Effectiveness of Oral Hydration in Preventing Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Individuals Undergoing Elective Coronary Interventions. / Eficácia da Hidratação Oral na Prevenção da Nefropatia Induzida por Contraste em Indivíduos Submetidos a Intervenções Coronárias Eletivas.

BACKGROUND: Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is defined as worsening renal function, represented by an increase in serum creatinine of ≥ 25% or ≥ 0.5 mg/dL up to 72 h after exposure to iodinated contrast medium (ICM). The most effective preventive measure to date is intravenous hydration (IVH). Little is known about the effectiveness of outpatient oral hydration (OH). OBJETIVE: To investigate whether outpatient OH with water is as effective as IVH with 0.9% saline solution in preventing CIN in elective coronary procedures. METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, we analyzed the medical records and laboratory data of individuals undergoing percutaneous coronary procedures with ICM. Data collected between 2012 and 2015 refer to individuals who underwent IVH and those collected between 2016 and 2020 (after implementation of an OH protocol) correspond to individuals who underwent OH at home before and after coronary procedures as instructed by the nursing team. Statistical significance was established at α = 0.05. RESULTS: In total, 116 patients were included in this study: 58 in the IVH group and 58 in the OH group. An incidence of CIN of 15% (9/58) was observed in the group that received IVH and an incidence of 12% (7/58) was seen in the group that received OH (p = 0.68). CONCLUSION: The OH protocol, performed by the patient, appears to be as effective as the in-hospital IVH protocol for the renal protection of individuals susceptible to CIN in elective coronary interventions. These findings should be put to test in larger trials.

FUNDAMENTO: A nefropatia induzida por contraste (NIC) é definida como deterioração da função renal, representada por um aumento da creatinina sérica ≥25% ou ≥0,5 mg/dL até 72 horas após a exposição ao meio de contraste iodado (MCI). A medida preventiva mais eficaz até o momento é a hidratação venosa (HV). Pouco se sabe sobre a eficácia da hidratação oral (HO) ambulatorial. OBJETIVO: Investigar se a HO ambulatorial com água é tão eficaz quanto a HV com solução salina a 0,9% na prevenção de NIC em procedimentos coronarianos eletivos. MÉTODOS: Neste estudo observacional retrospectivo, foram analisados prontuários médicos e dados laboratoriais para coletar dados de indivíduos submetidos a procedimentos coronarianos percutâneos com MCI. Os dados coletados entre 2012 e 2015 avaliaram indivíduos que foram submetidos à HV e entre 2016 e 2020 (após a implementação de um protocolo de HO), os indivíduos que foram submetidos à HO em casa antes e depois de procedimentos coronarianos, conforme orientação da equipe de enfermagem. A significância estatística adotada foi de α=0,05. RESULTADOS: No total, 116 pacientes foram incluídos neste estudo, 58 no grupo HV e 58 no grupo HO. Observou-se incidência de NIC de 15% (9/58) no grupo que recebeu HV e 12% (7/58) no grupo que recebeu HO (p=0,68). CONCLUSÃO: O protocolo de HO realizado pelo paciente parece ser tão eficaz quanto o protocolo de HV hospitalar na proteção renal de indivíduos suscetíveis a desenvolver NIC em intervenções coronarianas eletivas. Essas descobertas devem ser testadas em ensaios mais abrangentes.

Eficácia da Hidratação Oral na Prevenção da Nefropatia Induzida por Contraste em Indivíduos Submetidos a Intervenções Coronárias Eletivas / Effectiveness of Oral Hydration in Preventing Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Individuals Undergoing Elective Coronary Interventions

