Evaluation of monolithic HPLC columns for various pharmaceutical separations: method transfer from conventional phases and batch to batch repeatability.

Methods developed on conventional particle-packed C18 columns for pilocarpine, propranolol, glibenclamide, glimepiride, insulin and their respective degradation products or related compounds were transferred from the conventional Superspher 100RP-18e column to Chromolith Performance RP-18e columns. All transfers were successful applying the same chromatographic conditions, except for insulin where the acetonitrile content of the mobile phase was reduced by 0.5%. The intraday and interday precisions for both retention time and peak area were evaluated over a wide concentration range. Results were found to be equal, or slightly better on Chromolith Performance with RSD%<1.1% in all cases. Monolithic batch to batch repeatability of both retention time and peak area, compared for monolithic columns from different batches gave an RSD% of less than 1.3%. The separation of each drug and its related products was investigated on monolithic columns at flow rates from 1 to 9 ml/min, and superior resolution was always obtained using monolithic over conventional columns at the same flow rate. A total of seven monolithic columns from four different batches were used in this study.

[12-acyl-6,1 2-dihydro-6-phenyl-[1 ]benzofuro[2,3-c]- and -[1,5]benzothieno[2,3-c]-[1 ,5]-benzothiazepines--tetracyclic diltiazem derivatives]. / 12-Acyl-6,12-dihydro-6-phenyl-[1]benzofuro[2,3-c]- und -[1]benzothieno-[2,3-c]-[1,5]benzothiazepine--tetracyclische Diltiazem-Derivate.

The reaction of the tetracycles 1 with chloroacetylchloride yields the amides 2. The structure of 2a was proven by X-ray analysis. The amides 2 exist as diastereomers in solution because of planar chirality. From the N-chloroacetyl compounds only 2a, b could be substituted with diethylamine to give 3a, b. Reduction experiments of 3a, b with DIBAH do not afford diltiazem analogues; instead, the starting compounds la, b are formed by hydrolysis.

Wide concentration range investigation of recovery, precision and error structure in liquid chromatography.

Using a typical HPLC assay, the characteristics of recovery, system precision and repeatability were investigated over a wide concentration range. In the presence of a constant amount of typical tablet excipients, the antidiabetic drug glibenclamide was analyzed in the range from 0.24 to 0.005mg/mL (18 concentration levels, 6 independent sample preparations each). On the basis of a typical concentration for an HPLC glibenclamide assay of 0.2mg/mL, this corresponds to a relative amount of 120-0.025% label claim. In the range from 120 to 0.075%, the recovery was found to be quite constant and systematically heightened mainly due to the evaporation from vials during centrifuging and the displacement of solvent volume by the added matrix. Both system precision and repeatability remain almost constant in the interval from 120 to 10% at a R.S.D.% of 0.31 and 0.70%, respectively, indicating that the sample preparation is the major error source in this range (0.63%). Between 10 and 0.25%, a linear relationship between the logarithmized concentration and the repeatability was noted. However, for lower amounts close to the limit of quantitation, the R.S.D.% of measurements increases much more distinctly. This increase is caused by a strong rise of the system precision. At this concentration range, system precision and repeatability are not significantly different any longer. This leads to the conclusion that with the injection error being constant the peak integration error becomes the dominating error source at low concentrations, e.g. at concentrations below the five-fold of the LOQ. The results obtained here agree well with earlier published data. As the quantitation limit of 0.05% can be regarded as typical for a pharmaceutical impurity control test, generalizations of these findings from this extensive data set should be possible. In this context, peak integration and improvements of the signal-to-noise ratio are the most promising measures to improve an unsatisfactory precision in LC.