Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Curr Biol ; 34(17): 3966-3982.e7, 2024 Sep 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39146938

ABSTRACT

Epithelial organs maintain their integrity and prevent tumor initiation by actively removing defective cells, such as those that have lost apicobasal polarity. Here, we identify how transcription factors of two key signaling pathways-Jun-N-terminal kinase (JNK) and Hippo-regulate epithelial integrity by controlling transcription of an overlapping set of target genes. Targeted DamID experiments reveal that, in proliferating cells of the Drosophila melanogaster eye, the AP-1 transcription factor Jun and the Hippo pathway transcription regulators Yorkie and Scalloped bind to a common suite of target genes that promote organ growth. In defective neoplastic cells, AP-1 transcription factors repress transcription of growth genes together with the C-terminal binding protein (CtBP) co-repressor. If gene repression by AP-1/CtBP fails, neoplastic tumor growth ensues, driven by Yorkie/Scalloped. Thus, AP-1/CtBP eliminates defective cells and prevents tumor initiation by acting in parallel to Yorkie/Scalloped to repress expression of a shared transcriptome. These findings shed new light on the maintenance of epithelial integrity and tumor suppression.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins , Drosophila melanogaster , Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins , Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases , Transcriptome , Animals , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases/metabolism , Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases/genetics , Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/metabolism , Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/genetics , Signal Transduction , YAP-Signaling Proteins/metabolism , YAP-Signaling Proteins/genetics , Trans-Activators/metabolism , Trans-Activators/genetics , Transcription Factor AP-1/metabolism , Transcription Factor AP-1/genetics , Transcription Factors
2.
iScience ; 24(8): 102830, 2021 Aug 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34355153

ABSTRACT

The Hippo pathway is a conserved signaling network that regulates organ growth and cell fate. One such cell fate decision is that of R8 photoreceptor cells in the Drosophila eye, where Hippo specifies whether cells sense blue or green light. We show that only a subset of proteins that control organ growth via the Hippo pathway also regulate R8 cell fate choice, including the STRIPAK complex, Tao, Pez, and 14-3-3 proteins. Furthermore, key Hippo pathway proteins were primarily cytoplasmic in R8 cells rather than localized to specific membrane domains, as in cells of growing epithelial organs. Additionally, Warts was the only Hippo pathway protein to be differentially expressed between R8 subtypes, while central Hippo pathway proteins were expressed at dramatically lower levels in adult and pupal eyes than in growing larval eyes. Therefore, we reveal several important differences in Hippo signaling in the contexts of organ growth and cell fate.

3.
PLoS Genet ; 17(6): e1009146, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34097697

ABSTRACT

The Hippo pathway is an important regulator of organ growth and cell fate. In the R8 photoreceptor cells of the Drosophila melanogaster eye, the Hippo pathway controls the fate choice between one of two subtypes that express either the blue light-sensitive Rhodopsin 5 (Hippo inactive R8 subtype) or the green light-sensitive Rhodopsin 6 (Hippo active R8 subtype). The degree to which the mechanism of Hippo signal transduction and the proteins that mediate it are conserved in organ growth and R8 cell fate choice is currently unclear. Here, we identify Crumbs and the apical spectrin cytoskeleton as regulators of R8 cell fate. By contrast, other proteins that influence Hippo-dependent organ growth, such as the basolateral spectrin cytoskeleton and Ajuba, are dispensable for the R8 cell fate choice. Surprisingly, Crumbs promotes the Rhodopsin 5 cell fate, which is driven by Yorkie, rather than the Rhodopsin 6 cell fate, which is driven by Warts and the Hippo pathway, which contrasts with its impact on Hippo activity in organ growth. Furthermore, neither the apical spectrin cytoskeleton nor Crumbs appear to regulate the Hippo pathway through mechanisms that have been observed in growing organs. Together, these results show that only a subset of Hippo pathway proteins regulate the R8 binary cell fate decision and that aspects of Hippo signalling differ between growing organs and post-mitotic R8 cells.


Subject(s)
Cell Lineage/physiology , Drosophila Proteins/physiology , Eye Proteins/physiology , Eye/cytology , Membrane Proteins/physiology , Rhodopsin/physiology , Spectrin/physiology , Animals , Cytoskeleton/physiology , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster , Eye/growth & development , Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/metabolism , Photoreceptor Cells, Invertebrate/physiology , Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL