ABSTRACT
Background: A reliable assessment of liver volume, necessary before transplantation, remains a challenge. Our work aimed to assess the differences in the evaluation and measurements of the liver between independent observers and compare different formulas calculating its volume in relation to volumetric segmentation. Methods: Eight researchers measured standard liver dimensions based on 105 abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans. Based on the results obtained, the volume of the liver was calculated using twelve different methods. An independent observer performed a volumetric segmentation of the livers based on the same CT examinations. Results: Significant differences were found between the formulas and in relation to volumetric segmentation, with the closest results obtained for the Heinemann et al. method. The measurements of individual observers differed significantly from one another. The observers also rated different numbers of livers as enlarged. Conclusions: Due to significant differences, despite its time-consuming nature, the use of volumetric liver segmentation in the daily assessment of liver volume seems to be the most accurate method.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Radical resection is the only potentially curative treatment for pancreatic adenocarcinoma; however, only a minor fraction of patients are eligible for resection. Induction therapy may be offered to patients, but the response rate in cases with significant vascular involvement is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of modified of FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy (mFFX) + stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in combination as induction therapy for locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma. The primary endpoints were the resection rate and one-year overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), toxicity, and quality of live (QoL). Material and methods: Thirty patients with locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma were treated with 6 cycles of mFFX, followed by SBRT and additional 3 cycles of mFFX. The response was measured prior to SBRT and after regimen completion. In the absence of disease progression, the patients were referred for surgery. The patients were requested to complete quality of life questionnaires (QLQ)-C30 and QLQ-PAN26 questionnaires biweekly. Results: On the first evaluation, disease control was noted in 26 (86.7%) patients. Stereotactic body radiotherapy was performed in 20 patients. Twelve patients underwent laparotomy, with radical resection possible in 3 cases. The one-year OS rate was 63.3%. Overall, 11 grade ≥ 3 adverse events were noted. No deterioration in the overall QoL was observed. The median PFS was 7.53 months. Conclusions: The expected resection rate of ≥ 30% was not achieved. However, the combination was associated with good local control, low adverse event rate, and good QoL, which advocate its further investigation in this clinical situation.