Urologic issues in pediatric transplant recipients.

The limited supply of kidneys for pediatric transplantation leads to a large number of children in waiting transplant list. These patients have to be properly evaluated and prepared before organ transplantation to increase its success. The aim of this review is focus on urologic issues of pediatric kidney transplants such as preoperative evaluation and urinary tract abnormalities correction, surgical technique, and postoperative complications. All children that are candidates for kidney transplantation should be submitted to abdominal ultrasound. If bladder dysfunction is suspected, a more detailed evaluation is mandatory, including a voiding cystourethrography and urodynamic study. Patients with a poor bladder capacity and compliance will require bladder augmentation. Whenever possible the native ureter is recommended for that. Regarding kidney transplantation, recipient surgery can be safely performed through an extraperitoneal access, even in children weighting less than 10 kilograms. It allows adequate access to iliac vessels, aorta and vena cava. Graft survival continued to improve over the past decade and it is around 80% in 5 years. Postoperative complications such as urinary fistula may occur in less than 5% of cases, while vascular complications are reported in 1% to 2% of cases.

Low-intensity shockwave therapy for erectile dysfunction in kidney transplant recipients. A prospective, randomized, double blinded, sham-controlled study with evaluation by penile Doppler ultrasonography.

OBJECTIVES: To study the efficacy of Low intensity Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (Li- ESWT) for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) in kidney transplanted men. METHODS: Twenty men (mean age = 53.7 years) were selected. This was a double-blinded, prospective, randomized, sham-controlled trial. The ESWT protocol was based in a 2 treatment sessions per week for 3 weeks. The sham treatment was performed using the same device replacing the effective probe for one that emits zero energy. Baseline and follow-up assessment was performed with International Index of Erectile Function Questionnaire (IIEF) score and Erection Hardness Score (EHS) after 1, 4 and 12 months. Penile Doppler was performed before and after treatment. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients were recruited, 10 patients in each group. Baseline scores were similar. The mean EHS in after 1 month were 2.5 ± 0.85 (Li-EWST) and 2.4 ± 0.7 (Sham therapy), p = 0.724 . After 4 months it was 2.4 ± 0.7 and 2.6 ± 0.84, p = 0,0004 (between the moments) . The baseline IIEF score was 14.9 ± 3(Sham Theraphy) and 10.9 ± 5.1 (Li-EWST). The mean IIEF score after 1 month was 15.6 ± 6.1 (Li-EWST) and 16.6 ± 5.4 (Sham therapy). The mean IIEF score after 4 months was 17.2 ± 5.7 (Li-EWST) and 16.5 ± 5 (Sham therapy), p < 0.0001 (between the moments). IIEF score improvement was higher than 5 in 70% (ranged from 0-10) and in 10% (ranged from 1-14) in Li-ESWT and Sham groups, respectively. The mean change in IIEF score after 12 months was 4.8 in Li-ESWT group .Penile Doppler parameters were similar between groups and did not present improvements. CONCLUSIONS: Li-ESWT is a treatment with clinical efficacy. Despite evidences suggesting neoagiogenesis, our short protocol had no impact in penile Doppler parameters.

Does the urinary tract infection caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli impact the outcome of kidney transplant recipients?

The incidence of urinary tract infection (UTI) after kidney transplantation (KT) caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria is growing. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of UTI caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB) in the survival of graft and recipients following KT. This was a retrospective cohort study involving patients who underwent KT between 2013 and 2016. Patients were followed since the day of the KT until loss of graft, death or end of the follow-up period (31th December 2016). The outcomes measured were UTI by MDR following KT and graft and patient survival. Analyses were performed using Cox regression; for the graft and patient survival analysis, we used a propensity score for UTI by CR-GNB to matching a control group. UTI was diagnosed in 178 (23.9%) of 781 patients, who developed 352 UTI episodes. 44.6% of the UTI cases were caused by MDR bacteria. Identified risk factors for UTI by MDR bacteria were DM, urologic disease as the cause of end-stage renal failure, insertion of ureteral stent, carbapenem use, and delayed graft function (DGF). Risk factors for death during the follow-up period were female gender, patients over 60 years old at the time of KT, DM, body mass index over 31.8, UTI caused by CR-GNB. In conclusion, UTIs caused by CR-GNB have great impact on patients' survival after KT.

