


Subject(s)
Brain/drug effects , Serotonin Receptor Agonists/pharmacology , Sumatriptan/pharmacology , Triazoles/pharmacology , Adult , Affect/drug effects , Cognition/drug effects , Cross-Over Studies , Dizziness/chemically induced , Double-Blind Method , Electroencephalography/drug effects , Eye Movements/drug effects , Female , Headache/chemically induced , Humans , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacology , Nerve Tissue Proteins/administration & dosage , Nerve Tissue Proteins/physiology , Neuropsychological Tests , Postural Balance/drug effects , Reaction Time/drug effects , Receptor, Serotonin, 5-HT1B , Receptor, Serotonin, 5-HT1D , Receptors, Serotonin/drug effects , Receptors, Serotonin/physiology , Recognition, Psychology/drug effects , Reference Values , Serotonin Receptor Agonists/adverse effects , Serotonin Receptor Agonists/pharmacokinetics , Sumatriptan/adverse effects , Sumatriptan/pharmacokinetics , Temazepam/adverse effects , Temazepam/pharmacokinetics , Temazepam/pharmacology , Triazoles/adverse effects , Triazoles/pharmacokinetics , Tryptamines
3.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 51(2): 119-32, 2001 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11259983

ABSTRACT

Studies of novel antipsychotics in healthy volunteers are traditionally concerned with kinetics and tolerability, but useful information may also be obtained from biomarkers of clinical endpoints. A useful biomarker should meet the following requirements: a consistent response across studies and antipsychotics; a clear response of the biomarker to a therapeutic dose; a dose-response relationship; a plausible relationship between biomarker, pharmacology and pathogenesis. In the current review, all individual tests found in studies of neuroleptics in healthy volunteers since 1966 were progressively evaluated for compliance with these requirements. A MedLine search yielded 65 different studies, investigating the effects of 23 different neuroleptics on 101 different (variants of) neuropsychological tests, which could be clustered into seven neuropsychological domains. Subjective and objective measures of alertness, and of visual-visuomotor-auditory and motor skills were most sensitive to antipsychotics, although over half of all the studies failed to show statistically significant differences from placebo. The most consistent effects were observed using prolactin response and saccadic eye movements, where 96% and 83% of all studies resp. showed statistically significant effects. The prolactin inducing dose equivalencies relative to haloperidol of 19 different antipsychotic agents correlated with the lowest recommended daily maintenance dose (r(2) = 0.52). This relationship could reflect the clinical practice of aiming for maximum tolerated levels, or it could represent a common basis behind prolactin release and antipsychotic activity (probably D2-receptor antagonism). The number of tests used in human psychopharmacology appears to be excessive. Future studies should look for the most specific and sensitive test within each of the domains that are most susceptible to neuroleptics.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/pharmacology , Prolactin/analysis , Biomarkers/analysis , Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic , Eye Movements/drug effects , Humans , Motor Activity/drug effects
4.
Psychopharmacology (Berl) ; 153(2): 196-202, 2001 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11205419

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: (+/-) 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA or "ecstasy") has been shown to cause long term damage to serotonergic cerebral neurons in animals. The neurotoxic effects in humans are less clear and little is known about the functional consequences, although some studies suggest memory impairment. Given the widespread use of MDMA, our lack of knowledge raises concerns. OBJECTIVE: We investigated, in humans, the relation between past use of ecstasy and cognitive performance as well as serotonergic function. METHODS: Two groups of 21 males with moderate and heavy recreational use of MDMA, respectively, and a control group of 20 males without use of MDMA were compared. All were from the same subculture. Reaction time, direct recall, and recognition were assessed. Serotonergic function was measured by the neuro-endocrine response to a placebo-controlled, crossover challenge with dexfenfluramine. RESULTS: Ecstasy users showed a broad pattern of statistically significant, but clinically small, impairment of memory and prolonged reaction times. Heavy users were affected stronger than moderate users. Release of cortisol but not of prolactin after dexfenfluramine administration was significantly reduced in both groups of ecstasy users compared with the controls. Analyses of covariance showed that likely confounding variables including recent exposure to ecstasy, psychosocial profiles and use of other drugs did not explain the differences found between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide further evidence that use of ecstasy may be associated with impairment of memory and of serotonergic function. These findings are compatible with neurotoxicity of ecstasy as shown in animals.


