ABSTRACT
Introduction: The no-ventilation no-oxygenation situation is extremely important due to its high mortality. In these cases, open cricothyroidotomy is indicated. Around fifty percent of the difficulties are the result of inadequate identification of the cricothyroid membrane (CTM). Objective: To determine whether ultrasonography is superior to palpation to identify the CTM at the first attempt. Methods: A systematic review and a meta-analysis were conducted on the identification of the cricothyroid membrane versus palpation in Medline/Central and Embase. Clinical controlled trials and observational studies were included. Two authors independently and in duplicate selected the studies, assessed the biases and extracted the data; a random effects meta-analysis was successfully conducted for the correct identification of the CTM. The risk of bias was assessed and the certainty of the evidence was qualified. CRD42021223961. Results: 464 studies were included of which 15 met the eligibility criteria; 6 were clinical trials y 9 were observational. Ultrasound is superior to palpation in the detection of the CTM (RR 1.88, 95 % CI 1.05-3.36) according to the clinical trials, and it was also superior in observational studies (RR 1.76, 95 % CI 1.36-2.28). The association was preserved in the sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: Ultrasonography is superior to palpation for the correct identification of the TCM, though the certainty of the evidence is low. Further studies with better methodology are needed to improve both certainty and precision.
Introducción: La situación de no ventilación-no oxigenación es de gran importancia dada su elevada mortalidad. En dichos casos, la cricotiroidotomía abierta está indicada. Cerca de la mitad de las dificultades son causadas por inadecuada identificación de la membrana cricotiroidea (MCT). Objetivo: Determinar si la ultrasonografía es superior a la palpación para identificar la MCT al primer intento. Métodos: Se realizó una revisión sistemática y metaanálisis de identificación de membrana cricotiroidea versus palpación en Medline/Central y Embase. Se incluyeron ensayos clínicos controlados y estudios observacionales. Dos autores de manera independiente y por duplicado realizaron la selección de estudios, la evaluación de sesgos y la extracción de datos, se efectuó un metaanálisis de efectos aleatorios con el éxito de identificación correcta de la MCT. Se evaluó el riesgo de sesgos y se calificó la certeza de la evidencia. CRD42021223961. Resultados: Se incluyeron 464 estudios de los cuales 15 cumplieron criterios de elegibilidad, 6 fueron ensayos clínicos y 9 observacionales. La ecografía es superior a la palpación para detección de la MCT (RR 1,88, IC 95 % 1,05-3,36) según los ensayos clínicos y, similarmente, fue superior para los estudios observacionales (RR 1,76, IC 95 % 1,36-2,28); la asociación se conservó en los análisis de sensibilidad. Conclusiones: La ultrasonografía es superior a la palpación para detectar correctamente la MCT, aunque con baja certeza de la evidencia. Se requieren más estudios con mejor calidad metodo-lógica para mejorar la certeza y la precisión.
ABSTRACT
Prosthetic valve thrombosis is a feared complication with an annual incidence ranging between 0.3 to 1.3%. Diagnostic approach is essential for a better prognosis and ultimately determines the chosen therapeutic strategy. Emergent valvular surgery is usually recommended in hemodinamically unstable patients, large thrombus or recurrent embolic episodes. These high-risk conditions are often not the case. Therefore, in many patients the surgical risk is much greater than that of bleeding associated with thrombolytic administration. Ultra-slow infusions have been reported with similar efficacy and lower rates of bleeding complications. We present a case of mitral prosthetic valve thrombosis considered not feasible to surgical management and subsequently treated with an ultra-slow tissue plasminogen activator infusion.