Outbreak of IMP-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacter gergoviae among kidney transplant recipients.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to investigate a prolonged outbreak of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacter gergoviae (CREG) involving kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) between 2009 and 2014. METHODS: A case-control study was undertaken. Controls (n = 52) were selected from CREG-negative KTRs. Surveillance cultures for CREG were collected weekly. Colonization was defined as isolation of CREG from surveillance samples or from clinical specimens, with no evidence of infection. We also investigated infection control practices at the facility. RESULTS: Of 26 identified cases, 13 had had no known contact with another CREG-positive patient before the first positive culture. Seven patients (27%) developed infection. The site most often colonized was the urinary tract. During the study period two clusters were identified, one in 2009 and another in 2013-14. DNA sequencing revealed blaIMP-1 in all CREG tested. No environmental or hand cultures tested positive for CREG. An audit of infection control practices detected flaws in the handling and cleaning of urinary tract devices. Multivariate analysis identified advanced age, ureteral stent use, retransplantation and male gender as risk factors for CREG acquisition. CONCLUSIONS: An outbreak among KTRs caused by an unusual species of MDR bacteria may have resulted from a common source of contamination related to urinary tract devices.

Urological complications, vesicoureteral reflux, and long-term graft survival rate after pediatric kidney transplantation.

To describe a single-center experience with kidney transplantation and then study some donor and recipient features that may impact on graft survival and urological complication rates. We reviewed our database searching for pediatric patients who underwent kidney transplantation from August 1985 through November 2012. Preoperative data and postoperative complications were recorded. Graft survival rates were analyzed and compared based on the type of donor, donor's age from deceased donors, and recipients' ESRD cause. Kaplan-Meier curves with log rank and Wilcoxon tests were used to perform the comparisons. There were 305 pediatric kidney transplants. The mean recipient's age was 11.7 yr. The mean follow-up was 11.0 yr. Arterial and venous thrombosis rates were 1.6% and 2.3%, respectively, while urinary fistula and symptomatic vesicoureteral reflux were diagnosed in 2.9% and 3.6% of cases, respectively. Deceased kidney transplantation had a lower graft survival rate than living kidney transplantation (log rank, p = 0.005). Donor's age (p = 0.420) and ESRD cause (p = 0.679) were not significantly related to graft survival rate. In long-term follow-up, type of donor, but not donor's age, impacts on graft survival rate. ESRD cause has no impact on graft survival rate, showing that well-evaluated recipients may have good outcomes.

Revascularization of living-donor kidney transplant with multiple arteries: long-term outcomes using the inferior epigastric artery.

OBJECTIVE: To study the safety and long-term outcomes of use of the inferior epigastric artery (IEA) for revascularization of small accessory kidney arteries (3 mm or less). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data of 602 living-donor kidney transplants were reviewed. Age was 37.4 ± 15 years (range, 3-78 years). Multiple arteries were present in 98 kidneys (16.3%); of these, 83 (84.7%) had 2 and arteries and 15 (15.3%) had 3 arteries. In 21 kidneys (21.4%) with multiple arteries (group I [GI]), the IEA was used for reconstruction. Four (14.3%) had 3 arteries, and 17 (85.7%) had 2 arteries. In 77 patients (group II [GII]), the inferior accessory renal artery was reconstructed with a side-to-side or an end-to-side anastomosis to the main renal artery. Follow-up was 43.8 ± 38.1 months (range, 1-124 months). The Fisher exact test and the 2-tailed t test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Delayed graft function occurred in 1 GI patient (4.8%) and in 5 GII patients (6.5%; P >.05). One partial renal infarction occurred in each group (4.8% vs 1.3%; P >.05). There was 1 urinary fistula in GI and 3 urinary fistulas and 1 ureteral stenosis in GII (P >.05). One graft (4.8%) lost function in GI and 5 (6.5%) in GII (P >.05). Eleven patients (53.4%) were hypertensive in GI and 53 (68.8%) in GII (P >.05). CONCLUSION: The use of the IEA for revascularization of a living-donor kidney transplant with multiple arteries is safe and effective, yielding similar long-term outcomes compared with the standard technique. Use of the IEA avoids the risks of manipulation of the main renal artery.

