Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Vaccine Immunol ; 14(9): 1108-16, 2007 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17634505

ABSTRACT

To monitor antigen-specific CD4+ T cells during a recall immune response to tetanus toxoid (TT), a sequential analysis including ex vivo phenotyping and cytokine flow cytometry, followed by cloning and T-cell-receptor (TCR) spectratyping of cytokine-positive CD4+ T cells, was performed. Grossly, twice as many TT-specific CD4+ T-cell clones, ex vivo derived from the CCR7+/- CD69+ interleukin-2-positive (IL-2+) CD4+ subsets, belonged to the central memory (T(CM); CD62L+ CD27+ CCR7+) compared to the effector memory population (T(EM); CD62L- CD27- CCR7-). After the boost, a predominant expansion of the T(CM) population was observed with more limited variations of the T(EM) population. TCR beta-chain-variable region (BV) spectratyping and sequencing confirmed a large concordance between most frequently expressed BV TCR-CDR3 from ex vivo-sorted CCR7+/- CD69+ IL-2+ CD4+ subsets and BV usage of in vitro-derived TT-specific CD4+ T-cell clones, further demonstrating the highly polyclonal but stable character of the specific recall response to TT. Taken together, ex vivo flow cytometry analysis focused on the CCR7+/- CD69+ IL-2+ CD4+ subsets appears to target the bulk of antigen-specific T cells and to reach an analytical power sufficient to adequately delineate in field trials the profile of the antigen-specific response to vaccine.


Subject(s)
CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Epitopes, T-Lymphocyte/immunology , Tetanus Toxoid/immunology , Antigens, CD/immunology , Antigens, Differentiation, T-Lymphocyte/immunology , Flow Cytometry/methods , Humans , Immunization, Secondary , Interleukin-2/immunology , Lectins, C-Type , Longitudinal Studies , Lymphocyte Activation , Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell/immunology , Receptors, CCR7/immunology , Tetanus Toxoid/administration & dosage
2.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 113(4): 669-76, 2004 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15100671

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Direct comparisons of antihistamines are rare but very much needed. Newly available antihistamine preparations, levocetirizine, the R-enantiomer of racemate cetirizine, and desloratadine, an active metabolite of loratadine, have been recently released for allergic rhinitis. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare levocetirizine and desloratadine in a nasal provocation test (NPT) with grass pollen. METHODS: Twenty-four volunteers with grass pollen allergy and a history of rhinitis were enrolled in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Three NPTs were performed in a dose-escalating manner during the out-of-season period 4 hours after a single dose of levocetirizine (5 mg), desloratadine (5 mg), or placebo. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a better overall protection of a single dose of levocetirizine compared with desloratadine in an NPT with grass pollen allergen. In contrast to late-phase inflammatory markers, which were unaffected, extravascular leakage of the early-phase marker albumin was significantly limited by levocetirizine.


Subject(s)
Allergens/immunology , Cetirizine/therapeutic use , Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating/therapeutic use , Hypersensitivity/drug therapy , Loratadine/analogs & derivatives , Loratadine/therapeutic use , Piperazines/therapeutic use , Poaceae/immunology , Pollen/immunology , Adult , Albumins/metabolism , Biomarkers/analysis , Cross-Over Studies , Differential Threshold , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Hypersensitivity/physiopathology , Male , Nasal Lavage Fluid/chemistry , Nasal Provocation Tests , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL