Shaves off the Cavity or Specimen in Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Re-excision for positive margins (margins where tumor is positive) after breast conserving surgery (BCS) is common and burdensome for breast cancer patients. Routine shave margins can reduce positive margins and re-excision rates. Cavity shaving margin (CSM) removes margins from the lumpectomy cavity edges, whereas specimen shave margin (SSM) requires ex vivo removal of margins from the resected specimen. METHODS: We assessed breast cancer patients undergoing BCS who received CSM or SSM procedures from 2017 to 2019. CSM and SSM techniques were compared by analyzing positive rates of primary and final shaved margins, re-excision rates, and tissue volumes removed. RESULTS: Of 116 patients included in this study, 57 underwent CSM and 59 underwent SSM. Primary margins were positive or close in 19 CSM patients and 21 SSM patients (33% versus 36%; P = 0.798). Seventeen CSM patients had a tumor in shaved margin specimens, compared to four patients for SSM (30% versus 7%; P < 0.001); however, final shave margins were similar (5% versus 5%; P = 0.983). Volumes of shave specimens were higher with SSM (40.7 versus 13.4 cm3; P < 0.001), but there was no significant difference in the total volume removed (146.8 versus 134.4 cm3; P = 0.540). For tumors 2 cm or larger, the total volume removed (140 versus 206 cm3; P = 0.432) and rates of final margin positivity (7.5% versus 0%; P = 0.684) were similar for both techniques. CONCLUSIONS: CSM and SSM are effective techniques for achieving low re-excision rates. Our findings suggest that surgeons performing either CSM or SSM may maintain operative preferences and achieve similar results.

Navigating the Infinite Number of Educational Resources: The Development of a Publicly Available Surgical Educational Digital Resource Library.

OBJECTIVE: There has been an explosion of digital resources available for general surgical education and board preparation. This makes it difficult for a new learner, regardless of their training level, to determine which resources best fit their needs. The uncertainty surrounding resource selection due to the large number of options causes stress, anxiety, and inefficiency for surgical learners. Our objective was to develop a digital surgical educational resource library to assist with selection. DESIGN: A needs assessment via multi-center focus groups encompassing all levels of learners from various subspecialties and training levels (medical students, trainees, junior surgeons, and senior surgeons) was performed to determine what information is desired in a surgical resource library. We conducted follow-up interviews and surveys to learn which resources were most commonly used for studying throughout training. SETTING: Multi-institutional RESULTS: The initial needs assessment detailed requests for an expansive array of surgical resources characterized by media type and price. We identified 104 resources that met these criteria. There were 33 resources used by medical students, 37 by residents, 16 used specifically for surgical boards preparation, and 25 by attending surgeons. These resources were composed of textbooks, review books, question banks, audio resources, video resources, and review courses. The prices of the resources ranged from free to greater than 400 dollars. CONCLUSIONS: A digital resource library should be broad and must address needs that change along a learner's career. Changes and improvements are required not only to meet the changing needs of the learners, but also to ensure the library remains current with the ever-growing number of resources. We plan to incorporate reviews of the resources from those surveyed to help visitors of the online library determine which resources may best suit their needs. Development of a digital resource library may assist learners by helping them easily identify what is available and has been peer reviewed allowing them to determine what best meets their educational needs.

Care Delivery Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Breast Cancer Care.