Transurethral injection therapy with carbon-coated beads (Durasphere®) for treatment of recurrent pyelonephritis in kidney transplant patients with vesico-ureteral reflux to the allograft.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Recurrent transplant pyelonephritis (RTP) secondary to vesico-ureteral reflux (VUR) to the transplant kidney (KTx) remains a significant cause of infectious complications with impact on patient and graft outcomes. Our objective was to verify the safety and efficacy of transurethral injection of Durasphere(®) to relieve RTP secondary to VUR after renal transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between June 2004 and July 2008, eight patients with RTP (defined as two or more episodes of pyelonephritis after transplantation) and VUR to the KTx were treated with subureteral injections of Durasphere(®). The mean age at surgery was 38.8 ± 13.8 yr (23-65). The patients were followed regularly every six months. The mean interval between the KTx and the treatment was 76 ± 74.1 (10-238 months). The mean follow-up was 22.3 ± 16.1 months (8-57 months). RESULTS: Six patients (75%) were free of pyelonephritis during a mean period of follow-up of 23.2 ± 17.1 months (8-57 months). Two of them had no VUR and four cases presented with G II VUR (pre-operative G IV three cases and one case G III). In one case, symptomatic recurrent cystitis made a second treatment necessary. This patient remained free of infections for three yr after the first treatment and for 18 months after the second treatment. Of the remaining two patients, one had six episodes of RTP before treatment in a period of three yr and only two episodes after treatment in two yr of follow-up. The last case had a new episode of pyelonephritis five months after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Transurethral injection therapy with Durasphere(®) is a safe and effective minimally invasive treatment option for KTx patients with recurrent RTP. A second treatment seems to be necessary in some cases.

Contribuições à técnica cirúrgica em transplante renal: Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo / Contributions to the surgical tecniques of kidney transplantation: Clinic Hospital of São Paulo University School of Medicine

Não é infreqüente ouvir que, em transplante renal, inovações de impacto no âmbito cirúrgico já não são mais prováveis. No entanto, soluções de alto impacto econômico ainda surgem com freqüência e muitas delas têm surgido no Brasil, contribuindo significativamente para a mudança de conduta cirúrgica em transplante renal a nível mundial. A técnica cirúrgica do transplante renal propriamente dita está bem estabelecida há anos, sendo muito parecida entre os diversos serviços de transplante. Já no que se refere ao tratamento cirúrgico das complicações do transplante e dos pacientes com doenças associadas à insuficiência renal crônica dialítica (IRCD), observamos considerável controvérsia e variação nas condutas. Este estudo pretende oferecer um panorama sobre as técnicas cirúrgicas utilizadas no transplante renal, as complicações decorrentes deste procedimento e os resultados obtidos pelo Serviço de Transplante Renal do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo...

Is not rare to hear that, on kidney transplantation, improvements on surgical aspects are not probable anymore. Although, solutions with high economical impact arises frequently and, many of them, in Brazil, contributing, significantly, for changes on surgical conduct on kidney transplantation worldwide. The surgical techniques for kidney transplantation are well established and do not change between the groups of transplants. Although, the surgical treatment of complicated outcomes and of patients with diseases related to chronic renal failure is still controversial. This study aims to offer a general overview about the surgical techniques of kidney transplantation, complications inherent to this procedure and the results obtained by the Kidney Transplantation Team of Clinic Hospital of São Paulo University Medical School.

Comparative and prospective analysis of three different approaches for live-donor nephrectomy.

