Impact of p16 Alterations and Pretreatment Anemia on Toxicity in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Undergoing Definitive Radiochemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Human papilloma virus (HPV) infection, p16 expression and hypoxia may play important roles in the carcinogenesis, treatment response and toxicities of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The aim of this analysis was to assess whether there is any correlation between pre-radiotherapy (RT) anemia, p16 expression and toxicities and local control for patients undergoing definitive therapy. METHODS: 79 HNSCC patients who had undergone radiochemotherapy (RCT) or RT-antibody therapy were retrospectively analyzed. p16 (INK4A) expression was detected by immunohistochemical analysis. Factors predisposing for acute side effects were examined by uni- and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: p16 overexpression was detected in 32 cases. Pretreatment anemia was present in one third of patients. Only 5% of patients were characterized by both pre-RT anemia and p16 overexpression. p16 expression was significantly associated with acute grade 3 toxicity. 47% of p16-positive patients developed grade ≥ 3 radiodermatitis compared to 26% of p16-negative patients (p = 0.04). A reduced risk of severe skin toxicities was noted for patients with hypoxic blood values before RT. p16 expression was significantly correlated with local control (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: p16 expression is associated with better response to definitive combined treatment (RCT, RT + cetuximab), but also significantly related to acute high-grade toxicity.

Predictors of overall satisfaction of cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy.

BACKGROUND: Reporting the experiences and satisfaction of patients, as well as their quality of care scores is an emerging recommendation in health care systems. Many aspects of patients' experience determine their overall satisfaction. The aim of this evaluation was to define the main factors contributing to the satisfaction of patients undergoing radiotherapy in an outpatient setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1,710 patients with a histologically proven cancer, who were treated in our department between 2012 and 2014, were recruited for this prospective evaluation. At the end of therapy, each patient was asked to grade the skills and the care provided by radiation therapists, physicians, and physician's assistants, as well as the overall satisfaction during therapy. Statistical analysis was performed to determine which parameters had the greatest influence on overall satisfaction. RESULTS: Overall satisfaction with the provided care was high with a mean satisfaction score of 1.4. Significant correlations were found between overall satisfaction and each of the following survey items: courtesy, protection of privacy, professional skills and care provided by the radiation therapists and physicians, accuracy of provided information, and cleanliness. Linear regression analysis demonstrated that courteous behavior and the protection of privacy were the strongest predictors for overall satisfaction (P<0.001), followed by care and skills of physicians and radiation therapists. Patients suffering from head and neck cancer expressed lower overall satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Based on our prospectively acquired data, we were able to identify and confirm key factors for patient satisfaction in an outpatient radiooncological cancer center. From these results, we conclude that patients want most importantly to be treated with courtesy, protection of privacy and care.