Real-World Treatment Persistence Among Advanced Therapy-Naïve or -Experienced Patients with Ulcerative Colitis Initiated on Ustekinumab or Adalimumab.

INTRODUCTION: Persistence on advanced therapies in ulcerative colitis (UC) is a useful real-world treatment performance measure. This study compared real-world persistence during the maintenance phase among advanced therapy-naïve and -experienced patients with UC initiated on ustekinumab or adalimumab. METHODS: Claims data from the IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus de-identified database (01/01/2015-06/30/2022) were used to select adult patients with UC treated with ustekinumab or adalimumab based on the agent first initiated (index date) after 10/21/2019. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance cohorts on baseline characteristics. Persistence on the index agent (no gaps in days of supply of > 120 days for ustekinumab or > 60 days for adalimumab), persistence while corticosteroid-free, while on monotherapy, and persistence on the US labeled dose were described and compared during the 12-month period post-index using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models. Outcomes were analyzed separately among advanced therapy-naïve and advanced therapy-experienced patients. RESULTS: At 12 months post-index, advanced therapy-naïve patients receiving ustekinumab (n = 371) had higher persistence on the index agent [83.8% vs. 57.6%, hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) = 3.09 (2.29-4.16); p < 0.001), persistence while corticosteroid-free [2.00 (1.63-2.45); p < 0.001], persistence while on monotherapy [2.67 (2.07-3.44); p < 0.001], and persistence on the labeled dose [4.21 (2.76-6.44); p < 0.001] versus those receiving adalimumab (n = 1726). At 12 months post-index, advanced therapy-experienced patients receiving ustekinumab (n = 693) had higher persistence on the index agent [78.1% vs. 59.2%, 2.44 (1.82-3.26); p < 0.001], persistence while corticosteroid-free [1.24 (1.01-1.54); p = 0.0447], persistence while on monotherapy [2.53 (2.00-3.21); p < 0.001], and persistence on the labeled dose [4.77 (3.09-7.35); p < 0.001] versus those receiving adalimumab (n = 254). CONCLUSION: This claims-based analysis demonstrated significantly higher treatment persistence, including persistence while corticosteroid-free, persistence while on monotherapy, and persistence on the labeled dose, among both advanced therapy-naïve and advanced therapy-experienced patients with UC initiated on ustekinumab compared to adalimumab.

Comparison of real-world healthcare resource utilization among advanced therapy-naïve and advanced therapy-experienced patients with ulcerative colitis initiated on ustekinumab or vedolizumab.

OBJECTIVES: To describe and compare healthcare resource utilization (HRU) among advanced therapy-naïve and advanced therapy-experienced patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) initiating ustekinumab or vedolizumab in the United States. METHODS: Claims data from IQVIA PharMetrics Plus de-identified database (01/01/2015-06/30/2022) were used to identify adult patients with UC initiating ustekinumab or vedolizumab (index date) after 10/21/2019. Baseline characteristics were balanced using inverse probability of treatment weighting. All-cause and UC-related HRU (number of inpatient admissions, inpatient days, emergency department visits, and outpatient visits) were described during the post-index period, and Poisson regression models were used to evaluate associations between index therapy and HRU outcomes. Analyses were performed separately among advanced therapy-naïve or advanced therapy-experienced patients. RESULTS: A total of 444 (ustekinumab) and 1,917 (vedolizumab) advanced therapy-naïve patients, and 647 (ustekinumab) and 1,152 (vedolizumab) advanced therapy-experienced patients were identified. In advanced therapy-naïve patients, higher rates of UC-related inpatient days (rate ratio [95% confidence interval] = 1.84 [1.15, 3.58]; p = 0.004), emergency department visits (1.39 [1.01, 2.17]; p = 0.044), and outpatient visits (1.81 [1.61, 2.04]; p < 0.001) were observed among patients initiating vedolizumab relative to ustekinumab. In advanced therapy-experienced patients, higher rates of UC-related inpatient admissions (1.47 [1.06, 2.12]; p = 0.012), inpatient days (2.18 (1.44, 3.71); p < 0.001), and outpatient visits (1.50 (1.19, 1.82); p < 0.001) were observed among patients initiating vedolizumab relative to ustekinumab. Results were similar when all-cause HRU was examined. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with UC with and without advanced therapy experience, higher rates of all-cause and UC-related HRU were observed among those treated with vedolizumab relative to ustekinumab.

