ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Limited data exist on sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) of the head and neck. OBJECTIVE: To review the results of SLNB for patients with cSCC of the head and neck at the authors' institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was completed for patients who underwent SLNB for cSCC of the head and neck over 19 years. Patient demographics, immune status, tumor stage, total patients with positive SLNB, local recurrence, nodal recurrence, in-transit metastasis, and disease-specific death were recorded. RESULTS: Sixty patients underwent lymphoscintigraphy, and an SLN was identified in 58 patients. The mean follow-up was 3.2 years (range, 15 days-16 years). Four patients (6.9%) had a positive SLNB. All were Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) stage T2b tumors. Three of these patients were immunosuppressed, 3 patients underwent neck dissection, and 2 patients received adjuvant radiation. None developed local or regional recurrence. Of the 53 patients with a negative SLNB, there were 4 local recurrences, 2 in-transit metastases, and no nodal recurrences. CONCLUSION: Immunosuppressed patients with tumors BWH stage T2b or greater may be a reasonable cohort to focus future prospective studies on the utility of SLNB in cSCC of the head and neck.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Skin Neoplasms , Adult , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Humans , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Prospective Studies , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/surgery , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/surgeryABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Complete removal of melanoma is a primary goal of excision, and local recurrence is one measure to evaluate the efficacy of surgical technique. OBJECTIVE: To compare published local recurrence rates for melanoma treated with Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) or staged excision versus wide local excision (WLE). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Search of 6 databases identified comparative and noncomparative studies that reported local recurrence rates after MMS, staged excision, or WLE for melanoma. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence interval (CI) from comparative studies and event rates from noncomparative studies. RESULTS: Of the 71 studies included (16,575 patients), 12 were comparative studies (2,683 patients) and 56 were noncomparative studies (13,698 patients). Comparative studies showed increased recurrence after WLE compared with MMS or staged excision (odds ratio [OR], 2.5; 95% CI, 1.4-4.6) and compared with MMS alone (OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.8-5.9). Pooled data from comparative and noncomparative studies showed a local recurrence rate of 7% after WLE (95% CI, 5%-11%), 3% after staged excision (95% CI, 2%-4%), and less than 1% after MMS (95% CI, 0%-1%). Statistical heterogeneity was moderate to high. CONCLUSION: Local recurrence of melanoma is significantly lower after MMS (<1%) and staged excision (3%) compared with WLE (7%).
