Prospective Evaluation of Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser Treatment of Mature Burn Scars, Post-traumatic Scars, and Post-acne Scars.

BACKGROUND: Annually, around 100 million patients worldwide acquire scars, some of which can cause significant problems. Various treatment interventions, such as topical scar creams, steroids, laser therapy, and surgery, have been developed to manage these scars. This study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of fractional CO2 laser treatment by assessing outcomes using the Patient Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and clinical photographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 47 patients were included in the study, divided into three groups: a post-acne scar group with 14 patients, a post-burn scar group with 17 patients, and a post-traumatic scar group with 16 patients. Detailed histories were taken, and clinical examinations were performed and recorded on a prepared proforma. Aesthetic outcomes were evaluated based on clinical photographs, and total patient and observer scores were recorded using POSAS at baseline, and after one and three months. POSAS comprises two components: the observer scale (POSAS-O) and the patient scale (POSAS-P). Fractional CO2 laser treatments were performed in each group, with sessions repeated every four weeks for three consecutive sessions. Data were analyzed using the paired t-test for before-and-after comparisons in each study group. Welch's ANOVA test was used for comparisons among the three groups at a significance level of p=0.05, using MS Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington) and IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20 (Released 2011; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York). RESULTS: The mean age for men was 26.38 ± 8.19 years and for women 22.21 ± 6.38 years. The study comprised 34 female patients (72.34%) and 13 male patients (27.66%). The mean POSAS observer and patient scales were recorded and compared for all three types of scars from baseline to three months. The mean percentage change in POSAS-O and POSAS-P (total score) in relation to different scar sites was recorded. The most significant difference in mean percentage change, statistically significant (p-value < 0.05), was observed for facial scars, followed by scars on the neck, and was minimal for scars on the hand, in both observer and patient groups. Even a single session of fractional CO2 laser therapy had profound effects on the overall quality of scars. CONCLUSION: Fractional carbon dioxide laser therapy improves the quality of scars and produces significant improvements in skin texture, with better effects on post-traumatic scars than on post-burn and post-acne scars. Future studies are needed to better understand the mechanism of action and to optimize the doses and timing of therapy.

Multicomponent Home-based Physical Therapy Versus Usual Care for Recovery After Hip Fracture.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the effect of 2 home-based 16-week multi-component physical therapy interventions on functional recovery compared to usual care after hip fracture. DESIGN: Cross-study comparison using participants from the Community Ambulation Project (CAP; a randomized controlled trial) were compared to the Baltimore Hip Studies-seventh cohort (BHS-7; an observational cohort study) at 3 different time points (CAP: 15, 31, 55 weeks; BHS-7: 8, 26, and 52 weeks). SETTING: General community PARTICIPANTS: Combined convenience sample of hip-fracture patients 8-26 weeks post admission from a prospective cohort study and randomized controlled trial. (N=549) INTERVENTIONS: CAP participants were randomized to one of 2 interventions (PUSH: specific multi-component intervention; PULSE: non-specific multi-component intervention) after standard rehabilitation; BHS-7 participants received usual care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean function (as measured by Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and gait speed) was estimated in each cohort as quadratic functions of time using data from 3 post-fracture assessments in both studies (CAP: 15, 31, 55 weeks; BHS-7: 8, 26, and 52 weeks). RESULTS: The harmonized samples included 101 PUSH, 100 PULSE, and 128 BHS-7 participants that had different demographic and clinical characteristics. Mean baseline SPPB scores (meters per second) were PUSH: 5.5 (SD=2.2), PULSE: 5.5 (SD=2.4), and BHS-7: 4.6 (SD=2.5); and mean gait speeds were 0.60 m/s (SD=0.20) for PUSH, 0.59 m/s (SD=0.17) for PULSE, and 0.46 m/s SD=(0.21) for BHS-7, respectively. Estimated between-group differences for SPPB improvement from 75 days to 1-year post admission were 0.7 (P=.04) in PUSH vs BHS-7; and 0.9 (P=.01) in PULSE vs BHS-7. Mean differences in change in gait speed were 0.08 (P=.002) for PUSH vs BHS-7; and 0.06 (P=.02) PULSE vs BHS-7 (P=.02). CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this cross-study comparison that combined participants from 2 separate studies, with different designs and samples, suggest that home-based multi-component physical therapy programs were associated with greater functional improvement after hip fracture compared to usual care.

Mid-term Surgery Outcomes in Patients With COVID-19: Results From a Nationwide Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Determine mid-term postoperative outcomes among coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-positive (+) patients compared with those who never tested positive before surgery. BACKGROUND: COVID-19 is thought to be associated with prohibitively high rates of postoperative complications. However, prior studies have only evaluated 30-day outcomes, and most did not adjust for demographic, clinical, or procedural characteristics. METHODS: We analyzed data from surgeries performed at all Veterans Affairs hospitals between March 2020 and 2021. Kaplan-Meier curves compared trends in mortality and Cox proportional hazards models estimated rates of mortality and pulmonary, thrombotic, and septic postoperative complications between patients with a positive preoperative severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) test [COVID (+)] and propensity score-matched COVID-negative (-) patients. RESULTS: Of 153,741 surgical patients, 4778 COVID (+) were matched to 14,101 COVID (-). COVID (+) status was associated with higher postoperative mortality ( P <0.0001) with a 6-month survival of 94.2% (95% confidence interval: 93.2-95.2) versus 96.0% (95% confidence interval: 95.7.0-96.4) in COVID (-). The highest mortality was in the first 30 postoperative days. Hazards for mortality and postoperative complications in COVID (+) decreased with increasing time between testing COVID (+) and date of surgery. COVID (+) patients undergoing elective surgery had similar rates of mortality, thrombotic and septic complications, but higher rates of pulmonary complications than COVID (-) patients. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of mid-term outcomes among COVID-19 patients undergoing surgery. COVID-19 is associated with decreased overall and complication-free survival primarily in the early postoperative period, delaying surgery by 5 weeks or more reduces risk of complications. Case urgency has a multiplicative effect on short-term and long-term risk of postoperative mortality and complications.

Partial COVID-19 vaccination associated with reduction in postoperative mortality and SARS-CoV-2 infection.

BACKGROUND: There are currently no data to guide decisions about delaying surgery to achieve full vaccination. METHODS: We analyzed data from patients undergoing surgery at any of the 1,283 VA medical facilities nationwide and compared postoperative complication rates by vaccination status. RESULTS: Of 87,073 surgical patients, 20% were fully vaccinated, 15% partially vaccinated, and 65% unvaccinated. Mortality was reduced in full vaccination vs. unvaccinated (Incidence Rate Ratio 0.77, 95% CI [0.62, 0.94]) and partially vaccinated vs. unvaccinated (0.75 [0.60, 0.94]). Postoperative COVID-19 infection was reduced in fully (0.18 [0.12, 0.26]) and partially vaccinated patients (0.34 [0.24, 0.48]). Fully vaccinated compared to partially vaccinated patients, had similar postoperative mortality (1.02, [0.78, 1.33]), but had decreased COVID-19 infection (0.53 [0.32, 0.87]), pneumonia (0.75 [0.62, 0.93]), and pulmonary failure (0.79 [0.68, 0.93]). CONCLUSIONS: Full and partial vaccination reduces postoperative complications indicating the importance of any degree of vaccination prior to surgery.

COVID-19 Vaccination Associated With Reduced Postoperative SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Morbidity.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of COVID-19 vaccination on postoperative mortality, pulmonary and thrombotic complications, readmissions and hospital lengths of stay among patients undergoing surgery in the United States. BACKGROUND: While vaccination prevents COVID-19, little is known about its impact on postoperative complications. METHODS: This is a nationwide observational cohort study of all 1,255 Veterans Affairs facilities nationwide. We compared patients undergoing surgery at least 2 weeks after their second dose of the Pfizer BioNTech or Moderna vaccines, to contemporary propensity score matched controls. Primary endpoints were 30-day mortality and postoperative COVID-19 infection. Secondary endpoints were pulmonary or thrombotic complications, readmissions, and hospital lengths of stay. RESULTS: 30,681 patients met inclusion criteria. After matching, there were 3,104 in the vaccination group (1,903 received the Pfizer BioNTech, and 1,201 received the Moderna vaccine) and 7,438 controls. Full COVID-19 vaccination was associated with lower rates of postoperative 30-day COVID-19 infection (Incidence Rate Ratio and 95% confidence intervals, 0.09 [0.01,0.44]), pulmonary complications (0.54 [0.39, 0.72]), thrombotic complications (0.68 [0.46, 0.99]) and decreased hospital lengths of stay (0.78 [0.69, 0.89]). Complications were also low in vaccinated patients who tested COVID-19 positive before surgery but events were too few to detect a significant difference compared to controls. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 vaccination is associated with lower rates of postoperative morbidity. The benefit is most pronounced among individuals who have never had a COVID-19 infection before surgery.

Increased complications in patients who test COVID-19 positive after elective surgery and implications for pre and postoperative screening.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated the adoption of protocols to minimize risk of periprocedural complications associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. This typically involves a preoperative symptom screen and nasal swab RT-PCR test for viral RNA. Asymptomatic patients with a negative COVID-19 test are cleared for surgery. However, little is known about the rate of postoperative COVID-19 positivity among elective surgical patients, risk factors for this group and rate of complications. METHODS: This prospective multicenter study included all patients undergoing elective surgery at 170 Veterans Health Administration (VA) hospitals across the United States. Patients were divided into groups based on first positive COVID-19 test within 30 days after surgery (COVID[-/+]), before surgery (COVID[+/-]) or negative throughout (COVID[-/-]). The cumulative incidence, risk factors for and complications of COVID[-/+], were estimated using univariate analysis, exact matching, and multivariable regression. RESULTS: Between March 1 and December 1, 2020 90,093 patients underwent elective surgery. Of these, 60,853 met inclusion criteria, of which 310 (0.5%) were in the COVID[-/+] group. Adjusted multivariable logistic regression identified female sex, end stage renal disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, cancer, cirrhosis, and undergoing neurosurgical procedures as risk factors for being in the COVID[-/+] group. After matching on current procedural terminology code and month of procedure, multivariable Poisson regression estimated the complication rate ratio for the COVID[-/+] group vs. COVID[-/-] to be 8.4 (C.I. 4.9-14.4) for pulmonary complications, 3.0 (2.2, 4.1) for major complications, and 2.6 (1.9, 3.4) for any complication. DISCUSSION: Despite preoperative COVID-19 screening, there remains a risk of COVID infection within 30 days after elective surgery. This risk is increased for patients with a high comorbidity burden and those undergoing neurosurgical procedures. Higher intensity preoperative screening and closer postoperative monitoring is warranted in such patients because they have a significantly elevated risk of postoperative complications.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on diagnosis of new cancers: A national multicenter study of the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused disruptions in treatment for cancer. Less is known about its impact on new cancer diagnoses, where delays could cause worsening long-term outcomes. This study quantifies decreases in encounters related to prostate, lung, bladder and colorectal cancers, procedures that facilitate their diagnosis, and new diagnoses of those cancers in the COVID era compared to pre-COVID era. METHODS: All encounters at Veterans' Affairs facilities nationwide from 2016 through 2020 were reviewed. The authors quantified trends in new diagnoses of cancer and in procedures facilitating their diagnosis, from January 1, 2018 onward. Using 2018 to 2019 as baseline, reductions in procedures and new cancer diagnoses in 2020 were estimated. Calculated absolute and percentage differences in annual volume and observed-to-expected volume ratios were calculated. Heat maps and funnel plots of volume changes were generated. RESULTS: From 2018 through 2020, there were 4.1 million cancer-related encounters, 3.9 million relevant procedures, and 251,647 new cancers diagnosed. Compared to the annual averages in 2018 through 2019, colonoscopies in 2020 decreased by 45% whereas prostate biopsies, chest computed tomography scans, and cystoscopies decreased by 29%, 10%, and 21%, respectively. New cancer diagnoses decreased by 13% to 23%. These drops varied by state and continued to accumulate despite reductions in pandemic-related restrictions. CONCLUSION: The authors identified substantial reductions in procedures used to diagnose cancer and subsequent reductions in new diagnoses of cancer across the United States because of the COVID-19 pandemic. A nomogram is provided to identify and resolve these unmet health care needs and avoid worse long-term cancer outcomes. LAY SUMMARY: The disruptions due to the COVID-19 pandemic have led to substantial reductions in new cancers being diagnosed. This study quantifies those reductions in a national health care system and offers a method for understanding the backlog of cases and the resources needed to resolve them.

Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Pulmonary Embolism after Systemic Thrombolysis.

Massive pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening condition with a high mortality. Both systemic thrombolytics and veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) have been used in the management of massive PE. However, the safety of VA- ECMO in the setting of recent thrombolytic administration is not clear. The purpose of this study is to analyze the outcomes of patients who received VA-ECMO in the setting of systemic thrombolytics (ST). A single institution retrospective study of PE patients treated with VA-ECMO between December 2015 and December 2020 was performed. Patients who received ST were compared with those who did not receive ST. Outcomes, including mortality, major bleeding, duration of mechanical ventilation, need for renal replacement therapy, and length of hospital stay, were compared. A total of 83 patients with PE required VA-ECMO support and 18 of these received systemic thrombolytics. There was no statistically significant difference in survival to discharge between the patients who received ST compared with those who did not (88.9% vs 84.6%; p = 0.94). Major bleeding events occurred more often in patients who received ST (61.1% vs 26.2%; p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in time on mechanical ventilation, need for renal replacement therapy, or length of stay between the groups. Reasonable survival can be achieved despite an increased frequency of major bleeding events in patients that receive ST prior to VA-ECMO for PE. ST administration should not be considered an absolute contraindication to VA-ECMO. Further multi-center studies are needed to corroborate these findings.

A Nation-Wide Review of Elective Surgery and COVID-Surge Capacity.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in over 225,000 excess deaths in the United States. A moratorium on elective surgery was placed early in the pandemic to reduce risk to patients and staff and preserve critical care resources. This report evaluates the impact of the elective surgical moratorium on case volumes and intensive care unit (ICU) bed utilization. METHODS: This retrospective review used a national convenience sample to correlate trends in the weekly rates of surgical cases at 170 Veterans Affairs Hospitals around the United States from January 1 to September 30, 2020 to national trends in the COVID-19 pandemic. We reviewed data on weekly number of procedures performed and ICU bed usage, stratified by level of urgency (elective, urgent, emergency), and whether an ICU bed was required within 24 hours of surgery. National data on the proportion of COVID-19 positive test results and mortality rates were obtained from the Center for Disease Control website. RESULTS: 198,911 unique surgical procedures performed during the study period. The total number of cases performed from January 1 to March 16 was 86,004 compared with 15,699 from March 17 to May 17. The reduction in volume occurred before an increase in the percentage of COVID-19 positive test results and deaths nationally. There was a 91% reduction from baseline in the number of elective surgeries performed allowing 78% of surgical ICU beds to be available for COVID-19 positive patients. CONCLUSION: The moratorium on elective surgical cases was timely and effective in creating bed capacity for critically ill COVID-19 patients. Further analyses will allow targeted resource allocation for future pandemic planning.

Transcarotid Approach for Ascending Aortic Endovascular Repair.

This report describes a case of penetrating aortic ulcer in zone 0 of the ascending aorta with concern for free rupture that was treated with a transcarotid endovascular stent graft. The patient was noted to be a poor candidate for open repair given comorbidities, frailty, and age. She had chronic occlusion of the right external iliac artery and stenosis of the left external iliac artery. Endovascular ascending aortic stenting was deployed successfully through right common carotid access. The patient had an uncomplicated postoperative course without evidence of stroke. The transcarotid approach is an optimal alternative access for patients undergoing endovascular ascending aortic repair.

Ischemia-reperfusion Injury in the Transplanted Lung: A Literature Review.