Subject(s)
Cognition/drug effects , Hallucinogens/pharmacology , N-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine/pharmacology , Serotonin Agents/pharmacology , Serotonin/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neuropsychological Tests , Reaction Time/drug effects
5.
J Clin Psychopharmacol ; 18(4): 289-95, 1998 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9690694

ABSTRACT

meta-Chlorophenylpiperazine (mCPP) is a compound that is frequently used in challenge tests of the serotonergic system. Its human pharmacology is largely unexplored. The objective of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of mCPP. Eight female and six male healthy volunteers were included in a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, three-way crossover design of single-dose intravenous (0.1 mg/kg), oral (0.5 mg/kg), and placebo treatment, with 24-hour follow-up. mCPP showed a large variability in clearance (11-92 mL/hr) and bioavailability (14-108%). Two female subjects dropped out because of headache and dysphoria. During the 27 occasions in which mCPP was administered, autonomic physical symptoms were observed in 23 subjects and disturbances of mood in 6 subjects. Oral and intravenous mCPP caused sudden increases in cortisol levels, prolactin levels, and total scores of the Body Sensation Questionnaire. Administration of mCPP also led to concentration-dependent increases of saccadic peak velocity and adaptive tracking performance and to a decrease of electroencephalographic occipital theta activity. No clinically relevant effects on electrocardiogram, temperature, and blood pressure were found. In conclusion, it is doubtful whether mCPP is a useful compound for challenge tests in view of the large pharmacokinetic variability after intravenous and oral administration. The effects of mCPP are consistent with disinhibition of the central nervous system.


Subject(s)
Piperazines/pharmacokinetics , Serotonin Receptor Agonists/pharmacokinetics , Administration, Oral , Adult , Arousal/drug effects , Central Nervous System/drug effects , Cross-Over Studies , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Male , Metabolic Clearance Rate/physiology , Neural Inhibition/drug effects , Piperazines/pharmacology , Serotonin Receptor Agonists/pharmacology
6.
J Clin Pharmacol ; 38(12): 1129-36, 1998 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11301565

ABSTRACT

Potential interethnic differences in drug disposition and effects between Japanese and white subjects hamper the registration in Japan of medications already used in Western countries. This double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study was conducted to compare the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of a single oral dose of nitrazepam (5 mg) in age- and sex-matched Japanese (n = 8) and white (n = 8) healthy volunteers. The study was performed in centers in Japan and the Netherlands using the same methods and study design. Subjects were individually matched for gender, age, and body stature. Drug effects were measured by means of saccadic and smooth pursuit eye movements and visual analog lines obtained from the scales of Bond and Lader. There were no pharmacokinetic differences between the Japanese and white subjects. Clearance of nitrazepam was 0.91 +/- 0.165 mL/min/kg and 1.17 +/- 0.492 mL/min/kg, and half-life (t1/2) was 22.1 +/- 4.96 hours and 21.5 +/- 7.51 hours for the Japanese and European groups, respectively. Pharmacokinetic parameters showed no significant correlation with age, height, or weight. The average time-effect curves for the different parameters were comparable between groups. Compared with placebo, both groups showed similar significant reductions in average peak velocity and increases in saccadic inaccuracy and reaction time. Visual analog scores showed clear sedation in the white subjects, but insignificant effects in the Japanese subjects. Smooth pursuit did not change significantly in either group. Slope and intercept of the concentration-effect relationships for saccadic peak velocity showed considerable intersubject variability, but no clear differences between groups. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of nitrazepam were similar in matched healthy Japanese and white subjects. Interethnic comparative studies are feasible, and provide meaningful information about potential racial differences in disposition and action of drugs. Such studies can form a rational basis for comparative clinical trials.