Comparison of Real-World On-Label Treatment Persistence in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis Receiving Guselkumab Versus Subcutaneous Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Treatment persistence among patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is essential for achieving optimal treatment outcomes. Guselkumab, a fully human interleukin-23p19-subunit inhibitor, was approved by the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of active PsA in July 2020, with a dosing regimen of 100 mg at week 0, week 4, then every 8 weeks. In the Phase 3 DISCOVER-1 and DISCOVER-2 studies of patients with active PsA, 94% of guselkumab-randomized patients completed treatment through 1 year and 90% did so through 2 years (DISCOVER-2). Real-world evidence is needed to compare treatment persistence while following US prescribing guidelines (i.e., on-label persistence) for guselkumab versus subcutaneous (SC) tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis). METHODS: Adults with PsA receiving guselkumab or their first SC TNFi (i.e., adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, or golimumab) between 14 July 2020 and 31 March 2022 were identified in the IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus database (first claim defined the treatment start date [index date]). Baseline characteristics and biologic use (biologic-naïve/biologic-experienced) were assessed during the 12-month period preceding the index date. Baseline characteristics were balanced between cohorts using propensity-score weighting based on the standardized mortality ratio approach. The follow-up period spanned from the index date until the earlier of the end of continuous insurance eligibility or end of data availability. On-label persistence, defined as the absence of treatment discontinuation (based on a gap of 112 days for guselkumab or 56 days for SC TNFi) or any dose escalation/reduction during follow-up, was assessed in the weighted treatment cohorts using Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves. A Cox proportional hazards model, further adjusted for baseline biologic use, was used to compare on-label persistence between the weighted cohorts. RESULTS: The guselkumab cohort included 526 patients (mean age 49.8 years; 61.2% female) and the SC TNFi cohort included 1953 patients (mean age: 48.5 years; 60.2% female). After weighting, baseline characteristics were well balanced with a mean follow-up of 12.3-12.4 months across cohorts; 51.5% of patients in the guselkumab cohort and 16.7% in the SC TNFi cohort received biologics in the 12-month baseline period. Respective rates of treatment persistence at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months were 91.2%, 84.1%, 75.9%, and 71.5% for the guselkumab cohort versus 77.3%, 61.6%, 50.0%, and 43.7% for the SC TNFi cohort (all log-rank p < 0.001). At 12 months, patients in the guselkumab cohort were 3.0 times more likely than patients in the SC TNFi cohort to remain persistent on treatment (p < 0.001). Median time to discontinuation was not reached for the guselkumab cohort and was 8.9 months for the SC TNFi cohort. CONCLUSION: This real-world study employing US commercial health-plan claims data to assess on-label treatment persistence in PsA demonstrated that, at 12 months, guselkumab was associated with a 3 times greater likelihood of persistence compared with SC TNFi.

Treatment patterns for patients with BRCA1/2-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients with BRCA-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) have an aggressive disease course. This study aimed to describe real-world treatment patterns among patients with BRCA-positive mCRPC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: De-identified electronic health record data from the Flatiron Health-Foundation Medicine Inc. Metastatic Prostate Cancer Clinico-Genomic Database (January 01, 2011 to June 30, 2022) were used to select patients with BRCA-positive mCRPC initiating first-line (1L) therapy with an oncologist-defined advanced line of therapy (LOT) or androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) monotherapy. Treatment sequences and reasons for censoring were described in 1L, and among patients who initiated a second-line (2L) therapy. RESULTS: A total of 98 treated patients with BRCA-positive mCRPC were identified. The top 3 treatment regimens in 1L, overall, were ADT monotherapy (19%), enzalutamide (14%), and olaparib (13%). The main reason for censoring patients with ADT monotherapy was death (52.6%). Among 79 patients treated with an advanced LOT in 1L, 43.0% (n = 34) did not initiate a 2L therapy, of which, 29.4% died. In patients who initiated a 2L (n = 45), the most common 1L to 2L treatment sequence was olaparib to docetaxel (11.1%). The most prescribed 2L therapies were docetaxel (22.2%), olaparib (20.0%), abiraterone acetate (13.3%), and enzalutamide (11.1%). From 1L initiation, the median time-to-next-treatment was 6.2 months. CONCLUSION: Among patients with BRCA-positive mCRPC, ADT monotherapy, enzalutamide, and olaparib were most commonly used. Prognosis of BRCA-positive patients was poor, with most patients failing initial therapy resulting in a switch to a new therapy or death. These findings highlight the need for earlier and more effective treatments for patients with BRCA-positive mCRPC.

Predictors of High Healthcare Cost Among Patients with Generalized Myasthenia Gravis: A Combined Machine Learning and Regression Approach from a US Payer Perspective.

BACKGROUND: High healthcare costs could arise from unmet needs. This study used random forest (RF) and regression methods to identify predictors of high costs from a US payer perspective in patients newly diagnosed with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG). METHODS: Adults with gMG (first diagnosis = index) were selected from the IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus database (2017-2021). Predictors of high healthcare costs were measured 12 months pre-index (main cohort) and during both the 12 months pre- and post-index (subgroup). Top 50 predictors of high costs [≥ $9404 (main cohort) and ≥ $9159 (subgroup) per-patient-per-month] were identified with RF models; the magnitude and direction of association were estimated with multivariable modified Poisson regression models. RESULTS: The main cohort and subgroup included 2739 and 1638 patients, respectively. In RF analysis, the most important predictors of high costs before/on the index date were index MG exacerbation, all-cause inpatient admission, and number of days with corticosteroids. After the index date, these were immunoglobulin and monoclonal antibody use and number of all-cause outpatient visits and MG-related encounters. Adjusting for the top 50 predictors, post-index immunoglobulin use increased the risk of high costs by 261%, monoclonal antibody use by 135%, index MG exacerbation by 78%, and pre-index all-cause inpatient admission by 27% (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis links patient characteristics both before the formal MG diagnosis and in the first year to high future healthcare costs. Findings may help inform payers on cost-saving strategies, and providers can potentially shift to targeted treatment approaches to reduce the clinical and economic burden of gMG.

Understanding profiles of patients with treatment-resistant depression by stringency of health plan prior authorization criteria for approval of esketamine nasal spray.

OBJECTIVES: In the United States (US), prescription drug coverage is subject to prior authorization (PA) criteria, which may vary between health plans and may exceed drug label requirements. This study aimed to characterize profiles and treatment history of patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) who initiated esketamine nasal spray, by stringency of their health plans' PA criteria relative to the esketamine label. METHODS: Adults with evidence of TRD (≥2 antidepressant courses of adequate dose and duration) prior to initiating esketamine were identified using US insurance claims data (03/2016-02/2022). Based on health plan PA criteria for esketamine obtained from Managed Markets Insight & Technology data (05/2020-02/2022), patients were grouped into stringent (PA criteria exceeds label) and non-stringent (PA criteria less stringent or equal to label) cohorts. Patient treatment history before esketamine initiation was compared using Wilcoxon rank sum and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: The stringent cohort included 168 patients (mean age: 45 years, 63% female) and the non-stringent cohort included 400 patients (mean age: 45 years, 70% female). During the ongoing major depressive episode before esketamine initiation, the stringent versus non-stringent cohort completed 3.9 versus 3.8 antidepressant treatment courses, on average (p = 0.217); 94.6% versus 96.8% used augmentation therapy (p = 0.240), including 59.3% versus 58.1% with an antipsychotic (p = 0.844), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of health plan stringency, on average, patients exceeded US label-mandated number of antidepressant trials before esketamine initiation, which questions the need for health insurance plans PA criteria above label.

Real-world economic burden associated with disease progression from metastatic castration-sensitive to castration-resistant prostate cancer on treatment in the United States.

BACKGROUND: The advent of next-generation imaging will likely reduce nonmetastatic prostate cancer (PC) prevalence and increase identification of metastatic prostate cancer cases, resulting in two predominant advanced stages in the metastatic setting. There is a need to characterize changes in health care resource utilization (HRU) and costs when metastatic castration-sensitive PC (mCSPC) progresses to metastatic castration-resistant PC (mCRPC) to identify value drivers from current and new treatments. OBJECTIVE: To describe treatment patterns, HRU, and total health care costs among patients with mCSPC, before and after progression to mCRPC. METHODS: Clinical data from the Flatiron Metastatic PC Core Registry (January 1, 2013, to December 1, 2021) and linked claims from Komodo Health (January 1, 2014, to December 1, 2021) were used to identify patients with progression from mCSPC to mCRPC (date of progression was the index date) and subsequently initiated first-line mCRPC therapy on/after January 1, 2017. Treatment patterns and all-cause/PC-related HRU and health care costs were described per-patient-per-month (PPPM), separately for no more than 12 months pre-index (mCSPC disease state) and post-index (mCRPC disease state). Costs (payer's perspective) included those for services/procedures from medical claims and costs from pharmacy claims. Continuous HRU and costs were compared between the mCSPC and mCRPC disease states using Wilcoxon signed rank tests. RESULTS: Among 296 patients with mCSPC progressing to mCRPC (median age 69.0 years, 60.5% White, 15.9% Black), use of systemic therapies with androgen deprivation therapy increased dramatically from 35.1% in the mCSPC disease state to 92.9% in the mCRPC disease state, and use of androgen deprivation therapy monotherapy decreased from 25.7% to 2.4%, respectively. Although 39.2% received none of these therapies in the mCSPC disease state, this proportion decreased to 4.7% after transition to mCRPC. The mean number of days with PC-related outpatient visits increased from 1.57 to 2.16 PPPM in the mCSPC and mCRPC disease states (P < 0.001). From the mCSPC to mCRPC disease states, mean all-cause total health care costs PPPM increased from $4,424 (medical costs: $2,846) to $9,717 (medical costs: $4,654), and mean PC-related total health care costs PPPM increased from $2,859 (medical costs: $1,626) to $8,012 (medical costs: $3,285; all P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world study of patients with disease progression from mCSPC to mCRPC in US clinical practice, nearly 2-in-3 patients did not receive treatment with additional systemic therapies before progression to castration resistance. Post-progression, mean PC-related total costs increased nearly 3-fold, with a more than 2-fold increase in PC-related medical costs. Use of additional systemic therapies may delay the time and cost associated with disease progression to castration resistance.