PURPOSE: COVID-19 has altered healthcare delivery. Previous work has focused on patients with cancer and COVID-19, but little has been reported on healthcare system changes among patients without COVID-19. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of patients with breast cancer (BC) in New York City between February 1, 2020, and April 30, 2020. New patients were included as were patients scheduled to receive intravenous or injectable therapy. Patients with COVID-19 were excluded. Demographic and treatment information were obtained by chart review. Delays and/or changes in systemic therapy, surgery, radiation, and radiology related to the pandemic were tracked, along with the reasons for delay and/or change. Univariate and multivariable analysis were used to identify factors associated with delay and/or change. RESULTS: We identified 350 eligible patients, of whom 149 (42.6%) experienced a delay and/or change, and practice reduction (51.0%) was the most common reason. The patients who identified as Black or African American, Asian, or Other races were more likely to experience a delay and/or change compared with White patients (Black, 44.4%; Asian, 47.1%; Other, 55.6%; White, 31.4%; P = .001). In multivariable analysis, Medicaid compared with commercial insurance (odds ratio [OR], 3.04; 95% CI, 1.32 to 7.27) was associated with increased odds of a delay and/or change, whereas stage II or III BC compared with stage I (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.95; and OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.092, respectively) was associated with decreased odds of a delay and/or change. CONCLUSION: Almost half of the patients with BC without COVID-19 had a delay and/or change. We found racial and socioeconomic disparities in the likelihood of a delay and/or change. Further studies are needed to determine the impact these care alterations have on BC outcomes.

The Effect of Surgical Trainee Education on Opioid Prescribing: An International Evaluation.

INTRODUCTION: Up to 6% of opioid naive patients who undergo surgery become chronic opioid users. The aim of this study was to determine if formal opioid prescribing education of general surgery residents is associated with decreased opioid prescribing postoperatively. METHODS: We surveyed surgery residents at 3 general surgery programs in the United States and 1 in Israel. Residents were divided into 2 groups based on whether or not they received formal opioid prescribing education. RESULTS: Of those surveyed, 107 (50%) responded. 45% of residents had formal opioid prescribing education, which included instructional videos, current literature, and hospital guidelines. For the 4 operations analyzed, residents who received no formal teaching prescribed a higher number of opioids (lumpectomy p = 0.001, open inguinal hernia repair p = 0.004, laparoscopic appendectomy p = 0.007, thyroidectomy p = 0.002). The largest difference in opioid prescribing was seen in "high prescribers," defined as residents prescribing 15 or more opioid pills. For thyroidectomy, 24.4% of residents without formal education prescribed 20 or more oxycodone 5mg pills compared to 0% of residents with formal education. The Israeli cohort was less likely to receive a pain focused education and was also less likely to prescribe opioids to their patients for all 4 procedures evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: Although a minority of general surgery residents are receiving an opioid prescribing education, a formal educational program was associated with significantly decreased opioid prescribing. There is a need for a generalizable educational opioid program for surgery residents.

Surgical Education and the Longitudinal Model at the Columbia-Bassett Program.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate a longitudinal medical student surgical curriculum. DESIGN: This is a case-controlled study of students who participated in a longitudinal surgical curriculum compared to students who participated in a standard 12-week surgical clerkship. This study evaluates qualitative data including exam scores as well as qualitative data regarding student experience. SETTING: All students were from Columbia College of Physicians and Surgeons in New York City. A portion of the students completed their clerkship at the main university campus and others performed their clerkship at an affiliate site including Bassett Health Network. The longitudinal curriculum was only at the Bassett Health Network. PARTICIPANTS: All medical students who completed their surgical curriculum from 2012 to 2015 were eligible. The survey response rate was 45% for a total of 128 students. RESULTS: The students receiving the longitudinal curriculum outperformed the block students on the national shelf exam (77 vs 71, p = 0.001). The longitudinal students were also more likely to learn directly from attending surgeons and were more likely to have a greater interest in a surgical career after their surgery experience. CONCLUSIONS: The longitudinal approach to teaching surgery to medical students achieves non-inferior or superior testing outcomes when compared to the block model, and superior outcomes in terms of students' own attitudes and perceptions.

Should patients With obstructing colorectal cancer have proximal diversion?

