Safety and efficacy of azacitidine in Belgian patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes, acute myeloid leukaemia, or chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia: results of a real-life, non-interventional post-marketing survey.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated azacitidine (Vidaza(®)) safety and efficacy in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), and chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia (CMML), in a real-life setting. Treatment response, dose, and schedule were assessed. METHODS: This non-interventional, post-marketing survey included 49/50 patients receiving azacitidine at 14 Belgian haematology centres from 2010-2012. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), including treatment-related TEAEs, and serious TEAEs (TESAEs) were recorded throughout the study. Treatment response [complete response (CR), partial response (PR), haematological improvement (HI), stable disease (SD), treatment failure (TF)) and transfusion-independence (TI) were evaluated at completion of a 1-year observation period (1YOP) or at treatment discontinuation, and overall survival (OS), at study conclusion. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 74·7 (range: 43·9-87·8) years; 69·4% had MDS, 26·5% had primary or secondary AML, and 4·1% had CMML. Treatment-related TEAEs, grade 3-4 TEAEs, and TESAEs were reported in 67·3%, 28·6%, and 18·4% of patients, respectively. During 1YOP, patients received a median of 7 (1-12) treatment cycles. Treatment response was assessed for 38/49 patients. Among MDS and CMML patients (n = 29), 41·4% had CR, PR, or HI, 41·4% had SD, and 17·2% had TF. Among AML patients (n = 9), 44·4% had CR or PR, 33·3% had SD, and 22·2% had TF. TI was observed in 14/32 (43·8%) patients who were transfusion-dependent at baseline. Median (95% confidence interval) OS was 490 (326-555) days; 1-year OS estimate was 0·571 (0·422-0·696). CONCLUSIONS: Our data support previous findings that azacitidine has a clinically acceptable safety profile and shows efficacy.

Azacitidine access program for Belgian patients with myelodysplastic syndromes, acute myeloid leukemia or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia.

OBJECTIVE: Azacitidine (Vidaza *) is approved in Europe for treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with 20-30% bone marrow (BM) blasts, and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) with 10-29% BM blasts and no myeloproliferative syndrome (i.e. <13.000/µL white blood cells). In Belgium, the azacitidine reimbursement process can take several months, and is often delayed at submission for medical assessment by the Belgian National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance of incomplete patient dossiers, due to disease complexity and classification, and administrative burden. We describe the Vidaza Access Program and its application to an initial 175 patients. Individual medical dossiers were reviewed for completeness to facilitate patient access to treatment in Belgium. METHODS: A standardized anonymized patient information form is completed by the physician and sent for review to the Belgian Celgene Medical Department. The form is reviewed within three working days and, for complete dossiers, Celgene grants a financial guarantee for treatment with azacitidine. The patient can then be treated without the hospital being subjected to financial risk. RESULTS: Between January 2013 and June 2014, 63 physicians (53 Belgian hospitals) recruited 175 patients. In total, 163 patient dossiers were approved by Celgene (120 MDS, 36 AML, and 7 CMML), of which 104 dossiers were also approved by the review committee and 49 have been waiting for a final decision for a median of 6 months; no information is currently available for the remaining 10. No dossiers approved by Celgene have been rejected by the review committee. CONCLUSIONS: The Celgene Vidaza Access Program offers support to healthcare professionals in the appropriate use of azacitidine. By facilitating the assessment of patient dossiers and providing a financial guarantee for prescribers and hospitals, treatment can be initiated more rapidly and patients may better benefit from azacitidine treatment.

Olfactory bulb volume and depth of olfactory sulcus in patients with idiopathic olfactory loss.

Olfactory loss is considered as idiopathic (IOL) when no cause can be found, neither on the basis of a standardized history nor a thorough clinical evaluation. Olfactory bulb volume (OB) has been shown to be decreased in patients with olfactory loss due to trauma, infections, or sinonasal disease. However, OB volume has not yet been investigated in IOL patients. Twenty-two patients with IOL were compared with 22 controls in terms of olfactory performance and of OB volume assessed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Psychophysical testing confirmed that patients had lower scores than controls: P < 0.001 for threshold (T), discrimination (D), identification (I) and global TDI score. Mean right, left and total OB volumes were significantly smaller for IOL patients as compared to controls. Both for IOL and controls, there was a significant correlation between odor thresholds and total OB volume, respectively. In conclusion, patients with IOL have decreased olfactory function and decreased OB volume when compared with controls. This was previously demonstrated for patients with postinfectious or posttraumatic olfactory dysfunction, but not for patients with uneventful conditions possibly damaging their olfactory apparatus.