Reduction in emergency access for acute myocardial infarction during the COVID-19 pandemic: a survey from the greater area of Rome.

BACKGROUND: On March 9, 2020, the Italian government imposed a national lockdown to tackle the COronaVIrus Disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic, including stay at home recommendations. The precise impact of COVID-19 scare and lockdown on emergency access for acute myocardial infarction (MI) is still subject to debate. METHODS: Data on all patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography at 9 hospitals in the greater area of Rome, Italy, between February 19, 2020 and March 29, 2020 were retrospectively collected. Incidence of ST-elevation MI (STEMI), and non-ST-elevation MI (NSTEMI), as well as corresponding percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), was compared distinguishing two different 20-day time periods (before vs. on or after March 10, 2020). RESULTS: During the study period, 1068 patients underwent coronary angiography, 142 (13%) with STEMI and 169 (16%) with NSTEMI. The average daily number of STEMI decreased from 4.3 before the lockdown to 2.9 after the lockdown (P=0.021). Similarly, the average daily number of NSTEMI changed from 5.0 to 3.5 (P=0.028). The average daily number of primary PCI changed from 4.2 to 2.9 (P=0.030), while the average daily number of PCI for NSTEMI changed from 3.5 to 2.5 (P=0.087). For STEMI patients, the time from symptom onset to hospital arrival (onset-to-door time less than three hours) showed a significant increase after the lockdown (P=0.018), whereas door-to-balloon time did not change significantly from before to after the lockdown (P=0.609). CONCLUSIONS: The present study, originally reporting on the trends in STEMI and NSTEMI in the Rome area, highlights that significant decreases in the incidence of both acute coronary syndromes occurred between February 19, 2020 and March 29, 2020, together with increases in time from symptom onset to hospital arrival, luckily without changes in door-to-balloon time.

Interplay between COVID-19, pollution, and weather features on changes in the incidence of acute coronary syndromes in early 2020.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused an unprecedented change in the apparent epidemiology of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). However, the interplay between this disease, changes in pollution, climate, and aversion to activation of emergency medical services represents a challenging conundrum. We aimed at appraising the impact of COVID-19, weather, and environment features on the occurrence of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) in a large Italian region and metropolitan area. METHODS AND RESULTS: Italy was hit early on by COVID-19, such that state of emergency was declared on January 31, 2020, and national lockdown implemented on March 9, 2020, mainly because the accrual of cases in Northern Italy. In order to appraise the independent contribution on changes in STEMI and NSTEMI daily rates of COVID-19, climate and pollution, we collected data on these clinical events from tertiary care cardiovascular centers in the Lazio region and Rome metropolitan area. Multilevel Poisson modeling was used to appraise unadjusted and adjusted effect estimates for the daily incidence of STEMI and NSTEMI cases. The sample included 1448 STEMI and 2040 NSTEMI, with a total of 2882 PCI spanning 6 months. Significant reductions in STEMI and NSTEMI were evident already in early February 2020 (all p<0.05), concomitantly with COVID-19 spread and institution of national countermeasures. Changes in STEMI and NSTEMI were inversely associated with daily COVID-19 tests, cases, and/or death (p<0.05). In addition, STEMI and NSTEMI incidences were associated with daily NO2, PM10, and O3 concentrations, as well as temperature (p<0.05). Multi-stage and multiply adjusted models highlighted that reductions in STEMI were significantly associated with COVID-19 data (p<0.001), whereas changes in NSTEMI were significantly associated with both NO2 and COVID-19 data (both p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Reductions in STEMI and NSTEMI in the COVID-19 pandemic may depend on different concomitant epidemiologic and pathophysiologic mechanisms. In particular, recent changes in STEMI may depend on COVID-19 scare, leading to excess all-cause mortality, or effective reduced incidence, whereas reductions in NSTEMI may also be due to beneficial reductions in NO2 emissions in the lockdown phase.