BACKGROUND: Up to 20% of patients with colorectal cancer present with obstruction. The goal of this study was to compare the short-term outcomes of patients with obstructing colon cancer who underwent resection and primary anastomosis with or without proximal diversion. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Procedure Targeted Colectomy databases from 2012 to 2014 were reviewed. Patients undergoing colorectal resection with or without diverting ostomy for obstructing colorectal cancer were analyzed. Propensity score-matched cohorts of diverted and nondiverted patients were created accounting for patient characteristics. The primary outcomes were 30-day mortality, postoperative complications, and readmission. RESULTS: There were 2,323 patients (92%) with no proximal diversion and 204 patients (8%) with proximal diversion. In univariate analysis, patients with colorectal resection with diversion were significantly more likely to have any complication (P = .001), sepsis (P = .01), and blood transfusion (P = .001). Diversion patients were also significantly more likely to be readmitted to the hospital within 30 days of the index procedure (P = .02). Proximal diversion was associated with any complication (P = .01), failure to wean off ventilator (P = .05), and longer length of stay (P = .01) in matched cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Proximal diversion in the setting of obstructive colorectal cancer is associated with higher rates of any complication, deep wound infection, sepsis, and readmission. Surgeons who perform a primary anastomosis with diversion for obstructing colorectal cancer should take into account the significant risk for postoperative complications.

Scoring System for the Management of Acute Gallstone Pancreatitis: Cost Analysis of a Prospective Study.

Predicting the presence of a persistent common bile duct (CBD) stone is a difficult and expensive task. The aim of this study is to determine if a previously described protocol-based scoring system is a cost-effective strategy. The protocol includes all patients with gallstone pancreatitis and stratifies them based on laboratory values and imaging to high, medium, and low likelihood of persistent stones. The patient's stratification then dictates the next course of management. A decision analytic model was developed to compare the costs for patients who followed the protocol versus those that did not. Clinical data model inputs were obtained from a prospective study conducted at The Mount Sinai Medical Center to validate the protocol from Oct 2009 to May 2013. The study included all patients presenting with gallstone pancreatitis regardless of disease severity. Seventy-three patients followed the proposed protocol and 32 did not. The protocol group cost an average of $14,962/patient and the non-protocol group cost $17,138/patient for procedural costs. Mean length of stay for protocol and non-protocol patients was 5.6 and 7.7 days, respectively. The proposed protocol is a cost-effective way to determine the course for patients with gallstone pancreatitis, reducing total procedural costs over 12 %.

Validation and improvement of a proposed scoring system to detect retained common bile duct stones in gallstone pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: In 2009, a study from our institution used retrospective data and multivariate analysis to identify 5 quantitative variables and their cutoffs that have a positive predictive value (PPV) for common bile duct (CBD) stones in gallstone pancreatitis. They also proposed a management protocol based on the scoring system. This prospective study sought to validate that scoring system. METHODS: From October 2009 to August 2013, patients with gallstone pancreatitis were enrolled in the study. Scores of 0-5 were determined at admission, with 1 point for each criterion met: CBD ≥ 9 mm, gamma glutamyltransferase ≥ 350 U/L, alkaline phosphatase ≥ 250 U/L, total bilirubin ≥ 3 mg/dL, and direct bilirubin ≥ 2 mg/dL. All CBDs were assessed using intraoperative cholangiogram, MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). RESULTS: Of 84 patients, 16 had CBD stones. A score of 0 had negative predictive value (NPV) of 100% for CBD stones (P < .001). Scores of 1 and 2 had NPV of 81% and 83%, respectively. A score of 3 had NPV of 60%. A score of 4 had PPV of 67% (P = .002). A score of 5 had PPV of 100% (P < .001). The overall accuracy of the scoring system was 88%. CONCLUSION: The scoring system is accurate in prediction of CBD stones in patients with gallstone pancreatitis. We propose that patients with 0 points undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 1 and 2 points undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative cholangiogram, 3 and 4 points undergo MRCP, and 5 points undergo ERCP as the first step in management for gallstone pancreatitis. The proposed protocol eliminated negative ERCPs.