Subject(s)
Anti-Anxiety Agents/pharmacokinetics , Nitrazepam/pharmacokinetics , Administration, Oral , Adolescent , Adult , Asian People , Cross-Over Studies , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Europe , Female , Humans , Japan , Male , Nitrazepam/pharmacology , White People
7.
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord ; 21(10): 860-4, 1997 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9347403

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: A defective central serotonergic neurotransmission has been suggested to result in the concomitant occurrence of an appetite disorder and a disturbed mood. This syndrome was termed carbohydrate carving (CC) obesity. Excessive consumption of carbohydrate-rich snacks would, through a plasma amino acid mediated mechanism, restore serotonergic neurotransmission and thereby relieve the symptoms of atypical depression. OBJECTIVES: To test whether CC obese patients indeed exhibit symptoms of atypical depression, whether these symptoms can be alleviated by carbohydrate-rich snacks and whether they respond differently to the snacks than non-carbohydrate craving (NC) control subjects. Furthermore, we investigated whether differences between CC and NC patients could be related to peripheral metabolic differences. DESIGN: Double blinded, randomized with cross-over. Patients received three types of snacks (100/0/0, 70/29/1 and 35/3/62 energy percent carbohydrate/fat/protein respectively) on three consecutive test days. Before and after snack administration mood and performance were tested and blood samples were obtained. SUBJECTS: 9 CC and 17 NC obese patients, matched for sex, age and body mass index. MEASUREMENTS: Mood states (Profile of Mood States and Visual Analogue Scales) and performance (Bourdon-Wiersma cancellation test), serum glucose and insulin and plasma amino acid concentrations. RESULTS: Before snack consumption, CC patients had slightly higher anger and fatigue scores and tended to have lower mood scores than NC patients. The efficiency of performance increased in both groups after all snacks. No other psychological effects of the snacks were registered. Psychological and metabolic responses of CC and NC patients to the snacks were similar. CONCLUSION: Although they may have a somewhat disturbed mood, CC obese patients do not improve their mood states through ingestion of a carbohydrate-rich snack. It seems, from a therapeutic point of view, useless to maintain the concept of carbohydrate craving.


Subject(s)
Affect/physiology , Appetite , Dietary Carbohydrates , Dietary Fats/administration & dosage , Dietary Proteins/administration & dosage , Obesity/physiopathology , Obesity/psychology , Psychomotor Performance/physiology , Adult , Amino Acids/blood , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Cohort Studies , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Insulin/blood , Male , Middle Aged
8.
Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 62(4): 444-52, 1997 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9357396

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Quantitative electroencephalographic parameters and saccadic eye movements are frequently used as pharmacodynamic measures of benzodiazepine effect. We investigated the relationship between these measures and the hypnotic effect. METHODS: The correlation between the pharmacodynamic measures and sleep quality was determined in 21 patients with primary insomnia. The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships were characterized after administration of 20 mg oral temazepam. The hypnotic effect was determined on the basis of polysomnographic sleep recordings and a subjective sleep evaluation questionnaire. Correlations between pharmacodynamic measures and the improvement of sleep were investigated. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships for the parameters derived from electroencephalography and saccadic eye movements showed considerable interindividual variability. Administration of temazepam led to a significant improvement in the objective parameters sleep period efficiency, wake time after sleep onset, and sleep efficiency and in the subjective assessment of sleep quality. No significant correlations were observed between the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic-derived parameters and the improvement in objective or subjective sleep parameters. CONCLUSION: In subjects with primary insomnia the administration of 20 mg oral temazepam results in changes in both the pharmacodynamic measures and in quality of sleep. No individual correlations between the pharmacodynamic measures and quality of sleep were observed. We concluded that the investigated pharmacodynamic measures are of value in the first assessment of clinical efficacy and for the selection of the dose(s) to be investigated in subsequent trials that aim at showing clinical efficacy. However, the conclusive quantification of clinical efficacy should be performed only on the basis of the clinical end point itself.


Subject(s)
Anti-Anxiety Agents/pharmacology , Electroencephalography/drug effects , Saccades/drug effects , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/drug therapy , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/physiopathology , Sleep/drug effects , Temazepam/pharmacology , Adult , Aged , Anti-Anxiety Agents/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Polysomnography , Predictive Value of Tests , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/blood , Surveys and Questionnaires , Temazepam/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
9.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 44(3): 267-75, 1997 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9296321

ABSTRACT

AIMS: The central effects of benzodiazepines may be attenuated after chronic use by changes in pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics or both. This attenuation may be influenced by the dosing pattern and the characteristics of the user population. The objectives of this study were to evaluate drug sensitivity in long-term users of temazepam and lorazepam in a clinical population. METHODS: The sensitivity to benzodiazepine effects in chronic users (1-20 years) of lorazepam (n = 14) or temazepam (n = 13) was evaluated in comparison with age and sex matched controls. Drug sensitivity was evaluated by plasma concentration in relation to saccadic eye movement parameters, postural stability and visual analogue scales. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetics of lorazepam and temazepam did not differ between patients and control subjects. Chronic users of lorazepam showed clear evidence of reduced sensitivity, indicated by lack of any pharmacodynamic difference between patients and controls at baseline, when drug concentrations were similar to the peak values attained in the control subjects after administration of 1-2.5 mg of lorazepam. In addition, there was a two- to four fold reduction in the slopes of concentration-effect plots for measures of saccadic eye movements and body sway (all; P < or = 0.01). By contrast, sensitivity in chronic users of temazepam was not different from controls. The difference between the temazepam and the lorazepam group appears to be associated with a more continuous drug exposure in the latter, due to the longer half-life and a more frequent intake of lorazepam. This pattern of use may be partly related to the more anxious personality traits that were observed in the chronic users of lorazepam. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic users of lorazepam show evidence of tolerance to sedative effects in comparison with healthy controls. Tolerance does not occur in chronic users of temazepam. The difference may be related to pharmacological properties, in addition to different patterns of use, associated with psychological factors.


Subject(s)
Anti-Anxiety Agents/pharmacokinetics , Lorazepam/pharmacology , Lorazepam/pharmacokinetics , Temazepam/pharmacology , Temazepam/pharmacokinetics , Adult , Affect/drug effects , Aged , Anti-Anxiety Agents/therapeutic use , Area Under Curve , Drug Tolerance , Female , Humans , Male , Metabolic Clearance Rate , Middle Aged , Postural Balance/drug effects , Saccades/drug effects
10.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 41(6): 565-73, 1996 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8799523

ABSTRACT

1. Interaction between alcohol and bretazenil (a benzodiazepine partial agonist in animals) was studied with diazepam as a comparator in a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled six-way cross over experiment in 12 healthy volunteers, aged 19-26 years. 2. Bretazenil (0.5 mg), diazepam (10 mg) and matching placebos were given as single oral doses after intravenous infusion of alcohol to a steady target-blood concentration of 0.5 g l-1 or a control infusion of 5% w/v glucose at 1 week intervals. 3. CNS effects were evaluated between 0 and 3.5 h after drug administration by smooth pursuit and saccadic eye movements, adaptive tracking, body sway, digit symbol substitution test and visual analogue scales. 4. Compared with placebo all treatments caused significant decrements in performance. Overall, the following sequence was found for the magnitude of treatment effects: bretazenil+alcohol > diazepam+alcohol > or = bretazenil > diazepam > alcohol > placebo. 5. There were no consistent indications for synergistic, supra-additive pharmacodynamic interactions between alcohol and bretazenil or diazepam. 6. Bretazenil with or without alcohol, and diazepam+alcohol had marked effects. Because subjects were often too sedated to perform the adaptive tracking test and the eye movement tests adequately, ceiling effects may have affected the outcome of these tests. 7. No significant pharmacokinetic interactions were found. 8. Contrary to the results in animals, there were no indications for a dissociation of the sedative and anxiolytic effects of bretazenil in man.


