Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus and frontotemporal dementia: an unexpected association.

Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus has a complex multifactorial pathogenesis and is associated with Alzheimer's disease in many patients. To date, it is not well known if a similar association exists with behavioural variant of frontotemporal lobar degeneration. In a first step, we compare the prevalence of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus in two groups of patients, one with behavioural variant of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (n = 69) and the other with Alzheimer's disease (n = 178). In the second step, we describe more precisely the phenotype of patients with the association of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus and behavioural variant of frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Firstly, we report that the prevalence of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus was far higher in the group of patients with behavioural variant of frontotemporal lobar degeneration than in the group of patients with Alzheimer's disease (7.25% and 1.1%, respectively, P = 0.02). Secondly, we show that patients with the double diagnosis share common clinical and para-clinical features of both idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus and behavioural variant of frontotemporal lobar degeneration patients, including CSF shunting efficacy in real-life experience. Overall, our results suggest a link between these two conditions and should encourage neurologists to look for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus in their behavioural variant of frontotemporal lobar degeneration patients in the event of gait disturbances; the benefit/risk balance could indeed be in favour of shunt surgery for selected patients with this newly described entity.

The Effects of Confinement on Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Alzheimer's Disease During the COVID-19 Crisis.

BACKGROUND: Neuropsychiatric symptoms, such as depression, anxiety, apathy, agitation, and hallucinations, are frequent in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and their prevalence tends to increase with external stressors. OBJECTIVE: We offer the first investigation of the effects of confinement during the COVID-19 crisis on neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients with AD. METHODS: We contacted caregivers of 38 patients with AD who were confined to their homes for nearly two months and asked them to report whether patients experienced any change in neuropsychiatric symptoms during, compared to before, the confinement and rate its severity and impact on themselves using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Questionnaire. RESULTS: Among the 38 patients, only 10 demonstrated neuropsychiatric changes during the confinement. Cognitive function of these 10 patients, assessed with the Mini-Mental State Examination, was worse than that of patients who did not demonstrate neuropsychiatric changes. Interestingly, among the 10 patients with neuropsychiatric changes, the duration of confinement significantly correlated with the severity of symptoms as well as with their caregivers' distress. DISCUSSION: The confinement seems to impact neuropsychiatric symptomatology in AD patients with low baseline cognitive function.

Impact of Confinement on the Burden of Caregivers of Patients with the Behavioral Variant of Frontotemporal Dementia and Alzheimer Disease during the COVID-19 Crisis in France.

INTRODUCTION: The clinical presentation of the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) differs from that of Alzheimer disease (AD), with major impairments in behavioral functions in bvFTD and cognitive impairment in AD. Both behavioral disturbances in bvFTD and cognitive impairment in AD contribute to caregiver burden. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of home confinement during the COVID-19 crisis on the burden of caregivers of bvFTD or AD patients. METHODS: During the COVID-19 lockdown in France, neurologists and neuropsychologists from the Memory Center of Nantes Hospital conducted teleconsultations for 38 AD patients and 38 bvFTD patients as well as for their caregivers. During these consultations, caregivers were invited to rate the change in their burden during home confinement. They were also invited to rate behavioral or emotional changes in the patients during, compared with before, the confinement. RESULTS: Twenty-two bvFTD caregivers and 14 AD caregivers experienced an increase in burden. For bvFTD caregivers, this increased burden occurred regardless of behavioral changes, while AD caregivers experienced an increased burden related to changes in patients' neuropsychiatric symptoms. Among the whole cohort, 2 factors were associated with increased caregiver burden: behavioral change and bvFTD. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate that during home confinement in the COVID-19 crisis, neuropsychiatric symptoms were the core factor that impacted caregiver burden in different ways depending on the disease.

Frontotemporal dementia is the leading cause of "true" A-/T+ profiles defined with Aß42/40 ratio.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with positive tauopathy but negative Aß42 (A-T+) in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) represent a diagnostic challenge. The Aß42/40 ratio supersedes Aß42 and reintegrates "false" A-T+ patients into the Alzheimer's disease spectrum. However, the biomarker and clinical characteristics of "true" and "false" A-T+ patients remain elusive. METHODS: Among the 509 T+N+ patients extracted from the databases of three memory clinics, we analyzed T+N+ patients with normal Aß42 and compared "false" A-T+ with abnormal Aß42/40 ratio and "true" A-T+ patients with normal Aß42/40 ratio, before CSF analysis and at follow-up. RESULTS: 24.9% of T+N+ patients had normal Aß42 levels. Among them, 42.7% were "true" A-T+. "True" A-T+ had lower CSF tauP181 than "false" A-T+ patients. 48.0% of "true" A-T+ patients were diagnosed with frontotemporal lobar degeneration before CSF analysis and 64.0% at follow-up, as compared with 6% in the "false" A-T+ group (P < .0001). DISCUSSION: Frontotemporal lobar degeneration is probably the main cause of "true" A-T+ profiles.

Long-term efficacy and tolerability of bilateral pallidal stimulation to treat tardive dyskinesia.

OBJECTIVE: To confirm the efficacy and safety of deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the internal part of the globus pallidus in improving severe tardive dyskinesia (TD). METHODS: Nineteen patients with severe pharmacoresistant TD were included. All were assessed at baseline and at 3, 6 (main outcome measure), and 12 months, and in the long term (6-11 years) for 14 patients, after bilateral pallidal DBS, using motor scales (Extrapyramidal Symptoms Rating Scale [ESRS], Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale [AIMS]), cognitive scales, and a psychiatric assessment. At 6 months, a double-blind ESRS evaluation was performed in the stimulation "on" and stimulation "off" conditions. RESULTS: At 6 months, all patients had a decrease of more than 40% on the ESRS. The efficacy of the procedure was confirmed by a double-blind evaluation. This improvement was maintained at 12 months (ESRS: decrease of 58% [21%-81%]; AIMS: decrease of 50% [7%-77%]) and in the long term (ESRS: decrease of 60% [22%-90%]; AIMS: decrease of 63% [14%-94%], n = 14). All the subscores of the ESRS (parkinsonism, dystonia, and chorea) and of the AIMS (facial, oral, extremities, and trunk movements) improved. Despite psychiatric comorbidities at baseline, cognitive and psychiatric tolerability of the procedure was excellent. No cognitive decline was observed and mood was improved in most of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Pallidal DBS procedure should be considered as a therapeutic option in disabling TD refractory to medical treatment. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that in patients with severe pharmacoresistant TD with implanted pallidal leads, the stimulation "on" condition significantly improved ESRS scores compared to the stimulation "off" condition.