ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is leading cause of morbidity and mortality among type 2 diabetics (T2DM). METHODS: 140 T2DM will be enrolled in randomized, double blind, placebo controlled Semaglutide Treatment On Coronary Plaque Progression (STOP) trial to determine effect of weekly subcutaneous semaglutide on coronary plaque progression. All participants will undergo Coronary Artery Calcium (CAC) Scoring and Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) at our center. A Fisher test, ANOVA and Kruskal Wallis were used. RESULTS: As of May 2020, 87 patients (81%) randomized (mean age 56.4 ± 8.4â¯yrs. and 62% male) with documented CAD by CCTA. Approximately 20% of screened study population were screen failed due to normal coronaries (n= 14) or HbA1C<7 (n=7). Of interest, 14 persons with diabetes with normal coronaries (no calcification) were significantly more likely to be females (21% vs 62%), have higher glomerular filtration rate (106.5 ± 19.4 vs 89.9 ± 22.6â¯mL/min/1.73m2; p= 0.006), and younger (53.4 ± 9.0 vs 56.4 ± 8.4â¯yrs.; p=0.02) than those who were randomized. CONCLUSION: Among T2DM, there is a significant portion who have normal coronary arteries and may have a better prognosis. Excluding these participants from cardiovascular studies may improve power and decrease sample size.
Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Glucagon-Like Peptides/therapeutic use , Plaque, Atherosclerotic , Computed Tomography Angiography , Coronary Angiography , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnosis , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Plaque, Atherosclerotic/complications , Plaque, Atherosclerotic/epidemiology , Predictive Value of Tests , PrevalenceABSTRACT
We intended to assess the ability of current-generation 256-slice coronary CT angiography (CCTA) to measure left atrial volume (LAV), comparing patients with a high heart rate (HiHR) of at least 70 bpm and patients with heart rate variability such as atrial fibrillation (AFib). Methods: Using the prospective Converge Registry of patients undergoing 256-detector CCTA on a Revolution scanner, we enrolled 121 HiHR patients (74 men; mean age, 62.7 ± 12.5 y) and 102 AFib patients (72 men; mean age, 60.5 ± 11.0 y) after obtaining informed consent. Quantitative data analysis of LAV was performed using automated methods, and end-systolic phases were chosen for measurements from CCTA. A Student t test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, or χ2 test assessed baseline parameters. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analysis was used to assess LAV and LAV index (LAVI) while adjusting potentially confounding variables. Results: Mean LAV was significantly higher in AFib subjects (148.6 ± 57.2 mL) than in HiHR subjects (102.1 ± 36.5 mL) (P < 0.0001). Similarly, mean LAVI was significantly higher in AFib subjects (72.4 ± 28.1 mL/m2) than in HiHR subjects (51.5 ± 19.0 mL/m2) (P < 0.0001). After adjusting for age, body mass index, sex, diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and smoking, subjects with AFib had, on average, LAV measures higher by 41.2 ± 6.7 mL and LAVI values higher by 23.1 ± 3.4 mL/m2 (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: Misalignment and motion artifacts in CCTA images affect diagnostic CT performance, especially in patients with elevated heart rates or profound arrhythmia. However, the new-generation Revolution CCTA provides detailed information on left-atrium-complex morphology and function, in addition to coronary anatomy, in HiHR and AFib patients without additional radiation, scanning, or contrast requirements.