Impact of temporary traffic bans on the risk of acute coronary syndromes in a large metropolitan area.

BACKGROUND: Strong epidemiologic evidence has highlighted the role of pollution, on top of adverse climate features, as a novel cardiovascular risk factor. However, mechanistic proof that reducing pollution may be beneficial to prevent atherothrombotic events is limited. We aimed at appraising the impact of temporary traffic bans in a large metropolitan area on the risk of acute coronary syndromes. METHODS: Aggregate and anonymized data from 15 tertiary cardiac care centers were obtained detailing precoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) daily cases of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), including those treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Data on pollutants and climate were sought for the same days. Mixed level regression was used to compare the week before vs after the traffic ban (Fortnight analysis), the 3 days before vs. after (Weekly analysis) and the Sunday before vs. after (Sunday analysis). RESULTS: A total of 8 days of temporary traffic bans were included, occurring between 2017 and 2020, totaling 802 STEMI and 1196 NSTEMI in the Fortnight analysis, 382 STEMI and 585 in the Weekly analysis, and 148 STEMI and 210 NSTEMI in the Sunday analysis.Fortnight and Sunday analyses did not disclose a significant impact of traffic ban on STEMI or NSTEMI (all P>0.05). Conversely, Weekly analysis showed non-significant changes for STEMI, but a significant decrease in daily NSTEMI when comparing the 3 days before the traffic ban with the ban day (P=0.043), as well as the 3 days before vs. the 3 days after the ban (P=0.025). No statistically significant effect of traffic ban was found at Fortnight, Weekly or Sunday analyses for daily mean concentrations of benzene, carbon monoxide, nitric oxide, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, sulfur dioxide, particulate matter (PM) <2.5 µm or PM <10 µm (all P>0.05). However, minimum daily concentrations showed a significant reduction of ozone during the ban in comparison to the week preceding it (P=0.034), nitric oxide during the ban in comparison to the 3 days preceding it (P=0.046), and an increase in benzene during the ban in comparison to the Sunday before (P=0.039). CONCLUSIONS: Temporary traffic ban may favorably reduce coronary atherothrombotic events, and in particular NSTEMI, even if not globally and immediately impacting on environmental pollution. Further controlled studies are required to confirm and expand this hypothesis-generating results.

342 Impact of temporary traffic bans on the risk of acute coronary syndromes in a large metropolitan area.

Aims: Strong epidemiologic evidence has highlighted the role of pollution, on top of adverse climate features, as a novel cardiovascular risk factor. However, mechanistic proof that reducing pollution may be beneficial to prevent atherothrombotic events is limited. We aimed at appraising the impact of temporary traffic bans in a large metropolitan area on the risk of acute coronary syndromes. Methods and results: Aggregate and anonymized data from 15 tertiary cardiac care centers were obtained detailing pre-coronarivus disease 2019 (COVID-19) daily cases of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), including those treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Data on pollutants and climate were sought for the same days. Mixed level regression was used to compare the week before vs. after the traffic ban (Fortnight analysis), the 3 days before vs. after (Weekly analysis) and the Sunday before vs. after (Sunday analysis). A total of 8 days of temporary traffic bans were included, occurring between 2017 and 2020, totaling 802 STEMI and 1196 NSTEMI in the Fortnight analysis, 382 STEMI and 585 in the Weekly analysis, and 148 STEMI and 210 NSTEMI in the Sunday analysis. Fortnight and Sunday analysis did not disclose a significant impact of traffic ban on STEMI or NSTEMI (all P > 0.05). Conversely, Weekly analysis showed non-significant changes for STEMI but a significant decrease in daily NSTEMI when comparing the 3 days before the traffic ban with the ban day (P = 0.043), as well as the 3 days before vs. the 3 days after the ban (P = 0.025). No statistically significant effect of traffic ban was found at Fortnight, Weekly or Sunday analyses for daily mean concentrations of benzene, carbon monoxide, nitric oxide, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, sulfur dioxide, particulate matter (PM) <2.5 µm or PM < 10 µm (all P > 0.05). However, minimum daily concentrations showed a significant reduction of ozone during the ban in comparison to the week preceding it (P = 0.034), nitric oxide during the ban in comparison to the 3 days preceding it (P = 0.046), and an increase in benzene during the ban in comparison to the Sunday before (P = 0.039). Conclusion: Temporary traffic bans may favorably reduce coronary atherothrombotic events, and in particular NSTEMI, even if not globally and immediately impacting on environmental pollution. Further controlled studies are required to confirm and expand this hypothesis-generating results.

