Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Front Vet Sci ; 11: 1362011, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38872793

ABSTRACT

This study aims to investigate bacterial communities and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in airborne dust from pig farms. Airborne dust, pig feces and feed were collected from nine pig farms in Thailand. Airborne dust samples were collected from upwind and downwind (25 meters from pig house), and inside (in the middle of the pig house) of the selected pig house. Pig feces and feed samples were individually collected from the pen floor and feed trough from the same pig house where airborne dust was collected. A direct total bacteria count on each sampling plate was conducted and averaged. The ESKAPE pathogens together with Escherichia coli, Salmonella, and Streptococcus were examined. A total of 163 bacterial isolates were collected and tested for MICs. Pooled bacteria from the inside airborne dust samples were analyzed using Metagenomic Sequencing. The highest bacterial concentration (1.9-11.2 × 103 CFU/m3) was found inside pig houses. Staphylococcus (n = 37) and Enterococcus (n = 36) were most frequent bacterial species. Salmonella (n = 3) were exclusively isolated from feed and feces. Target bacteria showed a variety of resistance phenotypes, and the same bacterial species with the same resistance phenotype were found in airborne dust, feed and fecal from each farm. Metagenomic Sequencing analysis revealed 1,652 bacterial species across all pig farms, of which the predominant bacterial phylum was Bacillota. One hundred fifty-nine AMR genes of 12 different antibiotic classes were identified, with aminoglycoside resistance genes (24%) being the most prevalent. A total of 251 different plasmids were discovered, and the same plasmid was detected in multiple farms. In conclusion, the phenotypic and metagenomic results demonstrated that airborne dust from pig farms contained a diverse array of bacterial species and genes encoding resistance to a range of clinically important antimicrobial agents, indicating the significant role in the spread of AMR bacterial pathogens with potential hazards to human health. Policy measurements to address AMR in airborne dust from livestock farms are mandatory.

2.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0304250, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38787814

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to investigate the potential mechanisms associated with the persistence of chloramphenicol (CHP) resistance in Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica isolated from pigs, pork, and humans in Thailand. The CHP-resistant E. coli (n = 106) and Salmonella (n = 57) isolates were tested for their CHP susceptibility in the presence and absence of phenylalanine arginine ß-naphthylamide (PAßN). The potential co-selection of CHP resistance was investigated through conjugation experiments. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) was performed to analyze the E. coli (E329, E333, and E290) and Salmonella (SA448, SA461, and SA515) isolates with high CHP MIC (32-256 µg/mL) and predominant plasmid replicon types. The presence of PAßN significantly reduced the CHP MICs (≥4-fold) in most E. coli (67.9%) and Salmonella (64.9%). Ampicillin, tetracycline, and streptomycin co-selected for CHP-resistant Salmonella and E. coli-transconjugants carrying cmlA. IncF plasmids were mostly detected in cmlA carrying Salmonella (IncFIIAs) and E. coli (IncFIB and IncF) transconjugants. The WGS analysis revealed that class1 integrons with cmlA1 gene cassette flanked by IS26 and TnAs1 were located on IncX1 plasmid, IncFIA(HI1)/HI1B plasmids and IncFII/FIB plasmids. IncFIA(HI1)/HI1B/Q1in SA448 contained catA flanked by IS1B and TnAs3. In conclusion, cross resistance through proton motive force-dependent mechanisms and co-selection by other antimicrobial agents involved the persistence of CHP-resistance in E. coli in this collection. Dissemination of CHP-resistance genes was potentially facilitated by mobilization via mobile genetic elements.


Subject(s)
Escherichia coli , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Plasmids , Animals , Escherichia coli/genetics , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Thailand , Swine , Humans , Plasmids/genetics , Salmonella/genetics , Salmonella/drug effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Chloramphenicol Resistance/genetics , Chloramphenicol/pharmacology , Whole Genome Sequencing
3.
Antibiotics (Basel) ; 13(2)2024 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38391534

ABSTRACT

Probiotics have been popularly used in livestock production as an alternative to antibiotics. This study aimed to investigate the microbiological quality and phenotypic and genotypic antimicrobial resistance of bacteria in probiotic products sold for food animals. A total of 45 probiotic products were examined for the number of viable cells, species, and antimicrobial susceptibility; the contamination of Escherichia coli and Salmonella; and the presence of 112 genes encoding resistance to clinically important antimicrobials and transferability of AMR determinants. The results showed that 29 of 45 products (64.4%) were incorrectly labeled in either number of viable cells or bacterial species. None of the tested products were contaminated with E. coli and Salmonella. A total of 33 out of 64 bacterial isolates (51.6%) exhibited resistance to at least one antimicrobial agent. Of the 45 products tested, 16 (35.5%) carried AMR genes. Almost all AMR genes detected in probiotic products were not correlated to the AMR phenotype of probiotic strains formulated in the products. Three streptomycin-resistant Lactobacillus isolates could horizontally transfer their AMR determinants. The findings demonstrated that the probiotic products could serve as reservoirs for the spread of AMR genes and may not yield benefits to animals as claimed. The need for the adequate quality control of probiotic products is highlighted.

4.
Clin Infect Dis ; 77(Suppl 7): S588-S596, 2023 12 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38118017

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Strengthening external quality assessment (EQA) services across the One Health sector supports implementation of effective antimicrobial resistance (AMR) control strategies. Here we describe and compare 2 different approaches for conducting virtual laboratory follow-up assessments within an EQA program to evaluate quality management system (QMS) and procedures for pathogen identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). METHODS: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in 2021 and 2022, 2 laboratory assessment approaches were introduced: virtual-based and survey-based methodologies. The evaluation of 2 underperforming Animal Health laboratories through a virtual-based approach occurred between May and August 2021. This evaluation encompassed the utilization of 3 online meetings and document reviews, performed subsequent to the execution of EQA procedures. Within a distinct group of laboratories, the survey-based assessment was implemented from December 2021 to February 2022, also following EQA procedures. This phase encompassed the dissemination of an online survey to 31 participating laboratories, alongside a sole online consultation meeting involving 4 specific underperforming laboratories. RESULTS: The virtual-based assessment post-EQA aimed to identify gaps and areas for improvement in the laboratory's practices for pathogen identification and AST. This approach was, however, time-intensive, and, hence, only 2 laboratories were assessed. In addition, limited interactions in virtual platforms compromised the assessment quality. The survey-based post-EQA assessment enabled evaluation of 31 laboratories. Despite limitations for in-depth analysis of each procedure, gaps in QMS across multiple laboratories were identified and tailored laboratory-specific recommendations were provided. CONCLUSIONS: Reliable internet and plans for efficient time management, post-EQA virtual laboratory follow-up assessments are an effective alternative when conducting onsite evaluation is infeasible as observed during the COVID-19 pandemic, although the successful implementation of remediation plans will likely require in person assessments. We advocate application of hybrid approaches (both onsite and virtual) for targeted capacity building of AMR procedures with the ability to implement and oversee the process.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents , COVID-19 , One Health , Humans , Quality Control , Laboratories , Pandemics/prevention & control , Asia , Quality Assurance, Health Care , COVID-19 Testing
5.
Epidemiol Infect ; 150: e110, 2022 05 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35535461

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to determine the epidemiology and association of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) among Escherichia coli and Salmonella in Thailand. The E. coli (n = 1047) and Salmonella (n = 816) isolates from pigs, pork and humans were screened for 18 replicons including HI1, HI2, I1-γ, X, L/M, N, FIA, FIB, W, Y, P, FIC, A/C, T, FIIAs, F, K and B/O using polymerase chain reaction-based replicon typing. The E. coli (n = 26) and Salmonella (n = 3) isolates carrying IncF family replicons, ESBL and/or mcr genes were determined for FAB formula. IncF represented the major type of plasmids. Sixteen and eleven Inc groups were identified in E. coli (85.3%) and Salmonella (25.7%), respectively. The predominant replicon patterns between E. coli and Salmonella were IncK-F (23.7%) and IncF (46.2%). Significant correlations (P < 0.05) were observed between plasmid-replicon type and resistance phenotype. Plasmid replicon types were significantly different among sources of isolates and sampling periods. The most common FAB types between E. coli and Salmonella were F2:A-:B- (30.8%) and S1:A-:B- (66.7%), respectively. In conclusion, various plasmids present in E. coli and Salmonella. Responsible and prudent use of antimicrobials is suggested to reduce the selective pressures that favour the spread of AMR determinants. Further studies to understand the evolution of R plasmids and their contribution to the dissemination of AMR genes are warranted.


