HLA-DQA1-HLA-DRB1 polymorphism is a major predictor of azathioprine-induced pancreatitis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: Azathioprine (AZA)-induced pancreatitis is an unpredictable and dose-independent adverse event affecting 2%-7% of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients treated with AZA. There are no tools in clinical practice to identify at-risk individuals; however, a genome wide association study (GWAS) identified a strong association between the Class II HLA gene region polymorphism (rs2647087) and thiopurine-induced pancreatitis. AIM: To independently confirm the findings of the GWAS in an IBD cohort, to evaluate its utility in clinical practice and to offer a novel AZA treatment algorithm for IBD based on pharmacogenomic principles. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study evaluated 373 AZA-exposed IBD patients from a tertiary care academic centre in London, Canada. Due to the limited number of patients taking mercaptopurine (MP), such patients were not included this cohort. All subjects underwent screening for the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs2647087 mapped to the HLA-DQA1*02:01-HLA-DRB1*07:01 haplotype and were sub-divided based on the presence (n = 13) or absence (n = 360) of an AZA-induced pancreatitis diagnosis. The risk of AZA-induced pancreatitis was assessed based on rs2647087 genotype. RESULTS: The risk of pancreatitis during AZA-therapy was highly predictable and genotype dependent: 0.53% for wild type (A/A), 4.25% (OR = 4.19, 95% CI 1.02-36.45, P = 0.044) for heterozygous (A/C), and 14.63% (OR = 15.83, 95% CI 3.80-145.26, P = 0.0001) for homozygous variant (C/C) patients. CONCLUSIONS: The class II HLA region (at rs2647087) is an important marker of AZA-induced pancreatitis risk. We propose a simple and clinically implementable algorithm based on rs2647087 and TPMT genotypes for AZA selection and dosing for patients with IBD.

Genetic Predictors of Azathioprine Toxicity and Clinical Response in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND: Thiopurines (Azathioprine (AZA) and 6-Mercaptopurine (6-MP) are considered a well-established therapy for patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) including ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's Disease (CD). However, nearly 20% of patients discontinue thiopurines due to adverse events. Functional polymorphisms of several enzymes involved in the metabolism of thiopurines have been linked with toxicity. The clinical value of variant carriers such as TPMT, ITPA and GSTs in predicting toxicity and adverse events for IBD patients treated with thiopurines remains to be clarified. OBJECTIVES: To determine if variation in TPMT, ITPA and GST genotypes can predict adverse effects such as neutropenia, pancreatitis, liver enzyme elevation, as well as clinical response for patients with IBD treated with thiopurines. METHODS: Patients known to have IBD and treated with AZA or 6MP were enrolled. Adverse effects were calculated and their correlation with TPMT, ITPA and GST genotypes was evaluated. Further, the correlation between clinical response and TPMT, ITPA and GST genotypes were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 53 patients were enrolled. 16/53 patients (28.6%) responded to AZA therapy. 17 patients experienced adverse events with 10 having to discontinue treatment. Three patients (5.4%) developed severe myelosuppression (WBC< 2.0 or neutrophils <1.0). Loss of function TPMT genotype was associated with adverse events (OR 3.64, 95% CI 0.55 - 24.23, p=0.0313). ITPA and GST polymorphisms were not associated with toxicity. GSTM1 deletion was associated with poor clinical response to therapy (OR 3.75, 95% CI 0.940 - 14.97, p=0.1028), however, neither TPMT*3A nor ITPA polymorphisms were associated with clinical response. CONCLUSION: In addition to TPMT for adverse events, genotyping for GSTM1 appears to predict clinical response in IBD patients treated with thiopurines.

Pharmacokinetic profiles for oral and subcutaneous methotrexate in patients with Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: Methotrexate (MTX) is administered subcutaneously to Crohn's Disease (CD) patients. There are very few studies evaluating the use of oral (PO) MTX in CD. A drug and its pharmaceutical alternative are equivalent (bioequivalence) when the bioavailability of the alternative falls within 80-125% of the bioavailability of the standard (US Food and Drug Administration - FDA). AIM: To compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of PO and subcutaneous (SC) MTX in CD patients to determine the bioequivalence of these two routes. METHODS: Eleven patients received a PO and an SC MTX dose (25 mg) separated by one week over a two-week interval. Blood samples were collected at specified times over a 24-h period for each patient on two separate days. MTX plasma levels were obtained using sensitive mass spectrometry. Areas under the curve (AUC) were compared between the two routes. RESULTS: The mean AUC values were 3375 ng/mL × h (PO MTX) and 3985 ng/mL × h (SC MTX). The mean AUC ratio (PO/SC) was 0.86 (0.62-1.08). This correlates with a relative PO bioavailability of 86% in comparison to SC. The 90% confidence interval for the mean AUC (PO/SC) ratio is (0.785, 0.929). There were no adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The mean MTX AUC (PO/SC) in these patients falls outside the 90% confidence interval for the bioequivalence limit. SC MTX is more bioavailable than PO MTX; however, the mean relative MTX bioavailability (PO/SC) nearly met the FDA bioequivalence standard and PO MTX could be proposed in responders who would prefer this route.