One-year outcome from an all-comers population of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with biolimus-eluting stent with biodegradable polymer.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of biolimus-eluting stent (BES) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a real world clinical scenario. BACKGROUND: Randomized studies suggest that the BES with biodegradable polymer is more effective and safe than early generation coronary stents in patients with STEMI. METHODS: We included all consecutive STEMI patients undergoing PCI in this prospective, multicenter registry. The primary endpoint of the study was the rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), a composite of cardiac death, recurrent myocardial infarction and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization at 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: Between June and December 2012 we enrolled 311 STEMI patients. The primary endpoint occurred in 3.2% (95% confidence interval: 1.6-5.8) of patients: cardiac death, re-infarction, and ischemia-driven TVR occurred in 2.3%, 1.3%, and 0.6% of patients, respectively. One-year MACE-free survival was 96.8% ± 1.0%. CONCLUSIONS: In a real-world cohort of STEMI patients undergoing PCI, the use of BES is associated with good 1-year clinical outcome. These results confirm and expand previous findings showing the efficacy and safety of BES in the setting of randomized trials.

ORAl iMmunosuppressive therapy to prevent in-Stent rEstenosiS (RAMSES) cooperation: a patient-level meta-analysis of randomized trials.

OBJECTIVE: The role of oral immunosuppressive therapy (OIT) to prevent restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and stenting is still controversial. This study evaluates the impact of oral administration of prednisone or sirolimus to prevent restenosis. METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis of trials in which PCI-patients were randomized to bare metal stents (BMS) plus OIT (BMS + OIT group) versus BMS or drug-eluting stents alone (BMS/DES group). Primary endpoints were target lesion revascularization and death/myocardial infarction (MI). Secondary endpoints were death, MI, stent thrombosis and in-stent late lumen loss. Hazard ratio and weighted geometric mean difference [95% confidence intervals] served as summary statistics. RESULTS: Individual data of seven trials (1246 patients [BMS + OIT, n = 608 versus BMS/DES, n = 638] with 1456 coronary lesions) were merged. At a median follow-up of 360 days, BMS + OIT versus BMS/DES significantly reduced the risk of revascularization (0.49 [0.24-0.98], P = 0.04). In particular, BMS + OIT reduced the risk of revascularization (0.38 [0.21-0.67], P < 0.001) and late lumen loss (-0.39 mm [-0.67, -0.11], P < 0.001) as compared with BMS alone. BMS + OIT versus BMS/DES showed a similar risk of death/MI (0.67 [0.29-1.53], P = 0.34), death (0.82 [0.25-2.69], P = 0.71), MI (0.58 [0.24-1.39], P = 0.22) and stent thrombosis (0.43 [0.10-1.87], P = 0.26). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing PCI the use of BMS and oral immunosuppressive therapy reduces the risk of revascularization as compared with BMS alone but not as compared with DES alone, while these therapies display a similar risk of death/MI. The advantage of adding oral immunosuppressive therapy to BMS is due to a lower risk of restenosis as compared with BMS alone.

