ABSTRACT
Chemotherapy-induced neurotoxicity is a well-known complication of several very effective systemic anticancer treatments, mainly presenting as cognitive impairment ("chemo-brain") and peripheral neuropathy. The social and economic effects of long-lasting chemotherapy-induced neurotoxicity on patients' lifestyles and their relationships are under-investigated, and their impact is, therefore, largely unknown. In this study, we used a web-based questionnaire to record the self-reported perception of chemotherapy-induced neurotoxicity on cancer patients' health status, but also on several different aspects of their daily life. From the study results, it emerged that the impact of chemotherapy-induced neurotoxicity on personal, social, and working activities is very high. A similar effect was also observed when the psychological impact is assessed. Moreover, there is evidence suggesting that the management of CIPN is suboptimal; this is partially due to a lack of effective drugs, but also of appropriate advice from healthcare providers. In conclusion, this study provides evidence for the relevance of the impact on the explored aspects of the daily life of cancer patients and spotlights the need for a larger and more structured investigation on these long-term side effects of anticancer chemotherapy.
ABSTRACT
Background: Cancer patients are among the main consumers of traditional, complementary, integrative, and alternative medicine (TCIM) such as natural products (herbals, integrators, etc.) and mind and body practices (yoga, acupuncture, etc.). Methods: A questionnaire on TCIM was submitted to 415 Italian cancer patients. The questionnaire consisted of three sections: (i) biographical and clinical information; (ii) use of natural substances; and (iii) use of mind-body practices. Results: 406 patients completed the questionnaire. The prevalence of TCIM use was 72.3%. Of them, 75.6% started to use TCIM after a tumor diagnosis. The main reasons for using TCIM were to mitigate side effects (65.0%), to regain physical and mental balance (35.9%), to relieve pain (18.3%), and to improve the efficacy of cancer therapy (16.0%). 44.7% of patients taking natural products used them during conventional therapies (chemotherapy, radiotherapy, etc.), and in 67.5% of cases without consulting a doctor. As a consequence, only about 50% of patients taking natural substances used these compounds appropriately, and the most common errors were related with the purpose of reducing the side effects of the therapy (52.3%) and for boosting immune system (32.1%). Conclusions: There is an impelling need to provide patients with scientifically validated information to raise awareness about the benefits and risks of using TCIM.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The use of oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) has constantly increased in the prevention of thromboembolism, particularly in patients 80 years of age or older. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this multicentre study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in elderly patients managed with a computer dosing algorithm compared with a dosage decided by expert physicians. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine Italian thrombosis centres utilising the Zeus dosing algorithm were involved. The before-after study enrolled patients managed firstly by medical staff (manual system) or with the PARMA algorithm for 12 months from July 2008 to June 2009 and then with the Zeus algorithm during the analogous period from 2010 to 2011. Of 7605 patients in the OAT maintenance phase, 2281 were older than 80 years (mean age 84.2 years). Data for these 2281 patients managed with both modalities were analysed. RESULTS: Of the 2281 patients 80 years of age or older, 1776 underwent OAT for atrial fibrillation (AF). Use of a dosing algorithm increased the OAT quality: time in therapeutic range (TTR) was significantly (p < 0.001) higher during the Zeus period than during the manual period (71.6 vs. 68.8 %). The TTR achieved with Zeus was similar to that obtained with the PARMA algorithm. In addition, patients managed with Zeus took a weekly drug dosage significantly (p < 0.01) lower than that both suggested by PARMA and prescribed by expert physicians, with a reduced number of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that the effectiveness and safety of VKA therapy in patients 80 years of age or older increases with computer dosing algorithms.