Resumo Fundamento A nefropatia induzida por contraste (NIC) é definida como deterioração da função renal, representada por um aumento da creatinina sérica ≥25% ou ≥0,5 mg/dL até 72 horas após a exposição ao meio de contraste iodado (MCI). A medida preventiva mais eficaz até o momento é a hidratação venosa (HV). Pouco se sabe sobre a eficácia da hidratação oral (HO) ambulatorial. Objetivo Investigar se a HO ambulatorial com água é tão eficaz quanto a HV com solução salina a 0,9% na prevenção de NIC em procedimentos coronarianos eletivos. Métodos Neste estudo observacional retrospectivo, foram analisados prontuários médicos e dados laboratoriais para coletar dados de indivíduos submetidos a procedimentos coronarianos percutâneos com MCI. Os dados coletados entre 2012 e 2015 avaliaram indivíduos que foram submetidos à HV e entre 2016 e 2020 (após a implementação de um protocolo de HO), os indivíduos que foram submetidos à HO em casa antes e depois de procedimentos coronarianos, conforme orientação da equipe de enfermagem. A significância estatística adotada foi de α=0,05. Resultados No total, 116 pacientes foram incluídos neste estudo, 58 no grupo HV e 58 no grupo HO. Observou-se incidência de NIC de 15% (9/58) no grupo que recebeu HV e 12% (7/58) no grupo que recebeu HO (p=0,68). Conclusão O protocolo de HO realizado pelo paciente parece ser tão eficaz quanto o protocolo de HV hospitalar na proteção renal de indivíduos suscetíveis a desenvolver NIC em intervenções coronarianas eletivas. Essas descobertas devem ser testadas em ensaios mais abrangentes.

Abstract Background Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is defined as worsening renal function, represented by an increase in serum creatinine of ≥ 25% or ≥ 0.5 mg/dL up to 72 h after exposure to iodinated contrast medium (ICM). The most effective preventive measure to date is intravenous hydration (IVH). Little is known about the effectiveness of outpatient oral hydration (OH). Objetive To investigate whether outpatient OH with water is as effective as IVH with 0.9% saline solution in preventing CIN in elective coronary procedures. Methods In this retrospective observational study, we analyzed the medical records and laboratory data of individuals undergoing percutaneous coronary procedures with ICM. Data collected between 2012 and 2015 refer to individuals who underwent IVH and those collected between 2016 and 2020 (after implementation of an OH protocol) correspond to individuals who underwent OH at home before and after coronary procedures as instructed by the nursing team. Statistical significance was established at α = 0.05. Results In total, 116 patients were included in this study: 58 in the IVH group and 58 in the OH group. An incidence of CIN of 15% (9/58) was observed in the group that received IVH and an incidence of 12% (7/58) was seen in the group that received OH (p = 0.68). Conclusion The OH protocol, performed by the patient, appears to be as effective as the in-hospital IVH protocol for the renal protection of individuals susceptible to CIN in elective coronary interventions. These findings should be put to test in larger trials.

Cardiovascular Autonomic Responses to Aerobic, Resistance and Combined Exercises in Resistance Hypertensive Patients.

Here, we report the acute effects of aerobic (AER), resistance (RES), and combined (COM) exercises on blood pressure, central blood pressure and augmentation index, hemodynamic parameters, and autonomic modulation of resistant (RH) and nonresistant hypertensive (NON-RH) subjects. Twenty participants (10 RH and 10 NON-RH) performed three exercise sessions (i.e., AER, RES, and COM) and a control session. Hemodynamic (Finometer®, Beatscope), office blood pressure (BP), and autonomic variables (accessed through spectral analysis of the pulse-to-pulse BP signal, in the time and frequency domain-Fast Fourrier Transform) were assessed before (T0), one-hour (T1), and twenty-four (T2) hours after each experimental session. There were no changes in office BP, pulse wave behavior, and hemodynamic parameters after (T0 and T1) exercise sessions. However, AER and COM exercises significantly reduced sympathetic modulation in RH patients. It is worth mentioning that more significant changes in sympathetic modulation were observed after AER as compared to COM exercise. These findings suggest that office blood pressure, arterial stiffness, and hemodynamic parameters returned to baseline levels in the first hour and remained stable in the 24 hours after the all-exercise sessions. Notably, our findings bring new light to the effects of exercise on RH, indicating that RH patients show different autonomic responses to exercise compared to NON-RH patients. This trial is registered with trial registration number NCT02987452.

Antenatal corticosteroid therapy modulates hepatic AMPK phosphorylation and maternal lipid metabolism in early lactating rats.