Randomized Comparison of Xience V and Multi-Link Vision Coronary Stents in the Same Multivessel Patient With Chronic Kidney Disease (RENAL-DES) Study.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with chronic kidney disease have shown suboptimal results. Drug-eluting stents (DES) might reduce the rate of target vessel revascularization in comparison with bare-metal stents (BMS) in patients with chronic kidney disease. However, given the multiple concomitant individual variables present in such patients, the comparison of neointimal growth after percutaneous coronary intervention is complex and difficult to assess. METHODS AND RESULTS: Randomized Comparison of Xience V and Multi-Link Vision Coronary Stents in the Same Multivessel Patient with Chronic Kidney Disease (RENAL-DES) was a prospective, randomized, multicenter study to directly compare the efficacy in the prevention of clinical restenosis of everolimus-eluting stent (Xience V) and BMS with an identical design (Multi-Link Vision), both implanted in the same patient with multivessel coronary artery disease and chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min). The primary end point of the study was the ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization as detected with myocardial scintigraphy at 12 months. In 215 patients, 512 coronary vessels were successfully treated with the randomly assigned DES (n=257) or BMS (n=255). At 1 year, the rate of ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization for DES and BMS groups was 2.7% (95% confidence interval, 1.1%-5.6%) and 11.4% (95% confidence interval, 7.8% to 16%), respectively, P<0.001. For the multivariate analysis, independent predictors of the ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization were BMS implantation (odds ratio, 4.95; 95% confidence interval, 2.1-11.6; P<0.001) and vessel size (odds ratio, 0.32; 95% confidence interval, 0.1-0.7; P=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first randomized trial showing a reduction of clinical restenosis with a new-generation DES in comparison with a BMS of equal design, in patients who have chronic kidney disease with multivessel coronary artery disease. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00818792.

Prediction of cardiovascular events by inflammatory markers in patients undergoing carotid stenting.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether inflammatory markers predict atherosclerotic disease activity after carotid treatment in patients with severe carotid stenosis and nonsignificant coronary artery disease undergoing carotid stenting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From March 1, 2004, to September 30, 2005, a total of 55 consecutive patients (mean ± SD age, 69±8.3 years; 26 men) with severe carotid stenosis and nonsignificant coronary artery disease were treated with carotid stent implantation. Patients were followed up for a period of 5 years for the occurrence of cardiovascular events. RESULTS: A significant correlation between quantitative analysis of debris entrapped in the filters and inflammatory markers was found. Moreover, the number of particles per filter, the total particles area, and the mean particle axis per filter were significantly higher in patients with clinical events at the follow-up compared with patients without events (87 vs 32, P=.006; 50,118.7 vs 17,782, P=.002; 33.9 vs 30.2, P=.03). At 5-year follow-up we recorded cardiovascular or neurologic events in 11 of the 55 patients (20%). Higher preprocedural levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, interleukin 6 soluble receptor, and interleukin 6 were significantly associated with clinical events at follow-up (P<.001, P=.05, and P=.02, respectively). In particular high-sensitivity C-reactive protein measured at 24 and 48 hours after carotid stenting showed a significant correlation with clinical events (P=.001). Also preprocedural intracellular adhesion molecule 1 and circulating vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 blood concentrations were significantly correlated with a worse prognosis at follow-up (P=.04 and P=.03, respectively). CONCLUSION: In patients with severe carotid stenosis and nonsignificant coronary artery disease, inflammation is associated with atherosclerotic disease activity and a worse prognosis. Interleukin 6, interleukin 6 soluble receptor, intracellular adhesion molecule 1, vascular cell adhesion molecule 1, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels at baseline and 24 and 48 hours after carotid stenting are predictive of neurologic and cardiovascular events at follow-up.

Stress cardiomyopathy: transient basal ballooning.

Stress cardiomyopathy is a reversible left ventricular dysfunction triggered by emotional stress. We describe a variant of transient left ventricular ballooning in a patient in which basal and midventricular segments are affected. This confirms that there is not just one ventricular dysfunction pattern in Takotsubo cardiomyopathy. The involvement of only the basal and midventricle segments is an intriguing observation with no clear explanation; furthermore, there are no predictive factors for the differently sited wall motion abnormalities.