Lung ischemia-reperfusion injury (LIRI) and primary graft dysfunction are leading causes of morbidity and mortality among lung transplant recipients. Although extensive research endeavors have been undertaken, few preventative and therapeutic treatments have emerged for clinical use. Novel strategies are still needed to improve outcomes after lung transplantation. In this review, we discuss the underlying mechanisms of transplanted LIRI, potential modifiable targets, current practices, and areas of ongoing investigation to reduce LIRI and primary graft dysfunction in lung transplant recipients.

Periprocedural complications in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to those without infection: A nationwide propensity-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Reports on emergency surgery performed soon after a COVID-19 infection that are not controlled for premorbid risk-factors show increased 30-day mortality and pulmonary complications. This contributed to a virtual cessation of elective surgery during the pandemic surge. To inform evidence-based guidance on the decisions for surgery during the recovery phase of the pandemic, we compare 30-day outcomes in patients testing positive for COVID-19 before their operation, to contemporary propensity-matched COVID-19 negative patients undergoing the same procedures. METHODS: This prospective multicentre study included all patients undergoing surgery at 170 Veterans Health Administration (VA) hospitals across the United States. COVID-19 positive patients were propensity matched to COVID-19 negative patients on demographic and procedural factors. We compared 30-day outcomes between COVID-19 positive and negative patients, and the effect of time from testing positive to the date of procedure (≤10 days, 11-30 days and >30 days) on outcomes. RESULTS: Between March 1 and August 15, 2020, 449 COVID-19 positive and 51,238 negative patients met inclusion criteria. Propensity matching yielded 432 COVID-19 positive and 1256 negative patients among whom half underwent elective surgery. Infected patients had longer hospital stays (median seven days), higher rates of pneumonia (20.6%), ventilator requirement (7.6%), acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS, 17.1%), septic shock (13.7%), and ischemic stroke (5.8%), while mortality, reoperations and readmissions were not significantly different. Higher odds for ventilation and stroke persisted even when surgery was delayed 11-30 days, and for pneumonia, ARDS, and septic shock >30 days after a positive test. DISCUSSION: 30-day pulmonary, septic, and ischaemic complications are increased in COVID-19 positive, compared to propensity score matched negative patients. Odds for several complications persist despite a delay beyond ten days after testing positive. Individualized risk-stratification by pulmonary and atherosclerotic comorbidities should be considered when making decisions for delaying surgery in infected patients.

Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion: Current Achievements and Future Directions.

There is a severe shortage in the availability of donor organs for lung transplantation. Novel strategies are needed to optimize usage of available organs to address the growing global needs. Ex vivo lung perfusion has emerged as a powerful tool for the assessment, rehabilitation, and optimization of donor lungs before transplantation. In this review, we discuss the history of ex vivo lung perfusion, current evidence on its use for standard and extended criteria donors, and consider the exciting future opportunities that this technology provides for lung transplantation.

Understanding the Pathognomonic Tumefactive Appearance of Neurolymphomatosis: A Unifying Theory of Neurolymphoma.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of peripheral neurolymphomatosis (NL) is difficult and often delayed, because patients can have isolated, nonspecific nerve symptoms. Magnetic resonance imaging will usually show nonspecific findings of enlarged, contrast-enhancing nerves. We aimed to elucidate the mechanism behind an imaging finding we believe is pathognomonic of NL and likely of other hematologic diseases with peripheral nerve involvement. METHODS: We reviewed the imaging studies of a previously reported cohort of patients, in addition to those from more recent patients, all with tumefactive NL, in which enlarged nerve bundles were surrounded by tumor. We reviewed the demographic data, clinical data (e.g., primary or secondary disease, biopsy-proven diagnosis), and imaging findings (e.g., tumefactive appearance, primary involved nerve, location of epicenter of tumefactive appearance, vascular involvement). RESULTS: All cases showed a maximum tumefactive appearance at branch or junction points, with a gradual decrease of this appearance moving proximally and distally from the epicenter in a "crescendo-decrescendo" pattern. We have described this as a phasic mechanism with 3 phases: malignant cells fill the intraneural space; extrude at a weak spot of the nerve, which often occurs at a branch or junction point; and then expand and fill the subparaneurial space, creating the grossly tumefactive appearance with proximal and distal spread. CONCLUSIONS: We have presented a novel, unifying theory explaining the pathognomonic tumefactive appearance of NL. Our theory offers the first rational explanation for the radiological appearance of NL with peripheral nerve involvement. We believe that with earlier recognition of NL on imaging studies, patients will be able to receive an earlier diagnosis and undergo earlier treatment.

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy has a Lower Risk of Postoperative Bleeding Than Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.

Measures to reduce postoperative bleeding (POB) after bariatric surgery is skewed toward laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). We use 2015 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) to characterize the differences in bleeding rates between LSG and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypasses (LRYGB). Propensity score matching and multivariable logistic regressions tested for independent differences in POB rates. A total of 168,093 patients from 742 centers were identified in the data set. After selection 36,925 patients with LRYGB and 20,020 patients with LSG were included in the analysis. A total of 710 (1.25%) patient suffered a POB. The independent odds of POB were 38% lower for patients having LSG compared with those having LRYGB (odds ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval=0.51-0.76). This difference is more pronounced with intraoperative securing of the staple line. Appropriate measures to reduce POB after each type of bariatric procedure is warranted.

Recurrent desmoid-type fibromatosis associated with underlying neuromuscular choristoma.

OBJECTIVE: Desmoid-type fibromatosis (DTF) presents a therapeutic dilemma. While lacking metastatic potential, it is a locally aggressive tumor with a strong propensity for occurrence near nerve(s) and recurrence following resection. In this study, the authors introduce the association of an occult neuromuscular choristoma (NMC) identified in patients with DTF. METHODS: After experiencing a case of DTF found to have an occult NMC, the authors performed a retrospective database review of all other cases of biopsy-proven DTF involving the extremities or limb girdles in patients with available MRI data. Two musculoskeletal radiologists with expertise in peripheral nerve imaging reviewed the MRI studies of the eligible cases for evidence of previously unrecognized NMC. RESULTS: The initial case of a patient with an occult sciatic NMC is described. The database review yielded 40 patients with DTF-18 (45%) in the upper limb and 22 (55%) in the lower limb. Two cases (5%) had MRI findings of NMC associated with the DTF, one in the proximal sciatic nerve and the other in the proximal tibial and sural nerves. CONCLUSIONS: The coexistence of NMC may be under-recognized in a subset of patients with extremity DTF. This finding poses implications for DTF treatment and the likelihood of recurrence after resection or biopsy. Further study may reveal crucial links between the pathogenesis of NMC and DTF and offer novel therapeutic strategies.

Primary retroperitoneal filariasis: a common disease of tropics with uncommon presentation and review of literature.

Lymphatic filariasis is caused by nematode filariae Wuchereria bancrofti, Brugia malayi or Brugia timori. It is commonly seen in tropical and subtropical regions of the world and affects the lymphatic system of humans, who are the definitive host while mosquito is the intermediate host. The most common manifestation of the disease is hydrocele followed by lower limb lymphoedema and elephantiasis. Although filariasis is much more common entity in north India, its presentation as retroperitoneal cyst is very rare with reported incidence rate of 1/105 000. We present a case of primary retroperitoneal filariasis in a 52-year-old man, without any classic signsandsymptoms, diagnosed postoperatively after surgical resection following diagnostic uncertaintyandfailure of other medical therapies.

The Right Way to Teach Left-Handed Residents: Strategies for Training by Right Handers.

PURPOSE: Left-handed (LH) residents remain underrepresented among surgical trainees, and there are few available data on how best to train them. The challenge is amplified when pairing a LH resident with a right-handed (RH) mentor. This report provides recommendations on how to improve the training of LH surgeons in a safe and effective manner. METHODS: A comprehensive literature review was performed using different databases and search engines to identify all articles relevant to the training of LH residents. RESULTS: A total of 40 articles highlighted the challenges for LH surgical residents and RH mentors. Our recommendations are based on the following 4 themes: identifying inherent differences in left vs. RH residents, providing guidance to RH mentors training LH residents, adapting the RH environment to the LH surgeon, and maximizing safety during training. CONCLUSION: An organized approach needs to be taken in training the LH resident. Changes should be instituted at program-wide and national levels to ensure that the training experience of the sinistral surgical resident is optimized.