Predictive factors associated with immunosuppressive agent use in ulcerative colitis: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Some patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) require immunosuppressants as maintenance therapy. AIM: To assess epidemiological, clinical and disease factors at diagnosis that predict immunosuppressant use in UC. METHODS: All UC patients diagnosed between 1992 and 2005 and currently managed in the inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) clinic were included. Forty-three patients who currently or previously received azathioprine (AZA) or mercaptopurine (MP) for UC were compared with 130 controls. Charts were reviewed and logistic regression analyses were applied to identify factors associated with AZA or MP use. RESULTS: In univariate model, seven factors at diagnosis correlated with AZA use: male gender [odds ratio (OR) 2.2]; left-sided or extensive colitis or pancolitis (OR 8.7-14.1); systemic steroid use within the first 6 months of diagnosis (OR 5.1); more than 10 bowel movements daily (OR 6.4); persistent or mostly blood in stool (OR 2.8); endoscopic proven moderate to severe disease (OR 7.2-12.0) and requirement of hospitalization (OR 2.7) on diagnosis. In multivariate model, the first three factors were shown to be statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Male gender, initial presentation with severe and extensive disease clinically and endoscopically, requirement of hospitalization on diagnosis or systemic steroids within 6 months of diagnosis are predictive factors for immunosuppressant use in UC.

Efficacy of argon plasma coagulation compared to topical formalin application for chronic radiation proctopathy.

BACKGROUND: Chronic radiation proctopathy (CRP) is a troublesome complication of radiotherapy to the pelvis for which current treatment modalities are suboptimal. Currently, the application of formalin to the rectal mucosa (AFR) and thermal ablation with argon plasma coagulation (APC) are the most promising options. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of AFR with APC for CRP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Records of 22 patients (male to female ratio, 19:3; mean age, 74 years) who received either APC or AFR for chronic hematochezia caused by CRP, and who were evaluated and treated between May 1998 and April 2002, were reviewed. Complete evaluations were made three months after completion of each therapeutic modality. Patients were considered to be responders if there was a 10% increase in hemoglobin from baseline or complete normalization of hemoglobin (male patients, higher than 130 g/L; female patients, higher than 115 g/L) without the requirement for blood transfusion. RESULTS: The mean hemoglobin level before therapy was 107 g/L. Patients received an average of 1.78 sessions for APC and 1.81 sessions for AFR. Eleven patients (50%) were treated with APC alone, eight patients (36%) with AFR alone and three (14%) with both modalities (two with AFR followed by APC, and one with APC followed by AFR). Eleven of 14 patients (79%) in the APC group were responders, compared with three of 11 patients (27%) in the AFR group (P=0.017). In the APC group, seven of 11 responders required only a single session, while in the AFR group, only one patient responded after a single session. Adverse events (nausea, vomiting, flushing, abdominal cramps, rectal pain and fever) occurred in two patients after APC and in nine patients after AFR (P=0.001). In the APC group, the mean hemoglobin level increase was 20 g/L at three months follow-up, compared with 14 g/L in the AFR group. CONCLUSION: This retrospective study suggests that APC is more effective and safe than topical AFR to control hematochezia caused by CRP. Further studies are needed to confirm this observation.

Screening for colorectal cancer: the cost to find an advanced adenoma.

OBJECTIVE: Cancer Care Ontario has recommended a program to screen for colorectal cancer using fecal occult blood testing (FOBT). Patients who test positive on FOBT will require further investigation. We examined the cost of finding an advanced adenoma in these patients using four different strategies. METHODS: Using decision analysis software (DATA 3.5, TreeAge Software, Boston, MA), we considered four strategies for evaluating patients referred for a positive FOBT: 1) flexible sigmoidoscopy to the splenic flexure, 2) flexible sigmoidoscopy with air contrast barium enema (ACBE), 3) virtual colonoscopy, and 4) colonoscopy. If an adenoma was found in any of the first three methods, colonoscopy and polypectomy were performed. An advanced adenoma was defined as a villous adenoma, tubular adenoma > or = 10 mm, high grade dysplasia, or cancer. Values for probabilities, test characteristics and costs ($CDN) were estimated from a MEDLINE literature review, local costs, and OHIP fee codes. Patients with adenomas identified as well as direct medical costs from a third party payer perspective were calculated. RESULTS: Assuming a probability of adenoma of 16.9%, the cost for each strategy (compared to no investigation) was as follows: flexible sigmoidoscopy to the splenic flexure, $226; flexible sigmoidoscopy with ACBE, $424; virtual colonoscopy, $597; and colonoscopy, $387. The cost to clear a patient of adenoma(s) was $1,930, $2,840, $3,681, and $2,290, respectively. Despite being most cost-effective, the sigmoidoscopy strategy was predicted to detect 69% of cases of advanced adenomas. The radiological strategies would be less expensive if ACBE cost less than $115 or virtual colonoscopy cost less than $291. The colonoscopy strategy was more cost-effective if the probability of an adenoma was > or = 33.5%. When the incremental costs were considered to investigate 1000 patients, virtual colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy with ACBE were both more costly then colonoscopy, and neither detected as many cases of advanced adenomas. CONCLUSION: Improved access to colonoscopy seems to be the preferred approach to deal with increased referrals.