PURPOSE: Living donor nephrectomy is usually performed by a retroperitoneal flank incision. Due to the significant morbidity and long recovery time for a flank incision, anterior extra peritoneal sub-costal and transperitoneal video-laparoscopic methods have been described for donor nephrectomy. We prospectively compare the long-term results of donors as well as functional recipients submitted to these three approaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 107 live donor renal transplantations were prospectively evaluated from May 2001 to January 2004. Donors were compared with regard to operative and warm ischemia time, postoperative pain, analgesic requirements, and complications. Recipients were compared with regard to graft function, acute cellular rejection, surgical complications, and graft and recipient survival. RESULTS: The mean operative and warm ischemia times were longer in the video-laparoscopic group (p<0.001), whereas patients of the flank incision group presented more postoperative pain (p=0.035), required more analgesics (p<0.001), had longer hospital stays (p<0.001), and suffered more pain on the 90th day after surgery (p=0.006). In the sub-costal and flank incision groups, there was a larger number of paraesthesias and abdominal wall asymmetries (p<0.001). Recipient groups were demographically comparable and presented similar acute tubular necrosis incidence and delayed graft function. The incidence of acute cellular rejection was higher in the video-laparoscopic and flank incision groups (p=0.013). There was no difference in serum creatinine levels, surgical complications, or recipient or graft survival between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The video-laparoscopic and sub-costal approaches proved to be safe, and to provide donor advantages relative to the flank incision approach. Among recipients, the complication rate, graft survival, and recipient survival were similar in all groups.

Comparative and prospective analysis of three different approaches for live-donor nephrectomy

PURPOSE: Living donor nephrectomy is usually performed by a retroperitoneal flank incision. Due to the significant morbidity and long recovery time for a flank incision, anterior extra peritoneal sub-costal and transperitoneal video-laparoscopic methods have been described for donor nephrectomy. We prospectively compare the long-term results of donors as well as functional recipients submitted to these three approaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 107 live donor renal transplantations were prospectively evaluated from May 2001 to January 2004. Donors were compared with regard to operative and warm ischemia time, postoperative pain, analgesic requirements, and complications. Recipients were compared with regard to graft function, acute cellular rejection, surgical complications, and graft and recipient survival. RESULTS: The mean operative and warm ischemia times were longer in the video-laparoscopic group (p<0.001), whereas patients of the flank incision group presented more postoperative pain (p=0.035), required more analgesics (p<0.001), had longer hospital stays (p<0.001), and suffered more pain on the 90th day after surgery (p=0.006). In the sub-costal and flank incision groups, there was a larger number of paraesthesias and abdominal wall asymmetries (p<0.001). Recipient groups were demographically comparable and presented similar acute tubular necrosis incidence and delayed graft function. The incidence of acute cellular rejection was higher in the video-laparoscopic and flank incision groups (p=0.013). There was no difference in serum creatinine levels, surgical complications, or recipient or graft survival between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The video-laparoscopic and sub-costal approaches proved to be safe, and to provide donor advantages relative to the flank incision approach. Among recipients, the complication rate, graft survival, and recipient survival were similar in all groups.

Radical retropubic prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer in renal transplant patients.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility of radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) in renal transplant recipients with clinically localized prostate cancer. METHODS: A prospective protocol was established between August 2004 and November 2007. In that period, 8 patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer were submitted to RRP, and their clinicopathologic data were reviewed. RESULTS: The mean age (+/- standard deviation) at surgery was 59.6 +/- 6.7 years (range, 49-67 years). All patients had T1C tumors, except for 1 with a T2A tumor. The mean preoperative prostate-specific antigen value was 4.5 +/- 1.8 ng/mL (range, 1.6-7.0 ng/mL). The mean interval between renal transplantation and RRP was 89.9 +/- 65.1 months (range, 40-209 months). The procedure was well tolerated without major complications, and all patients were discharged on the fifth postoperative day. There was no impairment to bladder descent caused by the presence of the allograft or the ureteroneocystostomy. Urethrovesical anastomosis was easily performed in all cases in the standard manner. Blood transfusion was needed in 2 patients (1 received 2 U and another 5 U of blood). The mean operative duration was 183 +/- 29.7 minutes (range, 150-240 minutes), the mean estimated blood loss was 656 +/- 576 mL (range, 100-2000 mL), and no deterioration of graft function was observed. All patients were followed, and the mean follow-up was 10.5 months (range, 2-30 months). Prostate-specific antigen was undetectable in all cases during this time frame. CONCLUSIONS: Radical retropubic prostatectomy in renal transplant patients is safe, effective, and can be easily performed in the same manner as described by Walsh, regardless of the presence of the allograft. The only necessary technical modification is the avoidance of ipsilateral lymphadenectomy to prevent damage to the transplanted organ.

Comparison of renal transplantation outcomes in children with and without bladder dysfunction. A customized approach equals the difference.

PURPOSE: We examined the development of urological abnormalities in a group of pediatric renal transplant recipients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed 211 patients younger than 19 years who underwent 226 renal transplants. Three groups of patients were studied-136 children with end stage renal disease due to a nonurological cause (group 1), 56 children with a urological disorder but with an adequate bladder (group 2a) and 19 children with lower urinary tract dysfunction and/or inadequate bladder drainage (group 2b). A total of 15 children in group 2b underwent bladder augmentation (ureterocystoplasty in 6, enterocystoplasty in 9), 2 underwent continent urinary diversion, 1 underwent autoaugmentation and 1 underwent a Mitrofanoff procedure at the bladder for easier drainage. Kidney transplantation was performed in the classic manner by extraperitoneal access, and whenever possible the ureter was reimplanted using an antireflux procedure. RESULTS: At a mean followup of 75 months 13 children had died, 59 grafts were lost and 15 children had received a second transplant. Two patients in group 2a required a complementary urological procedure to preserve renal function (1 enterocystoplasty, 1 vesicostomy). A total of 12 major surgical complications occurred in 226 kidney transplants (5.3%), with a similar incidence in all groups. The overall graft survival at 5 years was 75%, 74% and 84%, respectively, in groups 1, 2a and 2b. CONCLUSIONS: With individualized treatment children with severely inferior lower urinary tract function may undergo renal transplantation with a safe and adequate outcome.

Primary reconstruction is a good option in the treatment of urinary fistula after kidney transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: urinary fistula is a morbid complication after renal transplantation leading to graft losses and patient death. We review and update our data on urinary fistula after renal transplantation and the outcome after surgical and conservative management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: the charts of 1046 renal transplants were reviewed. Transplants were performed through an extended inguinotomy; vascular anastomoses to the iliac vessels and urinary reconstruction accomplished through the Gregoir technique. Fistulae were diagnosed by urinary leaks through the incision or by the occurrence of a collection in the iliac fossa. Patient was treated surgically or conservatively according to the characteristics of the fistula and patient clinical status. RESULTS: Thirty one fistulae were diagnosed (2.9%). Twenty nine leaks due to ureteral necrosis and 2 due to reimplantation fault. The incidence of leaks among cadaver and live donor transplants was 3.22% and 2.63%, respectively (p = 0.73). Among diabetic and non diabetic patients the incidence of urinary leaks was 6.4% and 2.6%, respectively (p = 0.049). Treatment consisted in anastomosis of the graft ureter or pelvis with the ureter of the recipient in 17 cases with success in 13 (76.5%). Prolonged bladder drainage was employed in 7 cases and the fistula healed in 4 (57%). Ureteral reimplantation was performed in 3 cases and did not work in any of them. Ureteral ligature plus nephrostomy was employed in two cases and worked in one (50%). Percutaneous nephrostomy and ureteral stenting with double J catheter were employed in one case each and worked in both. CONCLUSIONS: The anastomosis of the graft ureter with the ureter of the recipient is a good method for treating urinary fistulae after renal transplantation when local and systemic conditions are good. Ureteral ligature associated to nephrostomy should be applied in cases of unfavorable local conditions or clinically unstable patients.

Primary reconstruction is a good option in the treatment of urinary fistula after kidney transplantation

OBJECTIVES: urinary fistula is a morbid complication after renal transplantation leading to graft losses and patient death. We review and update our data on urinary fistula after renal transplantation and the outcome after surgical and conservative management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: the charts of 1046 renal transplants were reviewed. Transplants were performed through an extended inguinotomy; vascular anastomoses to the iliac vessels and urinary reconstruction accomplished through the Gregoir technique. Fistulae were diagnosed by urinary leaks through the incision or by the occurrence of a collection in the iliac fossa. Patient was treated surgically or conservatively according to the characteristics of the fistula and patient clinical status. RESULTS: Thirty one fistulae were diagnosed (2.9 percent). Twenty nine leaks due to ureteral necrosis and 2 due to reimplantation fault. The incidence of leaks among cadaver and live donor transplants was 3.22 percent and 2.63 percent, respectively (p = 0.73). Among diabetic and non diabetic patients the incidence of urinary leaks was 6.4 percent and 2.6 percent, respectively (p = 0.049). Treatment consisted in anastomosis of the graft ureter or pelvis with the ureter of the recipient in 17 cases with success in 13 (76.5 percent). Prolonged bladder drainage was employed in 7 cases and the fistula healed in 4 (57 percent). Ureteral reimplantation was performed in 3 cases and did not work in any of them. Ureteral ligature plus nephrostomy was employed in two cases and worked in one (50 percent). Percutaneous nephrostomy and ureteral stenting with double J catheter were employed in one case each and worked in both. CONCLUSIONS: The anastomosis of the graft ureter with the ureter of the recipient is a good method for treating urinary fistulae after renal transplantation when local and systemic conditions are good. Ureteral ligature associated to nephrostomy should be applied in cases of unfavorable local conditions or clinically unstable patients.

Surgical complications after renal transplantation in grafts with multiple arteries.

INTRODUCTION: Renal transplantation with multiple arteries appears, in literature, associated to a major index of surgical complications. This study compared the surgical complications and short-term outcome renal transplants with multiple arteries and single artery grafts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data of 64 renal transplants with multiple arteries performed between January 1995 and December 1999 were compared to the ones of 292 transplants with single renal artery. The aspects analyzed were number of arteries of the graft, donor type, vascular reconstruction technique, the occurrence of surgical complications, the incidence of delayed graft function, graft function 1 month after transplantation, graft loss and the patients' deaths. RESULTS: The incidence of surgical complications in grafts with multiple arteries and single renal artery was respectively: vascular--3.1% and 3.1%; urological--6.3% and 2.7% and other surgical complications--15.6% and 10.6%, respectively. The incidence of lymphoceles was 3.1% in grafts with a single artery and 12.5% in grafts with more than 1 artery (p = 0.0015). The incidence of delayed graft function in grafts with multiple arteries and with a single renal artery was respectively 35.1 and 29.1% (p = 0.295). Mean serum creatinine at the 30th postoperative day was 2.46 and 1.81 in grafts with multiple and with 1 artery, respectively (p = 0.271). CONCLUSIONS: Kidney transplantation using grafts with single and multiple arteries present similar indexes of surgical complications and short-term outcome; lymphoceles were more frequent among grafts with multiple arteries.

Surgical complications after renal transplantation in grafts with multiple arteries

INTRODUCTION: Renal transplantation with multiple arteries appears, in literature, associated to a major index of surgical complications. This study compared the surgical complications and short-term outcome renal transplants with multiple arteries and single artery grafts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data of 64 renal transplants with multiple arteries performed between January 1995 and December 1999 were compared to the ones of 292 transplants with single renal artery. The aspects analyzed were number of arteries of the graft, donor type, vascular reconstruction technique, the occurrence of surgical complications, the incidence of delayed graft function, graft function 1 month after transplantation, graft loss and the patients' deaths. RESULTS: The incidence of surgical complications in grafts with multiple arteries and single renal artery was respectively: vascular - 3.1 percent and 3.1 percent; urological - 6.3 percent and 2.7 percent and other surgical complications - 15.6 percent and 10.6 percent, respectively. The incidence of lymphoceles was 3.1 percent in grafts with a single artery and 12.5 percent in grafts with more than 1 artery (p = 0.0015). The incidence of delayed graft function in grafts with multiple arteries and with a single renal artery was respectively 35.1 and 29.1 percent (p = 0.295). Mean serum creatinine at the 30th postoperative day was 2.46 and 1.81 in grafts with multiple and with 1 artery, respectively (p=0.271). CONCLUSIONS: Kidney transplantation using grafts with single and multiple arteries present similar indexes of surgical complications and short-term outcome; lymphoceles were more frequent among grafts with multiple arteries.

Clinical and urodynamic evaluation after ureterocystoplasty and kidney transplantation.

PURPOSE: We assessed clinical and surgical results in renal transplantation candidates with voiding dysfunction and end stage renal disease who underwent bladder augmentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 8 patients 3 to 30 years old with dilated ureters, voiding dysfunction and end stage renal disease who underwent renal transplantation following bladder augmentation from 1995 to 2003. The etiology of bladder dysfunction was neurogenic bladder in 3 patients, posterior urethral valves in 3 and vesicoureteral reflux in 2. All cases were assessed by ultrasonography, voiding cystourethrography and urodynamic studies. RESULTS: Mean followup was 50 months (range 4 to 93). Previous urodynamic evaluation revealed a bladder capacity of 75 to 294 ml (mean +/- SD 167.38 +/- 77.32) and an intravesical pressure of 28 to 100 mm H2O (mean 51.25 +/- 22.17). Urodynamic study after augmentation and kidney transplantation showed a bladder capacity of 191 to 400 ml (mean 335.25 +/- 99.01) and an intravesical pressure of 15 to 35 mm H2O (mean 28 +/- 9.45). Mean serum creatinine was 1.65 mg/dl (range 0.8 to 2.5). All patients remained continent. Three patients with neurogenic bladder empty the bladder by clean intermittent catheterization and the others empty by the Valsalva maneuver. None of the grafts were lost and the most common complication was asymptomatic urinary tract infection. CONCLUSIONS: Bladder augmentation is a well-known procedure for low capacity and poorly compliant bladders even in candidates for a renal transplant. Ureterocystoplasty combines the benefits common to all enterocystoplasties without adding to complications or risks.

Laparoscopic nephrectomy in live donor

OBJECTIVE: To present the initial experience of videolaparoscopic nephrectomy in live renal donor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the period from April 2000 to August 2003, 50 left nephrectomies in live donor were performed by videolaparoscopy for transplantation. Twenty-eight patients were male (56 percent) and 22 female (44 percent). Mean age was 37.2 years, and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 27.1 kg/m². RESULTS: Mean surgical time was 179.5 minutes, and warm ischemia time of the graft was 3.79 minutes. The mean estimated bleeding was 141 mL. There was no need of blood transfusion or conversion to open surgery. In 42 cases (84 percent), the vascular portion of the graft was considered good by the recipient's surgical team and in all cases, the ureter was considered of proper size, though in one of them (2 percent) its vascularization was considered improper. The transplanted kidneys produced urine still in the surgical room in 46 of the 50 transplantations considered. In only 2 cases opioid was required for analgesia. In average, 3.1 doses of dipyrone were used for each patient during hospital stay, and hospital discharge occurred, in average, after 3.2 days post-operatively. Two patients required re-operations and one of them evolved to death. CONCLUSIONS: The laparoscopic nephrectomy in live donor for renal transplantation is an alternative to conventional open surgery. In relation to the graft, no alteration, either anatomic or functional, was detected. Though there is already a large documentation in the international literature regarding this procedure, in our setting a prospective randomized study with the usual surgical study is still necessary in order to prove the advantages and disadvantages of the method.

Laparoscopic nephrectomy in live donor.

OBJECTIVE: To present the initial experience of videolaparoscopic nephrectomy in live renal donor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the period from April 2000 to August 2003, 50 left nephrectomies in live donor were performed by videolaparoscopy for transplantation. Twenty-eight patients were male (56%) and 22 female (44%). Mean age was 37.2 years, and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 27.1 kg/m2. RESULTS: Mean surgical time was 179.5 minutes, and warm ischemia time of the graft was 3.79 minutes. The mean estimated bleeding was 141 mL. There was no need of blood transfusion or conversion to open surgery. In 42 cases (84%), the vascular portion of the graft was considered good by the recipient's surgical team and in all cases, the ureter was considered of proper size, though in one of them (2%) its vascularization was considered improper. The transplanted kidneys produced urine still in the surgical room in 46 of the 50 transplantations considered. In only 2 cases opioid was required for analgesia. In average, 3.1 doses of dipyrone were used for each patient during hospital stay, and hospital discharge occurred, in average, after 3.2 days post-operatively. Two patients required re-operations and one of them evolved to death. CONCLUSIONS: The laparoscopic nephrectomy in live donor for renal transplantation is an alternative to conventional open surgery. In relation to the graft, no alteration, either anatomic or functional, was detected. Though there is already a large documentation in the international literature regarding this procedure, in our setting a prospective randomized study with the usual surgical study is still necessary in order to prove the advantages and disadvantages of the method.