Long-term results of immunosuppressive oral prednisone after coronary angioplasty in non-diabetic patients with elevated C-reactive protein levels.

AIMS: To present the long-term results of prednisone-treated patients enrolled in the IMPRESS studies. Such studies demonstrated the efficacy of a short course of immunosuppression with oral prednisone after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with bare metal stent (BMS) implantation compared to BMS alone at one year. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eighty-four non-diabetic patients with elevated C-reactive protein after PCI treated with BMS and prednisone, were followed clinically for a minimum of five years. Event-free survival was defined as freedom from death, myocardial infarction, and need for target vessel revascularisation. Event-free survival rate at a mean of 6.5 +/- 1.4 years was significantly better in prednisone-treated patients of the IMPRESS and IMPRESS-2/MVD respectively compared to their original control arms: 87.8 versus 47.6%, relative risk: 7.9; 95%CI: 2.6-24.1, p<0.0001, log-rank=13.06, p=0.0003; and 93 versus 60.5%, relative risk: 8.7; 95%CI: 2.3-32.7, p=0.0004, log-rank=13,18, p=0.0003, respectively. The event-free survival was 54.1% in controls and 90.5% in the prednisone group; relative risk: 8.1; 95%CI: 3.5-18.7, p<0.0001, log-rank= 26.33, p<0.0001. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical benefits of oral treatment with prednisone after conventional PCI in non-diabetic patients with evidence of systemic inflammation after stenting are maintained at long-term follow-up, either in patients with single or multivessel coronary artery disease.

A new variant of Tako-tsubo cardiomyopathy: transient mid-ventricular ballooning.

Stress cardiomyopathy is a reversible left ventricular dysfunction precipitated by emotional stress. Affected patients are generally women, whose symptoms are similar to myocardial infarction with reversible apical dyskinesis associated with hypercontractile basal segments and no evidence for hemodynamically significant coronary arterial stenoses by angiography. We report the case of an 82-year-old woman who presented with acute onset of chest pain after emotional stress and with reversible left ventricular dysfunction consisting of akinesis of the midventricular segments and hyperkinesis of the basal and apical segments.

C-Reactive protein, clinical outcome, and restenosis rates after implantation of different drug-eluting stents.

Sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs), paclitaxel-eluting stents (PESs), and dexamethasone-eluting stents (DEXs) have anti-inflammatory properties; thus, the decreased in-segment restenosis rate observed with the use of these stents might be related to a weaker postprocedural inflammatory response. One hundred sixty consecutive patients with stable coronary artery disease who underwent successful single-vessel/lesion coronary artery stenting were prospectively studied. Thin-strut bare metal stents were deployed in 39 patients, SESs in 30, PESs in 61, and DEXs in 30. The 4 groups were similar with respect to demographic and angiographic variables and prevalence of risk factors. C-reactive protein (CRP) was measured at baseline and 24 and 48 hours after the procedure. Maximal increase in CRP was calculated as the increase in CRP at 48 hours/CRP compared with baseline. Angiographic follow-up was performed after 12.9 +/- 1.3 months or sooner, if needed, on the basis of clinical evidence. All patients presented a postprocedural increase in CRP that peaked at 48 hours (median 10.0 mg/L). Maximal CRP increase was similar across the 4 groups (medians 3.5 mg/L in the bare metal stent group, 3.6 mg/L in the SES group, 4.0 mg/L in the PES group, 3.5 mg/L in the DEX group, p = 0.45). Incidences of angiographic binary restenosis (>50% lumen diameter decrease) were 20.5% in the bare metal stent group, 3.3% in the SES group, 4.9% in the PES group, and 36.6% in the DEX group (p = 0.0004 for SES and PES groups vs bare metal stent and DEX groups). Postprocedural increase in CRP was significantly correlated with clinical and angiographic outcomes. In conclusion, the acute postprocedural systemic inflammatory response induced by drug-eluting stent implantation appears to be similar to that induced by bare metal stents. However, the restenosis rate is lower for SESs and PESs than for DEXs and bare metal stents. Thus, the decreased incidence of stent restenosis that was observed after SES and PES deployment is unlikely to be related to a decreased acute systemic inflammatory response, but rather to an increased local resistance to inflammatory mediators.

