Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Insect Sci ; 2023 Nov 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37990951

ABSTRACT

Bactrocera tryoni and Bactrocera neohumeralis are morphologically similar sibling pest fruit fly species that possess different biological attributes, geographic distributions, and host ranges. The need to differentiate between the two species is critical for accurate pest status assessment, management, biosecurity, and maintenance of reference colonies. While morphologically similar, adults may be separated based on subtle characters; however, some characters exhibit intraspecific variability, creating overlap between the two species. Additionally, there is currently no single molecular marker or rapid diagnostic assay that can reliably distinguish between B. neohumeralis and B. tryoni; therefore, ambiguous samples remain undiagnosed. Here we report the first molecular marker that can consistently distinguish between B. tryoni and B. neohumeralis. Our diagnostic region consists of two adjacent single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within the pangolin (pan) gene region. We confirmed the genotypes of each species are consistent across their distributional range, then developed a tetra-primer amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS) PCR assay for rapid diagnosis of the species. The assay utilizes four primers in multiplex, with two outer universal primers, and two internal primers: one designed to target two adjacent SNPs (AA) present in B. tryoni and the other targeting adjacent SNPs present in B. neohumeralis (GG). The assay accurately discriminates between the two species, but their SNP genotypes are shared with other nontarget tephritid fruit fly species. Therefore, this assay is most suited to adult diagnostics where species confirmation is necessary in determining ambiguous surveillance trap catches; maintaining pure colony lines; and in Sterile Insect Technique management responses.

2.
PeerJ ; 11: e15831, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37601253

ABSTRACT

Background: The Australian citrus industry remains one of the few in the world to be unaffected by the African and the Asian citrus psyllids, Trioza erytreae Del Guercio and Diaphorina citri Kuwayama, respectively, and the diseases their vectored bacteria can cause. Surveillance, early detection, and strict quarantine measures are therefore fundamental to safeguard Australian citrus. However, long-term targeted surveillance for exotic citrus pests can be a time-consuming and expensive activity, often relying on manually screening large numbers of trap samples and morphological identification of specimens, which requires a high level of taxonomic knowledge. Methods: Here we evaluated the use of non-destructive insect metabarcoding for exotic pest surveillance in citrus orchards. We conducted an 11-week field trial, between the months of December and February, at a horticultural research farm (SuniTAFE Smart Farm) in the Northwest of Victoria, Australia, and processed more than 250 samples collected from three types of invertebrate traps across four sites. Results: The whole-community metabarcoding data enabled comparisons between different trapping methods, demonstrated the spatial variation of insect diversity across the same orchard, and highlighted how comprehensive assessment of insect biodiversity requires use of multiple complimentary trapping methods. In addition to revealing the diversity of native psyllid species in citrus orchards, the non-targeted metabarcoding approach identified a diversity of other pest and beneficial insects and arachnids within the trap bycatch, and recorded the presence of the triozid Casuarinicola cf warrigalensis for the first time in Victoria. Ultimately, this work highlights how a non-targeted surveillance approach for insect monitoring coupled with non-destructive DNA metabarcoding can provide accurate and high-throughput species identification for biosecurity and biodiversity monitoring.


Subject(s)
Citrus , Hemiptera , Animals , Humans , Hemiptera/genetics , Biosecurity , Insecta/genetics , Victoria , CD40 Ligand
3.
PLoS One ; 18(5): e0285587, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37186593

ABSTRACT

The bacterial microbiome of psyllids has been studied for decades, with a strong focus on the primary and secondary endosymbionts capable of providing essential amino acids for the insects' diet and therefore playing a key role in the insects' ability to radiate on novel plant hosts. Here, we combine metabarcoding analysis of the bacterial communities hosted by psyllids with a multi-gene phylogenetic analysis of the insect hosts to determine what factors influence the bacterial diversity of the psyllids' microbiomes, especially in the context of the dispersal and evolutionary radiation of these insects in Aotearoa New Zealand. Using multi-gene phylogenetics with COI, 18S and EF-1α sequences from 102 psyllid species, we confirmed for the first time monophyly for all the six genera of native/endemic Aotearoa New Zealand psyllids, with indications that they derive from at least six dispersal events to the country. This also revealed that, after its ancestral arrival, the genus Powellia has radiated onto a larger and more diverse range of plants than either Psylla or Ctenarytaina, which is uncommon amongst monophyletic psyllids globally. DNA metabarcoding of the bacterial 16S gene here represents the largest dataset analysed to date from psyllids, including 246 individuals from 73 species. This provides novel evidence that bacterial diversity across psyllid species is strongly associated with psyllid phylogenetic structure, and to a lesser degree to their host plant association and geographic distribution. Furthermore, while the strongest co-phylogenetic signals were derived from the primary and secondary symbionts, a signal of phylosymbiosis was still retained among the remaining taxa of the bacterial microbiome, suggesting potential vertical transmission of bacterial lineages previously unknown to have symbiotic roles.


Subject(s)
Hemiptera , Microbiota , Humans , Animals , Phylogeny , Hemiptera/genetics , New Zealand , Bacteria/genetics , Plants , Symbiosis/genetics , Microbiota/genetics
4.
PLoS One ; 18(2): e0281759, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36791141

ABSTRACT

Insect identification and preservation of voucher specimens is integral to pest diagnostic and surveillance activities; yet bulk-trapped insects are a diagnostic challenge due to high catch numbers and the susceptibility of samples to environmental damage. Many insect trap catches rely on examination of morphological characters for species identifications, which is a time consuming and highly skilled task, hence there is a need for more efficient molecular approaches. Many bulk DNA extraction methods require destructive sampling of specimens, resulting in damaged, or fully destroyed, voucher specimens. We developed an inexpensive, rapid, bulk DNA isolation method that preserves specimens as pinned vouchers to a standard that allows for post-extraction morphological examination and inclusion in insect reference collections. Our protocol was validated using a group of insects that are time-consuming to identify when trapped in large numbers-the dacine fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae: Dacinae). In developing our method, we evaluated existing protocols against the following criteria: effect on morphology; suitability for large trap catches; cost; ease of handling; and application to downstream molecular diagnostic analyses such as real-time PCR and metabarcoding. We found that the optimum method for rapid isolation of DNA extraction was immersing flies in a NaOH:TE buffer at 75°C for 10 minutes, without the need for proteinase K or detergents. This HotSOAK method produced sufficient high-quality DNA whilst preserving morphological characters suitable for species-level identification with up to 20,000 flies in a sample. The lysates performed well in down-stream analyses such as loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) and real-time PCR applications, while for metabarcoding PCR the lysate required an additional column purification step. Development of this method is a key step required for upscaling our capacity to accurately detect insects captured in bulk traps, whether for biodiversity, biosecurity, or pest management objectives.


Subject(s)
Insecta , Tephritidae , Animals , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Insecta/genetics , Tephritidae/genetics , Drosophila/genetics , DNA/genetics , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
5.
PeerJ ; 10: e12981, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35228909

ABSTRACT

A fast and reliable method for obtaining a species-level identification is a fundamental requirement for a wide range of activities, from plant protection and invasive species management to biodiversity assessments and ecological studies. For insects, novel molecular techniques such as DNA metabarcoding have emerged as a rapid alternative to traditional morphological identification, reducing the dependence on limited taxonomic experts. Until recently, molecular techniques have required a destructive DNA extraction, precluding the possibility of preserving voucher specimens for future studies, or species descriptions. Here we paired insect metabarcoding with two recent non-destructive DNA extraction protocols, to obtain a rapid and high-throughput taxonomic identification of diverse insect taxa while retaining a physical voucher specimen. The aim of this work was to explore how non-destructive extraction protocols impact the semi-quantitative nature of metabarcoding, which alongside species presence/absence also provides a quantitative, but biased, representation of their relative abundances. By using a series of mock communities representing each stage of a typical metabarcoding workflow we were able to determine how different morphological (i.e., insect biomass and exoskeleton hardness) and molecular traits (i.e., primer mismatch and amplicon GC%), interact with different protocol steps to introduce quantitative bias into non-destructive metabarcoding results. We discuss the relevance of taxonomic bias to metabarcoding identification of insects and potential approaches to account for it.


Subject(s)
DNA Barcoding, Taxonomic , Insecta , Animals , DNA Barcoding, Taxonomic/methods , Insecta/genetics , DNA/genetics , Biodiversity , Plants/genetics
6.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 7946, 2021 04 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33846382

ABSTRACT

Metabarcoding has the potential to revolutionise insect surveillance by providing high-throughput and cost-effective species identification of all specimens within mixed trap catches. Nevertheless, incorporation of metabarcoding into insect diagnostic laboratories will first require the development and evaluation of protocols that adhere to the specialised regulatory requirements of invasive species surveillance. In this study, we develop a multi-locus non-destructive metabarcoding protocol that allows sensitive detection of agricultural pests, and subsequent confirmation using traditional diagnostic techniques. We validate this protocol for the detection of tomato potato psyllid (Bactericera cockerelli) and Russian wheat aphid (Diuraphis noxia) within mock communities and field survey traps. We find that metabarcoding can reliably detect target insects within mixed community samples, including specimens that morphological identification did not initially detect, but sensitivity appears inversely related to community size and is impacted by primer biases, target loci, and sample indexing strategy. While our multi-locus approach allowed independent validation of target detection, lack of reference sequences for 18S and 12S restricted its usefulness for estimating diversity in field samples. The non-destructive DNA extraction proved invaluable for resolving inconsistencies between morphological and metabarcoding identification results, and post-extraction specimens were suitable for both morphological re-examination and DNA re-extraction for confirmatory barcoding.


Subject(s)
Aphids/genetics , DNA Barcoding, Taxonomic/methods , Hemiptera/genetics , Animals , DNA/genetics , Genetic Loci , Larva/physiology , Phylogeny
7.
J Chem Ecol ; 46(8): 675-687, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32185581

ABSTRACT

We explored how gut-associated yeasts influence olfactory behaviour and resource use in two pest species of Carpophilus beetle that co-exist in Australian stone fruits. Molecular analysis of yeasts isolated from the gut of C. davidsoni (prefers ripe fruits) and C. hemipterus (prefers overripe and rotting fruits) revealed that the predominant species were Pichia kluyveri and Hanseniaspora guilliermondii. In olfactory attraction and oviposition trials, adult beetles preferred H. guilliermondii over P. kluyveri, and follow up GC-MS analysis revealed unambiguous differences between the odour profiles of these yeasts. In contrast to behavioural trials, larval feeding assays showed that fruit substrates inoculated with P. kluyveri yielded significantly faster development times, higher pupal mass, and a greater number of adult beetles, compared to H. guilliermondii - in other words, the lesser preferred yeast (by foraging adults) was more suitable for larval survival. Moreover, whilst larvae of both species survived to adulthood when fed solely on P. kluyveri (i.e. without a fruit substrate), only larvae of C. davidsoni could develop on H. guilliermondii; and only C. davidsoni reached adulthood feeding on a yeast-free fruit substrate. We discuss how these findings may relate to adaptations towards early colonising of fruits by C. davidsoni, enabling differences in resource use and potentially resource partitioning in the two beetles. More broadly, consideration of microbial interactions might help develop host selection theory. Our results could pave the way to more powerful attractants to mass-trap and monitor Carpophilus pests in fruit orchards.


