Transition from opportunistic cytological to organized screening program with DNA-HPV testing detected prevalent cervical cancers 10 years in advance.

Cervical cancer screening in Brazil is opportunistic, based on cytology and offered for women aged 25-64 years, with low coverage (30%) and 70% of cancer diagnoses done in advanced stages, without impact on mortality. The current study reports 5-year first-round results of a population-based DNA-HPV testing screening program in a Brazilian city, which intended to be a model for transition to a more efficient program. Program flowchart is simple and current, indicating repetition of a negative test after five years. The first-round (October 2017-September 2022) screened 20,551 women by DNA-HPV testing with 58.7% coverage and 99.4% compliance with the program's targeted age range. Coverage increases to 77.8% when excluding the 'pandemic period'. The DNA-HPV testing was 87.2% negative with 6.2% colposcopy referrals and 84.8% colposcopies performed. A total of 258 high-grade precursor lesions and 29 cervical cancers (mean age = 41.4 years, 83% Stage I) were detected. As a reference, 41,387 cytology tests from the previous program (2012-2016) detected 36 cervical cancers (mean age = 52.0 years, p = 0.0005), with 67% in advanced stages (p < 0.0001). Organizing cervical cancer screening using DNA-HPV testing demonstrated good coverage, high age and colposcopy compliance, and detection of more precancerous lesions and cervical cancers 10 years in advance.

Is the HPV-test more cost-effective than cytology in cervical cancer screening? An economic analysis from a middle-income country.

OBJECTIVE: To report a modelling study using local health care costs and epidemiological inputs from a population-based program to access the cost-effectiveness of adopting hrHPV test. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness analysis based on a microsimulation dynamic Markov model. Data and costs were based on data from the local setting and literature review. The setting was Indaiatuba, Brazil, that has adopted the hrHPV test in place of cytology since 2017. After calibrating the model, one million women were simulated in hypothetical cohorts. Three strategies were tested: cytology to women aged 25 to 64 every three years; hrHPV test to women 25-64 every five years; cytology to women 25-29 years every three years and hrHPV test to women 30-64 every five years (hybrid strategy). Outcomes were Quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) and Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER). RESULTS: The hrHPV testing and the hybrid strategy were the dominant strategies. Costs were lower and provided a more effective option at a negative incremental ratio of US$ 37.87 for the hybrid strategy, and negative US$ 6.16 for the HPV strategy per QALY gained. Reduction on treatment costs would influence a decrease in ICER, and an increase in the costs of the hrHPV test would increase ICER. CONCLUSIONS: Using population-based data, the switch from cytology to hrHPV testing in the cervical cancer screening program of Indaiatuba is less costly and cost-effective than the old cytology program.