Antenatal corticosteroid therapy is used to reduce neonatal mortality in preterm infants but it is currently unknown whether this intervention affects lipid metabolism at the peripartum. This study aimed to evaluate if antenatal corticosteroid therapy in pregnant rats and women affects lipid metabolism during early lactation. We evaluated women at risk of preterm delivery that received corticosteroid therapy (CASE) and women that were not exposed to corticosteroid and were not at risk of preterm delivery (CONTROL). Samples were collected to measure serum and milk triacylglycerol (TAG) three days after delivery. Rats were treated with dexamethasone (DEX) between the 15th and the 20th days of pregnancy. Samples were collected at different days after delivery (L3, L8 and L14). TAG was measured in serum, liver and mammary gland (MG). TAG appearance rates were measured after tyloxapol injection and gavage with olive oil. We also evaluated the expression of key genes related to lipid metabolism in the liver and in the MG and hepatic phosphorylation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC). CASE volunteers delivered earlier than CONTROL but presented unaltered milk and serum TAG concentrations. Early lactating DEX rats exhibited increased TAG in serum, MG and milk. No changes in CD36 and LPL were detected in the MG and liver. Early lactating DEX rats displayed increased TAG appearance rate and reduced hepatic AMPK/ACC phosphorylation. Our data revealed that antenatal corticosteroid therapy reduces hepatic AMPK/ACC phosphorylation during early lactation that reflects in increased TAG concentration in serum, MG and milk.

Agomelatine reduces circulating triacylglycerides and hepatic steatosis in fructose-treated rats.

Agomelatine (AGO) is an antidepressant drug with agonistic activity at melatonin receptor 1 (MT1) and MT2 and with neutral antagonistic activity at serotonin receptor 5-HT2C. Although experimental studies show that melatonin reduces hypertriglyceridemia and hepatic steatosis induced by excessive fructose intake, no studies have tested if AGO exerts similar actions. To address this issue we have treated male Wistar rats with fructose (15% in the drinking water) and/or AGO (40 mg/kg/day) for two weeks. AGO reduced body weight gain, feeding efficiency and hepatic lipid levels without affecting caloric intake in fructose-treated rats. AGO has also decreased very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) production and circulating TAG levels after an oral load with olive oil. Accordingly, treatment with AGO reduced the hepatic expression of fatty acid synthase (Fasn), a limiting step for hepatic de novo lipogenesis (DNLG). The expression of apolipoprotein B (Apob) and microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (Mttp) in the ileum, two crucial proteins for intestinal lipoprotein production, were also downregulated by treatment with AGO. Altogether, the present data show that AGO mimics the metabolic benefits of melatonin when used in fructose-treated rats. This study also suggests that it is relevant to evaluate the potential of AGO to treat metabolic disorders in future clinical trials.

Effects of Anti-TNF alpha Therapy on Blood Pressure in Resistant Hypertensive Subjects: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study. / Efeitos da Terapia com Anti-TNF alfa na Pressão Arterial em Pacientes com Hipertensão Resistente: Um Estudo Piloto Randomizado, Duplo-Cego e Controlado por Placebo.

BACKGROUND: The cytokine tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) is elevated in resistant hypertension (RH), but the effects of a TNF-α inhibitor in this population is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this trial was to evaluate whether a single dose of infliximab controlled by placebo acutely reduces blood pressure (BP) in RH subjects. METHODS: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial was conducted, and randomized RH subjects received either infliximab or placebo. The primary endpoint was the change in mean BP levels relative to the baseline immediately after the infusion obtained by continuously beat-to-beat non-invasive hemodynamic assessment. Secondary endpoints included changes in office, ambulatory and central BP measurements; endothelial function; and inflammatory biomarkers after 7 days. The level of significance accepted was alpha=0.05. RESULTS: Ten RH subjects were enrolled. The primary endpoint analysis showed an acute decrease in mean BP values (mean of differences ± standard deviation = -6.3 ± 7.2 mmHg, p=0.02) from baseline, after the application of infliximab compared with placebo. Diastolic BP levels (-4.9 ± 5.5 mmHg, p=0.02), but not systolic BP levels (-9.4 ± 19.7 mmHg, p=0.16), lowered after infliximab infusion. No further significant differences were identified in either the other hemodynamic parameters or in secondary endpoints, except for TNF-α levels, which increased continuously after infliximab infusion. No adverse events were reported during the protocol. CONCLUSIONS: A single-dose of infliximab decreased the mean and diastolic BP levels immediately after its infusion, when compared to the placebo in RH. The anti-TNF-α therapy was found to be safe and well-tolerated. The results of this proof-of-concept are hypothesis-generating and need to be further investigated. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2021; 116(3):443-451).