Real-world clinical outcomes among patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer initiating apalutamide.

Aim: To describe overall survival, time to castration resistance and castration resistance-free survival in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) initiating apalutamide in a US oncology network. Patients & methods: Patients with mCSPC initiating apalutamide on or after 17 September 2019 from an electronic health record-derived deidentified database were included. Patients were followed from apalutamide initiation and were censored at the earlier of end of clinical activity or data availability (31 October 2022). Results: At 12 and 24 months, overall survival rates were 91.0 and 88.3%, rates of castration sensitivity were 85.7 and 72.1%, and castration resistance-free survival rates were 80.2 and 65.9%, respectively. Conclusion: Real-world clinical outcomes of patients with mCSPC treated with apalutamide were comparable to results from the phase III TITAN trial.

This study looked at health outcomes among 176 patients receiving a prostate cancer medication, apalutamide. The average age of patients was 72 years, and approximately two-thirds of patients were White. Two years after starting apalutamide, most patients remained alive and their cancer did not progress.

Comparative analysis of persistence and remission with guselkumab versus secukinumab and ixekizumab in the United States.

Purpose: Real-world data comparing long-term performance of interleukin (IL)-23 and IL-17 inhibitors in psoriasis are limited. This study compared treatment persistence and remission among patients initiating guselkumab versus IL-17 inhibitors.Methods: Adults with psoriasis initiating guselkumab, secukinumab, or ixekizumab treatment (index date) were identified from Merative™ MarketScan® Research Databases (01/01/2016-10/31/2021). Persistence was defined as no index biologic supply gaps of twice the labeled maintenance dosing interval. Remission was defined using an exploratory approach as index biologic discontinuation for ≥6 months without psoriasis-related inpatient admissions and treatments.Results: There were 3516 and 6066 patients in the guselkumab versus secukinumab comparison, and 3805 and 4674 patients in guselkumab versus ixekizumab comparison. At 18 months, the guselkumab cohort demonstrated about twice the persistence rate as secukinumab (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.15; p < 0.001) and ixekizumab cohorts (HR = 1.77; p < 0.001). At 6 months after index biologic discontinuation, the guselkumab cohort was 31% and 40% more likely to achieve remission than secukinumab (rate ratio [RR] = 1.31; p < 0.001) and ixekizumab cohorts (RR = 1.40; p < 0.001).Conclusions: Guselkumab was associated with greater persistence and likelihood of remission than IL-17 inhibitors, indicating greater disease control and modification potential.

Treatment Patterns, Acute Healthcare Resource Use, and Costs of Patients with Treatment-Resistant Depression Completing Induction Phase of Esketamine in the United States.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to understand treatment patterns, acute healthcare use, and cost patterns among adults with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) who completed induction treatment with esketamine nasal spray in the United States (US). Per label, induction is defined as administration twice a week for 4 weeks, after which maintenance is started on a weekly basis for 4 weeks, and thereafter, patients are treated weekly or bimonthly. METHODS: Adults with one or more esketamine claim (index date) on or after March 5, 2019 were selected from Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database (January 2016-June 2022). Before the index date, patients had evidence of TRD and ≥ 12 months of continuous insurance eligibility (baseline period). Patients with eight or more esketamine treatment sessions were included in the main cohort. A subgroup included patients with one or more baseline mental health (MH)-related inpatient (IP) admission or emergency department (ED) visit (i.e., prior acute healthcare users). Treatment patterns were described during the follow-up period (index date until earliest of end of insurance eligibility or data); acute healthcare (i.e., IP and ED) resource use and costs (2021 US dollars) were reported during the baseline and follow-up periods. RESULTS: Of the 322 patients in the main cohort, 111 comprised the subgroup of prior acute healthcare users. During the follow-up period, mean time from index date to eighth esketamine session was 73.2 days in the main cohort and 78.8 days in the subgroup (per label, 28 days). Further, 75.2% of the main cohort and 73.9% of the subgroup completed four or more esketamine maintenance sessions following induction. In the main cohort, mean all-cause acute healthcare costs per patient per month (PPPM) decreased from baseline ($837) to follow-up ($770). Similar reductions were observed for mean MH-related acute healthcare costs PPPM (baseline $648, follow-up $577). In the subgroup, mean all-cause acute healthcare costs PPPM also decreased (baseline $2323, follow-up $1423), driven by mean MH-related acute healthcare costs PPPM (baseline $1880, follow-up $1139). Mean all-cause acute healthcare use per ten patients per month remained largely stable from baseline to follow-up in the main cohort (IP days: baseline 2.24, follow-up 2.13; ED visits: baseline 1.33, follow-up 1.45) and decreased in the subgroup (IP days: baseline 6.38, follow-up 4.56; ED visits: baseline 2.58, follow-up 2.41). Trends in mean MH-related acute healthcare use were similar. CONCLUSION: Patients generally required more time than label recommendation to complete esketamine induction treatment, and most went on to have 12 or more esketamine sessions. Completion of induction treatment correlated with reductions in mean all-cause and MH-related acute healthcare costs. Larger reductions were seen in the subgroup of prior acute healthcare users.

Economic burden of generalized myasthenia gravis (MG) in the United States and the impact of common comorbidities and acute MG-events.

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the incremental healthcare costs and resource utilization (HRU) associated with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG), as well as variability in these outcomes among patients with gMG and common comorbidities and acute MG-related events. METHODS: Adults with gMG and without MG were identified from a large US database (2017-2021). The index date was the first MG diagnosis (gMG cohort) or random date (non-MG cohort). Cohorts were propensity score matched 1:1. The gMG cohort included subgroups of patients with a 12-month pre-index (baseline) cardiometabolic or psychiatric comorbidity, or a post-index MG exacerbation/crisis. Monthly healthcare costs (2021 USD) and HRU were compared post-index between gMG and non-MG cohorts. RESULTS: The gMG and matched non-MG cohorts each contained 2,739 patients. Mean incremental healthcare costs associated with MG were $4,155 (gMG: $5,567; non-MG: $1,411), with differences driven by incremental inpatient costs of $2,166 (gMG: $2,617; non-MG: $452); all p < 0.001. The gMG versus non-MG cohort had 4.36 times more inpatient admissions and 2.26 times more outpatient visits; all p < 0.001. Among patients with gMG in cardiometabolic (n = 1,859), psychiatric (n = 1,308), and exacerbation/crisis (n = 419) subgroups, mean monthly healthcare costs were $6,660, $7,443, and $17,330, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: gMG is associated with substantial incremental costs and HRU, with inpatient costs driving the total incremental costs. Costs increased by 20% and 34% among patients with cardiometabolic and psychiatric conditions, respectively, and over three times among those with acute MG-related events. gMG is a complex disease requiring management of comorbidities and treatment options that can prevent acute symptomatic events.

Generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) is a rare long-standing condition that affects the junctions between nerves and muscles, causing them to be weak. In a serious case, the diaphragm ­ a muscle that helps with breathing ­ becomes so weak that a patient will need a machine to breathe for them. This is called MG exacerbation or crisis. In this study, we used a large insurance database in the United States to look at how much money healthcare payers paid for gMG patients on average and what healthcare resources patients with gMG used. We compared these findings with patients without gMG. Also, among patients with gMG, we reported these findings specifically for patients who also had heart, blood, or blood vessel disease; patients who had a mental illness; and patients who had MG exacerbation or crisis later on. We found that patients with gMG used $5,567 per month on average ($4,155 more than patients without gMG), mostly from overnight hospital stays. Patients with gMG also had four times more overnight hospital stays and two times more hospital day visits when we compared them to patients without gMG. Patients with gMG and other health conditions used even more money and resources per month. Patients with MG exacerbation or crisis used $17,330 per month on average. Our results showed that gMG led to higher healthcare cost and resource use. In order to reduce cost and resources, doctors also need to control for other health conditions as they treat patients with gMG, and to prevent patients from having MG exacerbation or crisis later on.

Real-World Maintenance Phase Persistence on Ustekinumab and Adalimumab in Ulcerative Colitis.

Purpose: To describe real-world persistence in bio-naïve and bio-experienced adults with ulcerative colitis (UC) treated with ustekinumab, a recently approved anti-interleukin 12/23 antibody, or adalimumab, an anti-TNF biologic. Methods: This is a descriptive, retrospective cohort study. Patients initiating ustekinumab or adalimumab (index date, between 10/21/2019 and 08/13/2021) were selected from the Komodo Health comprehensive dataset and stratified into bio-naïve and bio-experienced subgroups based on biologic use 12 months pre-index date. Endpoints evaluated at 12-months after maintenance phase start using Kaplan-Meier analysis included 1) persistence; 2) persistence while being corticosteroid-free (<14 consecutive days of corticosteroid supply after day 90 post-index); and, 3) persistence while on monotherapy (no immunomodulators/non-index biologics/advanced therapies). Results: Ustekinumab cohort included 778 patients (236 bio-naïve, 542 bio-experienced) and adalimumab cohort included 1693 patients (1517 bio-naive, 176 bio-experienced). At 12 months after maintenance phase start, 75.5% and 50.5% of bio-naïve patients persisted on ustekinumab and adalimumab and 72.3% and 56.9% of bio-experienced patients persisted on ustekinumab and adalimumab, respectively. Further, 55.1% and 38.2% of bio-naïve patients were persistent and corticosteroid-free with ustekinumab and adalimumab; 43.7% and 33.4% of bio-experienced patients were persistent and corticosteroid-free with ustekinumab and adalimumab, respectively. Moreover, 68.1% and 44.5% of bio-naïve patients were persistent and on monotherapy with ustekinumab and adalimumab; 61.6% and 47.9% of bio-experienced patients were persistent and on monotherapy with ustekinumab and adalimumab, respectively. Conclusion: At 12 months after maintenance phase start, patients with UC treated with ustekinumab had numerically higher persistence, including persistence while corticosteroid-free and persistence while on monotherapy, than patients treated with adalimumab.

Characterizing the real-world economic burden of metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer in the United States.

AIMS: To describe healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs of patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). METHODS: Linked data from Flatiron Metastatic PC Core Registry and Komodo's Healthcare Map were evaluated (01/2016-12/2021). Patients with chart-confirmed diagnoses for metastatic PC without confirmed castration resistance in Flatiron who initiated androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) monotherapy or advanced therapy for mCSPC in 2017 or later (index date) with a corresponding pharmacy or medical claim in Komodo Health were included. Advanced therapies considered were androgen-receptor signaling inhibitors, chemotherapies, estrogens, immunotherapies, poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors, and radiopharmaceuticals. Patients with <12 months of continuous insurance eligibility before index were excluded. Per-patient-per-month (PPPM) all-cause and PC-related HRU and costs (medical and pharmacy; from a payer's perspective in 2022 $USD) were described in the 12-month baseline period and follow-up period (from the index date to castration resistance, end of continuous insurance eligibility, end of data availability, or death). RESULTS: Of 871 patients included (mean age: 70.6 years), 52% initiated ADT monotherapy as their index treatment without documented advanced therapy use. During baseline, 31% of patients had a PC-related inpatient admission and 94% had a PC-related outpatient visit; mean all-cause costs were $2551 PPPM and PC-related costs were $839 PPPM with $787 PPPM attributable to medical costs. Patients had a mean follow-up of 15 months, during which 38% had a PC-related inpatient admission and 98% had a PC-related outpatient visit; mean all-cause costs were $5950 PPPM with PC-related total costs of $4363 PPPM, including medical costs of $2012 PPPM. LIMITATIONS: All analyses were descriptive; statistical testing was not performed. Treatment effectiveness and clinical outcomes were not assessed. CONCLUSION: This real-world study demonstrated a significant economic burden in mCSPC patients, and a propensity to use ADT monotherapy in clinical practice despite the availability and guideline recommendations of advanced life-prolonging therapies.

Burden of chronic corticosteroid use among patients with ulcerative colitis initiated on targeted treatment or conventional therapy in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Chronic corticosteroid use is common in ulcerative colitis (UC); however, real-world evidence of its burden to the health care system is limited. OBJECTIVE: To quantify chronic corticosteroid use burden in UC. METHODS: Adults with UC initiated on targeted treatments (ie, biologics and advanced/small molecule therapies) or conventional therapy (index date) were selected from a deidentified US insurance claims database (January 1, 2004, to September 30, 2021). Targeted treatments and conventional therapy initiators were stratified into chronic (>90 days corticosteroid use 12 months post-index [landmark]) and nonchronic corticosteroid users. Patient characteristics 12 months pre-index were balanced with inverse probability of treatment weighting. Health care resource use, costs (US$ 2021), and corticosteroid-related complications were compared in the 12 months post-landmark. RESULTS: Targeted treatment initiators included 1,886 chronic and 1,911 nonchronic corticosteroid users; conventional therapy initiators included 4,980 chronic and 5,199 nonchronic users. Chronic vs nonchronic users had 94% more inpatient days and 16% more outpatient visits among targeted treatment initiators, and 135% more inpatient days and 30% more outpatient visits among conventional therapy initiators (all P < 0.01). Mean all-cause total costs per patient per year were $73,491 for chronic vs $58,884 for nonchronic users ($14,607 higher; P < 0.01) for targeted treatment initiators, and $39,335 for chronic vs $21,271 for nonchronic users ($18,065 higher; P < 0.01) for conventional therapy initiators. Odds of infection and bone loss were 14% and 113% higher, respectively, in chronic vs nonchronic users among targeted treatment initiators and 29% and 47% higher in chronic vs nonchronic users among conventional therapy initiators (all P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that chronic corticosteroid use is associated with substantial clinical and economic burden and may indicate unmet needs in the management of UC progression.

Real-world economic burden of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer before and after first-line therapy initiation.

AIMS: To describe healthcare costs of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) initiating first-line (1 L) therapies from a US payer perspective. METHODS: Patients initiating a Flatiron oncologist-defined 1 L mCRPC therapy (index date) on or after mCRPC diagnosis were identified from linked electronic medical records/claims data from the Flatiron Metastatic Prostate Cancer (PC) Core Registry and Komodo's Healthcare Map. Patients were excluded if they initiated a clinical trial drug in 1 L, had <12 months of insurance eligibility prior to index, or no claims in Komodo's Healthcare Map for the Flatiron oncologist-defined index therapy. All-cause and PC-related total costs per-patient-per-month (PPPM), including costs for services and procedures from medical claims (i.e. medical costs) and costs from pharmacy claims (i.e. pharmacy costs), were described in the 12-month baseline period before 1 L therapy initiation (including the baseline pre- and post- mCRPC progression periods) and during 1 L therapy (follow-up). RESULTS: Among 459 patients with mCRPC (mean age 70 years, 57% White, 16% Black, 45% commercially-insured, 43% Medicare Advantage-insured, and 12% Medicaid-insured), average baseline all-cause total costs (PPPM) were $4,576 ($4,166 pre-mCRPC progression, $8,278 post-mCRPC progression). Average baseline PC-related total costs were $2,935 ($2,537 pre-mCRPC progression, $6,661 post-mCRPC progression). During an average 1 L duration of 8.5 months, mean total costs were $13,746 (all-cause) and $12,061 (PC-related) PPPM. The cost increase following 1 L therapy initiation was driven by higher PC-related outpatient and pharmacy costs. PC-related medical costs PPPM increased from $1,504 during baseline to $5,585 following 1 L mCRPC therapy initiation. LIMITATIONS: All analyses were descriptive; statistical testing was not performed. CONCLUSION: Incremental costs of progression to mCRPC are significant, with the majority of costs driven by higher PC-related costs. Using contemporary data, this study highlights the importance of utilizing effective therapies that slow progression and reduce healthcare resource demands despite the initial investment in treatment costs.

Economic and clinical burden of chronic corticosteroid use in patients with Crohn[apos]s disease initiated on biologic or conventional therapies in the US: A retrospective claims study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic corticosteroid (CS) use is associated with complications, but estimates of the economic and clinical burden in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the burden of chronic CS use in CD in the United States in terms of health care resource utilization (HRU), health care costs, and CS-related complications. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of adults with CD initiated on biologics or conventional therapies (index date). Patients from a deidentified insurance claims database (2004-2021) were classified as chronic CS users (>90 days of CS use) or nonchronic CS users based on a 12-month landmark period starting on the index date. Patient baseline characteristics were balanced, and outcomes (HRU, costs [2021 US dollars], and CS-related complications) 12 months after the landmark period were compared between CS groups using regressions with nonparametric bootstrap resampling to estimate confidence intervals and P values. RESULTS: Biologic initiators (mean age: 44 years, 55% female) included 3366 chronic and 3401 nonchronic CS users; conventional therapy initiators (mean age: 51 years, 59% female) included 3657 chronic and 3727 nonchronic CS users. Compared with nonchronic users, chronic users had significantly more inpatient days and outpatient visits (biologic initiators: 37% and 24% more, respectively; conventional therapy initiators: 36% and 17%, respectively; all P<0.05). Chronic users also had significantly higher mean all-cause total costs per-patient-per year (biologic: $72,967 vs. $63,100, mean cost difference [MCD] = $9867; conventional therapy: $40,144 vs. $26,426, MCD = $13,718; all P<0.001), as well as higher odds of infection (biologic: 14% higher; conventional therapy: 20% higher) and bone loss (63% and 41%, respectively) (all P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Chronic CS use in patients with CD is associated with a significant economic and clinical burden including higher HRU, health care costs, and prevalence of complications, suggesting unmet needs in the clinical management of this population.

Persistence and Dose Escalation During Maintenance Phase and Use of Nonbiologic Medications Among Patients With Ulcerative Colitis Initiated on Ustekinumab in the United States.

Background: Real-world data on treatment patterns among patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) initiated on ustekinumab are limited. Methods: Adults with UC initiated on ustekinumab (index date) between 10/18/2019 and 04/31/2022 were selected from a deidentified health insurance claims database (Symphony Health, an ICON plc Company, PatientSource). Persistence (no gaps in days of supply >120 days), persistence while being corticosteroid-free (no corticosteroid use for ≥14 days of supply after a 90-day grace period from index date) and dose escalation (≥2 consecutive subcutaneous claims ≥100% above daily maintenance dose) were described during the maintenance phase using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Nonbiologic treatments, among patients with ≥2 ustekinumab claims within 90 days post-index and ≥6 months of follow-up, were compared with logistic models 6 months post- versus pre-ustekinumab initiation. Results: 6565 patients on ustekinumab entered the maintenance phase. At month 12 of the maintenance phase, 72.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 70.1%-73.9%) were persistent, 50.8% (95% CI: 48.7%-52.9%) were persistent and corticosteroid-free, and 19.2% (95% CI: 17.3%-21.3%) of patients had dose escalation. In the 6 months post- versus pre-ustekinumab initiation, the odds of nonbiologic medication use assessed in 4147 patients were significantly lower: 57% lower odds for corticosteroid, 46% for 60 cumulative days of corticosteroid, 42% for 5-aminosalicylic acid, and 24% for immunomodulators (all P < .001). Conclusions: Most patients with UC reaching the maintenance phase on ustekinumab remained persistent after 12 months of maintenance therapy. Nonbiologic medication use post-ustekinumab initiation was significantly lower, notably for corticosteroids. Given the multiple complications associated with chronic corticosteroid use, this reduction can be seen as clinically relevant and informs treatment choice for patients with UC.

