Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Trials ; 24(1): 224, 2023 Mar 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36964584

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction aims to restore anteroposterior and rotatory stability to the knee following ACL injury. This requires the graft to withstand the forces applied during the process of ligamentisation and the rehabilitative period. We hypothesise that the use of suture tape augmentation of single bundle ACL reconstruction (ACLR) will reduce residual knee laxity and improve patient-reported outcomes at 2-year follow-up. We will conduct a 1:1 parallel arm single-centre randomised controlled trial comparing suture tape augmented ACLR to standard ACLR technique. METHODS: The study design will be a parallel arm 1:1 allocation ratio randomised controlled trial. Sixty-six patients aged 18 and over waitlisted for primary ACLR will be randomised. Patients requiring osteotomy and extra-articular tenodesis and who have had previous contralateral ACL rupture or repair of meniscal or cartilage pathology that modifies the post-operative rehabilitation will be excluded. The primary outcome measure will be the side-to-side difference in anterior tibial translation (measured on the GNRB arthrometer) at 24 months post-surgery. GNRB arthrometer measures will also be taken preoperatively, at 3 months and 12 months post-surgery. Secondary outcomes will include patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) collected online, including quality of life, activity and readiness to return to sport, complication rates (return to theatre, graft failure and rates of sterile effusion), examination findings and return to sport outcomes. Participants will be seen preoperatively, at 6 weeks, 3 months, 12 months and 24 months post-surgery. Participants and those taking arthrometer measures will be blinded to allocation. DISCUSSION: This will be the first randomised trial to investigate the effect of suture-tape augmentation of ACLR on either objective or subjective outcome measures. The use of suture-tape augmentation in ACLR has been associated with promising biomechanical and animal-level studies, exhibiting equivalent complication profiles to the standard technique, with initial non-comparative clinical studies establishing possible areas of advantage for the technique. The successful completion of this trial will allow for an improved understanding of the in situ validity of tape augmentation whilst potentially providing a further platform for surgical stabilisation of the ACL graft. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australia New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry ACTRN12621001162808. Universal Trial Number (UTN): U1111-1268-1487. Registered prospectively on 27 August 2021.


Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , Humans , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Knee Joint/surgery , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/diagnosis , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Sutures , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/adverse effects , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/methods
2.
Arch Public Health ; 80(1): 103, 2022 Mar 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35361270

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic, progressive condition that can be effectively managed via conservative treatments including exercise, weight management and education. Offering these treatments contemporaneously and digitally may increase adherence and engagement due to the flexibility and cost-effectiveness of digital program delivery. The objective of this review was to summarise the characteristics of current digital self-management interventions for individuals with OA and synthesise adherence and attrition outcomes. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for randomised controlled trials utilising digital self-management interventions in individuals with OA. Two reviewers independently screened the search results and extracted data relating to study characteristics, intervention characteristics, and adherence and dropout rates. RESULTS: Eleven studies were included in this review. Intervention length ranged from 6 weeks to 9 months. All interventions were designed for individuals with OA and mostwere multi-component and were constructed around physical activity. The reporting of intervention adherence varied greatly between studies and limited the ability to form conclusions regarding the impact of intervention characteristics. However, of the seven studies that quantified adherence, six reported adherence > 70%. Seven of the included studies reported attrition rates < 20%, with contact and support from researchers not appearing to influence adherence or attrition. CONCLUSIONS: Holistic digital interventions designed for a targeted condition are a promising approach for promoting high adherence and reducing attrition. Future studies should explore how adherence of digital interventions compares to face-to-face interventions and determine potential influencers of adherence.

3.
Phys Ther ; 100(7): 1084-1093, 2020 07 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32239158

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The authors aimed to understand how physical therapists used practice guidelines to manage patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) in Australia. METHODS: This study used a concurrent triangulation mixed-method approach to explore how physical therapists applied clinical guidelines when managing patients with knee OA in an outpatient setting via completion of a semi-structured interview. Interviews were thematically analyzed by 2 investigators using an inductive approach. Themes were then triangulated to the results of an audit that evaluated the level of adherence to respective areas in the clinical guidelines among physical therapists at the participating site. RESULTS: One main theme and 3 subthemes were identified from 18 participants: (1) physical therapists were most confident in applying guidelines to improving range of movement and strength; (2) lack of knowledge in prescription of aerobic exercise, weight, and pain management; (3) pain is a bigger barrier in areas where knowledge is lacking; and (4) lack of clarity around the scope of practice. Themes converged with the reported level of adherence to guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Physical therapists commonly include range of movement and muscle strength exercises when managing people with knee OA. However, they were less confident in prescribing aerobic exercise and recommending weight and pain management strategies. IMPACT: Apart from the need to upskill physical therapists in the aforementioned areas of clinical practice, the role of a physical therapist in the management of people with knee OA requires further clarification.


Subject(s)
Exercise Therapy , Guideline Adherence/standards , Osteoarthritis, Knee/rehabilitation , Physical Therapists , Range of Motion, Articular , Australia , Exercise , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis, Knee/surgery , Pain Management , Qualitative Research , Retrospective Studies , Scope of Practice
4.
Phys Ther Sport ; 27: 29-37, 2017 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28822956

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Self-efficacy is positively associated with adherence behaviours and rehabilitation outcomes following Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) reconstruction. An internet resource can be an effective way to provide information, goal setting, patient monitoring and hence support overall self-management. PURPOSE: This study examined the feasibility of a three month 'internet-based intervention' (mobile-oriented site) to enhance recovery for patients following ACL reconstruction. The potential effect of the internet-based intervention on knee pain, function, self-efficacy and fear of pain were also assessed. METHOD: This was a pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) with pre and post intervention design (assessments at one week and three months following ACL reconstruction) comparing: (1) a control group and (2) an intervention group (internet-based intervention). A set of qualitative and quantitative assessments were included to evaluate potential improvements in self-efficacy, pain and function and perception of the internet intervention. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Seventeen participants were available for analysis (n = 10 intervention and n = 7 control group). Participants reported the internet-based intervention to be a useful tool for information, reminder and reinforcement for performing their exercise rehabilitation with 30.3% (±35.3%) adherence to the internet-based intervention. No differences were observed between the groups over time on the outcome questionnaires (p > 0.05). Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN12616001379404.


Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/rehabilitation , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , Exercise Therapy , Internet , Adult , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Female , Humans , Male , Pain/rehabilitation , Patient Compliance , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Pilot Projects , Recovery of Function , Return to Sport , Self Efficacy , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...