Subject(s)
Anticonvulsants/pharmacokinetics , Benzodiazepinones/pharmacokinetics , Diazepam/pharmacokinetics , Ethanol/pharmacology , Administration, Oral , Administration, Sublingual , Adult , Affect/drug effects , Anticonvulsants/administration & dosage , Anticonvulsants/blood , Anticonvulsants/pharmacology , Benzodiazepinones/administration & dosage , Benzodiazepinones/blood , Benzodiazepinones/pharmacology , Diazepam/administration & dosage , Diazepam/blood , Diazepam/pharmacology , Double-Blind Method , Ethanol/administration & dosage , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Male , Postural Balance/drug effects , Pursuit, Smooth/drug effects , Saccades/drug effects
11.
Epilepsy Res ; 20(3): 229-39, 1995 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7796795

ABSTRACT

The validity of a patient-based scale, presumably measuring adverse effects of drugs on cognitive function, was examined in a normal volunteer study. Thirty subjects were randomly assigned to placebo or one of two doses of a benzodiazepine, temazepam (10 mg and 20 mg), in a double-blind placebo-controlled parallel group design. Plasma samples were taken before the scale was completed and up to 8 hours post-dose. After administration of the medication the subjects were asked to maintain their normal daily routine as much as possible (reading, studying, conversations). The inventory was administered twice, at 50 minutes and 2 hours post-dose (peak level). The overall score was different between the three groups, only for the second assessment, 2 h post-dose (ANOVA, P < 0.02). Multiple t-testing between the three groups revealed statistically significant differences between placebo and the 10 mg temazepam group (P = 0.02) and between placebo and the 20 mg temazepam group (P = 0.006). No significant difference was found between the two temazepam groups. Analysis of the separate questions showed least sensitivity for questions related to the domain of 'hyperexcitability' and most sensitivity for 'fatigue' and 'slowing.' The overall score appeared to be sensitive already for the lower toxicity range suggesting an 'all or nothing effect'. The subjective reports, collected by using this scale, may therefore be used for the detection of gross overall changes in cognitive functioning.


Subject(s)
Cognition Disorders/chemically induced , Temazepam/adverse effects , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Reference Values , Reproducibility of Results , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Temazepam/blood
12.
Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 55(5): 535-45, 1994 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8181198

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To study the pharmacodynamic effects of intravenous temazepam after different infusion rates to pseudo steady-state concentrations. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study in an academic department of clinical pharmacology. Subjects were nine healthy volunteers. A computerized infusion pump was used to obtain target plasma concentrations of temazepam after 30 or 120 minutes and to maintain these levels for 2 hours. A vehicle infusion, similar to the 30-minute (fast) infusion was used as a placebo control. Infusion schedules were based on data obtained from individual subjects after infusion of 0.4 mg/kg temazepam in 30 minutes. Target plasma concentrations were chosen to induce subhypnotic effects and averaged (+/- SD) 597 +/- 123 ng/ml. Venous plasma concentrations of temazepam were measured by HPLC. Free fractions of temazepam were assessed at the start of the pseudo steady-state concentration intervals. Electroencephalogram alpha and beta amplitudes, saccadic peak velocity, and saccadic latency were used as pharmacodynamic parameters. RESULTS: The rate of change of plasma concentrations averaged 21 +/- 4 ng/ml.min-1 during fast infusion and 5 +/- 1 ng/ml.min-1 during slow infusion of temazepam. Average pseudo steady-state concentrations were 639 +/- 132 ng/ml after fast infusion and 629 +/- 133 ng/ml after slow infusion. At the onset of pseudo steady-state concentration intervals the average free fractions of temazepam were 44% (95% confidence interval, 19% to 61%) lower for slow than for fast infusions. Compared with the slow infusion, electroencephalogram beta amplitudes were significantly larger during the first 30 minutes of pseudo steady-state concentration after fast infusion of temazepam. No significant differences were found for the other parameters. There was a slight decline of temazepam effects during the pseudo steady-state concentration intervals for all parameters after the fast infusion and for saccadic peak velocity and saccadic latency after the slow infusion. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacodynamic effects of intravenous temazepam may depend partly on the rate of administration. Differences in pharmacodynamic effects after fast and slow infusions could be caused by changes in protein binding over time.


