Midterm results after aortic valve neocuspidization.

Objectives: Aortic valve neocuspidization with autologous pericardium is gaining increasing attention as a surgical treatment option for aortic valve disease. However, little is known about midterm durability and valve-related events. Methods: Patients undergoing aortic valve neocuspidization between 2016 and 2021 were included. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed before the operation, at discharge, and annually thereafter. Data were analyzed for incidences of structural valve deterioration, bioprosthetic valve failure, survival, freedom from reoperation, and hemodynamic performance. Results: A total of 162 patients underwent aortic valve neocuspidization (mean age, 52.6 ± 16.6 years; range, 13-78 years); 114 (70.4%) were male. A total of 132 patients presented with a bicuspid aortic valve (81.5%) and 126 patients presented with aortic valve stenosis (77.8%). Concomitant procedures were performed in 63 patients (38.9%). Mean follow-up was 3.5 ± 1.2 years. At discharge, peak and mean pressure gradients were 15.6 ± 7.2 mm Hg and 8.4 ± 3.7 mm Hg, respectively, with a mean effective orifice area of 2.4 ± 0.8 cm2. After 5 years, peak and mean pressure gradients were 14.5 ± 4.6 mm Hg and 7.5 ± 2.2 mm Hg, respectively, with a mean effective orifice area of 2.3 ± 0.8 cm2. At 5 years, cumulative incidences of moderate and severe structural valve deterioration and bioprosthetic valve failure were 9.82% ± 3.87%, 6.96% ± 3.71%, and 12.1% ± 4.12%, respectively. Survival was 97.3% ± 1.4%, and freedom from reoperation was 91.3% ± 2.4%. Conclusions: Aortic valve neocuspidization accomplishes low pressure gradients early after initial surgery and during follow-up. Survival in this young patient population is excellent. The main reason for reoperation is endocarditis, and rates for structural valve degeneration are low.

Impact of Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch on Long-term Outcomes After Aortic Valve Replacement.

BACKGROUND: Patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) after aortic valve replacement potentially affects the outcome after the operation. This study sought to determine whether PPM has an impact on long-term mortality and reoperation rates. METHODS: We included 645 patients who underwent biologic aortic valve replacement between 2000 and 2007. Based on echocardiographic examinations at postoperative month 6, the incidence of PPM was determined according to an indexed effective orifice area <0.85 cm2/m2. Survival and reoperation status were analyzed during 15 years of follow-up. RESULTS: PPM was present in 256 patients (40%), of whom 175 had moderate PPM and 81 had severe PPM. In multivariable adjusted analysis, survival was not statistically significantly impaired in patients with moderate PPM compared with patients with no PPM, whereas patients with severe PPM showed a marginally significant impairment of survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.40; 95% CI, 0.99-1.97; P = .054). Risk factors for survival were higher age (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.10-1.14; P < .001), arterial hypertension (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.38-2.31; P < .001), and diabetes mellitus (HR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.31-2.14; P < .001). In patients with no, moderate, and severe PPM, there were 10.1, 8.5, and 14.8 events of reoperation/1000 patient-years, respectively. The corresponding 10-year cumulative incidence of reoperation was 8.3%, 6.7%, and 12.1%, respectively. In multivariable adjusted analysis, PPM category was not significantly associated with the risk of reoperation (P > .2). CONCLUSIONS: In our study with directly measured effective orifice area, PPM was only marginally related to long-term survival and was not statistically significantly associated with the risk of reintervention.

Functional Mitral Valve Regurgitation: Mitral Valve Repair or Replacement? Our "Road Map" for the Appropriate Strategy.