FUNDAMENTO: A citocina fator de necrose tumoral alfa (TNF-α) é elevada na hipertensão resistente (HAR), mas os efeitos dos inibidores de TNF-α nessa população ainda são desconhecidos. OBJETIVOS: O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar se uma única dose de infliximabe controlada por placebo reduz a pressão arterial (PA) de forma aguda em pacientes com HAR. MÉTODOS: Realizamos um estudo cruzado, randomizado, duplo-cego e controlado por placebo em que pacientes com HAR receberam infliximabe ou placebo. O desfecho primário foi a alteração dos níveis de PA média em relação ao basal imediatamente após a infusão, obtida por avaliação hemodinâmica não invasiva contínua, batimento a batimento. Os desfechos secundários incluíram alterações em medidas de PA central, ambulatorial e em consultório, na função endotelial, e nos biomarcadores inflamatórios após 7 dias. O nível de significância aceito foi alfa=0,05. RESULTADOS: Foram incluídos dez portadores de HAR. O resultado do desfecho primário demonstrou uma redução aguda dos níveis de PA média (média das diferenças ± desvio padrão = -6,3 ± 7,2 mmHg, p=0,02) em relação ao basal, após o uso de infliximabe, em comparação com o placebo. Os níveis de PA diastólica (-4,9 ± 5,5 mmHg, p=0,02), mas não os níveis de PA sistólica (-9,4 ± 19,7 mmHg, p=0,16), reduziram após a infusão de infliximabe. Não foram identificadas diferenças significativas nos demais parâmetros hemodinâmicos, nem nos resultados dos desfechos secundários, com exceção dos níveis de TNF-α, que aumentaram continuamente após o uso de infliximabe. Não foram relatados eventos adversos durante o protocolo. CONCLUSÕES: Uma dose única de infliximabe reduziu os níveis de PA média e diastólica imediatamente após sua infusão, em comparação com placebo em HAR. A terapia com anti-TNF-α foi considerada segura e bem tolerada. Os resultados desse estudo prova de conceito são geradores de hipótese e precisam ser investigados em maior detalhe. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2021; 116(3):443-451).

Efeitos da Terapia com Anti-TNF alfa na Pressão Arterial em Pacientes com Hipertensão Resistente: Um Estudo Piloto Randomizado, Duplo-Cego e Controlado por Placebo / Effects of Anti-TNF alpha Therapy on Blood Pressure in Resistant Hypertensive Subjects: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study

Resumo Fundamento: A citocina fator de necrose tumoral alfa (TNF-α) é elevada na hipertensão resistente (HAR), mas os efeitos dos inibidores de TNF-α nessa população ainda são desconhecidos. Objetivos: O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar se uma única dose de infliximabe controlada por placebo reduz a pressão arterial (PA) de forma aguda em pacientes com HAR. Métodos: Realizamos um estudo cruzado, randomizado, duplo-cego e controlado por placebo em que pacientes com HAR receberam infliximabe ou placebo. O desfecho primário foi a alteração dos níveis de PA média em relação ao basal imediatamente após a infusão, obtida por avaliação hemodinâmica não invasiva contínua, batimento a batimento. Os desfechos secundários incluíram alterações em medidas de PA central, ambulatorial e em consultório, na função endotelial, e nos biomarcadores inflamatórios após 7 dias. O nível de significância aceito foi alfa=0,05. Resultados: Foram incluídos dez portadores de HAR. O resultado do desfecho primário demonstrou uma redução aguda dos níveis de PA média (média das diferenças ± desvio padrão = -6,3 ± 7,2 mmHg, p=0,02) em relação ao basal, após o uso de infliximabe, em comparação com o placebo. Os níveis de PA diastólica (-4,9 ± 5,5 mmHg, p=0,02), mas não os níveis de PA sistólica (-9,4 ± 19,7 mmHg, p=0,16), reduziram após a infusão de infliximabe. Não foram identificadas diferenças significativas nos demais parâmetros hemodinâmicos, nem nos resultados dos desfechos secundários, com exceção dos níveis de TNF-α, que aumentaram continuamente após o uso de infliximabe. Não foram relatados eventos adversos durante o protocolo. Conclusões: Uma dose única de infliximabe reduziu os níveis de PA média e diastólica imediatamente após sua infusão, em comparação com placebo em HAR. A terapia com anti-TNF-α foi considerada segura e bem tolerada. Os resultados desse estudo prova de conceito são geradores de hipótese e precisam ser investigados em maior detalhe. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2021; 116(3):443-451)

