Reference equations for within-breath respiratory oscillometry in White adults.

BACKGROUND: within-breath analysis of oscillometry parameters is a growing research area since it increases sensitivity and specificity to respiratory pathologies and conditions. However, reference equations for these parameters in White adults are lacking and devices using multiple sinusoids or pseudorandom forcing stimuli have been underrepresented in previous studies deriving reference equations. The current study aims to establish reference ranges for oscillometry parameters, including also the within-breath ones in White adults using multi-sinusoidal oscillations. METHODS: White adults with normal spirometry, BMI≤30kg/m2, without a smoking history, respiratory symptoms, pulmonary or cardiac disease, neurological or neuromuscular disorders, and respiratory tract infections in the previous 4 weeks were eligible for the study. Study subjects underwent oscillometry (multifrequency waveform at 5-11-19Hz, Resmon PRO FULL, Restech Srl, Italy) in 5 centers in Europe and the USA according to international standards. The within-breath and total resistance (R) and reactance (X), the resonance frequency, the area under the X curve, the frequency dependence of R (R5-19), and within-breath changes of X (ΔX) were submitted to Lambda-Mu-Sigma models for deriving reference equations. For each output parameter, an AIC-based stepwise input variable selection procedure was applied. RESULTS: 144 subjects (age 20.8 - 86.3 years; height 146 - 193 cm; BMI 17.42 - 29.98 kg/m2; 56% females) were included. We derived reference equations for 29 oscillatory parameters. Predicted values for inspiratory and expiratory parameters were similar, while differences were observed for their limits of normality. CONCLUSIONS: We derived reference equations with narrow confidence intervals for within-breath and whole-breath oscillatory parameters for White adults.

Diagnostic Potential of Oscillometry: A Population-based Approach.

Rationale: Respiratory resistance (Rrs) and reactance (Xrs) as measured by oscillometry and their intrabreath changes have emerged as sensitive parameters for detecting early pathological impairments during tidal breathing. Objectives: This study evaluates the prevalence and association of abnormal oscillometry parameters with respiratory symptoms and respiratory diseases in a general adult population. Methods: A total of 7,560 subjects in the Austrian LEAD (Lung, hEart, sociAl, boDy) Study with oscillometry measurements (computed with the Resmon Pro FULL; Restech Srl) were included in this study. The presence of respiratory symptoms and doctor-diagnosed respiratory diseases was assessed using an interview-based questionnaire. Rrs and Xrs at 5 Hz, their inspiratory and expiratory components, the area above the Xrs curve, and the presence of tidal expiratory flow limitation were analyzed. Normality ranges for oscillometry parameters were defined. Measurements and Main Results: The overall prevalence of abnormal oscillometry parameters was 20%. The incidence of abnormal oscillometry increased in the presence of symptoms or diagnoses: 17% (16-18%) versus 27% (25-29%), P < 0.0001. All abnormal oscillometry parameters except Rrs at 5 Hz were significantly associated with respiratory symptoms/diseases. Significant associations were found, even in subjects with normal spirometry, with abnormal oscillometry incidence rates increasing by 6% (4-8%; P < 0.0001) in subjects with symptoms or diagnoses. Conclusions: Abnormal oscillometry parameters are present in one-fifth of this adult population and are significantly associated with respiratory symptoms and disease. Our findings underscore the potential of oscillometry as a tool for detecting and evaluating respiratory impairments, even in individuals with normal spirometry.

Within-breath oscillometry for identifying exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in pediatric patients reporting symptoms with exercise.

Background: Evaluating oscillometry parameters separately for the inspiratory and expiratory breath phases and their within-breath differences can help to identify exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) in pediatric outpatients disclosing exercise-induced symptoms (EIS). Aims: To assess the response in impedance parameters following an exercise challenge in patients reporting EIS. Methods: Sixty-eight patients reporting EIS (34 asthmatics and 34 suspected of asthma, age mean = 10.8 years, range = 6.0-16.0) underwent an incremental treadmill exercise test. Spirometry was performed at baseline and 1, 5-, 10-, 15-, and 20-min post exercise. Oscillometry was performed at baseline and at 3- and 18-min post exercise. Bronchodilator response to 200 µg albuterol was then assessed. EIB was defined as a forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) fall ≥10% from baseline. Expiratory and inspiratory resistance (Rrs) and reactance (Xrs), their z-score (Ducharme et al. 2022), and their mean within-breath differences (ΔRrs = Rrsexp-Rrsinsp, ΔXrs = Xrsexp-Xrsinsp) were calculated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and their areas (AUCs) were used to evaluate impedance parameters' performances in classifying EIB. Results: Asthmatic patients developed EIB more frequently than those suspected of asthma [18/34 (52.9%) vs. 2/34 (5.9%), p < 0.001]. In the 20 subjects with EIB, Rrsinsp, Rrsexp, Xrsinsp, and Xrsexp peaked early (3'), and remained steady except for Xrsinsp, which recovered faster afterward. ΔXrs widened 18 min following the exercise and reversed sharply after bronchodilation (BD) (-1.81 ± 1.60 vs. -0.52 ± 0.80 cmH2O × s/L, p < 0.001). Cutoffs for EIB leading to the highest AUCs were a rise of 0.41 in z-score Rrsinsp (Se: 90.0%, Sp: 66.7%), and a fall of -0.64 in z-score Xrsinsp (Se: 90.0%, Sp: 75.0%). Accepting as having "positive" postexercise oscillometry changes those subjects who had both z-scores beyond respective cutoffs, sensitivity for EIB was 90.0% (18/20) and specificity, 83.3% (40/48). Conclusion: Oscillometry parameters and their within-breath differences changed markedly in pediatric patients presenting EIB and were restored after the bronchodilator. Strong agreement between z-scores of inspiratory oscillometry parameters and spirometry supports their clinical utility, though larger studies are required to validate these findings in a broader population.

Self-reported exercise-induced dyspnea and airways obstruction assessed by oscillometry and spirometry in adolescents.

BACKGROUND: Self-reported exercise-induced dyspnea (EID) is common among adolescents. Possible underlying pathologies are exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) and laryngeal obstruction (EILO). The forced oscillation technique (FOT) may evaluate exercise-induced changes in airway caliber. AIM: To investigate in adolescents the relationship between EID, EIB (post-exercise fall in forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1 )≥10%), EILO, and post-exercise challenge changes in FOT parameters. METHODS: One hundred and forty-three subjects (97 with EID) of 13-15 years old underwent a standardized exercise challenge with FOT measurement and spirometry repeatedly performed between 2 and 30 min post-exercise. EILO was studied in a subset of 123 adolescents. Subjects showing greater changes than the healthy subgroup in the modulus of the inspiratory impedance were considered FOT responders. RESULTS: EID-nonEIB subjects presented similar post-exercise changes in all FOT parameters to nonEID-nonEIB adolescents. Changes in all FOT parameters correlated with FEV1 fall. 45 of 97 EID subjects responded neither by FEV1 nor FOT to exercise. 19 and 18 subjects responded only by FEV1 (onlyFEV1 responders) or FOT (onlyFOTresponders), respectively. Only a lower baseline forced vital capacity (FVC)%predicted and a higher FEV1 /FVC distinguished the onlyFEV1 responders from onlyFOTresponders. FOT parameters did not present specific post-exercise patterns in EILO subjects. CONCLUSION: FOT can be used to identify post-exercise changes in lower airway function. However, EID has a modest relation with both FEV1 and FOT responses, highlighting the need for objective testing. More research is needed to understand whether onlyFEV1 responders and onlyFOTresponders represent different endotypes.