Subject(s)
Escherichia coli Infections , Pork Meat , Red Meat , Salmonella enterica , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Escherichia coli/genetics , Escherichia coli Infections/epidemiology , Escherichia coli Infections/veterinary , Humans , Plasmids/genetics , Salmonella/genetics , Salmonella enterica/genetics , Swine , beta-Lactamases/genetics
6.
J Vet Sci ; 22(5): e68, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34423604

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Colistin and carbapenem-resistant bacteria have emerged and become a serious public health concern, but their epidemiological data is still limited. OBJECTIVES: This study examined colistin and carbapenem resistance in Escherichia coli and Salmonella from pigs, pig carcasses, and pork in Thailand, Lao PDR, and Cambodia border provinces. METHODS: The phenotypic and genotypic resistance to colistin and meropenem was determined in E. coli and Salmonella obtained from pigs, pig carcasses, and pork (n = 1,619). A conjugative experiment was performed in all isolates carrying the mcr gene (s) (n = 68). The plasmid replicon type was determined in the isolates carrying a conjugative plasmid with mcr by PCR-based replicon typing (n = 7). The genetic relatedness of mcr-positive Salmonella (n = 11) was investigated by multi-locus sequence typing. RESULTS: Colistin resistance was more common in E. coli (8%) than Salmonella (1%). The highest resistance rate was found in E. coli (17.8%) and Salmonella (1.7%) from Cambodia. Colistin-resistance genes, mcr-1, mcr-3, and mcr-5, were identified, of which mcr-1 and mcr-3 were predominant in E. coli (5.8%) and Salmonella (1.7%), respectively. The mcr-5 gene was observed in E. coli from pork in Cambodia. Two colistin-susceptible pig isolates from Thailand carried both mcr-1 and mcr-3. Seven E. coli and Salmonella isolates contained mcr-1 or mcr-3 associated with the IncF and IncI plasmids. The mcr-positive Salmonella from Thailand and Cambodia were categorized into two clusters with 94%-97% similarity. None of these clusters was meropenem resistant. CONCLUSIONS: Colistin-resistant E. coli and Salmonella were distributed in pigs, pig carcasses, and pork in the border areas. Undivided-One Health collaboration is needed to address the issue.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Carbapenems/pharmacology , Colistin/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial/genetics , Escherichia coli Proteins/genetics , Escherichia coli/physiology , Pork Meat/microbiology , Salmonella/physiology , Animals , Cambodia , Escherichia coli/genetics , Escherichia coli Proteins/metabolism , Laos , Plasmids/physiology , Salmonella/genetics , Sus scrofa , Thailand
7.
Microb Drug Resist ; 27(4): 571-584, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32898454

