Relevance of circulating Semaphorin 4A for rheumatoid arthritis response to treatment.

The lack of validated tools to predict rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease course warrants the development of new reliable biomarkers. Our aim was to evaluate the merit of circulating SEMA4A for the prediction of outcomes in patients with RA. In a first cohort of 101 consecutive RA patients followed up for 41 ± 15 months, increased baseline SEMA4A levels were identified as an independent predictor of treatment failure (hazard ratio, HR 2.71, 95% CI 1.14-6.43), defined by the occurrence of patient-reported flares and initiation or change of targeted therapy. The highest predictive value of treatment failure was obtained with the combination of increased circulating SEMA4A and/or Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28-CRP > 3.2 and/or active synovitis on doppler ultrasound (HR 10.42, 95% CI 1.41-76.94). In a second independent cohort of 40 consecutive RA patients who initiated new therapy because of insufficient disease control, baseline SEMA4A levels were significantly higher in patients who further experienced none or moderate response, and SEMA4A concentrations were markedly decreased in the group of patients with good clinical response as compared to non-responders. Circulating SEMA4A appears as an appealing biomarker in RA with ability to predict treatment failure, and with association with response to therapy.

Evaluation of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis in Teleconsultation During the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: To describe which variables were collected by rheumatologists to monitor patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) during teleconsultation and identify which ones have more impact on clinician intervention. METHODS: Retrospective monocentric, routine care cross-sectional study including patients with RA seen in teleconsultation between March and September 2020. Available variables assessing disease status were collected in teleconsultation files. Clinician intervention was defined by treatment escalation and/or the need for a rapid face-to-face consultation or day hospitalization. RESULTS: One hundred forty-three patients with RA were included (116 females, mean age of 58 [SD 16] yrs, mean disease duration of 14 [SD 11] yrs). The presence or absence of patient self-reported RA flares was mentioned in all medical files, followed by the presence and/or the number of tender joints (76%), the duration of morning stiffness (66%), the number of pain-related nocturnal awakenings (66%) and the C-reactive protein (CRP) value (54%). Teleconsultation led to a clinician intervention in 22/143 patients (15%), representing 51% of patients with self-reported flares (22/43 patients). Therapeutic escalation was necessary in 13 patients and/or face-to-face consultation or day hospitalization were organized for 10 patients. Multivariate analysis identified RA flares (odds ratio [OR] 15.6, 95% CI 3.37-68.28) and CRP values > 10 mg/L (OR 3.32, 95% CI % 1.12-13.27) as the variables independently associated with clinician intervention. CONCLUSION: Our study identified patient-reported RA flares and increased CRP values as 2 red flags in teleconsultation, independently associated with therapeutic modification and/or the need for a rapid face-to-face consultation. These indicators may help clinicians' decision making in teleconsultation.

Efficacy of zoledronic acid in Erdheim-Chester disease: A case report.

Erdheim-Chester disease is rare form of non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis characterized by organ infiltration of CD68+ CD1a- histiocytes. Between 500 and 600 cases have been reported. It is a multifaceted disease ranging from a solely asymptomatic bone to a fatal multisystem pattern. Bone involvement occurs in more than 90% of cases. Although not life-threatening, bone localizations can be responsible of difficult-to-treat pain and disability. Treatment depends on lesion severity. Bisphosphonates have been reported to be efficient and safe in bone involvement. We report a case of a biopsy proven bone Erdheim-Chester disease in a 65-year-old woman with history of breast cancer. Her pain was relieved after 3 perfusions of zoledronic acid and the efficiency remained at one year of follow-up.

All-cause Mortality Associated with TNF-α Inhibitors in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

OBJECTIVE: To compare mortality data obtained from randomized controlled trials for the 5 tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitors used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: A systematic review of articles published up to November 2014 was performed using electronic databases. We included randomized, controlled trials, with a follow-up period of at least 24 weeks, comparing TNF-α inhibitors to placebo or disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. The primary outcome was the occurrence of all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Twenty-three studies were selected. These articles included 6525 patients in the anti-TNF-α group and 3523 in the control group. The duration of patient follow-up ranged from 24 to 104 weeks. The risk of all-cause mortality in patients receiving TNF-α inhibitors was not significantly different from those receiving the comparator (odds ratio 1.32; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-2.29). Subgroup analyses with respect to the molecule used, the dose received, the use of TNF-α inhibitors as monotherapy or combination therapy, or the quality of the trial did not modify the findings. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis performed on a large number of patients and including the 5 TNF-α inhibitors currently available shows no increased risk of medium-term all-cause mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.