Objectives: The optimal surgical approach for the treatment of functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) remains controversial. Current guidelines suggest that the surgical approach has to be tailored to the individual patient. The aim of the present study was to clarify further aspects of this tailored treatment. Methods: From 01/2006 to 12/2015, 390 patients underwent mitral valve (MV) surgery for FMR (ischemic n = 241, non-ischemic n = 149) at our institution. A regression analysis was used to determine the effect of MV repair or replacement on survival. The patients were analyzed according to the etiology of the MR (ischemic or non-ischemic), different age groups (<65 years, 65-75 years, and >75 years), LV function, and LV dimensions, as well as the underlying heart rhythm. Results: The overall survival rates for the repair group at 1, 5, and 8 years were 86.1 ± 1.9%, 70.6 ± 2.6%, and 55.1 ± 3.1%, respectively. For the same intervals, the survival rates in patients who underwent MV replacement were 75.9 ± 4.5%, 58.6 ± 5.4%, and 40.9 ± 6.4%, respectively (p = 0.003). Patients younger than 65 years, with an ischemic etiology of FMR, poor ejection fraction (<30%), severe dilatation of left ventricle (LVEDD > 60mm), and presence of atrial fibrillation had significantly higher mortality rates after MV replacement (HR, 3.0; CI, 1.3-6.9; p = 0.007). Patients between 65 and 75 years of age had a higher risk of death when undergoing mitral valve replacement (HR, 1.7; CI, 1.0-2.8; p = 0.04). In patients older than 75 years, the surgical approach (MV repair or replacement) had no effect on postoperative survival (HR, 0.8; CI, 0.4-1.3; p = 0.003). Conclusions: Our data demonstrate that, in patients younger than 65 years, the treatment of choice for FMR should be MV repair. This advantage was even more evident in patients with an ischemic origin of MR, a poor ejection fraction, a severe LV dilatation, and atrial fibrillation.

Incidence of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch in Valve-in-Valve with a Supra-Annular Valve.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for a degenerated surgical bioprosthesis (valve-in-valve [ViV]) has become an established procedure. Elevated gradients and patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) have previously been reported in mixed TAVR cohorts. We analyzed our single-center experience using the third-generation self-expanding Medtronic Evolut R prosthesis, with an emphasis on the incidence and outcomes of PPM. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from our TAVR database. Intraprocedural and intrahospital outcomes are reported. RESULTS: Eighty-six patients underwent ViV-TAVR with the Evolut R prosthesis. Mean age was 75.5 ± 9.5 years, 64% were males. The mean log EuroScore was 21.6 ± 15.7%. The mean time between initial surgical valve implantation and ViV-TAVR was 8.8 ± 3.2 years. The mean true internal diameter of the implanted surgical valves was 20.9 ± 2.2 mm. Post-AVR, 60% had no PPM, 34% had moderate PPM, and 6% had severe PPM. After ViV-TAVR, 33% had no PPM, 29% had moderate, and 39% had severe PPM. After implantation, the mean transvalvular gradient was reduced significantly from 36.4 ± 15.2 to 15.5 ± 9.1 mm Hg (p < 0.001). No patient had more than mild aortic regurgitation after ViV-TAVR. No conversion to surgery was necessary. Estimated Kaplan-Meier survival at 1 year for all patients was 87.4%. One-year survival showed no significant difference according to post-ViV PPM groups (p = 0.356). CONCLUSION: ViV-TAVR using a supra-annular valve resulted in low procedural and in-hospital complication rates. However, moderate or severe PPM was common, with no influence on short-term survival. PPM may not be a suitable factor to predict survival after ViV-TAVR.

AVNeo improves early haemodynamics in regurgitant bicuspid aortic valves compared to aortic valve repair.

OBJECTIVES: Calcified or fibrotic cusps in patients with bicuspid aortic valves and aortic regurgitation complicate successful aortic valve (AV)-repair. Aortic valve neocuspidization (AVNeo) with autologous pericardium offers an alternative treatment to prosthetic valve replacement. We compared patients with regurgitant bicuspid valves undergoing AV-repair or AVNeo. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed patients with regurgitant bicuspid valves undergoing AV-repair or AVNeo. We focused on residual regurgitation, pressure gradients and effective orifice area, determined preoperatively and at discharge. RESULTS: AV-repair was performed in 61 patients (mean age: 43.2 ± 11.3 years) and AVNeo in 22 (45.7 ± 14.1). Prior to the operation patients of the AV-repair group showed severe regurgitation in 38 cases (62.3%) and moderate in 23 (37.6%); in the AVNeo group, all patients exhibited severe regurgitation. Postoperatively, 57 patients (93.4%) patients had no or mild regurgitation after AV-repair and 21 (95.4%) after AVNeo. In AVNeo-patients, peak (10.6 ± 3.1 mmHg vs 22.7 ± 11 mmHg, P< 0.001) and mean pressure gradients (5.9 ± 2 mmHg vs 13.8 ± 7.3 mmHg, P < 0.001) were significantly lower and the orifice area significantly larger (2.9 ± 0.8 cm2 vs 1.9 ± 0.7 cm2, P < 0.001) compared to repair. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to AV-repair, patients AVNeo showed lower mean pressure gradients and larger orifice areas at discharge. The functional result was not different.