Subject(s)
Chemotaxis , Coleoptera/physiology , Hanseniaspora/chemistry , Herbivory , Olfactory Perception , Oviposition , Pichia/chemistry , Animals , Coleoptera/growth & development , Coleoptera/microbiology , Diet , Female , Fruit , Genetic Fitness , Larva/growth & development , Larva/microbiology , Larva/physiology , Male , Species Specificity
8.
Gigascience ; 8(8)2019 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31363753

ABSTRACT

Trap-based surveillance strategies are widely used for monitoring of invasive insect species, aiming to detect newly arrived exotic taxa as well as track the population levels of established or endemic pests. Where these surveillance traps have low specificity and capture non-target endemic species in excess of the target pests, the need for extensive specimen sorting and identification creates a major diagnostic bottleneck. While the recent development of standardized molecular diagnostics has partly alleviated this requirement, the single specimen per reaction nature of these methods does not readily scale to the sheer number of insects trapped in surveillance programmes. Consequently, target lists are often restricted to a few high-priority pests, allowing unanticipated species to avoid detection and potentially establish populations. DNA metabarcoding has recently emerged as a method for conducting simultaneous, multi-species identification of complex mixed communities and may lend itself ideally to rapid diagnostics of bulk insect trap samples. Moreover, the high-throughput nature of recent sequencing platforms could enable the multiplexing of hundreds of diverse trap samples on a single flow cell, thereby providing the means to dramatically scale up insect surveillance in terms of both the quantity of traps that can be processed concurrently and number of pest species that can be targeted. In this review of the metabarcoding literature, we explore how DNA metabarcoding could be tailored to the detection of invasive insects in a surveillance context and highlight the unique technical and regulatory challenges that must be considered when implementing high-throughput sequencing technologies into sensitive diagnostic applications.


Subject(s)
DNA Barcoding, Taxonomic , Genome, Insect , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Insecta/classification , Insecta/genetics , Animals , Biodiversity , Computational Biology/methods , DNA Barcoding, Taxonomic/methods , Databases, Genetic , Genetic Markers , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/methods
9.
J Chem Ecol ; 43(9): 891-901, 2017 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28836040

ABSTRACT

Yeast-insect interactions have been well characterized in drosophilid flies, but not in tephritid fruit flies, which include many highly polyphagous pest species that attack ripening fruits. Using the Queensland fruit fly (Bactrocera tryoni) as our model tephritid species, we identified yeast species present in the gut of wild-collected larvae and found two genera, Hanseniaspora and Pichia, were the dominant isolates. In behavioural trials using adult female B. tryoni, a fruit-agar substrate inoculated with Pichia kluyveri resulted in odour emissions that increased the attraction of flies, whereas inoculation with Hanseniaspora uvarum, produced odours that strongly deterred flies, and both yeasts led to decreased oviposition. Larval development trials showed that the fruit-agar substrate inoculated with the 'deterrent odour' yeast species, H. uvarum, resulted in significantly faster larval development and a greater number of adult flies, compared to a substrate inoculated with the 'attractive odour' yeast species, P. kluyveri, and a yeast free control substrate. GC-MS analysis of volatiles emitted by H. uvarum and P. kluyveri inoculated substrates revealed significant quantitative differences in ethyl-, isoamyl-, isobutyl-, and phenethyl- acetates, which may be responsible for the yeast-specific olfactory responses of adult flies. We discuss how our seemingly counterintuitive finding that female B. tryoni flies avoid a beneficial yeast fits well with our understanding of female choice of oviposition sites, and how the contrasting behavioural effects of H. uvarum and P. kluyveri raises interesting questions regarding the role of yeast-specific volatiles as cues to insect vectors. A better understanding of yeast-tephritid interactions could assist in the future management of tephritid fruit fly pests through the formulation of new "attract and kill" lures, and the development of probiotics for mass rearing of insects in sterile insect control programs.


Subject(s)
Pichia/physiology , Saccharomycetales/physiology , Tephritidae/microbiology , Animals , Female , Insect Control , Larva/anatomy & histology , Larva/microbiology , Larva/physiology , Odorants/analysis , Oviposition , Pest Control, Biological , Pichia/isolation & purification , Plant Diseases/parasitology , Prunus domestica/parasitology , Prunus persica/parasitology , Psidium/parasitology , Reproduction , Saccharomycetales/isolation & purification , Smell , Tephritidae/anatomy & histology , Tephritidae/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...