Subject(s)
Electroencephalography/drug effects , Saccades/drug effects , Temazepam/pharmacology , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous/methods , Reference Values , Temazepam/administration & dosage
13.
Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 55(5): 546-55, 1994 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8181199

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term reproducibility of pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and concentration-effect parameters after intravenous administration of temazepam. METHODS: Nine healthy volunteers were studied. Temazepam, 0.4 mg/kg, was infused intravenously for 30 minutes on two occasions 6 months apart. Venous plasma concentrations of temazepam were measured by HPLC in samples obtained between 0 and 24 hours. Pharmacodynamic effects were evaluated up to 8 hours for saccadic peak velocity and electroencephalogram (EEG) beta amplitudes. Subjects' state and trait anxiety were assessed by use of the Spielberger anxiety inventory. RESULTS: Significant correlations between occasions were found for area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) values (r = 0.91; p < 0.01) but not for maximum concentration and half-life. Significant correlations were also found for area under the effect-time curve (AUEC) values of peak velocity (r = 0.88; p < 0.01) but not for peak velocity (r = 0.48; p > 0.05). Significant differences between the slopes of concentration effect plots on different occasions were observed in two subjects for EEG beta and in three subjects for peak velocity, with one subject showing a similar change for both parameters. Trait anxiety scores were higher on the first occasion (33 +/- 7) than on the second occasion (29 +/- 7; p < 0.01). A negative correlation was found between trait anxiety scores and the slopes of concentration-effect plots for peak velocity (r = -0.63; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: For AUC and AUEC values the results indicate a reasonable long-term reproducibility of differences between subjects in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of temazepam. However, there were limitations to the predictive value of derived concentration-effect parameters.


Subject(s)
Temazepam/pharmacology , Adolescent , Adult , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Electroencephalography/drug effects , Female , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Linear Models , Male , Reference Values , Reproducibility of Results , Saccades/drug effects , Temazepam/administration & dosage , Time Factors
14.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 35(2): 114-20, 1993 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8443028

ABSTRACT

1. The effects of metoprolol-Oros 14/190 once daily, propranolol 80 mg twice daily and temazepam 10 mg once daily on central nervous system (CNS) related performance and haemodynamic variables were evaluated in a double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled, crossover study in 12 healthy volunteers. Drugs were administered for 3 consecutive days except for temazepam, which was administered on days 1 and 3 only. Treatment effects were evaluated at 0, 2, 5 and 8 h on days 1 and 3. 2. Neither beta-adrenoceptor blocker had significant effects in a battery of tests after single or 3 days dosing. Temazepam caused a decrease in saccadic peak velocity of 37.4 degrees s-1 (95% CI: 6.0, 68.9) at 2 h and an increase of auditory reaction times of 11.5 ms (0.2, 22.8) at 8 h on day 1. No significant effects of temazepam were detected on day 3. 3. Both beta-adrenoceptor blockers reduced exercise heart rate. Peak effects were measured at 2 h 40 min after propranolol but not metoprolol-Oros (difference, day 1:20 (11, 29) beats min-1, day 3:13 (8, 19) beats min-1). Both beta-adrenoceptor blockers significantly reduced baseline exercise heart rate on day 3. Compared with day 1, metoprolol-Oros caused larger reductions of exercise heart rate at all times on day 3. 4. Metoprolol-Oros and propranolol caused similar reductions of systolic- and diastolic blood pressure on days 1 and 3. Temazepam caused a small reduction in diastolic blood pressure at 5 h 40 min on day 1 but was otherwise devoid of haemodynamic effects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Subject(s)
Hemodynamics/drug effects , Metoprolol/pharmacology , Propranolol/pharmacology , Psychomotor Performance/drug effects , Adult , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Delayed-Action Preparations , Double-Blind Method , Drug Delivery Systems , Exercise , Female , Heart Rate/drug effects , Humans , Male , Metoprolol/administration & dosage , Propranolol/administration & dosage , Temazepam/administration & dosage , Temazepam/pharmacology
15.
Psychopharmacology (Berl) ; 110(4): 471-8, 1993.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7870919

