Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 35(6): 1232-1234, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38534004

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Pacemaker implantation can be challenging in patients with congenital heart disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a patient with Ebstein disease and symptomatic sinus node dysfunction, despite multiple attempts, the Micra® pacemaker could not be implanted in the severely dilated right ventricle. In that context, and after iodine injection to confirm the appropriate location, the Micra® pacemaker was successfully implanted in the right appendage at the first attempt. CONCLUSION: Despite the recent development of dedicated dual-chamber leadless pacemaker, to the best of our knowledge, this case is the first off-label Micra® implantation in a right appendage.


Subject(s)
Atrial Appendage , Cardiac Pacing, Artificial , Pacemaker, Artificial , Humans , Atrial Appendage/physiopathology , Atrial Appendage/surgery , Atrial Appendage/diagnostic imaging , Sick Sinus Syndrome/therapy , Sick Sinus Syndrome/physiopathology , Sick Sinus Syndrome/diagnosis , Ebstein Anomaly/surgery , Ebstein Anomaly/physiopathology , Treatment Outcome , Male , Equipment Design
2.
Front Cardiovasc Med ; 10: 1194687, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37304968

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Apart from pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), several step-by-step procedures that aim to modify left atrial substrate have been proposed for the ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), yet the optimal strategy remains elusive. There are cumulative data suggesting an incremental benefit of adding vein of Marshall (VOM) ethanol infusion to PVI in patients with persistent AF. We sought to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a novel stepwise ablation approach, incorporating a VOM alcoholization step, for persistent AF. Methods: In this single-center study, we prospectively enrolled 66 consecutive patients with symptomatic persistent AF and failure of at least one antiarrhythmic drug (ADD). The ablation procedure consisted of (i) PVI, (ii) left atrial segmentation with VOM ethanol infusion and the deployment of linear radiofrequency lesions across the roof and the mitral isthmus and (iii) electrogram-based ablation of dispersion zones. The first two steps were performed in all patients, whereas the third step was carried out only in those still in AF at the end of the second step. Atrial tachycardias during the procedure were mapped and ablated. At the end of the procedure, cavotricuspid isthmus ablation was additionally performed in all patients. The primary endpoint was 12-month freedom from AF and atrial tachycardia after a single procedure and an initial three-month blanking period. Results: Total procedure time was 153 ± 38.5 min. Fluoroscopy time was 16 ± 6.5 min and the radiofrequency ablation time was 26.14 ± 0.26 min. The primary endpoint occurred in 54 patients (82%). At 12 months, 65% of patients were off any AAD. In the univariate Cox regression analysis, left ventricular ejection fraction < 40% was the only predictor of arrhythmia recurrence (HR 3.56; 95% CI, 1.04-12.19; p = 0.04). One patient developed a pericardial tamponade and another a minor groin hematoma. Conclusion: A novel stepwise approach, including a step of ethanol infusion in the VOM, is feasible, safe and provides a high rate of sinus rhythm maintenance at 12 months in patients with persistent AF.

3.
Heart Lung Circ ; 27(8): 984-988, 2018 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28969980

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) is a life-saving therapy in patients with high risk of arrhythmic death. We aimed to evaluate ventricular arrhythmia (VA) occurrence rate and compliance with the WCD during the first 90 days following myocardial revascularisation with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <30%. METHODS: From September 2015 to November 2016, clinical characteristics, WCD recordings and compliance data of the aforementioned subset of patients were prospectively collected. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients (men=20, 80%) were included in this analysis. Mean age was 56±10 years and mean LVEF at enrolment was 26.6±4.3%. During a mean wearing period of 3.0±1.3 months, two episodes of VA occurred in two patients (8.3%): one successfully treated with WCD shock and one with spontaneous termination. The mean and median daily use of the WCD was 21.5hours and 23.5hours a day, respectively. Eighteen patients (75%) wore the WCD more than 22hours a day. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of VA, during the WCD period use after myocardial revascularisation with PCI, was high in our study. Otherwise it underlined that patient compliance is critical during the WCD period use. Remote monitoring and patient education are keys to achieve good compliance.


Subject(s)
Death, Sudden, Cardiac/prevention & control , Electric Countershock/instrumentation , Patient Compliance , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Tachycardia, Ventricular/etiology , Wearable Electronic Devices , Electrocardiography , Female , France/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Tachycardia, Ventricular/epidemiology , Tachycardia, Ventricular/therapy , Ventricular Function, Left/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL