ABSTRACT
Throughout pregnancy, the decidua is predominantly populated by NK lymphocytes expressing Killer immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIR) that recognize human leukocyte antigen-C (HLA-C) ligands from trophoblast cells. This study aims to investigate the association of KIR-HLA-C phenotypes in couples facing infertility, particularly recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) and recurrent implantation failure (RIF), in comparison to a reference population and fertile controls. This observational, non-interventional retrospective case-control study included patients consecutively referred to our Reproductive Immunology Unit from 2015 to 2019. We analyzed the frequencies of KIR and HLA-C genes. As control groups, we analyzed a reference Spanish population for KIR analysis and 29 fertile controls and their male partners for KIR and HLA-C combinations. We studied 397 consecutively referred women with infertility and their male partners. Among women with unexplained RPL (133 women) and RIF (176 women), the centromeric (cen)AA KIR genotype was significantly more prevalent compared to the reference Spanish population (p = 0.001 and 0.02, respectively). Furthermore, cenAA was associated with a 1.51-fold risk of RPL and a 1.2-fold risk of RIF. Conversely, the presence of BB KIR showed a lower risk of reproductive failure compared to non-BB KIR (OR: 0.12, p < 0.001). Women and their partners with HLA-C1C1/C1C1 were significantly less common in the RPL-Group (p < 0.001) and RIF-Group (p = 0.002) compared to the control group. Moreover, the combination of cenAA/C1C1 in women with C1C1 partners was significantly higher in the control group than in the RPL (p = 0.009) and RIF (p = 0.04) groups, associated with a 5-fold increase in successful pregnancy outcomes. In our cohort, the cenAA KIR haplotype proved to be a more accurate biomarker than the classic AA KIR haplotype for assessing the risk of RPL and RIF, and might be particularly useful to identify women at increased risk among the heterogeneous KIR AB or Bx population. The classification of centromeric KIR haplotypes outperforms classical KIR haplotypes, making it a better indicator of potential maternal-fetal KIR-HLA-C mismatch in patients.
Subject(s)
Abortion, Habitual , Infertility , Pregnancy , Humans , Male , Female , HLA-C Antigens/genetics , Retrospective Studies , Amino Acid Motifs , Case-Control Studies , Abortion, Habitual/genetics , Receptors, KIR/genetics , Infertility/genetics , BiomarkersABSTRACT
Varios miembros de diferentes asociaciones científicas y expertos de la reproducción han actualizado las recomendaciones de estudio genético e inmunológico en las parejas con disfunción en la reproducción con el fin de mejorar la asistencia sanitaria. El estudio se ha considerado altamente recomendable cuando la prueba diagnóstica es relevante para la toma de decisiones, moderada cuando estas han mostrado un resultado poco consistente y baja, cuando el beneficio de la prueba es incierto. Con la indicación de estas recomendaciones obtendremos una información relevante para el diagnóstico, pronóstico y tratamiento de la pareja con disfunción en la reproducción
In this article several members of diverse scientific associations and reproduction experts from Spain have updated different genetic and immunological procedure recommendations in couples affected by reproductive dysfunction with the goal of providing a set of useful guidelines for the clinic. The laboratory test has been considered as highly recommendable for making clinical decisions when the result of the diagnostic test is relevant, moderately recommendable when the results are of limited evidence because they are inconsistent, and low when the benefit of the test is uncertain. It is expected that these recommendations will provide some useful guidelines for the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of couples presenting reproductive dysfunction
Subject(s)
Humans , Infertility/diagnosis , Immunologic Tests/methods , Genetic Testing/methods , Reproductive Techniques/ethics , Abortion, Habitual/genetics , Cytogenetic Analysis/methods , Reproductive Physiological Phenomena/genetics , Reproductive Physiological Phenomena/immunology , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Genetic Counseling/organization & administration , Infertility, Male/genetics , Genetic Diseases, Inborn/prevention & controlABSTRACT
Varios miembros de diferentes asociaciones científicas y expertos de la reproducción han actualizado las recomendaciones de estudio genético e inmunológico en las parejas con disfunción en la reproducción con el fin de mejorar la asistencia sanitaria. El estudio se ha considerado altamente recomendable cuando la prueba diagnóstica es relevante para la toma de decisiones, moderada cuando estas han mostrado un resultado poco consistente y baja, cuando el beneficio de la prueba es incierto. Con la indicación de estas recomendaciones obtendremos una información relevante para el diagnóstico, pronóstico y tratamiento de la pareja con disfunción en la reproducción
In this article several members of diverse scientific associations and reproduction experts from Spain have updated different genetic and immunological procedure recommendations in couples affected by reproductive dysfunction with the goal of providing a set of useful guidelines for the clinic. The laboratory test has been considered as highly recommendable for making clinical decisions when the result of the diagnostic test is relevant, moderately recommendable when the results are of limited evidence because they are inconsistent, and low when the benefit of the test is uncertain. It is expected that these recommendations will provide some useful guidelines for the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of couples presenting reproductive dysfunction
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Reproduction/genetics , Tissue and Organ Procurement/methods , Reproduction/immunology , Prognosis , Reproduction/ethics , Infertility, Male/genetics , Epigenesis, GeneticABSTRACT
In this article several members of diverse scientific associations and reproduction experts from Spain have updated different genetic and immunological procedure recommendations in couples affected by reproductive dysfunction with the goal of providing a set of useful guidelines for the clinic. The laboratory test has been considered as highly recommendable for making clinical decisions when the result of the diagnostic test is relevant, moderately recommendable when the results are of limited evidence because they are inconsistent, and low when the benefit of the test is uncertain. It is expected that these recommendations will provide some useful guidelines for the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of couples presenting reproductive dysfunction.