ABSTRACT

Pharmacodynamic interactions of low doses of diazepam and alcohol were investigated in a double blind, randomised, 2 x 2 factorial, cross-over study in eight healthy volunteers. Alcohol or glucose 5% were administered intravenously at rates calculated to maintain breath alcohol levels of 0.5 g/l from 1.5 to 5.5 h after starting the alcohol infusion. Diazepam 5 mg or placebo were administered orally at 1.5 h. Evaluation of pharmacodynamic interactions was performed for the average results of tests performed at 2, 3.5 and 5 h. Plasma concentrations of (desmethyl-) diazepam and breath alcohol levels were measured for pharmacokinetic analysis. Breath alcohol reached pseudo steady state levels of 0.38 g/l (range: 0.24-0.57) after alcohol alone and 0.37 g/l (range: 0.27-0.52) in combination with diazepam. Alcohol effects were demonstrated for latency of saccadic eye movements, smooth pursuit eye movements and subjective drug effects. Diazepam impaired smooth pursuit and saccadic eye movements, adaptive tracking, digit symbol substitution and body sway. The effects of combined alcohol and diazepam were mostly additive without significant synergistic interactions. However, in two subjects large supra-additive effects occurred at 3.5 h following alcohol+diazepam, which were not explained by increased drug levels. The design and methods used in this study proved advantageous in evaluating low dose pharmacodynamic interactions. Despite the absence of significant synergistic interactions, unanticipated impairment of performance may occur in susceptible individuals when taking combined low doses of alcohol and diazepam.


Subject(s)
Diazepam/pharmacology , Ethanol/pharmacology , Adult , Affect/drug effects , Cross-Over Studies , Diazepam/pharmacokinetics , Double-Blind Method , Drug Interactions , Electrooculography/drug effects , Ethanol/administration & dosage , Ethanol/pharmacokinetics , Humans , Injections, Intravenous , Male , Postural Balance/drug effects , Psychomotor Performance/drug effects
16.
Epilepsy Res ; 13(3): 245-53, 1992 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1493787

ABSTRACT

We studied plasma levels and behavioural effects of a newly developed controlled release formulation of valproate (VPA-CR) in children with epilepsy. Valproate plasma levels and performances in attention and vigilance tasks were monitored during a 12-h period (daytime), both during monotherapy of conventional valproate (VPA) and 4 weeks after switching to a similar dosage of VPA-CR taken once daily. There was no significant difference between the two formulations with respect to mean diurnal trough and peak valproate plasma levels, and to mean fluctuation. The significantly higher Cmax/Cmin ratio during VPA-CR seems mainly due to low valproate plasma levels early in the morning. Neuropsychological assessment showed no significant differences, either between patients and controls, or within patients and controls when comparing the results obtained on the VPA and VPA-CR day. During both VPA and VPA-CR treatment, no correlation was found between cognitive performance and valproate plasma levels. The advantage of VPA-CR is that the once daily regimen may increase compliance and is more convenient for schoolchildren.


Subject(s)
Cognition/drug effects , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Valproic Acid/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Attention/drug effects , Child , Child, Preschool , Delayed-Action Preparations , Epilepsy/blood , Epilepsy/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Neuropsychological Tests , Psychomotor Performance/drug effects , Valproic Acid/blood , Valproic Acid/pharmacokinetics
17.
Epilepsia ; 33(6): 1137-44, 1992.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1464276

ABSTRACT

To compare the effects on attention and vigilance of conventional carbamazepine (CBZ) and CBZ controlled release (CBZ-CR), 15 schoolchildren with epilepsy and normal intelligence receiving CBZ were switched to CBZ-CR. Psychological examination was performed on the day before (day A) and 1 month after substitution (day B). Measurements of attention and vigilance were repeated throughout the day at 2-h intervals. Both on days A and B, CBZ plasma levels were monitored during a 12-h period. Fifteen matched healthy controls were submitted to identical test programs, allowing comparisons within subjects as well as between patients and control children. Variability of performance over sessions was neither increased nor decreased with CBZ-CR. Consistent differences over sessions did not exist between patients and controls with either drug. No relation was noted between reaction time and CBZ plasma level. The pharmacologic data confirm results of earlier studies in children. We noted a reduction in intradose fluctuations of CBZ level with CBZ-CR as compared with conventional CBZ. The neuropsychological results do not show a difference between the drugs. Neither were differences noted with respect to antiepileptic efficacy and side effects. At the end of the study, all but one of the children (and their parents) opted to receive CBZ-CR for ease of dosage administration and overall satisfaction.


Subject(s)
Arousal/drug effects , Attention/drug effects , Carbamazepine/administration & dosage , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Neuropsychological Tests , Adolescent , Attitude to Health , Carbamazepine/blood , Carbamazepine/pharmacokinetics , Child , Circadian Rhythm/drug effects , Delayed-Action Preparations , Epilepsy/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Reaction Time/drug effects
18.
Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 52(4): 402-8, 1992 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1424412

ABSTRACT

Saccadic eye movements were analyzed after single oral doses of 20 mg temazepam and placebo in a randomized, double-blind crossover study in eight healthy volunteers. For an optimal evaluation of concentration-effect relationships, 18 blood samples and 43 effect measures were obtained over 33 1/2 hours. After placebo, saccadic peak velocity decreased within the first hour, with average values remaining 6.2% to 12.1% below baseline up to 15 hours after intake. After temazepam, significant changes in peak velocity occurred for 5 hours, with maximum decreases averaging 29.2% (95% confidence interval, 10.0 to 37.2). The apparent duration of effects ranged from 3 to 9 hours in individual subjects. Linear concentration-effect relationships were demonstrated for peak velocity, with individual slopes ranging from -0.11 to -0.46 deg/sec.(ng/ml)-1 (average r = -0.82, all p < 0.01). Differences in protein binding of temazepam did not account for the approximate fourfold variability in individual sensitivities to temazepam. By increasing the frequency of measurements, the accuracy of pharmacodynamic evaluations was clearly enhanced in this study.


Subject(s)
Saccades/drug effects , Temazepam/pharmacology , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Circadian Rhythm/physiology , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Female , Heart Rate/drug effects , Humans , Male , Reference Values , Regression Analysis , Saccades/physiology , Temazepam/pharmacokinetics
19.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 33(1): 101-6, 1992 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1540478

ABSTRACT

1. Healthy student volunteers (n = 103) participating in ongoing clinical pharmacological research completed the Dutch Personality Inventory (DPI), the Dutch version of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-DY) and the Dutch version of the Sensation Seeking Scale (SSS). 2. The volunteers were more extrovert (P less than 0.001), more flexible (P less than 0.001), more tolerant or less impulsive (P less than 0.001), had more self-confidence and initiative (P less than 0.001), and were more satisfied and optimistic (P less than 0.01) when compared with the general norm. When compared with a student norm, volunteers had lower levels of state (P less than 0.001) and trait (P less than 0.05) anxiety. The general sensation seeking tendency of volunteers was higher than in the student norm group (P less than 0.001). The volunteers had a greater tendency to thrill-and-adventure-seeking (P less than 0.001) and to disinhibition (P less than 0.01). 3. Hence, volunteers were a selected sample of the total population of students. This may influence the interpretation of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters. 4. Personality screening should be added to the screening procedures for volunteers.


Subject(s)
Personality , Volunteers/psychology , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Personality Inventory , Pharmacokinetics
20.
Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 50(2): 172-80, 1991 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1868679

ABSTRACT

The effects of single oral doses of 5, 10, and 20 mg temazepam were evaluated with the adaptive tracking test, analysis of smooth-pursuit and saccadic eye movements, and visual analog lines in a placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover experiment with 12 healthy volunteers. Pharmacodynamic testing was performed until 10 hours and pharmacokinetics were evaluated until 24 hours. Temazepam, 20 mg, caused effects in all tests, with peak effects occurring at 30 minutes. The 10 mg dose caused effects on saccadic eye movements and subjective scores of alertness, whereas 5 mg temazepam was detected only by analysis of saccadic eye movements. Linear relationships between plasma concentrations and effects were found in nine subjects for saccadic peak velocity and eight subjects for subjective scores of alertness. The results of this study demonstrate manifest differences in the sensitivities of performance tests and stress the importance of validation of methods when effects of drugs on human performance are studied.


Subject(s)
Pursuit, Smooth/drug effects , Saccades/drug effects , Temazepam/pharmacology , Adult , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Pursuit, Smooth/physiology , Reference Values , Saccades/physiology , Task Performance and Analysis , Temazepam/administration & dosage , Temazepam/pharmacokinetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL