Co-designing a cardiac rehabilitation program with knowledge users for patients with cardiovascular disease from a remote area.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death worldwide. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs are recognized as effective in reducing the burden of cardiovascular disease. However, CR programs are offered inequitably across regions and are available in less than 15% of remote areas worldwide. The main goal of this study was to design a CR program adapted to the contexts of remote areas to improve the service offered to patients. METHODS: We used an iterative user-centered design approach to understand the user context and services offered in cardiac rehabilitation in remote areas. We conducted two co-design processes with knowledge users in two remote regions. Two advisory committees were created in each of these regions, comprising managers (n = 6), healthcare professionals (n = 12) and patients (n = 2). We utilized the BACPR guidelines and the Hautes Autorités de santé operational model to support data collection in coding sessions to develop the CR program. We conducted four cycles of co-design with each of the committees to develop the cardiac rehabilitation program. Qualitative data were analyzed iteratively after each cycle. RESULTS: The co-design process resulted in developing a prototype cardiac rehabilitation program similar in both regions. It is based on a contextualized six-phase pathway of care designed for remote regions. For each phase 0 to 6 of the care pathway, knowledge users were asked to describe how to offer these phases in remote areas. Participants made structural changes to phases 0, 2, 3 and 4 in order to overcome staffing shortages in remote areas. These changes make it possible to decentralize cardiac rehabilitation expertise away from specialized centers, to ensure equity of service across the territory. Therapeutic patient education was integrated into phase 4 to meet patients' needs. Participants suggested that three follow-up offerings could come from nursing services to increase access to the cardiac rehabilitation program (primary care, home care, special chronic disease programs) in patients' home communities. CONCLUSION: The co-design process enables us to meet the needs of remote regions in program development. This final program can be the subject of future implementation research.

Barriers and enablers to the implementation of patient-reported outcome and experience measures (PROMs/PREMs): protocol for an umbrella review.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome and experience measures (PROMs and PREMs, respectively) are evidence-based, standardized questionnaires that can be used to capture patients' perspectives of their health and health care. While substantial investments have been made in the implementation of PROMs and PREMs, their use remains fragmented and limited in many settings. Analysis of multi-level barriers and enablers to the implementation of PROMs and PREMs has been hampered by the lack of use of state-of-the-art implementation science frameworks. This umbrella review aims to consolidate available evidence from existing quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods systematic and scoping reviews covering factors that influence the implementation of PROMs and PREMs in healthcare settings. METHODS: An umbrella review of systematic and scoping reviews will be conducted following the guidelines of the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods reviews of studies focusing on the implementation of PROMs and/or PREMs in all healthcare settings will be considered for inclusion. Eight bibliographical databases will be searched. All review steps will be conducted by two reviewers independently. Included reviews will be appraised and data will be extracted in four steps: (1) assessing the methodological quality of reviews using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist; (2) extracting data from included reviews; (3) theory-based coding of barriers and enablers using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) 2.0; and (4) identifying the barriers and enablers best supported by reviews using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation-Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research (GRADE-CERQual) approach. Findings will be presented in diagrammatic and tabular forms in a manner that aligns with the objective and scope of this umbrella review, along with a narrative summary. DISCUSSION: This umbrella review of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods systematic and scoping reviews will inform policymakers, researchers, managers, and clinicians regarding which factors hamper or enable the adoption and sustained use of PROMs and PREMs in healthcare settings, and the level of confidence in the evidence supporting these factors. Findings will orient the selection and adaptation of implementation strategies tailored to the factors identified. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42023421845.

Job titles and education requirements of registered nurses in primary care: An international document analysis.

Background: Registered nurses have increasingly taken on new, integrated roles across a variety of health care settings, thus leading to a lack of clarity among titles used to identify registered nurses. Protected titles, such as "registered nurse," identify regulated professionals, whereas informal job titles identify nurses by their education or practice area. The variation in education requirements of registered nurses and the inconsistency in titles used to identify registered nurses in primary care internationally limits the ability to compare research findings and policies across countries. There is also minimal documentation on the education requirements specific to registered nurses in primary care. Objectives: This study aims to (a) outline protected titles and education requirements for registered nurses; and (b) identify job titles and education requirements specific to registered nurses in primary care internationally. Methods: A modified document analysis with key informant consultations was employed. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development and key partner countries were considered for inclusion (n=42). Online searches were performed using keywords (e.g. nurse, title, nursing education) to identify data focused on protected titles and education requirements of registered nurses, and job titles and education requirements of registered nurses in primary care. Data were extracted from online sources and verified for accuracy and completeness by key informants, identified for each country through online searches or professional networks. Results: Out of the 42 eligible countries, 24 countries were included in the final analysis. Five countries were excluded for their lack of available documents in English or French and 13 countries were excluded due to an inability to verify data with key informants. The findings show that "registered nurse" is the most common protected title internationally. Other protected titles include "general nurse" and "nurse." Many unofficial job titles for registered nurses in primary care were identified, including "primary care nurse," "general practice nurse," and "community nurse." Twelve countries had no specific job title for registered nurses in primary care. Consistently, there was no mandatory education required for registered nurses to practice in primary care. However, many countries had primary care-specific programs available for nurses to gain knowledge in this area. Conclusions: This study confirms that job titles used to identify registered nurses in primary care vary considerably across countries. A unified understanding of international nomenclature for this role can support and facilitate future research, education, and policy development to recognize and optimize primary care nursing by improving access and quality of care for individuals, families, and communities. Tweetable abstract: Globally, job titles of RNs in primary care vary considerably and there are no formal primary care education requirements to practice.