Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Pediatrics ; 117(2): e157-63, 2006 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16452325

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the impact of intense influenza media coverage during the 2003-2004 influenza season on the influenza vaccination status of children 6 to 59 months of age. METHODS: Children 6 to 59 months of age who presented to a large, academic pediatric continuity clinic or affiliated acute care clinic in the summer of 2004 were enrolled. A parental survey ascertained the influenza vaccination status of the child and family members during the 2003-2004 influenza season and factors that influenced their vaccination status. For children vaccinated in the clinic or health department, influenza vaccination dates were confirmed in a computerized medical chart or state immunization registry. RESULTS: Of 256 enrolled children, 98 (38%) parents reported that their child had received the 2003-2004 influenza vaccine, and 64 (65%) had confirmed influenza vaccination dates. Unlike the previous influenza season in which confirmed influenza vaccination dates from a similar study population were distributed more evenly from October through December, most children (75%) with confirmed vaccination dates received the vaccine after the media coverage in mid-November. Influenza vaccinations per week increased dramatically after the media coverage began (2.4 vs 8.6 per week; t test: P < .001). In late November and December 2003, the influenza-related media coverage, which focused primarily on an early, severe influenza season, increased dramatically and explained 85% of the variation in influenza vaccinations. Multivariate analysis showed that recalling a physician recommendation (odds ratio [OR]: 6.8; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.3-19.7), having a family member who had received the influenza vaccine (OR: 9.5; 95% CI: 4.3-21.3), having a continuity clinic visit between October and January (OR: 4.5; 95% CI: 2.0-10.1), and having a high-risk medical condition (OR: 2.9; 95% CI: 1.1-7.8) strongly predicted the influenza vaccination status in the children. CONCLUSION: Media coverage in conjunction with explicit physician recommendation for children and their contacts are key factors that are associated with influenza vaccination rates in children.


Subject(s)
Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Mass Media , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Child, Preschool , Humans , Infant
2.
Pediatrics ; 108(6): E99, 2001 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11731626

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine predictors of influenza virus vaccination status in children who are hospitalized during the influenza season. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among children who were hospitalized with fever between 6 months and 3 years of age or with respiratory symptoms between 6 months and 18 years of age. The 1999 to 2000 influenza vaccination status of hospitalized children and potential factors that influence decisions to vaccinate were obtained from a questionnaire administered to parents/guardians. RESULTS: Influenza vaccination rates for hospitalized children with and without high-risk medical conditions were 31% and 14%, respectively. For both groups of children, the vaccination status was strongly influenced by recommendations from physicians. More than 70% of children were vaccinated if a physician had recommended the influenza vaccine, whereas only 3% were vaccinated if a physician had not. Lack of awareness that children can receive the influenza vaccine was a commonly cited reason for nonvaccination. CONCLUSIONS: A minority of hospitalized children with high-risk conditions had received the influenza vaccine. However, parents' recalling that a clinician had recommended the vaccine had a positive impact on the vaccination status of children.


Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Communication Barriers , Cross-Sectional Studies , Health Status , Humans , Infant , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Patient Education as Topic , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Risk Factors , United States
4.
Curr Opin Pediatr ; 13(1): 60-4, 2001 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11176246

ABSTRACT

Because influenza significantly affects the health of children, this review describes the current and future options for preventing, diagnosing, and treating influenza infections. Currently, the inactivated influenza vaccine is recommended for prevention of influenza; however, the live, attenuated, intranasal influenza vaccine is a potential future option. For diagnosis, viral culture is the gold standard, although four rapid diagnostic tests are available for more immediate results. The impetus for rapid results is the availability of effective antiviral agents indicated for early influenza infection. The four currently approved antiviral agents are amantadine, rimantadine, zanamivir [Relenza, Glaxo Wellcome, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC] and oseltamivir [Tamiflu, Roche Pharmaceuticals, Nutley, NJ]. The indications, benefits, side effects and ages for which each drug is approved are reviewed.


Subject(s)
Influenza, Human , Adolescent , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Infant , Influenza Vaccines/therapeutic use , Influenza, Human/diagnosis , Influenza, Human/drug therapy , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Neuraminidase/antagonists & inhibitors , Nucleic Acid Synthesis Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...