Salvage strategy for long-term central venous catheter-associated Staphylococcus aureus infections in children: a multi-centre retrospective study in France.

OBJECTIVES: Catheter removal is recommended in adults with Staphylococcus aureus central-line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) but is controversial in children with long-term central venous catheters (LTCVC). We evaluated the occurrence of catheter salvage strategy (CSS) in children with S. aureus LTCVC-associated CLABSI and assessed determinants of CSS failure. METHODS: We retrospectively included children (<18 years) with an LTCVC and hospitalized with S. aureus CLABSI in eight French tertiary-care hospitals (2010-2018). CSS was defined as an LTCVC left in place ≥72 h after initiating empiric antibiotic treatment for suspected bacteraemia. Characteristics of patients were reviewed, and multi-variable logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with CSS failure (i.e., persistence, recurrence or complications of bacteraemia). RESULTS: We included 273 episodes of S. aureus LTCVC-associated CLABSI. CSS was chosen in 194 out of 273 (71%) cases and failed in 74 of them (38%). The main type of CSS failure was the persistence of bacteraemia (39 of 74 cases, 53%). Factors independently associated with CSS failure were: history of catheter infection (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 3.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.38-7.36), CLABSI occurring on an implantable venous access device (aOR 7.61, 95% CI 1.98-29.20) when compared with tunnelled-cuffed CVC, polymicrobial CLABSI (aOR 3.45, 95% CI 1.25-9.50), and severe sepsis at the initial stage of infection (aOR 4.46, 95% CI 1.18-16.82). CONCLUSIONS: CSS was frequently chosen in children with S. aureus LTCVC-associated CLABSI, and failure occurred in one-third of cases. The identified risk factors may help clinicians identify children at risk for CSS failure.

Pulmonary bacterial infections in adult patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in standard wards.

OBJECTIVES: During the COVID-19 pandemic, antibiotic use was very common. However, bacterial co-/secondary infections with coronaviruses remain largely unknown in standard wards. We aimed to investigate the characteristics of pulmonary bacterial infections associated with COVID-19 in hospitalized patients. METHODS: A retrospective monocentric observational study was conducted in Bichat hospital, France, between February 26 and April 22, 2020. All patients hospitalized in standard wards with COVID-19 (positive nasopharyngeal PCR and/or typical aspect on CT-scan) and diagnosed with pulmonary bacterial infection (positive bacteriological samples) were included. Bacteriological and clinical data were collected from the microbiology laboratories and patient's medical records. RESULTS: Twenty-three bacteriological samples from 22 patients were positive out of 2075 screened samples (1.1%) from 784 patients (2.8%). Bacterial infection occurred within a median of 10 days after COVID-19 onset. Diagnosis of pulmonary bacterial infection was suspected on increase of oxygen requirements (20/22), productive cough or modification of sputum aspect (17/22), or fever (10/22). Positive samples included 13 sputum cultures, one FilmArray® assay on sputum samples, one bronchoalveolar lavage, six blood cultures, and two pneumococcal urinary antigen tests. The most frequent bacteria were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (6/23), Staphylococcus aureus (5/23), Streptococcus pneumoniae (4/23), Enterococcus faecalis (3/23), and Klebsiella aerogenes (3/23). No Legionella urinary antigen test was positive. Four out of 496 nasopharyngeal PCR tests (0.8%) were positive for intracellular bacteria (two Bordetella pertussis and two Mycoplasma pneumonia). CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary bacterial secondary infections and co-infections with SARS-CoV-2 are uncommon. Antibiotic use should remain limited in the management of COVID-19.