Abstract Background: The cytokine tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) is elevated in resistant hypertension (RH), but the effects of a TNF-α inhibitor in this population is unknown. Objective: The aim of this trial was to evaluate whether a single dose of infliximab controlled by placebo acutely reduces blood pressure (BP) in RH subjects. Methods: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial was conducted, and randomized RH subjects received either infliximab or placebo. The primary endpoint was the change in mean BP levels relative to the baseline immediately after the infusion obtained by continuously beat-to-beat non-invasive hemodynamic assessment. Secondary endpoints included changes in office, ambulatory and central BP measurements; endothelial function; and inflammatory biomarkers after 7 days. The level of significance accepted was alpha=0.05. Results: Ten RH subjects were enrolled. The primary endpoint analysis showed an acute decrease in mean BP values (mean of differences ± standard deviation = -6.3 ± 7.2 mmHg, p=0.02) from baseline, after the application of infliximab compared with placebo. Diastolic BP levels (-4.9 ± 5.5 mmHg, p=0.02), but not systolic BP levels (-9.4 ± 19.7 mmHg, p=0.16), lowered after infliximab infusion. No further significant differences were identified in either the other hemodynamic parameters or in secondary endpoints, except for TNF-α levels, which increased continuously after infliximab infusion. No adverse events were reported during the protocol. Conclusions: A single-dose of infliximab decreased the mean and diastolic BP levels immediately after its infusion, when compared to the placebo in RH. The anti-TNF-α therapy was found to be safe and well-tolerated. The results of this proof-of-concept are hypothesis-generating and need to be further investigated. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2021; 116(3):443-451)

Pro-inflammatory Cytokines and Resistant Hypertension: Potential for Novel Treatments?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To gather data from studies evaluating the pro-inflammatory profile of individuals with resistant hypertension (RH), and bring a clinical update of new and potential complementary therapies to treat inflammation in RH. RECENT FINDINGS: Increases in pro-inflammatory cytokines are related to elevated blood pressure and target organ damage in RH patients. Clinical and experimental studies have shown that some biological therapies, especially TNF-α inhibitors, regulated pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines associated with improvements in clinical outcomes, although they are not yet reported in RH. New emerging therapies to treat inflammation in RH, although promising, are still hypotheses that have not been scientifically confirmed in clinical trials. For this reason, inflammation-target treatments, such as the TNF-α and IL-6 inhibitors, should be encouraged for testing as complementary therapies in RH in order to elucidate their potential benefits.

Efeitos dos antidiabéticos orais sobre a pressão arterial / Effects of oral antidiabetics on blood pressure

hipertensão arterial (HA) é uma doença multifatorial que vem crescendo em todo o mundo e está fortemente associada a comorbidades como a obesidade e o diabetes mellitus tipo 2 (DM2). Esse sinergismo aumenta o risco cardiovascular e a mortalidade. Devido à prevalência de diabéticos entre os pacientes hipertensos, o conhecimento de potenciais efeitos pressóricos e cardioprotetores de medicações disponíveis para o tratamento do DM2 é de grande interesse e importância na prática clínica, além de ser ideal para melhorar a qualidade de vida desses pacientes, com menor intervenção de polifarmácia. Neste trabalho reunimos evidências atuais dos efeitos cardíacos dos hipoglicemiantes orais ­ especialmente sobre a pressão arterial (PA) ­, enfatizando suas classes mais recentes, como os inibidores do Dipeptidil-peptidase-IV (DPP-IV) e dos inibidores dos cotransportadores de sódio e glicose do tipo 2 (iSGLT2).

Hypertension is a multifactorial disease that is growing worldwide and has strong association with comorbidities such as obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2DM), which increase cardiovascular risk and mortality. Due to the great prevalence of T2DM in hypertensive subjects, the knowledge of potential effects in blood pressure and for cardiovascular protection of available T2DM oral medications is of great interest and importance in clinical practice, improving patients' quality of life and minimizing polypharmacy. In this review we collected current evidence of the cardiac effects of oral hypoglycemic drugs ­ especially on blood pressure ­, with emphasis on the newer classes such as Dipeptidilpeptidase- IV (DPP-IV) and sodium glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors (iSGLT2).