Bismuth-based quadruple therapy with bismuth subcitrate, metronidazole, tetracycline and omeprazole in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori.

BACKGROUND: A previous study showed that 14 days of qid bismuth-based triple therapy with tetracycline 500 mg, metronidazole 250 mg and colloidal bismuth subcitrate 120 mg resulted in excellent Helicobacter pylori eradication rates (89.5%). The present study looked at a shorter treatment period by adding omeprazole and by reducing the dose of tetracycline. METHODS: One hundred sixty-one patients with H pylori confirmed by histology and (13)carbon urea breath test were included in the study. They were treated for seven days with bismuth subcitrate 120 mg plus metronidazole 250 mg plus tetracycline 250 mg qid plus omeprazole 20 mg bid (OBMT). Patients were 18 to 75 years of age and had dyspepsia with or without a history of peptic ulcer. Patients with irritable bowel syndrome, active ulcer or previous attempt at eradication, or those who had used antibiotics or antiulcer drugs in the previous 30 days were excluded. Eradication was determined by two (13)carbon urea breath tests done one and three months, respectively, after treatment. Strains with minimal inhibitory concentrations of 8 microg/mL or higher were considered to be resistant to metronidazole. RESULTS: The overall per protocol eradication rate was 84%-89.5% in metronidazole-sensitive and 70.8% in metronidazole-resistant strains. Modified intent-to-treat analysis resulted in a 80% eradication rate--82.5% in metronidazole-sensitive and 66.7% in metronidazole-resistant strains. Only one patient discontinued treatment because of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The OBMT regimen used in this study is safe and effective against metronidazole-sensitive H pylori strains.

Should ERCP be routine after an episode of "idiopathic" pancreatitis? A cost-utility analysis.

BACKGROUND: Patients often recover from an episode of acute pancreatitis with conservative therapy and without an identified cause. The options include proceeding with ERCP to identify and treat an occult common bile duct stone or performing the procedure only after a second episode of idiopathic pancreatitis occurs. METHODS: Decision analysis (SMLTREE software) was used to determine incremental cost-utility. Variables were estimated from a search of the literature, a utility analysis involving health professionals familiar with the question, and a retrospective review of hospital charts and costs. RESULTS: This model estimates an incremental utility gain for the prompt ERCP approach of 1.0 quality-adjusted life weeks per patient at an incremental cost of $245 (Canadian). This yields a cost-utility ratio of $12,740 (Canadian) per quality-adjusted life year. The result was highly sensitive to the probability of finding an occult common bile duct stone. CONCLUSION: Routine ERCP is of marginal overall benefit, but is of more substantial benefit and is more cost-effective in a subgroup of patients with a greater probability of having an occult common duct stone.

Pancreatic ductal stones: frequency of successful endoscopic removal and improvement in symptoms.

Pancreatic ductal stones may be responsible for attacks of acute pancreatitis (chronic relapsing pancreatitis) or exacerbations of chronic pain in patients with chronic pancreatitis. This study was undertaken to identify those patients with predominantly main pancreatic duct stones most amenable to endoscopic removal and to determine the effects on the patients' clinical course with such removal. Thirty-two patients with ductographic evidence of chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic duct stones underwent attempted endoscopic removal. Of the patients, 71.9% had complete or partial stone removal and 67.7% improved after endoscopic therapy. Symptomatic improvement was most evident in the group of patients with chronic relapsing pancreatitis. Factors favoring stone removal included (1) three or less stones, (2) stones confined to the head and/or body of the pancreas, (3) absence of a downstream stricture, (4) stone diameter less than or equal to 10 mm, and (5) absence of impacted stones. After successful stone removal, 25% of patients had regression of the ductographic changes of chronic pancreatitis and 41.7% had a decrease in the main pancreatic duct diameter. The only complication from therapy was mild pancreatitis in 8.2%. These data suggest that removal of pancreatic duct stones may result in symptomatic improvement. A longer follow-up will be necessary to determine whether endoscopic success results in long-standing clinical improvement and/or permanent regression of the morphologic changes of chronic pancreatitis.