Ischemic stroke and systemic embolism among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation who abandon oral anticoagulant therapy.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the risk of stroke and systemic embolism (SE) among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) who abandoned their first direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) fill ("abandoners") relative to patients who continued DOACs beyond the first fill ("continuers"). METHODS: In this retrospective longitudinal study, adults with NVAF prescribed DOACs were selected from Symphony Health, an ICON plc Company, PatientSource, 1 April 2017 to 31 October 2020. A 90-day landmark period following the first DOAC fill was used to classify patients as abandoners or continuers. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance baseline characteristics between cohorts. Time to ischemic stroke/SE was described and compared between cohorts using weighted Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models from the end of the landmark period until end of clinical activity or data. RESULTS: After weighting, 200,398 and 211,352 patients comprised the abandoner and continuer cohorts, respectively. The mean duration of follow-up was 14.9 and 15.7 months, respectively. At 12 months of follow-up, the probability of ischemic stroke/SE was 1.34% in the abandoner cohort and 1.00% in the continuer cohort; the risk of ischemic stroke/SE was 35% higher in the abandoner versus continuer cohort (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] = 1.35 [1.20, 1.51]; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with NVAF who abandoned the first DOAC fill had significantly higher risk of ischemic stroke/SE compared to patients who continued therapy beyond the first fill. There is an unmet need for better access to DOACs so that the long-term risk of poor outcomes may be minimized.

Long-term persistence and other treatment patterns among bio-naïve patients with Crohn's disease treated with ustekinumab or adalimumab.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate long-term persistence among bio-naïve patients with CD initiated on ustekinumab or adalimumab. METHODS: Adults with CD initiating ustekinumab or adalimumab (index date, between September 23, 2016 and August 1, 2019) were sampled from the IBM MarketScan Commercial Database. Patients without CD-indicated biologics (bio-naïve) and with no diagnoses for other autoimmune diseases 12 months pre-index date (baseline) were included. Cohorts were balanced on baseline characteristics with inverse probability of treatment weighting. Persistence was defined as the absence of therapy exposure gaps >120 days (ustekinumab) or >60 (adalimumab) between days of supply. Composite endpoints were persistence and being corticosteroid-free (no corticosteroids >14 days of supply after day 90 post-index) and persistence while on monotherapy (no immunomodulators/non-index biologics). Persistence was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox's models. RESULTS: Ustekinumab and adalimumab cohorts included 671 and 2,975 patients. At 12 months post-index, ustekinumab patients were significantly more persistent (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.60; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.33-1.93), persistent while on monotherapy (HR = 1.43; 95% CI = 1.24-1.65), and trended toward being more persistent and corticosteroid-free (HR = 1.14; 95% CI = 0.99-1.30) vs adalimumab. At 24 months post-index, ustekinumab patients were significantly more persistent (HR = 1.66; 95% CI = 1.40-1.97), persistent while on monotherapy (HR = 1.44; 95% CI = 1.26-1.64), and persistent and corticosteroid-free (HR = 1.15; 95% CI = 1.01-1.31) vs adalimumab. CONCLUSIONS: Bio-naïve patients with CD initiated on ustekinumab demonstrated significantly more persistence than patients initiated on adalimumab at 12 and 24 months of treatment. Long-term persistence is a measure of a drug's real-world performance and findings may aid clinical decision-making.

Choosing a treatment on which a patient can stay over a long period of time is key for the successful management of chronic conditions such as Crohn's disease. Information on whether and how long patients stay on treatment can help physicians make the right therapeutic choice. This study examined whether adults with Crohn's disease, who have not previously taken biologics, stay on treatment longer when given the biologic ustekinumab or adalimumab. At 12 and 24 months after starting the treatment, a larger proportion of patients were still using ustekinumab compared with adalimumab. The proportion of patients using the biologic without immunomodulators or other biologics was also higher with ustekinumab. The results suggest that patients without previous biologic experience stay on treatment longer with ustekinumab than with adalimumab.