Immunosuppressive oral prednisone after percutaneous interventions in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease. The IMPRESS-2/MVD study.

AIMS: To assess efficacy and safety of oral treatment with prednisone at immunosuppressive dose after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS AND RESULTS: Eighty-six consecutive patients with multi-vessel CAD were successfully treated with multiple PCI. Forty-three patients (115 coronary stenoses), with C-reactive protein >3mg/L 48 hours after PCI and in absence of contra-indications received 45-day high-dose oral prednisone treatment (study-group). Forty-three patients (106 coronary stenoses), did not receive prednisone (control-group). The primary clinical endpoint was 12-month event-free survival rate (defined as freedom from death, myocardial infarction, and the need for target vessel revascularisation). Angiographic restenosis at 8 months was assessed in the study group only. Event-free survival rates were 93 and 69.8% in the study and the control group, respectively (relative risk 0.34, 95%CI: 0.12 to 0.96, p=0.006). Target vessel revascularisation rate in the study group was 7% compared to 27.9% in the control group (p=0.01). Quantitative coronary angiography performed on 104 lesions of 39 prednisone-treated patients (91%) showed 4 restenotic lesions (3.8%). The mean late lumen loss was 0.61+/-0.35mm and loss index 31.3+/-21.6%. CONCLUSION: Oral immunosuppression with prednisone effectively reduces clinical restenosis in patients undergoing complex, multi-vessel PCI.

Mechanisms and predictors of transient left ventricular dysfunction early after successful percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty.

BACKGROUND: The immediate effects of balloon mitral valvuloplasty (BMV) on left ventricular (LV) function in patients with mitral stenosis are still controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the mechanisms and potential clinical, echocardiographic and hemodynamic predictors of transient LV dysfunction occurring in patients with mitral stenosis early after successful percutaneous BMV. METHODS: Sixty patients without residual mitral regurgitation were divided into two groups according to the changes in the left atrial (LA) pressure 15 min after successful BMV: 18 patients (group A) did not present with any reduction in LA pressure, and underwent nitroglycerin administration (0.4 mg, sublingually). The remaining 42 patients (group B) presented with a decrease in LA pressure. RESULTS: At baseline, both the mitral valve gradient and area assessed at echocardiography and during cardiac catheterization were similar in groups A and B. Group A patients presented with, however, higher LV early- and end-diastolic pressures and peak V waves during cardiac catheterization both prior to and 15 min after BMV than group B patients (all p values < 0.05). In group A, nitroglycerin administration was associated with a decrease in LV end-diastolic pressure (p = 0.049), LA pressure (p < 0.001), and peak V wave (p < 0.001) that was still persistent 30 min after its administration, reaching values similar to those observed in group B early after BMV. At multivariate analysis, the only independent predictors of LV dysfunction early after BMV were found to be LV early- (p = 0.015) and end-diastolic (p = 0.023) pressures at baseline and the Wilkins' score (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: After successful BMV a transient lack of LV adaptation to the increased LV preload resulting in a persistently elevated LA pressure is predicted by higher baseline LV diastolic filling pressures and higher Wilkins' scores. It is promptly and steadily reversed by nitroglycerin administration through a transient LV unloading, thus allowing a correct hemodynamic evaluation of the immediate results of the procedure.

Immunosuppressive Therapy for the Prevention of Restenosis after Coronary Artery Stent Implantation (IMPRESS Study).