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to investigate antimicrobial resistance (AMR) characteristics of Escherichia coli isolates from pig origin (including pigs, pig carcass, and pork) and humans in Thailand and Lao People's Democratic Republic (PDR) border provinces. The majority of the E. coli isolates from Thailand (69.7%) and Lao PDR (63.3%) exhibited multidrug resistance. Class 1 integrons with resistance gene cassettes were common (n = 43), of which the most predominant resistance gene cassette was aadA1. The percentage of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producers was 3.4 in Thailand and 3.2 in Lao PDR. The ESBL genes found were blaCTX-M14, blaCTX-M27, and blaCTX-M55, of which blaCTX-M55 was the most common (58.6%). Ser-83-Leu and Asp-87-Asn were the predominant amino acid changes in GyrA of ciprofloxacin-resistant isolates. Twenty-two percent of all isolates were positive for qnrS. Class 1 integrons carrying aadA1 from pigs (n = 1) and ESBL genes (blaCTX-M55 and blaCTX-M14) from pigs (n = 2), pork (n = 1), and humans (n = 7) were located on conjugative plasmids. Most plasmids (29.3%) were typed in the IncFrepB group. In conclusion, AMR E. coli are common in pig origin and humans in these areas. The findings confirm AMR as One Health issue, and highlight the need for comprehensive and unified collaborations within and between sectors on research and policy.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial/genetics , Pork Meat/microbiology , Animals , Humans , Integrons/genetics , Laos , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Plasmids , Swine , Thailand , beta-Lactamases/genetics
8.
J Glob Antimicrob Resist ; 18: 130-138, 2019 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31185332

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine prevalence, antimicrobial resistance, virulence genes, and Class 1 integrons of Enterococcus faecium (E. faecium) and Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) from pigs, pork and humans in Thailand-Laos border provinces. METHODS: Six hundred and forty-eight rectal and carcass swab samples from border provinces of Thailand (n=359) and Lao PDR (n=289) were collected and examined from September 2013 to October 2014. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of Enterococcus species was 483 of 648 (75%), comprising E. faecium (359 of 483, 74.3%) and E. faecalis (124 of 483, 25.7%). The occurrence of E. faecium in pigs, pig carcasses, retail pork, and humans in Thailand was 80.6%, 73.8%, 77.6%, and 67%, respectively. The prevalence of E. faecium was higher in Laos (65.7%) than Thailand (47.1%) (P<0.001). Conversely, E. faecalis was more common in Thailand (24.2%) than Laos (12.8%) (P<0.001). The E. faecium and E. faecalis isolates were resistant to all antimicrobials except vancomycin. High resistance was first observed to tetracycline, erythromycin and streptomycin, followed by gentamicin, ampicillin and chloramphenicol. Both E. faecium (7%) and E. faecalis (0.8%) carried empty Class 1 integrons: E. faecium carried gel (6.4%) and esp (0.8%), while E. faecalis carried agg (41.9%), cylA (36.3%), gel (60.5%), and esp (42.7%). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed a variable distribution of antimicrobial resistance and virulence genes among E. faecium and E. faecalis from pigs, pig products and humans in Thai-Laos border provinces. These pathogens may serve as potential reservoirs for the maintenance and widespread dissemination of antimicrobial resistance and virulence determinants from animals to humans via the food chain.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial/genetics , Enterococcus faecalis/genetics , Enterococcus faecium/genetics , Genes, Bacterial/genetics , Molecular Epidemiology , Virulence Factors/genetics , Animals , Enterococcus faecalis/isolation & purification , Enterococcus faecium/isolation & purification , Humans , Integrons/genetics , Laos , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Prevalence , Swine , Thailand , Virulence/drug effects , Virulence/genetics
9.
Vet World ; 12(1): 79-84, 2019 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30936658

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The genetic relationship among serotypes of Salmonella enterica from food animals, food of animal origin, and human is of interest as the data could provide an important clue for the source of human infection. This study aimed to determine the genetic relatedness of S. enterica from pig production and human in Thailand-Laos border provinces. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 195 S. enterica serotypes isolated from pig and pork (n=178) and human (n=17) including four serotypes (Typhimurium, Rissen, Derby, and Stanley) were randomly selected to examine their genetic relatedness using highly conserved sequence of three genes (fim A, man B, and mdh). RESULTS: The results showed that 195 Salmonella isolates of four different serotypes were grouped into five different clusters, and members of the same Salmonella serotypes were found in the same cluster. Salmonella isolated from pig production and human in Thailand-Laos border provinces represented overlapping population and revealed a high degree of similarity, indicating close genetic relationship among the isolates. CONCLUSION: The results support that the determination of Salmonella serotyping combined with analysis of phylogenetic tree can be used track the clonal evolution and genetic diversity of Salmonella serotypes in different host species.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...