Aortic valve neocuspidization using autologous pericardium compared to surgical aortic valve replacement.

INTRODUCTION: Aortic valve neocuspidization (AVNeo) for trileaflet aortic valve reconstruction using autologous pericardium (Ozaki procedure) depicts an encouraging new technique for the surgical treatment of aortic valve pathologies. The current study analyzes the early hemodynamic outcome of AVneo compared with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) using the Abbott/St. Jude Trifecta aortic valve biological prostheses. METHODS: All patients who underwent either AVNeo or SAVR between March 2017 and April 2020 were included. Exclusion criteria were emergency cases, endocarditis, redo- or additional root procedures. Main endpoints were differences between the two groups in terms of the effective orifice area (EOA) and the effective orifice area index (EOAI) at discharge. RESULTS: During the study period, 105 AVNeo patients and 458 SAVR patients met the inclusion criteria. EOA was significantly higher in the AVNeo group (2.4 cm2 ± 0.8 vs. 2.1 cm2 /m2 ± 0.6 in the SAVR group, respectively; p < .001). Multiple regression analysis, including AVNeo, annulus size, bicuspid valve, preoperative stenosis, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and diastolic diameter (LVEDD) found two factors, which favor larger EOA: Annulus size (p < .0001) and AVneo (p = .005). EOAI was significantly higher in the AVNeo group (1.23 ± 0.4 vs. 1.02 cm2 /m2 ± 0.3, respectively; p < .001). Multiple regression analysis for EOAI showed effects for AVneo (p = .005) and bicuspid valve (p = .029). Mean pressure gradients (MPG) were lower in the AVNeo group than in the SAVR group (AVNeo: MPG = 8.0 mmHg ± 3.6 vs. SAVR: MPG = 8.3 mmHg ± 3.6), but this finding did not reach statistical significance (p = .091). CONCLUSIONS: AVNeo shows significantly larger EOA and EOAI compared to SAVR using the Abbott/St. Jude Trifecta aortic valve biological prostheses.

Serial echocardiographic evaluation of the Perimount Magna Ease prosthesis.

BACKGROUND: The Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna Ease prosthesis (PME) represents the latest generation of stented bioprostheses used for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). The aim of our study was to evaluate the long-term clinical outcome and hemodynamic performance of the prosthesis with a focus on the incidence and course of structural valve deterioration (SVD) by serial echocardiographic examinations. METHODS: SAVR with the PME was performed in 58 consecutive patients between 2007 and 2008. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed preoperatively, at discharge and annually during a 10-year follow-up at the German Heart Center Munich. RESULTS: Mean age at surgery was 62±14 years. At discharge (n=57), the overall mean pressure gradient (MPG) and effective orifice area (EOA) were 15.8±4.1 mmHg and 1.8±0.4 cm2, respectively. Moderate patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) was present in 18 patients (32%) and severe PPM in 6 patients (11%) at discharge. Ten years following SAVR (n=33), the overall MPG was 16.6±7.3 mmHg and EOA was 1.3±0.4 cm2.Thirty-day and late mortality was 2% (n=1) and 21% (n=12), respectively. Survival at 1, 5, and 10 years was 94.7%±3.3%, 91.1%±4.1%, and 77.3%±5.9%, respectively. Freedom from reoperation at 10 years was 88.8%±4.7%. Ten years after PME implantation the cumulative incidence of any SVD, severe SVD, and bioprosthetic valve failure (BVF) was 25%±6%, 14%±5%, and 16%±5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The PME shows an excellent hemodynamic performance over the course of 10 years with development of clinically relevant SVD as late as 6 years post implant, and a 10-year incidence of severe SVD of 14%.

Mitral valve repair with the edge-to-edge technique: A 20 years single-center experience.

OBJECTIVES: For tailored treatment of primary mitral regurgitation (MR), surgeons developed different repair techniques. One of them, the edge-to-edge repair has recently seen a revival, especially for Barlow's disease. METHODS: This study was designed to assess the outcomes of the edge-to-edge technique in mitral valve (MV) repair. Preoperative, periprocedural, and postoperative data were prospectively collected in a dedicated database and analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Between March 1999 and July 2019, a total of 152 patients (mean age: 60 ± 13) received an edge-to-edge repair combined with annuloplasty for degenerative MR at our institution. MR resulted from posterior leaflet prolapse in 23 patients (15.1%), anterior leaflet prolapse in 19 (12.5%), and bileaflet prolapse in 110 (72.4%). Of those who had a bileaflet prolapse, 91 (82.7%) had Barlow's disease. Follow-up was complete in 97.4% (6.4 ± 5.7 years). Echocardiographic assessment was achieved in 85.5% (5.1 ± 5.6 years). Overall survival after 10 years was 73.7 ± 5.0%. Twelve patients required valve-related reoperations due to ring dehiscence (n = 2), leaflet suture dehiscence (n = 2), progression of native valve disease (n = 6), or due to device failure (ring fracture) (n = 2). The cumulative incidence of valve-related reoperation at 10 years was 8.4 ± 3.0% (5.2 ± 4.1% in patients with Barlow's disease). At latest follow-up, echocardiography revealed excellent valve function with no or mild MR in 93 patients (88.6%). The mean gradient was 2.9 ± 1.3 mmHg at discharge and decreased to 2.4 ± 1.3 mmHg. Three patients (2.8%) had more than moderate MR. CONCLUSION: Edge-to-edge MV repair is a simple method with excellent results in terms of valvular function and durability especially in patients with Barlow's disease.

Excellent Hemodynamic Performance After Aortic Valve Neocuspidization Using Autologous Pericardium.

BACKGROUND: Aortic valve neocuspidization (AVNeo) for trileaflet aortic valve reconstruction using autologous pericardium (Ozaki procedure) offers an alternative treatment modality to overcome drawbacks of conventional prosthetic aortic valve replacement. METHODS: Between October 2016 and April 2019, 103 patients underwent surgery. Mean follow-up was 426 ± 270 days. Aortic stenosis was the leading diagnosis in 80 patients (77.7%) and aortic regurgitation in 23 (22.3%), respectively. Mean age was 54.0 ± 16.4 years (range, 13.8-78.5). A bicuspid valve was found in 81 patients (78.6%). Transthoracic echocardiography was performed at discharge and at 6 to 12 months after surgery. During AVNeo surgery valve sizing for an Abbott/St Jude Trifecta bioprosthesis (virtually implanted Trifecta bioprosthesis; St Jude Medical, St Paul, MN) was performed to compare pressure gradients and effective orifice area with published data. RESULTS: Trileaflet aortic valve reconstruction was achieved in all patients. In 38 patients neocommissures were created (36.9%). Mean cross-clamp time was 135 ± 20 minutes. Four patients underwent reoperation; the overall freedom from reoperation was 96.1%. Echocardiographic 6- to 12-months follow-up after surgery was available in 93.8% of patients and did not show any change in hemodynamic parameters compared with discharge. Comparison between AVNeo and virtually implanted Trifecta Bioprosthesis revealed a significantly lower mean pressure gradient (8.5 ± 3.7 mm Hg vs 10.2 ± 2.0 mm Hg, P < .001) and higher mean effective orifice area (2.2 ± 0.7 cm2 vs 2.1 ± 0.4 cm2, P = .037) for AVNeo. CONCLUSIONS: AVNeo shows low reoperation rates after surgery within the first 2 years. The hemodynamic performance is excellent, and the effective orifice area and mean pressure gradient remain stable within the first year.

Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile Pacemaker Infection.

Clostridioides difficile is the leading cause of antibiotic-associated nosocomial diarrhea, but extra-intestinal manifestations are rare. We describe the first documented case of bacteraemia with pacemaker pocket and lead infection with the toxigenic C. difficile ribotype 014 with a lack of abdominal symptoms. The patient underwent pacemaker extraction and treatment with intravenous and oral vancomycin. Genotyping and molecular subtyping revealed clonality between pacemaker and intestinal isolates. This case illustrates the risk of intravascular device infections due to C. difficile. Even asymptomatic C. difficile colonization might pose a risk for prosthetic material infection.