OBJECTIVES: This study tested the effect of oral prednisone on clinical and angiographic restenosis rate after successful stent implantation in patients with persistent elevation of systemic markers of inflammation after the procedure. BACKGROUND: Experimental studies have shown that corticosteroids have the potential to reduce the inflammatory response associated with stent implantation. METHODS: Eighty-three patients undergoing successful stenting with C-reactive protein (CRP) levels >0.5 mg/dl 72 h after the procedure were randomized to receive oral prednisone or placebo for 45 days. The primary clinical end point was 12-month event-free survival rate (defined as freedom from death, from myocardial infarction, and from recurrence of symptoms requiring additional revascularization). The angiographic end points were restenosis rate and late loss at six months. RESULTS: Twelve-month event-free survival rates were 93% and 65% in patients treated with prednisone and placebo, respectively (relative risk [RR] 0.18, 95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.05 to 0.61, p = 0.0063). Six-month restenosis rate and late loss were lower in prednisone-treated than in placebo-treated patients (7% vs. 33%, p = 0.001, and 0.39 +/- 0.6 mm vs. 0.85 +/- 0.6 mm, p = 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with persistently high CRP levels after successful coronary artery stent implantation, oral immunosuppressive therapy with prednisone results in a striking reduction of clinical events and angiographic restenosis rate.

Combination of sotalol and magnesium prevents atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common complication reported in 20% to 40% of patients after coronary operations. Sotalol alone and magnesium alone have been shown to partially decrease the incidence of AF. The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of these two pharmacological agents, used alone or in combination, to reduce postoperative AF. METHODS: Two hundred seven consecutive coronary artery bypass patients (mean age 62 +/- 11 years) were randomized to receive sotalol alone (80 mg twice daily for 5 days starting from the morning of the first postoperative day) (group S), magnesium alone (1.5 g daily for 6 days starting in the operating room just before cardiopulmonary bypass) (group M), both pharmacologic agents at the same dosages (group S+M), or no antiarrhythmic agents (group CTR). All patients with an ejection fraction less than 0.40 were excluded. RESULTS: The incidence of postoperative AF was 11.8% (6/51) in the S group, 14.8% (8/54) in the M group, 1.9% (1/52) in the S+M group, and 38% (19/50) in the CTR group. The following differences were significant: group CTR versus groups S, M, and S+M with values of p = 0.002, p = 0.007 and p < 0.0001, respectively; and group S+M versus groups S and M with p = 0.04 and p = 0.01, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Incidence of AF after coronary operation was significantly reduced by the administration of sotalol alone and magnesium alone; more importantly, the incidence was further reduced by combining these agents.

Chest pain after coronary artery stent implantation.

A sizeable proportion of patients who undergo successful coronary artery stent implantation experiences chest pain immediately after the procedure and/or in the following months in the absence of in-stent restenosis. We investigated this phenomenon in 57 consecutive patients with stable angina who underwent successful stent implantation. Chest pain characteristics were assessed before stent implantation and during 6-month follow-up. All patients underwent coronary angiography within 6 months of the procedure 48 hours after exercise thallium-201 perfusion scintigraphy. Patients who did not exhibit in-stent restenosis underwent an ergonovine test at the end of routine coronary angiography. During follow-up, 15 patients complained of chest pain. Six of these patients exhibited scintigraphic evidence of myocardial ischemia and in-stent restenosis at angiography. In the remaining 9 patients, chest pain occurred in the absence of in-stent restenosis at angiography. In 8 of these patients intracoronary ergonovine administration reproduced their habitual pain, whereas it did not cause any pain in the 42 patients who were completely asymptomatic at follow-up and without in-stent restenosis. Ergonovine caused more intense vasoconstriction and nitroglycerin caused more intense vasodilation of the reference coronary diameter in patients with than in patients without ergonovine-induced pain (-17 +/- 3 vs -9 +/- 3%, p <0.001; 9 +/- 6 vs 5 +/- 4%, p <0.02, respectively). In conclusion, chest pain with features similar to habitual angina occurs in the absence of in-stent restenosis in 1/5 of patients after stent implantation and appears to be associated with more intense coronary vasoreactivity.